[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-07-27 Thread Mohamed Mansour
Hi all,
I am looking into this again, and we implemented the print:
http://www.google.com; hookup functionality into chromium (ToT). So far it
just shows a webpage.

I am trying to figure out how we could bring the image in there,  so I
worked on this CL (http://codereview.chromium.org/159387) which introduces
the concept of chrome://image/http://www.google.com;, where it fetches the
image from the current tab and places it on the domui. I got the idea from
another CL for extensions (http://codereview.chromium.org/144019).

The problem is that, we can't rely on that approach because of the following
(Gathered from extension code review comments):

Aaron Boodman said:

 That is an interesting idea. There would be a few challenges, though:

- We need a way to specify the desired format, size, etc. I guess they
could be querystring params?
- For printing in particular, it seems important to print the exact
thing the user sees, not re-request the URL

Without a solution to the second issue, I don't think the chrome://
URL idea is workable. But I do think that the code we used to
implement this extension API could easily be reused for for print
preview.



Erik Kay stated:

The way this code is currently written, it just grabs the backing store from
the current visible tab.  This means that it's the same size as the viewport
on the visible tab, no new layout happens.

Given this, I don't think this could be made to work with printing.  The two
obvious problems are the my browser width might not match paper width, and
that anything that's outside of the viewport (scrolled) won't be visible in
the preview.



I really don't know how to bring over the printed image, maybe because I
am inexperienced in the language, and I am asking for advice on what
approach should I take?

I want to reuse the same functionality of printing but what is the best way
to bring that image into the DOMUI. I tired with the chrome://image/url
approach, but as Erik and Aaron stated above, it wont work.

If you guys have the UI mockup of the settings, I could implement that now,
but since our previous comments, it is directly hooked up to the Print
Preview.

Any guidance is appreciated :)

-- Mohamed Mansour


On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Nick Baum nickb...@chromium.org wrote:



 On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Mohamed Mansour 
 m0.interact...@gmail.comwrote:

 I really like the mock-up, when can you do one for Settings?


 I'll put it on our list, but I don't expect to get to this in the next
 couple of weeks. In general, we try not to block engineers on UI, so if you
 make good progress on the preview, we'll prioritize this higher.


 If we are going to include settings to this page (such as margins,
 headers, footers, etc), does that mean it would be per page? I was thinking
 of global printer settings which will be persistent. I don't know how that
 will fit this mock-up, or we could have both. We could have a dialog which
 sole purpose is for printer settings and the inline page for per page
 settings/preview customization. The inline page can have a link to the
 global settings if needed.


 I think the settings should just be global and sticky (just like default
 printer on the mac: it just uses the last one you used). Most people
 probably don't want to change print settings when they're not printing.


 That will seem to be too crowded, and my vision would be incorporating all
 this (preview and settings) into the same page. I am just wondering how the
 UI's team vision is, wrt to settings. Would be nice to see.

 We already started with Headers/Footers data persistence in a previous CL.
 And would like to have a UI that will  let the user interact with such data
 instead of editing the Preference file directly. Later on we could start the
 print preview implementation, which I think is challenging.



 I think Ben's opinion was that the preferences would be hard to understand 
 without the preview, so we should do the preview first. I can't comment on 
 the difficulty of it :)



 -- Mohamed Mansour



 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Nick Baum nickb...@chromium.org wrote:

 Hi guys,
 I've attached an old print settings mock up from
 Glen. I think it'd make a lot
 of sense to add the print settings on this page as well.

 If someone wants to take a stab at the print preview as pictured here, I
 think that'd be a great first step. Once we have that working, I'd be happy
 to mock up some ideas for settings.

 Cheers,

 -Nick

 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel 
 mar...@chromium.orgwrote:

 Most of the print preview will be implement in RenderView and friends
 which is in chrome/ ... (previously it was all in browser/ in fact)

 On Jun 4, 2009 10:04 AM, Mohamed Mansour m0.interact...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I don't think so, it would be  using the same infrastructure of history
 / downloads / and new tab page. Someone can correct me if I am wrong.

 -- Mohamed Mansour

 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Marshall 

[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-07-27 Thread Nick Baum
Don't we have to re-render the page for printing anyway, since many sites
have print-specific CSS?
-Nick

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Mohamed Mansour
m0.interact...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all,
 I am looking into this again, and we implemented the print:
 http://www.google.com; hookup functionality into chromium (ToT). So far it
 just shows a webpage.

 I am trying to figure out how we could bring the image in there,  so I
 worked on this CL (http://codereview.chromium.org/159387) which introduces
 the concept of chrome://image/http://www.google.com;, where it fetches
 the image from the current tab and places it on the domui. I got the idea
 from another CL for extensions (http://codereview.chromium.org/144019).

