, which run on galinha. Most of that stuff is still
chicken 3 specific, IIRC.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
)))
((not (pair? fx)) (err fx))
(else
(let ((head (car fx))
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
by hand (manually, in every sense), which is no big deal (I love
using ediff... :-)
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
actually have practical implications.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Jim Ursetto schrieb:
What are the subtle implications that are making this a difficult decision?
Breaking existing code.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken
* resolving imports, so the read syntax is available too
late. I can currently not provide anything better than what you suggest.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo
Hello!
I just wanted to say that I'm not anymore reachable under
bunny...@gmail.com
To contact me, please use
fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Thanks.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http
deserve nothing better. ssl-make-i/o-ports should simply not
modify the port-data. Very bad. Verboten. Absolutely.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Hello!
Because I can't figure out how to extend `find-files' without
changing its signature (something I don't want for compatibility
reasons), can someone suggest an alternative name for a new
variant that can later supersede `find-files'?
cheers,
felix
write-char))
(with-output-to-port to
(lambda ()
(with-input-from-port from
(lambda ()
(port-for-each write read))
I'd call it `port-copy'.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken
From: Moritz Heidkamp mor...@twoticketsplease.de
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Suggestion for the ports unit: port-pipe
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 05:52:34 +0200
Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org writes:
I'd call it `port-copy'.
I thought of that, too, but it sounds like it would
allows arbitrary reader/write procedures, which I
find quite nice.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
invokes
`exit'.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
too dumb to use
ffmpeg correctly and I don't have the bandwidth to upload it
anyway. If someone could perhaps assist me in getting this onto
youtube or vimeo, I'd be grateful.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http
to somehow make it have sense - just a big lie, a sport, a
game. Something to waste time with. I'm doing it myself now, see?
I think we should (strongly) recommend to egg authors to use BSD or
MIT licenses for their code.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken
such a bug, IIRC),
so I will turn this into a warning that will always be shown.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
)
(= x y)))
(else #f
Any ideas for a better name? Any considerations that
should be taken into account?
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo
From: Alex Shinn alexsh...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] something equal? to EQUALP
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:09:19 +0900
Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org writes:
Repeatedly I need an equivalence predicate that performs structural
comparison but also compares numbers
From: John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] something equal? to EQUALP
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:05:59 -0400
Felix scripsit:
Any ideas for a better name? Any considerations that
should be taken into account?
How about structurally-equal? A little long, but very
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] something equal? to EQUALP
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 14:41:53 +0200
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:16:13AM +0200, Felix wrote:
Any ideas for a better name? Any considerations that
should be taken into account?
Maybe equal?* or equal
unresolved: ugarit-core
Hi, Alaric!
If you create a ticket for this, I can look into this problem.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
of such data in compiled Scheme programs (instead of
constructing it at runtime).
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
?
Unit posix, I'd say.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
place
before the time the poll is taken. If a CR gets rejected, further
discussion can go into details.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
define a setter trivially:
(define set-... (setter ...))
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
in our project).
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Hello!
A ticket has been created for a change-request to modify the
`equal?' procedure to not compare procedures structurally. See
https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/441
for more information. The discussion period is planned to end on 21st
of December.
cheers,
felix
a weird analogy, but it's
exactly the same to my brain.
Hello,
to me the analogy seems quite well chosen. By the way, sometimes I
actually wonder whether splicing behaviour of multiple values in an
argument list wouldn't be a good idea, but I'm unsure.
Never.
cheers,
felix
Hello!
The discussion period has ended. A poll has been set up to
whether `equal?' shall be changed not to recurse into closures
when comparing procedures.
https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/441
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken
is empty or not?
I guess it should. I will change it accordingly.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
be dealt with in a central place.
So, my opinion is: the current situation is allright for us, good for
the user, but mildly inconvenient for some developers. Making things
more convenient is something I can understand. But, I must insist on
one thing: no broken links. never.
cheers,
felix
store the raw egg, not the repo (a
tarball, say).
