FYI - received this today:
==
The bug entered on Wednesday, December 01, 2010 has been marked
verified by Adobe ColdFusion Team.
This means Adobe ColdFusion Team has verified the behavior you've
observed.
(If this email is addressed to you directly, you've logged this bug.
Otherwise,
Thanks for the answer :) Maybe running the site and the blogs on
separate instances is the main problem here. I don't have any session
replication set up. That said, I did have the blogs recognizing the
session from the main site. As in, it would pick up on the username,
userid, etc.. that were
I'll do some digging around tomorrow and get back to you.
You've now got me wondering if my jsessionid's are domain cookies or not...
Sent from my iPhone
On 06/12/2010, at 9:38 PM, daamsie pe...@travellerspoint.com wrote:
Thanks for the answer :) Maybe running the site and the blogs on
This is in relation to CF10 it seems and i would assume posting it would be
breaching the confidentiality agreement?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew [mailto:am2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 6 December 2010 7:30 PM
To: cfaussie
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: cfspreadsheet and vfs
FYI - received
I wouldn't think it'd matter too much:
Severity: 5 - Medium (Easy workaround, wait until next release)
(cute: waiting until next release is an Easy workaround - not a
criticism, just humorous)
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.au wrote:
This is in relation to
Is the Melb CFUG on this week?
Paul.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
On Dec 7, 12:52 am, Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.au wrote:
This is in relation to CF10 it seems and i would assume posting it would be
breaching the confidentiality agreement?
I doubt there is a confidentiality agreement for automated replies
from a public bug tracker..
--
You received
Hi Peter,
I did a bit more investigationing :)
To recap, your problem is twofold;
1. You'll need session replication between CF instances
2. You need to force the jsessionid to be a domain cookie
Session replication can be annoying. But not impossible. You might need to
consider running your
I don't know if I'd call the jsessionid a remnant so much as a feature, and
yes, of
J2EE more than JRun itself. :-) As far as I can recall, one would have the same
on
Tomcat, WebLogic, etc. as (again, I think) it's the J2EE spec way of doing
session id
cookies. (As most here may already know,
An automated reply would be sent to someone on the program, so any
communication regarding the program would fall under a NDA, regardless of it
is an automated reply
-Original Message-
From: Justin Carter [mailto:justin.w.car...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 7 December 2010 12:47 PM
To:
You don't have to be on any program or under NDA to find bugs in
ColdFusion, to log bugs or to receive those automated replies.
And if you do find bugs in CF9, log them at http://cfbugs.adobe.com/
rather than just complaining about them on mailing lists. You'll also
get an automated reply
I didn't say remnant I said artifact, maybe they mean the same thing :)
Agreed it's an artifact of the J2EE spec and server (in this case JRun).
Re: Railo, it has some cool mechanisms to store session data centrally or
distributed for example you can use EHCache. I'm just recalling some of the
Yep, sorry. They do mean about the same thing in my mind, but I should have
been more
accurate in my quote. :-)
As for storing sessions in other than memory, I'll note as well that that is
again
something that the J2EE servers all offer. Even JRun has it, but it's not
exposed by
CF. One could
Are you saying I may be in breach of the confidentiality agreement?
Which agreement are you referring to? I don't recall seeing one...
On Dec 7, 12:52 am, Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.au wrote:
This is in relation to CF10 it seems and i would assume posting it would be
breaching the
Excellent stuff. Going to give this a whirl now.
I updated to an Application.cfc on the blogs today. A bit messy at
first, but that's running smoothly now.
If I can't replicate sessions, I may just have to stick the blogs back
under the same instance. The main reason for separating them was to
Excuse my words but that whole discussion is bollocks and it makes me want to
go through the roof :)
Phil is 100% right with:
And if you do find bugs in CF9, log them at http://cfbugs.adobe.com/ rather
than just complaining about them on mailing lists. You'll also get an
automated reply
16 matches
Mail list logo