 The problem is that, we can't rely on that approach because of the
 following (Gathered from extension code review comments):

 Aaron Boodman said:

  That is an interesting idea. There would be a few challenges, though:

 - We need a way to specify the desired format, size, etc. I guess they
 could be querystring params?
 - For printing in particular, it seems important to print the exact
 thing the user sees, not re-request the URL

 Without a solution to the second issue, I don't think the chrome://
 URL idea is workable. But I do think that the code we used to
 implement this extension API could easily be reused for for print
 preview.



 Erik Kay stated:

 The way this code is currently written, it just grabs the backing store
 from the current visible tab.  This means that it's the same size as the
 viewport on the visible tab, no new layout happens.

 Given this, I don't think this could be made to work with printing.  The
 two obvious problems are the my browser width might not match paper width,
 and that anything that's outside of the viewport (scrolled) won't be visible
 in the preview.



 I really don't know how to bring over the printed image, maybe because I
 am inexperienced in the language, and I am asking for advice on what
 approach should I take?

 I want to reuse the same functionality of printing but what is the best way
 to bring that image into the DOMUI. I tired with the chrome://image/url
 approach, but as Erik and Aaron stated above, it wont work.

 If you guys have the UI mockup of the settings, I could implement that now,
 but since our previous comments, it is directly hooked up to the Print
 Preview.

 Any guidance is appreciated :)

 -- Mohamed Mansour



 On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Nick Baum nickb...@chromium.org wrote:



 On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Mohamed Mansour m0.interact...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 I really like the mock-up, when can you do one for Settings?


 I'll put it on our list, but I don't expect to get to this in the next
 couple of weeks. In general, we try not to block engineers on UI, so if you
 make good progress on the preview, we'll prioritize this higher.


 If we are going to include settings to this page (such as margins,
 headers, footers, etc), does that mean it would be per page? I was thinking
 of global printer settings which will be persistent. I don't know how that
 will fit this mock-up, or we could have both. We could have a dialog which
 sole purpose is for printer settings and the inline page for per page
 settings/preview customization. The inline page can have a link to the
 global settings if needed.


 I think the settings should just be global and sticky (just like default
 printer on the mac: it just uses the last one you used). Most people
 probably don't want to change print settings when they're not printing.


 That will seem to be too crowded, and my vision would be incorporating
 all this (preview and settings) into the same page. I am just wondering how
 the UI's team vision is, wrt to settings. Would be nice to see.

 We already started with Headers/Footers data persistence in a previous
 CL. And would like to have a UI that will  let the user interact with such
 data instead of editing the Preference file directly. Later on we could
 start the print preview implementation, which I think is challenging.



 I think Ben's opinion was that the preferences would be hard to understand 
 without the preview, so we should do the preview first. I can't comment on 
 the difficulty of it :)



 -- Mohamed Mansour



 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Nick Baum nickb...@chromium.org wrote:

 Hi guys,
 I've attached an old print settings mock up from
 Glen. I think it'd make a lot
 of sense to add the print settings on this page as well.

 If someone wants to take a stab at the print preview as pictured here, I
 think that'd be a great first step. Once we have that working, I'd be happy
 to mock up some ideas for settings.

 Cheers,

 -Nick

 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel 
 mar...@chromium.orgwrote:

 Most of the print preview will be implement in RenderView and friends
 which is in chrome/ ... (previously it was all in browser/ in fact)

 On Jun 4, 2009 10:04 AM, Mohamed Mansour 

[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-09 Thread Nick Baum
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Mohamed Mansour m0.interact...@gmail.comwrote:

 I really like the mock-up, when can you do one for Settings?


I'll put it on our list, but I don't expect to get to this in the next
couple of weeks. In general, we try not to block engineers on UI, so if you
make good progress on the preview, we'll prioritize this higher.


 If we are going to include settings to this page (such as margins, headers,
 footers, etc), does that mean it would be per page? I was thinking of global
 printer settings which will be persistent. I don't know how that will fit
 this mock-up, or we could have both. We could have a dialog which sole
 purpose is for printer settings and the inline page for per page
 settings/preview customization. The inline page can have a link to the
 global settings if needed.


I think the settings should just be global and sticky (just like default
printer on the mac: it just uses the last one you used). Most people
probably don't want to change print settings when they're not printing.


 That will seem to be too crowded, and my vision would be incorporating all
 this (preview and settings) into the same page. I am just wondering how the
 UI's team vision is, wrt to settings. Would be nice to see.

