On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 6:06 PM, fulvio ciriaco oiv...@gmail.com wrote:
chicken-install seems to honour CHICKEN_INSTALL_PREFIX only
during installation phase, i.e.
chicken-install wants to install in
$CHICKEN_INSTALL_PREFIX/$CHICKEN_REPOSITORY/
but compiles loading required
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Nicholas Indy Ray arel...@gmail.com wrote:
I think actually getting it running should be trivial, interfacing
with cocoa might be a bit harder, but not impossible. I figure the
largest problems is that the Apple developer agreement has strict
requirements
Hi!
I can't checkout the wiki pages from svn. I get sth like:
svn: In directory
'wiki\xsvnwiki-discuss\compiling-chicken-on-windows-xp-with-mingw'
svn: Can't move source to dest
svn: Can't move
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Matt Jones m...@momoweb.co.uk wrote:
Ah, I found the problem. My first analysis was wrong. In fact, after line
609 in tcp.scm in the version 3.4 source, the port isn't closed before
signalling the exception:
(let ((err (get-socket-error s)))
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Leonardo Valeri Manera
l.valeriman...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, Makefile.msvc grief: its using 'cat' where the CMD.EXE mingw
makefile isnt.
Yes, that should be fixed in trunk.
This is a pain because that comes in the coreutils package along with
GNU link which
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera
l.valeriman...@gmail.com wrote
This is the MSVC makefile, ofc I'm not using MinGW :D
The only GNU utils in path there were cat, make, gzip and tar.
That's failing because there's a space between '/out:' and 'chicken-import.so'
Ah.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Eduardo Cavazos wayo.cava...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I just noticed that something like this:
csc somefile.scm -dynamic -prologue SOME-DIRECTORY
doesn't produce an error. Does it make sense to pass a directory to
'-prologue'?
Just wondering if maybe
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Arto Bendiken arto.bendi...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I've asked Mario to change the Galinha repository rsync so that
http://trac.callcc.org/timeline will start showing the latest updates
again.
Unless anyone is experiencing some new unexpected problems, this
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Kon Lovett klov...@pacbell.net wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote:
Hello,
No pressure or rush. :-) I'm just planning ahead. Do y'all intend to offer
SRFI-27 for Chicken 4?
Short answer - Yes.
Long answer - Need to port 'lexmod' 1st
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Matt Jones m...@momoweb.co.uk wrote:
Kon Lovett wrote:
Versions before 3.0 are unsupported AFAIK. Packaged sources are
available at the Chicken website:
http://call-with-current-continuation.org as are instructions for
accessing the source repository.
Yo!
Version 4.0.0 of CHICKEN, the portable and practical Scheme system has
been released. In addition to many bugfixes and cleaning up, it
provides the following significant changes:
- PCRE has been replaced by Alex Shinn's excellent IrRegex regular
expression package (while still being API
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Matt Jones m...@momoweb.co.uk wrote:
(BTW, this part of my message above
The function 'fail appears to close the port -- (##net#close s) --
but somehow these ports end up open and accumulate.
refers to the code in Chicken's tcp.scm, in the definition of
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Shawn Rutledge
shawn.t.rutle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
chicken-setup doesn't exist in Chicken 4 (it's called chicken-install
now), and tinyclos isn't packaged for Chicken 4 anyway.
Oh that
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera
l.valeriman...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm aware of that. The rest of the calls to the compiler are properly
calling cl.
Also, the MSVC makefile uses cat while the mingw and msys ones dont ...
Yes, it also uses touch(1) somewhere. I'm going
Hello!
I wanted to thank everybody who helped in testing this release.