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
it.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
From: John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 02:19:20 -0400
Felix scripsit:
I like the idea of tgz-submission (did John suggest it? I can't
remember, it's already 60 seconds later). How about a central store
where the egg is to be installed
has tar/gunzip? (a pure mingw32 build doesn't have this).
* we can have recipe-my-wonderful-egg-latest, where chicken-install
grabs the sources from the upstream repos HEAD.
* we can have recipe-my-wonderful-egg-felix-2.0, pointing to Felix's
forked version
into a set of procedure
definitions. I remember a really badass red-black tree implementation
by Marc Feeley, but can't recall where I found it. It was written in
this style and would be a perfect use case for a functor.
Anyway, that's it.
cheers,
felix
any number of arguments, so your example
would probably an abbreviation for the common case of instantiating
a functor with a single argument module and providing the body of
that argument at the same step. Interesting! I'll ponder this.
cheers,
felix
to me,
but that is more a matter of taste. The use of a keyword is indeed not
everybodies taste, but I couldn't come up with a better syntax that
is both unambiguous and obvious.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
: squaring-functor))
(import scheme)
(define (multiply x y) (* x y)))
One possible syntax would be:
(module number-squarer = squaring-functor
(import scheme)
...)
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] The use of the null-pointer and null-pointer?
procedures
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:01:13 +0200
Hi!
I was wondering what use does (null-pointer?) has.
Historical. I will deprecate.
cheers,
felix
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] The use of the null-pointer and null-pointer?
procedures
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:27:58 +0200
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 05:25:12AM -0400, Felix wrote:
I was wondering what use does (null-pointer?) has.
Historical. I
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] The use of the null-pointer and null-pointer?
procedures
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:14:15 +0200
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:21:32AM -0400, Felix wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 05:25:12AM -0400, Felix wrote:
I was wondering
of the version number by
replacing egg-name-and-version with just egg-name. Please consider
modifying your very helpful script accordingly.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo
The infolist item is changed to remove redundancy and is now just
egg-name. Below is an updated program.
I have added this script to the core git repo
(scripts/reconstruct-egg-name.scm),
slightly modified. Thanks, again.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken
the manual is always welcome. But one question remains: does chicken-doc
know anything about foreign type specifiers? If not, should it, and what
should be the markup? Would using the [...] convention make an existing
or possible future extension of chicken-doc problematic?
cheers,
felix
to be avoided.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
.
Well, there is a floating-point specific operator that behaves according to IEEE
(on those platforms that do, that is): fpexpt. In most cases, informing the
user of such a situation may be desirable. Would you suggest (/ 1 0) should
return NaN as well?
cheers,
felix
to follow this model because the
number-crunchers like it?
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
semantics.
(just pointing out the necessity of the full numeric tower in the
core system is unnecessary and doesn't answer the question as
such)
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman
it again and again without really taking
advantage of the excellent testing infrastructure we already have
(Salmonella). From now one, bugfixes and small enhancements will be
committed directly to master. This will also mean more breakage will
occur there.
cheers,
felix
. Thanks for the reminder.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
From: Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Bumping version no. / build tag in banner
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 01:46:25 -0500
Hi Felix,
On Jul 1, 2011, at 1:22 AM, Felix wrote:
Why are you so concerned about build-times? Do you build chicken a lot?
Often enough
because it matches what people usually expect, for example in the
case of div-by-zero).
Could you comment on this?
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: expt should signal error on domain error
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 09:21:44 +0200
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 02:47:01AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Felix scripsit:
* Those who want IEEE behaviour can have it using fpexpt.
True
This deeply disappoints me. You all are a bunch of robots.
A very smart man I deeply respect once said: It is not necessary to say that
See, another robot.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https
Hello!
This change-reqest has been rejected and is closed.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Hello!
I registered at the GCC Compile Farm:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm
Contact me if you're interested in getting chicken-stuff tested on one
of their machines.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
this is not completely trivial, so it may
take a few days.
(Thanks to Kon Lovett for reporting the problem and to Peter for giving
advice)
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo
).