 We already started with Headers/Footers data persistence in a previous CL.
 And would like to have a UI that will  let the user interact with such data
 instead of editing the Preference file directly. Later on we could start the
 print preview implementation, which I think is challenging.


I think Ben's opinion was that the preferences would be hard to
understand without the preview, so we should do the preview first. I
can't comment on the difficulty of it :)



 -- Mohamed Mansour



 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Nick Baum nickb...@chromium.org wrote:

 Hi guys,
 I've attached an old print settings mock up from Glen. I think it'd make a
 lot of sense to add the print settings on this page as well.

 If someone wants to take a stab at the print preview as pictured here, I
 think that'd be a great first step. Once we have that working, I'd be happy
 to mock up some ideas for settings.

 Cheers,

 -Nick

 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.orgwrote:

 Most of the print preview will be implement in RenderView and friends
 which is in chrome/ ... (previously it was all in browser/ in fact)

 On Jun 4, 2009 10:04 AM, Mohamed Mansour m0.interact...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I don't think so, it would be  using the same infrastructure of history /
 downloads / and new tab page. Someone can correct me if I am wrong.

 -- Mohamed Mansour

 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Marshall Greenblatt 
 magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:   Hi Ben, ...

 




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-05 Thread Mohamed Mansour
I really like the mock-up, when can you do one for Settings?
If we are going to include settings to this page (such as margins, headers,
footers, etc), does that mean it would be per page? I was thinking of global
printer settings which will be persistent. I don't know how that will fit
this mock-up, or we could have both. We could have a dialog which sole
purpose is for printer settings and the inline page for per page
settings/preview customization. The inline page can have a link to the
global settings if needed.

That will seem to be too crowded, and my vision would be incorporating all
this (preview and settings) into the same page. I am just wondering how the
UI's team vision is, wrt to settings. Would be nice to see.

We already started with Headers/Footers data persistence in a previous CL.
And would like to have a UI that will  let the user interact with such data
instead of editing the Preference file directly. Later on we could start the
print preview implementation, which I think is challenging.

-- Mohamed Mansour


On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Nick Baum nickb...@chromium.org wrote:

 Hi guys,
 I've attached an old print settings mock up from Glen. I think it'd make a
 lot of sense to add the print settings on this page as well.

 If someone wants to take a stab at the print preview as pictured here, I
 think that'd be a great first step. Once we have that working, I'd be happy
 to mock up some ideas for settings.

 Cheers,

 -Nick

 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.orgwrote:

 Most of the print preview will be implement in RenderView and friends
 which is in chrome/ ... (previously it was all in browser/ in fact)

 On Jun 4, 2009 10:04 AM, Mohamed Mansour m0.interact...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I don't think so, it would be  using the same infrastructure of history /
 downloads / and new tab page. Someone can correct me if I am wrong.

 -- Mohamed Mansour

 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Marshall Greenblatt 
 magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:   Hi Ben, ...

 



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-04 Thread Guille -bisho-

I really like the idea of a page for printing. It will feel pretty
consistent with chrome UI.

And I'll also love an easy option for removing all header and footers
at once. Sometimes you print a document and then you want URL, page
numbers, and so. But also many times you print plain tickets, pay
confirmations, and so on. On all those printings you just want the
content in a blank page, and most browser UIs force you to click a lot
of times for removing URL, page, and all that stuff... Perhaps a
checkbox Add header and footers, so you can disable them or enable
with one click.

When you want them, usually the default configuration is OK. When you
don't, just unselect the checkbox. And if the options (where to print
URL, page #...) are remembered, we will solve the problem much better
than other brosers.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-04 Thread Marshall Greenblatt
Hi Ben,

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.orgwrote:


 I think we should do a page. This work is not otherwise on our
 immediate term plan so it may as well get done the right way. I think
 the page is more of a print preview than a print settings.


Would it be possible to develop this print preview capability in such a way
that doesn't live in or depend on /chrome so that other chromium-based
projects can use it is well?




 -Ben


Thanks,
Marshall

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-04 Thread Mohamed Mansour
I don't think so, it would be  using the same infrastructure of history /
downloads / and new tab page. Someone can correct me if I am wrong.
-- Mohamed Mansour


On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi Ben,

 On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) 
 b...@chromium.orgwrote:


 I think we should do a page. This work is not otherwise on our
 immediate term plan so it may as well get done the right way. I think
 the page is more of a print preview than a print settings.


 Would it be possible to develop this print preview capability in such a way
 that doesn't live in or depend on /chrome so that other chromium-based
 projects can use it is well?