It is always amazing and rewarding to get so much feedback and
support.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
2009/3/27 Leonardo Valeri Manera l.valeriman...@gmail.com:
Ok, admittedly its been ages since I've used MSVC on the commandline, but:
make PLATFORM=msvc PREFIX=blah ===
(eventually)
link -nologo -dll -implib:libchicken.lib \
-out:libchicken.dll library.obj eval.obj
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Aleksej Saushev a...@inbox.ru wrote:
Error: (import) during expansion of (import ...) - cannot import from
undefined module: scheme
Is the build installed in /usr/pkg/lib, or is this before the install?
cheers,
felix
2009/3/25 Ivan Shcheklein shchekl...@gmail.com:
Hi Felix,
MSVC+Cygwin's tools. Build failed since both chichen-defaults and
chicken-config contain something like this:
I don't understand: MSVC + cygwin?
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Elf e...@ephemeral.net wrote:
no. what happened is that the quoting rules are screwed up. i forgot to
backport the makefile from 3. ill do it in a few.
Please don't touch it, unless we have figured out what exactly goes
wrong.
cheers,
felix
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
I get the following when running make fullcheck --
scripts/makedist.scm is not in the tarball. I should add it...
Thanks.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
2009/3/26 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:19:08AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Aleksej Saushev a...@inbox.ru wrote:
Error: (import) during expansion of (import ...) - cannot import from
undefined module: scheme
Is the build
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera
l.valeriman...@gmail.com wrote:
You learn something every day I guess, I never suspected MSYS-make
would break when used outside of MSYS, though considering the PATH
mangling MSYS does its not surprising at all.
MSYS does many evil
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:09 PM, John Cowan co...@ccil.org wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
- mingw-msys: you have mingw + msys
- mingw: you *DON'T* have msys, just cmd.exe and bare bones mingw
I have never understood why we have both these builds, when it seems that
mingw would suffice
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:11 AM, underspecified
underspecif...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that the Chicken packages in Ubuntu are horribly out of date,
so I have built the Chicken 3.4 debs hosted on chicken.wiki.br and am
hosting them on my repository Ubuntu-NLP
Hi!
Alex reported that architecture-specific compiler options don't seem
to be passed
by csc on Mac OS X. I massages Makefile.macosx a bit, but can not test it
right now (and could only try the default ppc build, anyway). So if a Mac OS
user would try it out, I'd appreciate it (the order in which
Hi!
The current release candidate can be found at:
http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/chicken-4.0.0.tar.gz
I tested it on several systems (mingw(+msys), linux), but would
appreciate if others could give it a try. Note that some minor
recent trunk changes didn't make it, due to
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Kon Lovett klov...@pacbell.net wrote:
The chicken compiler uses Unit files.
Yes, exactly.
I'm also puzzled as to how this can be behaving differently
between Chicken 3 and 4 when the irregex.scm file is
identical.
It might be some glue code in regex.scm.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 08:48:50AM +0900, Ivan Raikov wrote:
I doubt this is the case, since the regex unit is almost identical
between Chicken 3 and Chicken 4. Taylor, can you compile Chicken with
the attached
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Tobia Conforto
tobia.confo...@gmail.com wrote:
A developer who wants to build against chicken 3 or 4 will install the right
-dev package, which forces removal of the other versions. But this is a
developer-only process and a developer is supposed to either be
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:38:30AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
Could you try to build chicken 4? (possibly twice, building the compiler
with the compiler built from the bootstrap tarball - so that you are really
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Ivan Raikov ivan.g.rai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Felix,
This means that we cannot have a Debian package for Chicken 4,
because Debian insists on having a soname version, so that it can do
things like installing libchicken 3 and 4 alongside each other. How
Hi!
I think you're right: these are two cases: the 10k stack is already too small
on a 64-bit machine and will continuously GC. The other case is the one
we're looking for. It may be that the irregex integration has a bug.
Could you try to build chicken 4? (possibly twice, building the compiler
Hi!
I just removed the use of soname from the build in trunk. It broke
explicit dynamic loading of core libraries. I just mention this in case
you have installed chicken 4 in the same prefix as a still used
chicken 3, because installing chicken 4 will now overwrite the
old libraries.
cheers,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
Usually when it hangs, I end up sending it ^C when it's inside mark().
