on it. Sorry.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, build...@chromium.org wrote:
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/
Automatically closing tree for compile on Chromium Builder (dbg)
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Chromium%20Builder%20%28dbg%29/builds/15729
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/WebKit/chromium/features.gypi
WebKit is under third_party/WebKit in the src tree
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:45 PM, n179911 n179...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Webkit has an option to disable SVG build with the executable. Can you
please tell me how can I
Either way, it seems like these are bugs that are worthy of being filed.
Greg, any advice?
J
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Rryk rryk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am implementing 3D rendering engine for Chromium and I need to
download huge scenes via Ajax. However I've noticed that
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Antony Sargent asarg...@google.com wrote:
What if the Incognito profile started with a copy-on-write version of
extensions' localStorage? That way extensions in Incognito mode would see
the writes they just made, but changes would not persist beyond Incognito
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Chase Phillips ch...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 14:50, Chase Phillips ch...@chromium.org wrote:
Darin's June 2, 2009 Google I/O Exploring Chrome Internals presentation
slide deck is now available from
Same here.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@chromium.org wrote:
Do you find that you have time to figure out if rebaselining a test is the
right thing to do while you're actively gardening? Maybe I just work too
slowly, but I often find that if I'm trying to rebaseline on
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Charlie Reis cr...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Ben Laurie b...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Fady Samuel fadysam...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles, I've read your paper and ultimately I think my goal may be
somewhere
(As discussed during lunch...) Why not just do this in this case and remove
EmptyString() altogether?
const std::string MyClass::foo() const {
static std::string empty = EmptyString();
return (everything == OK) ? member_string : empty;
}
I forget if this runs the constructor on first use or
And before you suggest using software transactional memory, keep in mind
that side effects (XHRs and other network activity for example)
are prevalent in normal JavaScript usage.
I don't mean to discourage you too muchespecially if you were interested
in digging really deeply into this
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
(As discussed during lunch...) Why not just do this in this case and
remove EmptyString() altogether?
const std::string MyClass::foo() const
What about renaming the function? EmptyStringHACK() or something?
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
You ignored the second half of my suggestion.
The second half of your
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote:
I just got back from vacation and would like to take action on this. I
read through the thread, but I don't see any sort of consensus on what
won't delete the --enable-webgl flag bug forget
to delete the --disable-sandbox-until flag.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Kenneth Russell k...@chromium.org wrote:
(Resending from chromium.org)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
After reading the WebGL blog post today, and following the link to the
wiki,
it struck me as fairly *bad* that we
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't understand the argument for a periodic indicator. We don't have a
periodic indicator telling the user when to restart their browser to pick
up
auto-updates.
I don't think this is a fair comparison. One is a
Or reject extensions that could be written without a NPAPI component.
*ducks*
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Avi Drissman a...@google.com wrote:
Q: Can't we have the extensions gallery warn that it won't work?
A:
Much of what can't be done on the web platform also can't be done inside the
NaCl sandbox.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:49 PM, John Abd-El-Malek
jabdelma...@google.comwrote:
NaCl is the answer to all these problems...
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote
-in to disabling the
sandbox, but I'm not sure that out-weighs the cost of having a good number
of dev channel users running *permanently* without the sandbox.
Was this idea considered? Any other ideas?
From a past thread on the subject:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
After reading the WebGL blog post today, and following the link to the
wiki, it struck me as fairly *bad* that we are telling people to disable
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Last Friday we recorded 4 tech talks based on the feedback we got on what
topics would be interestingand here they are!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFzC_Gx76E8
Darin Fisher talks about the recently upstreamed
Personally, I really like the tech talk format as an introduction to a
topic, but you're right that some would prefer something in written form and
that a Wiki has many benefits that a video does not have. If you're willing
to transcribe the information, I'm sure it would help others.