 -Ben


 Thanks,
 Marshall


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-04 Thread Marc-Antoine Ruel
Most of the print preview will be implement in RenderView and friends which
is in chrome/ ... (previously it was all in browser/ in fact)

On Jun 4, 2009 10:04 AM, Mohamed Mansour m0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:

I don't think so, it would be  using the same infrastructure of history /
downloads / and new tab page. Someone can correct me if I am wrong.
-- Mohamed Mansour

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Marshall Greenblatt magreenbl...@gmail.com
wrote:   Hi Ben, ...

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers
mailing list: chromium-de...

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-03 Thread Ian Fette
I notice you did not include page size, yet all the MSFT ones have it. I
personally find this useful (my printer has both 8.5x11 and A4 loaded, and
I use them both -- mostly 8.5x11, but a4 when I'm printing certain PDFs
(magazine articles, forms, etc from anywhere other than the US). Maybe I'm
abnormal, but I really like being able to select the page size there, rather
than having to go into printer options...
-ian

2009/6/2 Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org


 What I meant was to have a popup full of formatted choices which look
 like the thing you want to have.  So instead of Page # of #, which
 is pretty abstract, Page 1 of 2.  Also, instead of have six places
 where you can list five different things (Firefox has five, two of
 which are variants of each other), just have two popups each with all
 48 sensible combinations.  Well, OK, that's a little excessive, but
 maybe someone can think of a better something to constrain that.
 Personally, I don't think a popup with 48 items which are easy to
 navigate (because each item is only a small edit-distance from the
 previous one) is materially worse than three popups with 5 items.
 It's sort of like the search suggest popup, it's easy to navigate
 because things are constrained by what you've typed so far.

 Just in case it was the contents that was confusing, I mean instead of
 three independently-settable positions, show a formatted cell made up
 of the literal bits from the page, arranged as they would be shown on
 the output.  So in your png, the single Header: popup would show a
 cell with the left-justified title and right-justified URL and nothing
 in the middle.  When you pop it up the change things, you'd get the
 different variations to choose from, again formatted with the literal
 items from the page you're printing.

 -scott


 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mohamed Mansour
 m0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:
  I removed the options part to give a more visualized idea:
  http://i41.tinypic.com/syvz7p.png
  Scott, I agree headers / footers are confusing everywhere, can you
 elaborate
  on how we can do inline header/footer representation. I was thinking of
 the
  same thing, but I thought it would be confusing for the user to actually
  click that area, unless it is visually appealing. Ideas?
 
  -- Mohamed Mansour
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
 
  I think the headers and footers are confusing (everywhere).  Why not
  just a single popup for each selection which displays a real-time view
  of each thing?  So it might have items like:
 
  Header: Bonsai Kitten
  http://www.shorty.com/bonsaikitten/;
  Footer: Page 1 of 2   June
 2,
  2009
 
  Even better if it were in-line in the box that shows the page (header
  above, footer below).  Also better if it integrates with the margins,
  since the header and footer presumably take up some space, showing how
  that space is reclaimed might be valuable.
 
  -scott [not a UI designer, I hate almost all print panels, they almost
  always make what I want hard to do]
 
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org
 
  wrote:
   I like the mock.
   Glen has a veto on any UI.
   I think the Options is unnecessary until implemented so it can be
   trimmed
   off.
   The inches/mm issue is well done in Microsoft Word where you can type
   the
   units you want to use instead of being forced to use one or another.
   M-A
  
   On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mohamed Mansour
   m0.interact...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
   Hi guys, how are you doing? I asked Marc-Antoine about creating a
   mock-up
   of the print settings so I was looking into different printer
   settings user interfaces from various products.
  
   http://i44.tinypic.com/rka0c5.png
   The similarities between them is quite similar, but I really like
 what
   Firefox has done with how they divide their sections, as well, how
 the
   display the marginal data on the fly.  They all have the following
   things in
   common:
  
   Real-Time displaying of margin changes on the paper
   Changing headers / footers and allow custom desc
   Page orientations (Landscape and Portrait)
  
   What I liked about the Microsoft products is that everything is in
 one
   page. The user will not be confused with many
  
  
 clicks, and everything is there. But, the sections are not divided, they all 
 look squished.
   Here is my initial proposal.
  
   http://i40.tinypic.com/14ki9w0.png
   Only a single page, where the user will enter his format, options (if
   any), margins, and header/footer. The components are same as Firefox
   but all
   in one page. We should probably do a drop down to state which metric
 to
   use
   (inch/cm) since only America uses inches.
   I have brought my mother to test this, and mind you, she is very new
 to
   computers (very inexperienced),  she liked the above version because
   everything she needs is in her finger 

[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-03 Thread Scott Hess

Aha, perfect setup to a point I neglected to make: Lets make simple
things simple, and hard things possible, here.  I feel for Ian, but
only a little.  The reason I threw out an idea around headers and
footers is not because I use them a lot, it's because I have no idea
at all what my current headers and footers are set to, and I don't
care, so having a half-dozen popups to control them isn't useful to
me.  My main complaints about browser printing is that too often bits
of the content get cut off - nice page numbering doesn't help when the
results are in the round file.  If we can get all the output on the
page in every situation, I'd be more than happy to lose headers,
footers, and margin settings entirely.  [Only 50% kidding, there!]

