We have focused on making the 64-bit version complete, so there is
still some performance tuning to be done. Currently, the performance
of the 64-bit version is pretty close to the performance of the 32-bit
version when Chrome 2 stable was released.
-- Mads
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:26 PM,
I guess this is the command to checkout Webkit source using git
But I don't see 'git-chrome/src/DEPS' file when I checkout chromium source
using git.
And what is the purpose of the command 'git svn find-rev'? Isn't the code is
already checkout using the 'git checkout -b $i' command?
And what is
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Marshall
Greenblattmagreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of curiosity, what work remains to support a 64bit build on Windows?
V8 does not yet compile in 64-bit mode on Windows. We have focused on
making the 64-bit version of V8 work on Linux and Mac at first. We
It would be easier to recommend advice if I could see / review the code.
Can you provide a link to the in-progress CL?
-Darin
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20,
Hi,
From this chromium document,
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-documents/multi-process-architecture
Browser has an IO thread which receives messages from each Renderer
process and dispatch them to Browser Process.
But when I look at the code , the IOThread class
You want to look at the MessageLoop and possibly RenderViewHost.
Adam
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:27 PM, n179911n179...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From this chromium document,
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-documents/multi-process-architecture
Browser has an IO
What exactly are you trying to do?
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:27 PM, n179911 n179...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From this chromium document,
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-documents/multi-process-architecture
Browser has an IO thread which receives messages from
On Aug 20, 5:40 pm, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
This thread is massive. Having been the one who wrote the majority of
the Omnibox code on Linux, I can promise you that this debate has
already happened about 15 times previously. I'm not sure there is any
more information here,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:27 PM, n179911n179...@gmail.com wrote:
But when I look at the code , the IOThread class in
browser_process_impl.cc just contains below. It does not has any logic
which dispatches messages. Can you please tell me if it is the right
code? if not , can you please point
A bug tracker is the right place to have this discussion, and I see
you've filed 19508 which was closed WontFix. I appreciate your
opinion and dedication to Linux. We have plenty of Linux users who
have gotten adjusted to this behavior and prefer it. There is no
clear answer, which is why
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 01:14, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
The v8 team did some amazing work this quarter building a working
64-bit port. After a handful of changes on the Chromium side, I've
had Chromium Linux building on 64-bit for the last few weeks.
This is awesome. You should
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:42 PM, hap 497hap...@gmail.com wrote:
But I don't understand how to use git to check out Webkit source which
chromium depends on.
Should I use 'git-svn'? If yes, what is the url for the repository?
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/UsingGitWithWebKit
Note that it is your
The Omnibox widget code is already very involved, and I don't think it
is a good idea to add any more complexity or additional modes.
Chromium of course is open source, which is a very hidden form of configuration.
Good luck,
-- dean
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:57 AM, JT Olds jto...@xnet5.com
The problem fundamentally comes down to matching an existing platform
behavior versus try to do something better. I assert inline
autocomplete and tabs on top fall strictly into the latter category,
so you can't win an argument by just saying it matches the platform.
Inline autocomplete is a
Can we please make it configurable? I hate the click once select all
thing. It really drives me nuts. Chromium is so nice otherwise.
I don't care how hidden of a configuration parameter it is, just so
long as I can change it.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org
Sure, although I've only just started (have only updated the code to reflect
the changes to WorkerObjectProxy/WorkerContextProxy on the WebCore side, and
am now cascading the changes down into the WebKit API/browser).
http://codereview.chromium.org/173193
Thanks for the help, everyone. I think I
Joel had some ideas about doing something like thing for power saving.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:38 AM, n179911n179...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't want the renderer process to die. I just want it 'locked' so
that i can dump
Having played with my proof-of-concept for tab-modal file selection
(etc.) sheets (CL: http://codereview.chromium.org/164547), I think
it's time for a draft design document. I'd especially appreciate
feedback from the UI people. Here goes
Definitions:
A tab-specific dialog box or sheet
Evan, I don't know if you already got this, sorry if you did, but it
looks like it got lost somewhere. I guess I suck at Google Groups.