So if I step out to C_reclaim() I can step through from line 2802 (or
sometimes 2805; in runtime.c) to line 3016. This I do in GDB using
the
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:21 PM, William Ramsay ramsa...@comcast.net wrote:
To whom it may concern,
What happened to the xlib egg? And especially the docs that go with it?
I'm in the middle of a huge project that uses it!!!
What's the problem? It seems to be there.
cheers,
felix
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym
ala...@snell-pym.org.uk wrote:
Cool! (Unfortunately, I'm a Windows user now...)
I have a similar problem, involving Macs!
However, when I had a NetBSD workstation, I liked the ion window
manager - but I always wanted to do my own, that
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Eduardo Cavazos
wayo.cava...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I have some portable Scheme code; i.e. code that runs on a few
implementations. In that code are some macros which intentionally break
hygiene. So that rules out syntax-rules. Just about everybody supports
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Tobia Conforto
tobia.confo...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
(import-for-syntax matchable)
(define-syntax define-macro
(lambda (m . _)
`(define-syntax ,(caadr m)
(lambda (e . _)
(match e
(,(cadr m) ,@(cddr m)))
Eduardo, does
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
Well I was able to trigger a hang in my build with the debugging
symbols by setting the nursery stack size to 10k. Debug log from GDB
is attached. The three entries here were taken from allowing the
program to run
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Tobia Conforto
tobia.confo...@gmail.com wrote:
felix winkelmann wrote:
Sorry, but this does not work. An identifier introduced by a previous
(hygienic) macro expansion will not be correctly expanded.
Does this mean that you can't mix define-macro macros
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Eduardo Cavazos
wayo.cava...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
cons-wm is a window manager for the X Window System. Features:
* Written in Scheme
* Runs in Ypsilon, Larceny, and Chicken
* Minimalist
* Internals based on dwm 5.4.1
cons-wm aims to be a simple window
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wayo.cava...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to define 'define-macro' in terms of the new explicit
renaming macros of Chicken 4.0? Or is it offered somewhere and I just missed
it?
I know I know... 'define-macro' is bad. :-) But I have
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
a...@freaks-unidos.net wrote:
Hi, Azul!
I worked hard (with help from Mario and Felix) to try to make the
Chicken Eggs repository serve as the central development location for
most authors of Chicken extensions. Ironically, it doesn't
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
No problem. Can we do the same thing for the manual, soon?
I volunteer to do that as well, but would like to know if there are
gotchas like the Eggs Unlimited 3 page (which is currently broken, it
links to call/cc.org
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 12:10:39AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
Ok, here is what Marc Feeley, the author of SRFI-18 has to say
about this:
snip
Hope that clarifies things.
Hope that clarifies things.
Yup, thanks
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
The bug becomes more and more phantasmagorical!
When initially compiling chicken-boot with make PLATFORM=linux
DEBUGBUILD=yes bootstrap the bug does not appear.
When using -:d OR -:s500k OR -:s1m the bug does not
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
This has been implemented now.
For example, you can visit http://chicken.wiki.br/eggref/3/9p to view the
Chicken 3 documentation for the 9p egg and http://chicken.wiki.br/eggref/3/9p
to view the Chicken 4 documentation for
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
Yup, thanks for asking him. It still sucks, though ;)
We are bound to the SRFI-18 spec, but you are free to invent your own API.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Eduardo Cavazos wayo.cava...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's how I'm defining 'XSetErrorHandler' on the Chicken side:
(define XSetErrorHandler
(foreign-safe-lambda c-pointer XSetErrorHandler
(function int (c-pointer c-pointer
And finally, a test error
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wayo.cava...@gmail.com wrote:
In this particular case, like this:
(XSetErrorHandler xerrorhandler)
If you say
(XSetErrorHandler (location xerrorhandler))
does it work, then?