-scott


On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Ian Fette i...@chromium.org wrote:
 I notice you did not include page size, yet all the MSFT ones have it. I
 personally find this useful (my printer has both 8.5x11 and A4 loaded, and
 I use them both -- mostly 8.5x11, but a4 when I'm printing certain PDFs
 (magazine articles, forms, etc from anywhere other than the US). Maybe I'm
 abnormal, but I really like being able to select the page size there, rather
 than having to go into printer options...
 -ian

 2009/6/2 Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org

 What I meant was to have a popup full of formatted choices which look
 like the thing you want to have.  So instead of Page # of #, which
 is pretty abstract, Page 1 of 2.  Also, instead of have six places
 where you can list five different things (Firefox has five, two of
 which are variants of each other), just have two popups each with all
 48 sensible combinations.  Well, OK, that's a little excessive, but
 maybe someone can think of a better something to constrain that.
 Personally, I don't think a popup with 48 items which are easy to
 navigate (because each item is only a small edit-distance from the
 previous one) is materially worse than three popups with 5 items.
 It's sort of like the search suggest popup, it's easy to navigate
 because things are constrained by what you've typed so far.

 Just in case it was the contents that was confusing, I mean instead of
 three independently-settable positions, show a formatted cell made up
 of the literal bits from the page, arranged as they would be shown on
 the output.  So in your png, the single Header: popup would show a
 cell with the left-justified title and right-justified URL and nothing
 in the middle.  When you pop it up the change things, you'd get the
 different variations to choose from, again formatted with the literal
 items from the page you're printing.

 -scott


 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mohamed Mansour
 m0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:
  I removed the options part to give a more visualized idea:
  http://i41.tinypic.com/syvz7p.png
  Scott, I agree headers / footers are confusing everywhere, can you
  elaborate
  on how we can do inline header/footer representation. I was thinking of
  the
  same thing, but I thought it would be confusing for the user to actually
  click that area, unless it is visually appealing. Ideas?
 
  -- Mohamed Mansour
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
 
  I think the headers and footers are confusing (everywhere).  Why not
  just a single popup for each selection which displays a real-time view
  of each thing?  So it might have items like:
 
  Header: Bonsai Kitten
  http://www.shorty.com/bonsaikitten/;
  Footer: Page 1 of 2                                               June
  2,
  2009
 
  Even better if it were in-line in the box that shows the page (header
  above, footer below).  Also better if it integrates with the margins,
  since the header and footer presumably take up some space, showing how
  that space is reclaimed might be valuable.
 
  -scott [not a UI designer, I hate almost all print panels, they almost
  always make what I want hard to do]
 
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel
  mar...@chromium.org
  wrote:
   I like the mock.
   Glen has a veto on any UI.
   I think the Options is unnecessary until implemented so it can be
   trimmed
   off.
   The inches/mm issue is well done in Microsoft Word where you can type
   the
   units you want to use instead of being forced to use one or another.
   M-A
  
   On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mohamed Mansour
   m0.interact...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
   Hi guys, how are you doing? I asked Marc-Antoine about creating a
   mock-up
   of the print settings so I was looking into different printer
   settings user interfaces from various products.
  
   http://i44.tinypic.com/rka0c5.png
   The similarities between them is quite similar, but I really like
   what
   Firefox has done with how they divide their sections, as well, how
   the
   display the marginal data on the fly.  They all have the following
   things in
   common:
  
   Real-Time displaying of margin changes on the paper
   Changing headers / footers and 

[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-03 Thread Marc-Antoine Ruel
Yes it's still the goal but in the mean time it'd be nice to have something
to be able to configure the basic settings.

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.orgwrote:

 I don't like these dialog boxes... I thought we had a more ambitious
 goal once upon a time to do some of this in-tab. Then you could
 directly see the effect of the settings you were changing on the
 printed output.