To build the system you MUST make a boot-chicken first -
specialization is used for the core libraries and the compiler (the
bootstrapping chicken will be built without specialization).
See the Types manual chapter for documentation on the new
type-related things.
cheers,
felix
(string? x)
(error not a string))
(string-append x foo)
If I understand correctly it looks like any of the above will work.
In all cases x will be inferred to be of type string.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers
Hello!
This announces a change request for changing the representation of
evaulation environments. For more information, see:
https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/643
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https
Hi!
From now on I'll better ask first, so:
Would anybody be very unhappy if always?, none? and never?
(unit data-structures) get deprecated? They can be trivially defined
using constantly. The situation for any? is different IMHO, since
it directly corresponds to a type.
cheers,
felix
object
is of some type.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
From: John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:02:06 -0400
Felix scripsit:
none? is sort of weird, since there is no none type - every object
is of some type.
Sure it's a type, just as the null set
From: Thomas Chust ch...@web.de
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] deprecation of always?, never?, none?
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:43:58 +0200
Felix wrote:
[...]
none? is sort of weird, since there is no none type - every object
is of some type.
[...]
Hello,
that doesn't make none less
and Gambit)
return +inf.0 for (/ 1.0 0.0) and -inf.0 for (/ -1.0 0.0).
They return +nan.0 for (/ 0.0 0.0). Extra data points would be welcome.
CL signals div-by-zero.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:50:40AM -0400, Felix wrote:
This is really annoying, as you'd get random errors when you're working
with numbers in the extreme ranges representable by flonums even if you
absolutely know you're dividing by nonzero values.
Yes, that's floating point
From: Alaric Snell-Pym ala...@snell-pym.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: Division by inexact zero should return
infinity/nan
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:03:28 +0100
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/25/2011 11:07 AM, Felix wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:50:40AM
From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: overhaul environment representation
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:37:29 +0200
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [110831 09:35]:
Note that this will make then environments egg obsolete
Attached is a patch that adds documentation for the pure
declaration, which declares a toplevel identifier to name
a procedure that is free of side effects (and thus calls to it
may be eliminated). This declaration was previously named
constant, which is now deprecated.
cheers,
felix
commit
such procedures to make this
really a big performance boost, though.
I'm afraid the complexity this requires exceeds the gain. Compile-time
range checking is nice, but would only catch the trivial cases.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken
Hi, Moritz!
I applied it and signed off [34ae5a3]. I took the freedom to add an
entry for tests/data-structures-tests.scm in distribution/manifest and
fixed a missing argument in the entry in types.db.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
,
felix
commit 26fe4e103105aa9ca59caf83bd37b35641a05f40
Author: felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Date: Wed Sep 14 01:06:35 2011 +0200
- types.db fixes, suggested by sjamaan and some ehancements (need testing)
- matching (list-of T) with pair or list types will also work in exact
From: Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Subject: [PATCH] types.db fixes/enhancements, change in list-of matching
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 04:02:00 -0400 (EDT)
The attached patch fixes some issues in types.db which
were reported by Peter and uses slightly more precise
types in a few
From: Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] sequence type corrections and
enhancements
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 03:52:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] sequence type corrections
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] sequence type corrections and
enhancements
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:25:14 +0200
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:52:58AM -0400, Felix wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:51:55AM +0200, Felix wrote:
I think you
the patch. I also added an
entry in the Acknowledgements section in the manual.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
The attached patch (or changeset 96286a7a7144b17e4b7a3f08164fb6d6296f1722
in sjamaan-pending) fixes this problem by calling
convert_string_to_number() instead of strtol()/strtod().
I didn't really understand the purpose of the maybe_fixnum variable, so
I'd appreciate it if Felix or someone
Adds specialization rules for expt and atan with mixed
fixnum/float arguments. This patch is also available as
commit 0880ec1b in the felix-pending branch.
commit 0880ec1b83ed2fa5e472931597085b9daa9fcf14
Author: felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Date: Mon Sep 19 12:46:06 2011 +0200
Hi!
