By default, it is not possible to trigger at V8 GC programatically.
Use of such an API is tricky and most of the time you will end up
slowing down instead of helping. For that reason, we have avoided
exposing GC through the API.
We do have a flag in V8 called expose-gc that adds a JavaScript
The option to save the password does not appear on the following login
page:
http://websms.rogers.page.ca/2way/
Chrome (3.0.197.11) only saves the password when settings are imported
from Firefox which handles the password correctly.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
What about Cmd-Opt-H?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Robert Sesek rse...@gmail.com wrote:
Two things about the Mac history menu that I'd like people to weigh in on:
1. The Show All History command should have a keyboard shortcut. We can't
use the logical Cmd+H because it's bound by the
cmd-opt-h is used by the os too (cmd-h: hide current app, cmd-opt-h:
hide others).
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Julian Harrisk...@google.com wrote:
What about Cmd-Opt-H?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Robert Sesek rse...@gmail.com wrote:
Two things about the Mac history menu that I'd
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:08, Julian Harris k...@google.com wrote:
What about Cmd-Opt-H?
Cmd+Opt+H is also bound by the system for Hide Others.
2. Currently, items in the history menu open in the current foreground tab.
I'm currently working on a CL to make it so that if you hold down the
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Yes, sorry about that. Please see render_view.cc. They are just
implemented using WebFrame::executeCommand.
Ah, I see. As an API consumer I would prefer to have separate methods for
each supported command, or have
They always felt pretty different to me. In one case, I'm undoing something
I did, and I expect the state to be restored to how it was. In the other,
I'm initiating a new action, and I expect the behavior to be the same as for
bookmarks.
- Pam
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Mike Pinkerton
This is not the right place to bring this up. http://new.crbug.com
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Gobbledegook aftabkha...@gmail.com wrote:
The option to save the password does not appear on the following login
page:
http://websms.rogers.page.ca/2way/
Chrome (3.0.197.11) only saves the
Yeah, I agree. Those are problems. However, the intent is to match the set
of commands reachable by script. The values for execCommand are well
known.
I also worry about having to keep the WebKit API in sync with WebCore.
I agree that selectAll should be dropped in favor of
If I understand correctly, selectAll() and executeCommand(SelectAll) are
different. The first one selects all text in the frame, while the second one
selects all text in an editor (input box).
Regards
James Su
2009/8/14 Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
Yeah, I agree. Those are problems.
Oh, good catch. If that is indeed the case, then eliminating
WebFrame::selectAll would be a mistake.-Darin
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:58 AM, James Su su...@chromium.org wrote:
If I understand correctly, selectAll() and executeCommand(SelectAll) are
different. The first one selects all text in
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:58 PM, James Su su...@chromium.org wrote:
If I understand correctly, selectAll() and executeCommand(SelectAll) are
different. The first one selects all text in the frame, while the second one
selects all text in an editor (input box).
Ok :-) Can we document this in
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Hmm... take a look at EditorCommands.cpp. The executeSelectAll method just
calls frame-selection()-selectAll(). That's the same method that
WebFrameImpl::selectAll() calls.
I just verified this in the debugger -- the
Robert: How about grabbing a random person, setting them in front of
chromium, telling them I need you to do some UX testing for me. This
is about testing the program and not about testing you, you cannot do
anything wrong. Up here we have the history menu. What would you
expect what happens if
I think you'd need more than one person and twenty minutes. One person
isn't going give you any useful data - this thread is full of
one-persons.
I happen to agree with Pink, though I think there should be less
difference between History and Closed Items (I have a long running
rant about how
2009/8/12 Drew Wilson atwil...@chromium.org:
Hi all,
It appears from looking at the worker code that if worker script enters into
an infinite loop, the associated worker thread/process will never exit. The
JavaScriptCore implementation uses the JSC timeoutChecker mechanism to
halt script
I noticed that the size of the installation of these two builds ,
Google Chrome 3.0.198.1 and Chromium 4.0.202.r23182 were considerably
different, and was wondering do they both use the separate libv8 -
r2650 library?
Thanks
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium
…and repeat 3 times, for each version gives you six opinions – and
uninvolved opinions, too.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Glen Murphyg...@chromium.org wrote:
I think you'd need more than one person and twenty minutes. One person
isn't going give you any useful data - this thread is full
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:29 AM, codfatherswcodfat...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that the size of the installation of these two builds ,
Google Chrome 3.0.198.1 and Chromium 4.0.202.r23182 were considerably
different, and was wondering do they both use the separate libv8 -
r2650 library?
We
I've put together a brief document describing the core principles of the
Chrome product and some of the ways we try and achieve them.
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/core-principles
Thanks to Ian Fette and John Grabowski for helping me fill this out. Feel
free to edit if you have anything else
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Mike Beltzner beltz...@mozilla.comwrote:
This is great, Ben. I hope you don't mind if I let this inspire me to
update the Firefox Charter that you wrote back in 2004 with something
similar :)
I wholeheartedly support anything that makes Firefox better!
To
Currently most of the code for showing HTML dialogs is hard-coded to the
gears scheme (gears://), used by the 'Create Application Shortcuts'
dialog. If you wanted to add another HTML dialog today, you would need to
add a new scheme for the URL that points to the resource you would like to
have
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Tim Steele t...@chromium.org wrote:
and use a RenderViewHost directly. The personalization code used to do
something like this using a thing I added called HWNDHtmlView. I think
extensions used it for a while, and there was a bug+todo there to try and
Thanks for the speedy response guys. I got the impression chrome-resource
is coupled to the new tab page from stuff like this:
// Special case the new tab page. In older versions of Chrome, the new tab
// page was hosted at chrome-internal:blah. This might be in people's
saved
// sessions or
I thought this is something I should mention here:
This change: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=23244
reduced the number of crashes on Mac from 13-15 with high degree of
flakiness to a very consistent 2.
pkasting, this is your man.
:DG
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.comwrote:
I thought this is something I should mention here:
This change: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=23244
reduced the number of crashes on Mac from 13-15 with high degree of
flakiness to a very
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Tim Steele t...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Tim Steele t...@chromium.org wrote:
Thanks for the speedy response guys. I got the impression chrome-resource
is coupled to the new tab page from stuff like this:
hm. make that
Also, note that there's no guarantee we won't change this representation in
the future.
There is a proposed history API for our in-development extensions system,
but it's not implemented yet:
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/extensions/history-api
You can probably find the answer somewhere in
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/browser/history/
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/browser/history/In
particular, it looks like visit_database.cc uses Time::ToInternalValue().
Have a look at:
I think that rather than having a scheme that opens a dialog, we should make
the HTML dialog open any URL you give it. Then you can just re-use chrome://
which is used by the NTP etc.
-Ben
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Tim Steele t...@chromium.org wrote:
Currently most of the code for
It would be nice to have something about memory consumption in the Speed
section as well.
Linus
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Very nice!
Some things I would add to the speed section:
*How will my code perform when the operating system or hard disk
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=19270
(patches welcome!)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:35 PM, James Su su...@chromium.org wrote:
Oh yes, you are right. So it might be safe to remove selectAll().
Regards
James Su
2009/8/14 Marshall Greenblatt magreenbl...@gmail.com
On Thu,
32 matches
Mail list logo