 -Ben

 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mohamed Mansour
 m0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:
  I removed the options part to give a more visualized idea:
  http://i41.tinypic.com/syvz7p.png
  Scott, I agree headers / footers are confusing everywhere, can you
 elaborate
  on how we can do inline header/footer representation. I was thinking of
 the
  same thing, but I thought it would be confusing for the user to actually
  click that area, unless it is visually appealing. Ideas?
 
  -- Mohamed Mansour
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
 
  I think the headers and footers are confusing (everywhere).  Why not
  just a single popup for each selection which displays a real-time view
  of each thing?  So it might have items like:
 
  Header: Bonsai Kitten
  http://www.shorty.com/bonsaikitten/;
  Footer: Page 1 of 2   June
 2,
  2009
 
  Even better if it were in-line in the box that shows the page (header
  above, footer below).  Also better if it integrates with the margins,
  since the header and footer presumably take up some space, showing how
  that space is reclaimed might be valuable.
 
  -scott [not a UI designer, I hate almost all print panels, they almost
  always make what I want hard to do]
 
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org
 
  wrote:
   I like the mock.
   Glen has a veto on any UI.
   I think the Options is unnecessary until implemented so it can be
   trimmed
   off.
   The inches/mm issue is well done in Microsoft Word where you can type
   the
   units you want to use instead of being forced to use one or another.
   M-A
  
   On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mohamed Mansour
   m0.interact...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
   Hi guys, how are you doing? I asked Marc-Antoine about creating a
   mock-up
   of the print settings so I was looking into different printer
   settings user interfaces from various products.
  
   http://i44.tinypic.com/rka0c5.png
   The similarities between them is quite similar, but I really like
 what
   Firefox has done with how they divide their sections, as well, how
 the
   display the marginal data on the fly.  They all have the following
   things in
   common:
  
   Real-Time displaying of margin changes on the paper
   Changing headers / footers and allow custom desc
   Page orientations (Landscape and Portrait)
  
   What I liked about the Microsoft products is that everything is in
 one
   page. The user will not be confused with many
  
  
 clicks, and everything is there. But, the sections are not divided, they all 
 look squished.
   Here is my initial proposal.
  
   http://i40.tinypic.com/14ki9w0.png
   Only a single page, where the user will enter his format, options (if
   any), margins, and header/footer. The components are same as Firefox
   but all
   in one page. We should probably do a drop down to state which metric
 to
   use
   (inch/cm) since only America uses inches.
   I have brought my mother to test this, and mind you, she is very new
 to
   computers (very inexperienced),  she liked the above version because
   everything she needs is in her finger tips and understands it better
   than
   the others.
   So that is my take, what do you think? I would like to send this
 email
   off
   to Ben/Glen/Nick since they are the UI team and may have a better UI
   perspective on how to do things. Let me know if its allowed to be
 sent
   to
   dev mailing list!
   Thanks!
   -- Mohamed Mansour
  
  
  
   
  
 
 
   
 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-03 Thread Mohamed Mansour
Then you could directly see the effect of the settings you were changing on
the printed output. So similar what Scott suggestion regarding inline
editing? So something like this, or even more real-time ...  NOTE: I just
drew this at work with mspaint with paint brush and transform ;x

http://i42.tinypic.com/2lnxymd.png

Ian, page size is useful we could add that as well. I personally don't know
how complex we even want it. The chromium UI team is very very picky for
every inch being put on screen. We could make a full blown printer settings
page and have a Advanced link that expands more options. I don't know. I
am just spitting out mocks.

Maybe just place the preview as the main one and people click on appropriate
places, but that will be confusing to many newbs.


 -- Mohamed Mansour


On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.orgwrote:

 Yes it's still the goal but in the mean time it'd be nice to have something
 to be able to configure the basic settings.


 On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.orgwrote:

 I don't like these dialog boxes... I thought we had a more ambitious
 goal once upon a time to do some of this in-tab. Then you could
 directly see the effect of the settings you were changing on the
 printed output.

 -Ben

 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mohamed Mansour
 m0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:
  I removed the options part to give a more visualized idea:
  http://i41.tinypic.com/syvz7p.png
  Scott, I agree headers / footers are confusing everywhere, can you
 elaborate
  on how we can do inline header/footer representation. I was thinking of
 the
  same thing, but I thought it would be confusing for the user to actually
  click that area, unless it is visually appealing. Ideas?
 
  -- Mohamed Mansour
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
 
  I think the headers and footers are confusing (everywhere).  Why not
  just a single popup for each selection which displays a real-time view
  of each thing?  So it might have items like:
 
  Header: Bonsai Kitten
  http://www.shorty.com/bonsaikitten/;
  Footer: Page 1 of 2   June
 2,
  2009
 
  Even better if it were in-line in the box that shows the page (header
  above, footer below).  Also better if it integrates with the margins,
  since the header and footer presumably take up some space, showing how
  that space is reclaimed might be valuable.
 