On Wed,
Personally, I feel the opposite, and I'm not sure the perfect is the enemy
of good analogy doesn't really fit. If we erode the meaning of the secure
(as opposed to mixed) content icon, it seems like we're just going to need
to create UI in the future that says this is really super secure. I
Last Friday we recorded 4 tech talks based on the feedback we got on what
topics would be interestingand here they are!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFzC_Gx76E8
Darin Fisher talks about the recently upstreamed Chromium WebKit API.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bO3XEBuIDns
Pam Greene talks
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Last Friday we recorded 4 tech talks based on the feedback we got on what
topics would be interestingand here they are!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFzC_Gx76E8
Darin Fisher talks about the recently upstreamed
Isn't gcl try cl -b linux_view what you want?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Mike Pinkerton pinker...@chromium.orgwrote:
I've got a cl that builds fine on win/mac/linux but I'm afraid I could
impact views_linux. And, since there's no trybot, I have no way of
knowing until I actually check in
libraries (by the builbots) corresponding to the
revision you're syncing.
With this, a full initial checkout will produce a structure where you only
need to rebuild the modules you've changed their sourcecode to get the final
executable.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor
What's the intended purpose of such tools? Do they offer any functionality
beyond the standard tools? Do you envision them being helpful to people
debugging the Chromium network stack?
(Me replying does in no way imply that I have the authority to say yes or
no, btw. :-)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009
For a while now, I've advocated having 2 pacific timezone sheriffs always on
duty and having one or two in other time zones. I still advocate such an
idea.
So, to be clear, I think this is a good idea as long as the distribution of
sheriffs (time zone wise) is deliberate.
(I think this
Just for the record, you're also the one who originally said it was fine to
limit them to 5mb (for LocalStorage anyhow). :-)
What kind of extra space did you have in mind? Unlimited?
It's pretty late in the game to be making a decision like this for mstone-4,
but it might be possible if this
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Just for the record, you're also the one who originally said it was fine
to
limit them to 5mb (for LocalStorage anyhow). :-)
It is a consistent
Maybe we should say at least one PST and at least one non-Americas?
Note that even if people outside of the Americas are getting
sheriff duty more often, the duty is lighter weight...so I think it balances
out fairly well.
As we get more non-Americas committers, we can think about adding
+1 (for what it's worth)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.comwrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Finnur Thorarinsson
fin...@google.comwrote:
If the sheriff load is too much for two people
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
I think two sheriffs in US/Pacific during US/Pacific work hours is
plenty.
I was told at lunch that we already try to some degree to schedule
of the reasons this list is so incomplete).
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Things here have gotten a little stale:
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/web-platform-status Can everyone
working on OWP features please take a look and make sure what's written
Things here have gotten a little stale:
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/web-platform-status Can everyone working
on OWP features please take a look and make sure what's written there syncs
up with reality?
To edit: Scroll to the bottom, click sign in, sign in, then click edit
page at the top.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
A while ago I asked about the feasibility of setting up a WebKit Windows
try server. I seem to recall maruel mentioning that he didn't know it was
an interesting case and he'd look into it; and I know in general that
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@google.comwrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.comwrote:
I'm wondering if this is any more doable today than it was last time I
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote:
Btw, there's a webkit-dev thread out there right now about adding try
servers. I don't think anyone's figured out where the hardware will come
from
can put them to work within a week.
Adam
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org
wrote:
To be clear, I have ~10 mac minis dying in a closet waiting for jobs.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1
for a GraphicsContext
port? What is the bottleneck in the paint process (e.g. the Skia blit ops)?
2009/11/5 Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
Thanks for the suggestions so far! Here's what I've seen so far:
WebKit API - Darin?
Eric's WebKit talk
LayoutTests - Pam?
Bindings - Andrew?
Keep the ideas coming
, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
I think there's some painting stuff touched on in the first round of
talks,
but nothing terribly in depth. Are there others that would be
interested
*If you don't use extensions that use Local Storage or you only use the
official Google Chrome builds, you can probably ignore this. (Local Storage
was only enabled by default as of last Friday.)*
As of svn rev
31584http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=31584,
local storage
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Roberto Perez robj.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
As Phistuck said, modifying gclient config file and then skipping the
changes of the modules that you're not working on seems a good solution to
prevent continuous rebuildings of other modules.
But this doesn't skip
This is related to the thread (last Friday?) about making a light weight
checkout of Chromium the default.
Btw a quick look indicates that 100k are Google specific files (hermetic
build environment and such). 200k are layout tests. So that leaves only
150k filesprobably many of which are
In general, it might be interesting to document how to get a more lean
checkout of Chromium.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
Can we note this on dev.chromium.org somewhere?
Adam
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Steve VanDeBogart vand...@chromium.org
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Ben Goodger (Google)
b...@chromium.orgwrote:
it'd be nice to have a gclient config lean or something like that.