Could someone please review my scrutinizer patches? They
are quite critical to make the type-analysis (more) correct.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken
The attached patch fixes the implementation of the pseudo parameters
current-input-port, current-output-port, current-error-port and
current-exception-handler which now return the correct value in the
assignment case.
Also, some types.db entries have been corrected.
cheers,
felix
commit
Attached a patch to print the contents of blobs also in pretty-printing
mode.
cheers,
felix
From 596d4f4642d512f24a0b7e4b1db2ea681911ab75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:23:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] pretty printer shows
and call the ports write-string
method directly. Thanks to felix for the suggestion.
Thanks for taking care of this issue, Christian!
Two more suggestions:
- use ##sys#check-port* to make sure the port is open
- use ##sys#check-port-mode to do the direction check
cheers,
felix
with a
'Error: call of non-procedure: #f' as they do now.
Yes, that sucks.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
The attached patch introduces a native port-check routine and
various wrappers for checking port-direction and closed-status.
All uses of ##sys#check-port where changed accordingly and
redundant call to ##sys#check-port-mode where removed.
cheers,
felix
commit
The attached patch introduces separate type-specifiers for input- and
output-ports. The old port type is still available but only
abbreviates (or input-port output-port). types.db has been
changed accordingly and is thus not compatible to old chickens
(so needs bootstrap).
cheers,
felix
commit
From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] proposed bugfix for #706
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:25:21 +0200
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [110929 03:18]:
I would suggest simply to detect the error in C_file_info_2, and act
but just returning #f and hoping noone will notice is the wrong
thing.
Nobody suggested that.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
From: Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] cleanup port-checking routines
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:59:17 -0600
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:40:42AM -0400, Felix wrote:
The attached patch introduces a native port-check routine and
various wrappers
From: Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] add input- and output port types
specifiers
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 06:21:22 -0600
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:46:41AM -0400, Felix wrote:
The attached patch introduces separate type-specifiers for input
From: Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] add input- and output port types
specifiers
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 06:21:22 -0600
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:46:41AM -0400, Felix wrote:
The attached patch introduces separate type-specifiers for input
From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] add input- and output port types
specifiers
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:57:47 +0200
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [110930 08:40]:
From: Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.org
, signed off and applied.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
instead of using ##sys#file-info.
The patch was done in collaboration with Christian, but I post it
here once more in case someone wants to comment.
cheers,
felix
From 71eb0e713084f670d9f2cebc1f475ba25d779b3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Date: Fri, 30
From: Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] drop ##sys#file-info
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 09:18:53 -0601
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 01:33:11PM +0200, Felix wrote:
This patch replaces ##sys#file-info with a cleaner file/directory
exists check. It checks
Hello!
I submit this patch once more in the hope that someone might
sign it off.
cheers,
felix
commit 15a40a03dc77f0d87bfdabb6e0b89601317bfbdb
Author: felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Date: Fri Sep 30 08:19:10 2011 +0200
Squashed commit of the following:
commit
Hello!
Attached once more a patch to fix a bug with let-bound variables
introduced during inlining.
cheers,
felix
diff --git a/support.scm b/support.scm
index cb95c0d..d2444b8 100644
--- a/support.scm
+++ b/support.scm
@@ -673,6 +673,7 @@
(val1 (walk (first subs) rl))
(a (gensym v
From: Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Subject: [PATCH] mark let-bound variables as inline-transient (resubmission)
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:11:20 +0200 (CEST)
Hello!
Attached once more a patch to fix a bug with let-bound variables
introduced during inlining.
Here
From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] mark let-bound variables as
inline-transient (resubmission)
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 22:01:51 +0200
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [111004 08:14]:
From: Felix fe...@call-with-current
This patches avoids an error when [file|directory]-exists? gets
EOVERFLOW or ENOTDIR, which indicate an existing or no-existing file,
respectively.
cheers,
felix
commit 473edf9428a7bc38fc033e86d0bbcb362f1cd2d8
Author: felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Date: Sat Oct 8 15:09:42
1 - 100 of 1292 matches
Mail list logo