  -scott [not a UI designer, I hate almost all print panels, they almost
  always make what I want hard to do]
 
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel 
 mar...@chromium.org
  wrote:
   I like the mock.
   Glen has a veto on any UI.
   I think the Options is unnecessary until implemented so it can be
   trimmed
   off.
   The inches/mm issue is well done in Microsoft Word where you can type
   the
   units you want to use instead of being forced to use one or another.
   M-A
  
   On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mohamed Mansour
   m0.interact...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
   Hi guys, how are you doing? I asked Marc-Antoine about creating a
   mock-up
   of the print settings so I was looking into different printer
   settings user interfaces from various products.
  
   http://i44.tinypic.com/rka0c5.png
   The similarities between them is quite similar, but I really like
 what
   Firefox has done with how they divide their sections, as well, how
 the
   display the marginal data on the fly.  They all have the following
   things in
   common:
  
   Real-Time displaying of margin changes on the paper
   Changing headers / footers and allow custom desc
   Page orientations (Landscape and Portrait)
  
   What I liked about the Microsoft products is that everything is in
 one
   page. The user will not be confused with many
  
  
 clicks, and everything is there. But, the sections are not divided, they all 
 look squished.
   Here is my initial proposal.
  
   http://i40.tinypic.com/14ki9w0.png
   Only a single page, where the user will enter his format, options
 (if
   any), margins, and header/footer. The components are same as Firefox
   but all
   in one page. We should probably do a drop down to state which metric
 to
   use
   (inch/cm) since only America uses inches.
   I have brought my mother to test this, and mind you, she is very new
 to
   computers (very inexperienced),  she liked the above version because
   everything she needs is in her finger tips and understands it better
   than
   the others.
   So that is my take, what do you think? I would like to send this
 email
   off
   to Ben/Glen/Nick since they are the UI team and may have a better UI
   perspective on how to do things. Let me know if its allowed to be
 sent
   to
   dev mailing list!
   Thanks!
   -- Mohamed Mansour
  
  
  
   
  
 
 
   
 




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, 

[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-03 Thread Marc-Antoine Ruel
That's an idea of what it'll looks like when embedded in a tab but it's
dependent on Sverrir's (and future) work.
M-A

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Mohamed Mansour m0.interact...@gmail.comwrote:

 Then you could directly see the effect of the settings you were changing
 on the printed output. So similar what Scott suggestion regarding inline
 editing? So something like this, or even more real-time ...  NOTE: I just
 drew this at work with mspaint with paint brush and transform ;x

 http://i42.tinypic.com/2lnxymd.png

 Ian, page size is useful we could add that as well. I personally don't know
 how complex we even want it. The chromium UI team is very very picky for
 every inch being put on screen. We could make a full blown printer settings
 page and have a Advanced link that expands more options. I don't know. I
 am just spitting out mocks.

 Maybe just place the preview as the main one and people click on
 appropriate places, but that will be confusing to many newbs.


  -- Mohamed Mansour



 On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.orgwrote:

 Yes it's still the goal but in the mean time it'd be nice to have
 something to be able to configure the basic settings.


 On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Ben Goodger (Google) 
 b...@chromium.orgwrote:

 I don't like these dialog boxes... I thought we had a more ambitious
 goal once upon a time to do some of this in-tab. Then you could
 directly see the effect of the settings you were changing on the
 printed output.

 -Ben

 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mohamed Mansour
 m0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:
  I removed the options part to give a more visualized idea:
  http://i41.tinypic.com/syvz7p.png
  Scott, I agree headers / footers are confusing everywhere, can you
 elaborate
  on how we can do inline header/footer representation. I was thinking of
 the
  same thing, but I thought it would be confusing for the user to
 actually
  click that area, unless it is visually appealing. Ideas?
 
  -- Mohamed Mansour
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
 
  I think the headers and footers are confusing (everywhere).  Why not
  just a single popup for each selection which displays a real-time view
  of each thing?  So it might have items like:
 
  Header: Bonsai Kitten
  http://www.shorty.com/bonsaikitten/;
  Footer: Page 1 of 2
 June 2,
  2009
 
  Even better if it were in-line in the box that shows the page (header
  above, footer below).  Also better if it integrates with the margins,
  since the header and footer presumably take up some space, showing how
  that space is reclaimed might be valuable.
 