It'd be nice for it to be the default in fact.
I know we've avoided
I started a new thread about a lite version of the checkout. Might be good
to move discussion there.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Ben Goodger
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:50 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
Over the last week, I've been making some changes to how threads are used
in the browser process, with the goal of simplifying cross-thread access and
improving stability.
*The problem*
We were using a number of
About 6 months ago, we had a series of tech talks on various bits of
Chromium's architecture. (They're listed here:
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/tech-talk-videos) The youtube ratings
are pretty high, they've all had over a thousand views, and I've seen them
mentioned in a couple
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:34 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:50 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.orgwrote:
Over the last week, I've been making some changes to how threads
about some WebKit tech talks? Such talks
would be incredibly valuable to those helping out now and then with
WebKit.
-Scott
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
About 6 months ago, we had a series of tech talks on various bits of
Chromium's architecture
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:01 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:34 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org
wrote:
test_shell being a test shell used mostly for
:
A general big picture talk would be a great starter. How the DOM is
modeled, how the render tree works, the interesting objects ...
-Scott
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Sure...we definitely have some in-house expertise on this. I could even
see
if any
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra
.
- Mohamed Mansour
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Scott Violet s...@chromium.org wrote:
It's not Chromium, but how about some WebKit tech talks? Such talks
would be incredibly valuable to those helping out now and then with
WebKit.
-Scott
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor
Ha.
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/11/03/1334203/X11-Chrome-Reportedly-Outperforms-Windows-and-Mac-Versions
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Linus Upson li...@google.com wrote:
scrolling jank in gmail
http://crbug.com/25741
Linus
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Adam Barth
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 19:08, Drew Wilson atwil...@chromium.org wrote:
I've also been known to use the built-in GNU emacs from a terminal shell
(especially when working remotely/SSH-ing). I see no reason why you
I've spent a good deal of this week trying to track down what turned out to
be a simple but fairly common problem: I forgot virtual dispatch only
partially works in destructors. There have been several email threads about
this, but it still bites us form time to time, so I thought it was worth
any
mention of such a thing.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I've spent a good deal of this week trying to track down what turned out
to
be a simple but fairly common problem: I forgot virtual dispatch only
partially works in destructors. There have
From http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-windows
Ensure that /MP is enabled. You can do this by creating a file called inc
lude.gypi which contains the following lines:
{
'variables': {
'msvs_multi_core_compile': 1
}
}
Put this file in a folder
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 00:44, Ian Fette i...@chromium.org wrote:
In an effort to provide more transparency into what the team is working
on, I'm sending out the meeting notes from the green tree task force to
Why did you use the internal nacl mailing list? This is an issue that
affects all of Chromium. The NaCl team members are on chromium-dev, right?
If not, they should have been the day that our fates became intertwined.
J
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:17 PM, John Grabowski j...@chromium.org wrote:
I'll follow up with the NaCl team to make sure they are.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:57 AM, John Grabowski j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
Why did you use the internal nacl mailing list?
To keep things unambiguous and try
Today I noticed a bunch of recently added CRASH test expectations for layout
tests. I know that we sometimes have to roll in a crasher or two, but
aren't we supposed to be filing p0-p1, dev channel release blockers at least
until we can prove the crash is not exploitable in the browser and
, they can draft
someone. (In general, I think we should empower gardeners to draft people
when there are lots of high prioirity items stacking up and/or we get really
behind ToT.)
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Today I noticed a bunch of recently added
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:19 AM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
That sounds like a reasonable policy.
Hmm...I thought this was the policy. I guess not? :-)
There is the current idea of figuring out
Darin knows for sure, but I'm not aware of any intentions on Google's part
to engineer such an elaborate API. As long as it didn't add a
major maintenance burden (i.e. exposed things similar to one of the other
WebKit APIs) I'd imagine patches would be welcome though.
I believe only Darin can
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for everyone's help. Good overnight progress. 6 media tests skipped.
2 tests marked SLOW. 5 assigned.
12 unassigned general tests.
10 unassigned Mac plugin tests.
Any takers?
WIN/LINUX/MAC
This is still happening. VERY annoying. ANYONE who is disabling tests,
marking them flaky, etc needs to take the 30 seconds required to svn blame
the file and cc people the relevant people.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
Seriously. In a project as big
, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I think the main points of contention regarding SecurityOrigin::toString()
are the name toString and what type it should return.