But ideally, the API should work such that you can do flexible
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
I have no direct evidence that it was an infinite recursion. It was
just a guess by the symptoms, but admittedly I have little knowledge
of Chicken's internals. Sorry for the noise on that. The symptoms
are that
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
However, it turns out that an exception thrown in a thread simply
terminates the thread instead of unwinding the stack. The same does not
happen in the primordial thread:
Ok, here is what Marc Feeley, the author of SRFI-18
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe this is a bug in Chicken 4. It works in Chicken 3 with the
syntax-case egg, and in Scheme 48. It looks like an ellipsis form
matches after just checking the first pattern, without checking
subsequent patterns.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Matthew Welland m...@kiatoa.com wrote:
FYI: The link on the PS-tk egg wiki page seems dead. I did see some docs for
PS-tk on sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pstk
If desired I can cut 'n paste the sourceforge doc into the wiki but no
promises on
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Matthew Welland m...@kiatoa.com wrote:
I noticed the tk egg minutes after sending my previous email. The tk egg
seems to have nice documentation and it works on my Nokia n800. However the
PS-tk egg does not:
snip
Nokia-N800-50-2:~# csi
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
The cleanup I'm suggesting does not necessarily have to be major, the
immediate proposal of this mail is simply to move all the eggdocs to
a new subdirectory eggref/3, to match eggref/4 and also to match the
egg structure;
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Drew Hess drew.h...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Drew Hess dh...@bothan.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm able to consistently reproduce a segfault using alist-hash-table
with Chicken 3.4.0 on 3 different platforms: Debian unstable x86-64, Mac
OS X
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Jan Baumgart raga.r...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi!
Is it possible, to make subsequent calls to CHICKEN_eval from within
different nonreentrant(!) threads?
No, the chicken runtime system is not thread-safe.
cheers,
felix
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Nicholas Indy Ray arel...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having a problem while trying to profile a program that is taking
far too long,
The program is structured so that it makes tail calls back to prior
functions
(define (func-a p)
(if (...)
(func-a
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Rick R rick.richard...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks! This is exactly what I was looking for. I've been playing with
it a bit, and I've run into a few snags.
1. crunch.h wasn't created/copied it my std include. I had to
chicken-setup -keep and go to the directory.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:44 PM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
1. crunch.h wasn't created/copied it my std include. I had to
chicken-setup -keep and go to the directory.
The file is named include. I'm guessing that the script expected
there to be a local directory named include
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wayo.cava...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Even after R6RS, 'load' is all one can really count on. :-)
Below is a hacked version of load that I'm using for Chicken. If an '.so'
file doesn't exist for the file your loading, the file is compiled and
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Eduardo Cavazos
wayo.cava...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a screenshot of the fruits of today's labors:
http://proteus.freeshell.org/abstracting-screenshots/game1-turn6-chicken.png
That was produced by a pure Scheme implementation of the ContextFreeArt
semantics.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net wrote:
Hi,
I managed to have a finalizer raise an exception. This ran into a tight
loop in ##sys#force-finalizers. This patch will ignore them.
Gee, this got completely lost. Sorry, Joerg.
cheers,
felix
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:31 PM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
In interpreted code, the finalizers do not trigger at all, even when
you exit csi via (exit).
Hi!
I have reverted the original change that caused this for the time being.
cheers,
felix
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Alex Shinn alexsh...@gmail.com wrote:
When optimizing my Chicken code for speed, I find one of the
most important things is to write the code so that it gets
compiled into a single C function with gotos. It's often so
important to get this that I end up
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:36 PM, John Cowan co...@ccil.org wrote:
I don't think parameterize is tail-recursive (it uses dynamic-wind),
so if you expect procedure calls to be nested deeply, this might not be
an option.
