Much of what can't be done on the web platform also can't be done inside the NaCl sandbox.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:49 PM, John Abd-El-Malek <[email protected]>wrote: > NaCl is the answer to all these problems... > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jeremy Orlow <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Or reject extensions that could be written without a NPAPI component. >> *ducks* >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Peter Kasting <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Avi Drissman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Q: Can't we have the extensions gallery warn that it won't work? >>>> A: Sorry, we can't do that in an automated fashion. The extensions >>>> author should mention it. Too bad they don't. >>>> >>> >>> But we explicitly review patches with binary components. I can't see how >>> it could be impossible for us to also mark them as "Win-only". >>> >>> PK >>> >>> -- >>> Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] >>> View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: >>> http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev >>> >> >> -- >> Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] >> View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: >> http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev >> > > -- Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