In terms of the names: I think we should provide
Christmas came early for anyone working on WebKit! Thanks Glen. :-)
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Erik Corry erik.co...@gmail.com wrote:
This makes me very happy!
2009/10/15 Glenn Wilson gwil...@chromium.org:
Hi Webkit gardeners,
The Windows canary bot now generates formatted layout
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Michael Nordman
micha
Right now, we don't have a good story for what to do with
WebCore::SecurityOrigins in Chromium. We now have a WebSecurityOrigin in
WebKit, but if you want to move the data between processes, you need to
convert it to a string and then send that. In some cases we then convert
the string to a
::WebSecurityOrigin). We can then deal with these details only
if/when we need to.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Right now, we don't have a good story for what to do with
WebCore::SecurityOrigins in Chromium. We now have a WebSecurityOrigin in
WebKit
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
+1 SecurityOrigin class
Sounds like a reasonable plan.
I suspect
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
wrote:
As mentioned f2f, this falls apart as soon as Chrome tries to manufacture
a
security origin. I'm not sure, may already have instances of that
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.orgwrote
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Dumitru Daniliuc d...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.orgwrote
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
+1 SecurityOrigin class
Sounds like a reasonable plan.
I suspect
I assume we're going to start backing this data up from now on?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com wrote:
I accidentally checked in some test code (one number was wrong!) and
clobbered all but
a volunteer! :D :D :D
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I assume we're going to start backing this data up from now on?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Dumitru Daniliuc d...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Darin Fisher da
If this is the case, then I don't think a SecurityOrigin wrapper buys us
anything. Never mind.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Darin Fisher da
, but if all WebKit types follow this same convention,
then it's much less likely that people will do stupid things with them.
J
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
You mean string16
I think the bigger issue is how/when Area-Misc bugs get triaged. Do they
ever? If not, we should probably change that.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Guria guria...@gmail.com wrote:
Please confirm the bug
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=12900
It really annoys me.
I
Is there documentation anywhere for all the parameters you can feed into the
buildbot webpage? If not, a cheat sheet would be really helpful.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.orgwrote:
Hello,
Today I upgraded buildbot to the latest version.
If you have a
Part of this has to do with your level of experience and how big the review
is. Doing code reviews for people not yet up to speed is _painful_. And
large reviews also can be. I think part of the reason things seem better to
you is a reflection on your level of experience.
That said, some of us
Pawel, I was responding to the idea of suspending a tab. I agree that
exposing this information to extensions wouldn't be too hard and could be
quite useful.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Charles Reis cr...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor
I'm 99% sure we use what's in third_party
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:06 PM, hap 497 hap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can you please tell me if chromium on Mac OS X uses the networking
code in src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/platform/network/mac?
Or the code there is for Webkit? I asked because
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:59 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Carlos Pizano c...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:14 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org
wrote:
I'm not sure how Carlos is doing it? Will we know if something is
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm putting together a new computer and I'd like to optimize my chromium
build times :-) Is anyone currently building chromium using a
How is this different from ChromeBot?
How you control things depends on what level of realism you want. If
you're just verifying the sites work correctly, you might just use the code
the UI tests use. If you want to actually simulate button clicks and such,
then you'll need something more like
I totally agree. I envision it being something much more like RSS feeds.
In my mind, it should always advertise itself to the browser and then the
browser should decide how to advertise it to the user. Requiring scripts to
initiate things seems silly to me.
Is this API even part of any
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Is this API even part of any standard? Maybe we should bring this up on
WhatWG?
The thread title is a clue that these are specced in HTML5
all of this functionality for
a site in one shot... e.g. if the site published the data via some
kind of link tag then a menu item in the browser might activate that
the user could use to activate it.
-Ben
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Could we set jemalloc on selected renderer processes? I realize that
wouldn't
I saw this on Vista 64 as well.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.orgwrote:
Just in case someone else runs into this: I recently installed MSVC2005
and the Win7 Platform SDK on my win7/64 machine and it gave me this error at
link time:
S much better than grid view. :-)
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
Nice!
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Eric Seidel esei...@chromium.org wrote:
Who knew?
Looks like Mark (Rowe) recently updated their buildbot:
1 - 100 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