It is possible to have dynamic binding and tail recursion at the same
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Eduardo Cavazos
wayo.cava...@gmail.com wrote:
--
(use srfi-4)
(define (make-bytevector n)
(u8vector-blob/shared (make-u8vector n)))
(define bytevector-length blob-size)
(define
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Koen Weddepohl kweddep...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I'm interested in using Chicken for homebrew game development.
Anyway, I've been trying to get the SDL egg to work with the OpenGL egg.
However, I can't get any OpenGL graphics to display. I think this is
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:56 AM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
I am seeing finalizers fail to execute on recent SVN and I think
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Ivan Raikov ivan.g.rai...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
Some time last December, I made a partial port of the Chicken
build system to Scheme, and I got as far as getting Chicken 3 to build
under Linux, Mac OS, and Mingw+msys. The code consists mainly of the
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Kon Lovett klov...@pacbell.net wrote:
(##sys#slot l 1) - (%cdr l)
(##sys#setslot l 1 x) - (%set-cdr l x)
I was wondering. The compiler already inlines primitives when
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:12 PM, William Ramsay ramsa...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a way to do incremental compiling in Chicken?My program is
getting quite large and has a lot of include files involved. How do you go
from csc -vk foo.scm to
gcc test.c -o foo.o -c
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:49 PM, William Ramsay ramsa...@comcast.net wrote:
I put my list of files into a Makefile using the same code you gave below.
Make runs through each file and compiles it to an object file with no
problem at all. However, when I try to link it all together with
csc -o
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Koen Weddepohl kweddep...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I'm interested in using Chicken for homebrew game development.
Anyway, I've been trying to get the SDL egg to work with the OpenGL egg.
However, I can't get any OpenGL graphics to display. I think this is
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Adam C. Emerson az...@azureprime.com wrote:
The compile fails with:
/usr/bin/ld: ./libchicken.a(library-static.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against
`a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with
-fPIC
./libchicken.a: could not
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:03 AM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
Please try this [finalizer patch].
Hi. I am seeing finalizers fail to execute on recent SVN and I think
it is the result of this change. I
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym
ala...@snell-pym.org.uk wrote:
What do people think of this? Would it be welcome in the chicken core
once it's proven itself?
Sure. The use of strings for binary data is indeed something that should
be reduced. There is also a lot of copying
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Tobia Conforto
tobia.confo...@gmail.com wrote:
Newbie question: can Chicken load and (more importantly) unload/reload a .so
at runtime? I've never tried to.
There is some support for unloading the old instance of a .so, when
reloading it (at least on elf-ish
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym
ala...@snell-pym.org.uk wrote:
On 16 Jan 2009, at 11:40 am, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
Please may I have svn set up for:
posix-extensions
- in which I will (at Felix's suggestion) put my posix syscall
extensions.
Hold your horses, Kon's
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym
ala...@snell-pym.org.uk wrote:
Peter raised an interesting point on IRC - doesn't stat-regular? et al
do this? The stat-*? functions all take a file name, call stat, then
examine the mode of the result to see if it has the specified type.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym
ala...@snell-pym.org.uk wrote:
On 16 Jan 2009, at 10:45 am, felix winkelmann wrote:
Everything should be put into eggs. At some stage we have to
strip down the posixunix and put everything not needed for
the core system into eggs.
Ok
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:14 AM, William Ramsay ramsa...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi, William.
Sorry for responding so late.
I am trying to use macros with a program that requires some C
functions. But when I require-extension syntax-case and extend easyffi I
get compile errors.If I
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Shawn Rutledge
shawn.t.rutle...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/6/09, Shawn Rutledge shawn.t.rutle...@gmail.com wrote:
Now by reading the source I've discovered ##sys#unbound-in-eval. I
guess I can get the unbound variable name from there (and expect it to
break some
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Heinrich Taube ta...@uiuc.edu wrote:
im using chicken 3.0.0 . I have a file with some define-macro in it like
this:
(define-macro (send place . args)
(expand-send place args))
I include that file in my main file ChickenBridge.scm
(include mymacros.scm)
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Kevin Beranek ke...@kberanek.com wrote:
I've stumbled upon some interesting behavior of number-string. It
appears that there was previously a ticket filed for a similar bug in
version 2.6 (http://trac.callcc.org/ticket/160). What I've been
observing doesn't
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
If you put an extra set of quotation marks around the argument, won't
they effectively cancel the quotation marks added by system()?