The problem fundamentally comes down to matching an existing platform
behavior versus try to do something better. I assert inline
autocomplete and tabs on
Defining operator is fine. Other types do this:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM, JT Oldsjto...@xnet5.com wrote:
It's a shame this is what is left on the table, but hooray for git-svn!
FYI: don't use git-svn. We have a dedicated git mirror that you can
clone and fetch from. Much, much faster.
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/UsingGit
When I sync issues from WebKit they will get the label HTML5 if they have
the keyword HTML5 in their Bugzilla database. However, I will add the label
OWP so we can have simple searches on our side.
Jon
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.orgwrote:
That works for
Let me summarize what you all have stated:
- ALT: Highlight App menu button
- ALT-P: Show Page menu
- ALT-A: Show App menu
or..
- ALT: Highlight App menu button
- ALT-P: Highlight Page menu button
- ALT-A: Highlight App menu button
First set or second set?
Thanks!
-
Hi all,
As Glenn noted, we made great progress last week in rebaselining the
tests. Unfortunately, we don't have a mechanism to preserve the
knowledge we gained last week as to whether or not tests need to be
rebaselined or not, and why not. As a result, it's easy to imagine
that we'd need to
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi all,
As Glenn noted, we made great progress last week in rebaselining the
tests. Unfortunately, we don't have a mechanism to preserve the
knowledge we gained last week as to whether or not tests need to be
I really want to name it tools as Peter stated, If anyone has any
objections, please let me know, it will now be:
ALT-T = Tools Menu (previously known as App menu)
ALT-P = Page Menu.
The only difference within these sets is that within the first set, it
shows the menu (the menu popup will be
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org wrote:
I really want to name it tools as Peter stated, If anyone has any
objections, please let me know, it will now be:
ALT-T = Tools Menu (previously known as App menu)
ALT-P = Page Menu.
The only difference within these
There's growing interest from several parties in getting Chrome to
cross-compile onto linux/ARM. Let's make sure everyone is on the same
page so that we don't duplicate efforts.
I understand that Joel Stanley, Dean McNamee and Lei Zhang have
already been doing a lot of work towards that. There's
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
There's growing interest from several parties in getting Chrome to
cross-compile onto linux/ARM. Let's make sure everyone is on the same
page so that we don't duplicate efforts.
I understand that Joel Stanley, Dean
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org wrote:
Let me summarize what you all have stated:
- ALT: Highlight App menu button
- ALT-P: Show Page menu
- ALT-A: Show App menu
or..
- ALT: Highlight App menu button
- ALT-P: Highlight Page menu button
On Aug 21, 10:17 am, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
The Omnibox widget code is already very involved, and I don't think it
is a good idea to add any more complexity or additional modes.
...but, wait a sec, Chromium on OSX seems to do exactly the right
thing (for both Mac and Linux).
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
- Gyp uses pkg-config to find includes/lib dependencies, i.e. it's
going to look at the host for them. If your target distribution
matches your host
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
- Gyp
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Erik Corryerik.co...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/21 Antoine Labour pi...@google.com:
There's growing interest from several parties in getting Chrome to
cross-compile onto linux/ARM. Let's make sure everyone is on the same
page so that we don't duplicate efforts.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Erik Corryerik.co...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/21 Antoine Labour pi...@google.com:
There's growing interest from several parties in getting Chrome to
cross-compile onto linux/ARM. Let's
Note: Firefox on OSX selects all on single click. So there isn't a
clear answer on OSX either.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:18 PM, alenpeacock alenlpeac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 10:17 am, Dean McNamee
This seems to me like a lot more work for minimal gain. Because
you've thought more about it than I have, it makes me think I'm
misunderstanding something. Can you explain this more simply, in
terms of use cases?
Here's what I think you're saying:
1) We don't have notes on why tests are
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Antoine Labourpi...@google.com wrote:
- Gyp uses pkg-config to find includes/lib dependencies, i.e. it's
going to look at the host for them. If your target distribution
matches your host maybe you're fine, but it may not work at all, so
it'd would be good to
2009/8/21 Antoine Labour pi...@google.com:
There's growing interest from several parties in getting Chrome to
cross-compile onto linux/ARM. Let's make sure everyone is on the same
page so that we don't duplicate efforts.
