2009/6/26 Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
2009/6/25 Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏) u...@chromium.org
Thanks for review.
2009/6/25 Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
Only skimmed thusfar as well... but from what i've seen, looks reasonable
to me.
* A version of the diagram you have in the
OK. Thanks for the information.
Before I proceed to build an independent installer, please can you
advise
whether or not there are any plans for Chrome to provide such a
mechanism
for automatic NPAPI Plugin downloads at some point in the future ?
http://codereview.chromium.org/147200
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
http://codereview.chromium.org/147202 (i didn't know how to use gcl
properly, so i re-submitted and deleted the prev issue, prev was only
up for a very short while)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Non-Stickkevin.ra...@ntlworld.com wrote:
OK. Thanks for the information.
Before I proceed to build an independent installer, please can you
advise
whether or not there are any plans for Chrome to provide such a
mechanism
for automatic NPAPI Plugin
Feel free to make an eComstation port though, 2.0 is about to be
released, plus its not that different from any other OS ;)
- Itai
On Jun 23, 12:48 pm, Elliot Glaysher (Chromium) e...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Dan Kegeldaniel.r.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
p.s. And OS/2
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Non-Stickkevin.ra...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Before I proceed to build an independent installer, please can you
advise
whether or not there are any plans for Chrome to provide such a
Thanks for writing this! I would personally use this feature
frequently. The code looks good too.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:35 AM, nakroyoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote:
http://codereview.chromium.org/147202 (i didn't know how to use gcl
properly, so i re-submitted and deleted the prev
Is eComstation the OS/2 that dare not speak its name? :-)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Itaiida...@chromium.org wrote:
Feel free to make an eComstation port though, 2.0 is about to be
released, plus its not that different from any other OS ;)
- Itai
On Jun 23, 12:48 pm, Elliot
Yeah, this is great, thanks.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
Thanks for writing this! I would personally use this feature
frequently. The code looks good too.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:35 AM, nakroyoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Mike Beltzner beltz...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 25-Jun-09, at 7:02 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
This screen actually confuses me a little, as the Summary statistics don't
match the summation of the process based statistics. Do you mean to say your
summary statistics
On 26-Jun-09, at 12:59 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
Overall, though, that should mean that we're *not* double counting
memory. In fact, when I observed as the test ran, there were only
three processes: one for the browser, one for the single content
process from which all tabs were spawned,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Mike Beltzner beltz...@mozilla.comwrote:
On 26-Jun-09, at 12:59 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
Overall, though, that should mean that we're *not* double counting memory.
In fact, when I observed as the test ran, there were only three processes:
one for the browser,
Next week June 29 - July 2 is the Fixit week focusing on reliability.
All crash bugs are Fixit work items.
Did you have any luck?
Also this thread should probably be moved to the new extensions group
if possible
On Jun 9, 8:56 pm, Nick Baum nickb...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi John,
Web History doesn't have an official API, but I've emailed the teams.
I'll let you know if they can share any more info.
Based on our experiences from the past few weeks of rolling, I updated
the WebKit Integration documentation:
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/how-tos/webkit-merge-1
They key takeaways are:
1) roll often, in small increments
2) pay attention to actual changes you're rolling
This is not a pass. Specifically Regressions: Unexpected failures lists
the failures. Other times, you'll see Regressions: Unexpected * where * is
crash, timeout, failures, etc. Also, it should have popped up a window with
the results just for the failing tests.
Ojan
2009/6/25 David Jones
For the layout tests steps, why do you we need to build test_shell locally,
rebaseline and then add the other platforms to tests_fixable? Can't we just
use the rebaseline tool and point it at the integration bots? Currently, you
can point the tool at a specific builder. Maybe we could add a
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Ojan Vafaio...@chromium.org wrote:
For the layout tests steps, why do you we need to build test_shell
locally,
rebaseline and then add the other platforms to tests_fixable? Can't we
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Daniel Cowxdaniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Should GYP files be UTF8 Encoded?
They certainly shouldn't be UTF16 or anything like that. However, if
code-points 128 are slipping in I think the first question is why?
If we have a need for such code-points, then UTF-8
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Daniel Cowxdaniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Should GYP files be UTF8 Encoded?
We can probably get away with ascii for now... are there any
filenames that really need to be in a wider character set?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium
Not that I'm aware of. Just wanted to confirm that intention is ASCII
for now unless need arises.
On Jun 26, 2:18 pm, Dan Kegel daniel.r.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Daniel Cowxdaniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Should GYP files be UTF8 Encoded?
We can probably get away
When you middle-click on the home button, it opens in a background tab.
Is this intentional? I understand the idea of consistency with other
middle clicks, but I struggle to think of a use case where I want to
open an extra tab on my home page for later.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Peter Kastingpkast...@google.com wrote:
I don't understand; what's the alternative behavior you're proposing?
Sorry, I failed to make that explicit: Open in foreground. (See
original mail about false benefits of consistency.)
(Yes, this behavior is
Given that there are a large number of ways to open the home page in a new
foreground tab (e.g. ctrl-t + click, shift-middle click, etc.), there are a
very large number of other places in the UI where middle-click opens a new
background tab (including other toolbar buttons), there are no places I
This is only somewhat related to Chromium, but I'm asking here because
the chromium developers might be the most likely to know the answer.
I currently am running Windows 7 Ultimate x64, and I want to associate
mailto: links that I click in Chromium (and anywhere, really) to be
associated to a
It's a good idea. We've talked in the past about allowing webapps to
specify a manifest which (among other things) includes the list of
protocols that they wish to support. When a webapp is installed via
Create Application Shortcuts, we could add Chrome to the Windows list
on behalf of the
Thanks for getting back with me Ben.
Good to know you guys are aware of the problem and looking at portable
solutions. In the meantime, however, are you aware of any short-term
solutions to this annoying problem? I have to say this is the one
thing I hate about Windows 7 so far. I really don't
look at the 4th post in this thread, the one by nakro with the
registry trick
i have no win7 but i guess it should work as well
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid=3844726aab2447c8hl=en
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
I would recommend looking into how the underlying protocol system is
implemented (what the format of the command is that Windows
dispatches) then writing a script and setting that as the handler. In
Chrome you can launch an app frame like so:
path\to\chrome.exe --app URL
Your script would
In regards to the script, I do not have the domain knowledge to do
such a thing, unfortunately.
On Jun 26, 9:48 pm, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.org wrote:
I would recommend looking into how the underlying protocol system is
implemented (what the format of the command is that Windows
The intention was ascii AFAIK. Unless someone has a use case?
-BradN
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Cowx daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that I'm aware of. Just wanted to confirm that intention is ASCII
for now unless need arises.
On Jun 26, 2:18 pm, Dan Kegel
32 matches
Mail list logo