...Remarkable. It really seems to work.
I found this:
Hi!
I think the mingw (non-msys) build could work now. If you checkout the
trunk and do
make PLATFORM=mingw PREFIX=c:/some/path bootstrap # note the forward slashes!
make PLATFORM=mingw PREFIX=c:/some/path CHICKEN=chicken-boot
make PLATFORM=mingw PREFIX=c:/some/path CHICKEN=chicken-boot install
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo
a...@freaks-unidos.net wrote:
I'm not sure I can follow your example completely (I always get
quickly confused with these scenarios), but I understand the
weak/finalizable GC-root suggestion. I have to think more about
it, but it should
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Lam Luu luuxuan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all!
Given an S-Expression, (here is an example), is there any way to write a
script to determine whether or not that expression is a procedure-call or a
macro? If it is a macro call, is there anyway to expand it back
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:58 PM, John Cowan co...@ccil.org wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
The handling of backslashes as escaping characters is not the problem,
it seems. If I pass this string (verbatim, just like it is printed here) to
system(3):
c:\home\chicken-trunk\bin\csi -bnq -e
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Tobia Conforto
tobia.confo...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried adding an .exe extension to csi?
Like: c:\home\chicken-trunk\bin\csi.exe
I know it sounds stupid...
No, it doesn't. But I'm quite sure John is right with his assumption.
You could try and
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
If you put an extra set of quotation marks around the argument, won't
they effectively cancel the quotation marks added by system()?
That is, pass
c:\home\chicken-trunk\bin\csi -bnq -e (require-library setup-api)
-e
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Lars Nilsson chamael...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Thomas Chust ch...@web.de wrote:
Ivan Raikov wrote:
[...]
I think the problem is that \ in strings needs to be escaped,
[...]
Hello,
I don't think so, unless the escaping problem
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:14 AM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
- checkout the current svn trunk
- run make PLATFORM=mingw PREFIX=c:/home/chicken-trunk DEBUGBUILD=1
bootstrap
(prefix must contain drive letter and use forward slashes)
- run make PLATFORM=mingw PREFIX=c:/home
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Lars Nilsson chamael...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:14 AM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
The handling of backslashes as escaping characters is not the problem,
it seems. If I pass this string (verbatim, just like it is printed here
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Jack Trades jacktradespub...@gmail.com wrote:
1. import, if and define-syntax -- Where do they come from? Can they be
redefined?
They are currently handled specially (i.e. hardcoded). The proper
way to do it would be to introduce internal special forms and
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 3:43 PM, William Ramsay ramsa...@comcast.net wrote:
Also the doc for the xlib egg has an error. Freeing a structure is given
as: (free-NAME) - C-POINTER
I think it should be:(free-NAME C-POINTER)
Thanks - will be fixed.
cheers,
felix
Hi!
I'm trying to fix the mingw build and have encountered
a problem that leaves me absolutely dumbfounded.
I invoke csi and csc in chicken-install like this:
c:\home\chicken-trunk\bin\csi ...args ...
(Note the quotes around the pathname)
This works fine in cmd.exe, but fails when using the
Hello!
I have merged the irregular branch into trunk, so PCRE has now been
replaced with Alex' irregex regular expression package. That means,
SREs are now supported.
I noticed that regex-compilation into internal representation is relatively
slow, so precompiling the regexes is quite important
201 - 300 of 1820 matches
Mail list logo