I understand that Joel Stanley, Dean McNamee and Lei Zhang have
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
- Gyp uses pkg-config to find includes/lib dependencies, i.e. it's
going to
I'm trying to get a sense for what people perceive as the core team
values of Chromium, and I would like to enlist everyone in helping
figuring it out.
Basically, I want to put together a small set of core values and a
variety of example actions that support (or detract from) those
values.
A
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
Note: Firefox on OSX selects all on single click. So there isn't a
clear answer on OSX either.
Firefox has historically tended to favor do what Firefox does on
other platforms over follow the platform standard. In other
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
My argument was just that I know of only 2 frequently used URL bars in
browser. Safari, and Firefox. They differ in their behavior. I
don't know how you have an established standard when you only have a
few reference
At least in the batch of tests I examined, the ones that needed
re-baselining weren't tests we'd originally failed and suddenly started
passing. They were new tests that nobody had ever taken a good look at.
If that matches everyone else's experience, then all we need is an UNTRIAGED
annotation
As others have said, this thread has been beaten into the ground, and before
it we had 15 other threads get beaten into the ground. Various relevant
stakeholders such as beng, glen, pinkerton, etc. have been conversed with,
and while we are interested in getting more data (see the bug I filed)
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Pam Greene p...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm not convinced that passing tests we used to fail, or failing tests
differently, happens often enough to warrant the extra work of producing,
storing, and using expected-bad results. Of course, I may be completely
wrong.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Peter Kastingpkast...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Pam Greene p...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm not convinced that passing tests we used to fail, or failing tests
differently, happens often enough to warrant the extra work of producing,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:18 PM, alenpeacock alenlpeac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 10:17 am, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
The Omnibox widget code is already very involved, and I don't think it
is a good idea to add any more complexity or additional modes.
...but, wait a sec,
With the Google Summer of Code program winding down, I'm curious how
our GSoC participants are doing. Can the students and their mentors
share their experiences? (Assuming you're all done with evaluations
and all that.)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers
I'm looking at splitting the First Run UI import machinery into it's own
process on OS X.
I just wanted to sync up with people working on the Linux side of things to
make sure no-one else is working on the same thing in Linux-land?
Best regards,
Jeremy
AFAIK no one is working on it for Linux.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jeremy Moskovich jer...@chromium.orgwrote:
I'm looking at splitting the First Run UI import machinery into it's own
process on OS X.
I just wanted to sync up with people working on the Linux side of things to
make
On Aug 21, 4:36 pm, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
Note: Firefox on OSX selects all on single click. So there isn't a
clear answer on OSX either.
According to Gruber, this is badly broken:
http://daringfireball.net/2008/04/firefox_3_safari_3
LOCATION FIELD — The new Firefox 3
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Stuart Morgan
stuartmor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
Note: Firefox on OSX selects all on single click. So there isn't a
clear answer on OSX either.
Firefox has historically tended to favor do
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
This is all good feedback, thanks! To clarify, though: what do you
think the cost will be? Perhaps you are assuming things about how I
would implement this that are different than what I had in mind.
Some amount of your
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
This is all good feedback, thanks! To clarify, though: what do you
think the cost will be? Perhaps you are assuming things about how I
would
What's the motivation?
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jeremy Moskovichjer...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm looking at splitting the First Run UI import machinery into it's own
process on OS X.
I just wanted to sync up with people working on the Linux side of things to
make sure no-one else is
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Ojan Vafaio...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
This is all good feedback, thanks! To clarify, though: what do you
think
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Pam Greene p...@chromium.org wrote:
At least in the batch of tests I examined, the ones that needed
re-baselining weren't tests we'd originally failed and suddenly started
passing. They were new tests that nobody had ever taken a good look at.
If that matches
Sorry, I find out answer to my problem.
I need to put the directory name same as the ones listed in DEPS.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:07 PM, hap 497 hap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have added 'src/third_party/WebKit/WebKit: None,' to my .gclient
file.
But when I do 'gclient sync', it
Hi,
I have added 'src/third_party/WebKit/WebKit: None,' to my .gclient
file.
But when I do 'gclient sync', it still tries to sync up a subdirectory
'mac', under src/third_party/WebKit/WebKit.
$ gclient sync
found .git directory; skipping src
svn:
60 matches
Mail list logo