  -scott [not a UI designer, I hate almost all print panels, they almost
  always make what I want hard to do]
 
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel 
 mar...@chromium.org
  wrote:
   I like the mock.
   Glen has a veto on any UI.
   I think the Options is unnecessary until implemented so it can be
   trimmed
   off.
   The inches/mm issue is well done in Microsoft Word where you can
 type
   the
   units you want to use instead of being forced to use one or another.
   M-A
  
   On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mohamed Mansour
   m0.interact...@gmail.com
   wrote:
  
   Hi guys, how are you doing? I asked Marc-Antoine about creating a
   mock-up
   of the print settings so I was looking into different printer
   settings user interfaces from various products.
  
   http://i44.tinypic.com/rka0c5.png
   The similarities between them is quite similar, but I really like
 what
   Firefox has done with how they divide their sections, as well, how
 the
   display the marginal data on the fly.  They all have the following
   things in
   common:
  
   Real-Time displaying of margin changes on the paper
   Changing headers / footers and allow custom desc
   Page orientations (Landscape and Portrait)
  
   What I liked about the Microsoft products is that everything is in
 one
   page. The user will not be confused with many
  
  
 clicks, and everything is there. But, the sections are not divided, they 
 all look squished.
   Here is my initial proposal.
  
   http://i40.tinypic.com/14ki9w0.png
   Only a single page, where the user will enter his format, options
 (if
   any), margins, and header/footer. The components are same as
 Firefox
   but all
   in one page. We should probably do a drop down to state which
 metric to
   use
   (inch/cm) since only America uses inches.
   I have brought my mother to test this, and mind you, she is very
 new to
   computers (very inexperienced),  she liked the above version
 because
   everything she needs is in her finger tips and understands it
 better
   than
   the others.
   So that is my take, what do you think? I would like to send this
 email
   off
   to Ben/Glen/Nick since they are the UI team and may have a better
 UI
   perspective on how to do things. Let me know if its allowed to be
 sent
   to
   dev mailing list!
   Thanks!
   -- Mohamed 

[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-03 Thread Ben Goodger (Google)

I think we should do a page. This work is not otherwise on our
immediate term plan so it may as well get done the right way. I think
the page is more of a print preview than a print settings.

-Ben

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Mohamed Mansour
m0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:
 So what is the final verdict? Create a print settings dialog at a start or
 begin doing the printer settings tab page?
 -- Mohamed Mansour


 On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Sverrir Á. Berg sver...@chromium.org
 wrote:

 I think the main challenge is to keep the user flow simple.  Traditionally
 Windows programs have split the configuration of a print to two different
 dialogs.  The Page Setup dialog and the Print dialog.  This has always been
 very confusing for me and I think most users because its not obvious what
 changing the page size in the page setup dialog is supposed to do when you
 select a new printer in the Print dialog or move to a new document.   If we
 would go this route we would have a Page setup in the main menu and the
 print option in the page menu.  Confusing at best.
 My vision for this was that by selecting print the user would go directly
 to a new tab with the print preview where the configuration would be
 visually obvious and you could by clicking on the header margins etc change
 the options, view the visual effects and then there and select the single
 button on the page that would say print.
 I've been taking the first steps for this in the work I have been doing to
 duplicate the DOM so that we have a static copy that can be printed.  This
 is a prerequisite for the print preview (IMHO).
 As an in-between step we could go for a simple dialog that only displays
 the default case and has large buttons that you can click to edit page and
 printer settings (attached).
 Clicking the page would simply display a list of options (possibly similar
 to the manage search engines dialog) that would allow you do modify each one
 and possibly reset them all to default.  Crude but efficient.
 Sverrir


 On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org
 wrote:

 That's an idea of what it'll looks like when embedded in a tab but it's
 dependent on Sverrir's (and future) work.
 M-A

 On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Mohamed Mansour
 m0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:

 Then you could directly see the effect of the settings you were
 changing on the printed output. So similar what Scott suggestion regarding
 inline editing? So something like this, or even more real-time ...  NOTE: I
 just drew this at work with mspaint with paint brush and transform ;x

 http://i42.tinypic.com/2lnxymd.png
 Ian, page size is useful we could add that as well. I personally don't
 know how complex we even want it. The chromium UI team is very very picky
 for every inch being put on screen. We could make a full blown printer
 settings page and have a Advanced link that expands more options. I don't
 know. I am just spitting out mocks.
 Maybe just place the preview as the main one and people click on
 appropriate places, but that will be confusing to many newbs.

 -- Mohamed Mansour


 On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org
 wrote:

 Yes it's still the goal but in the mean time it'd be nice to have
 something to be able to configure the basic settings.

 On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.org
 wrote:

 I don't like these dialog boxes... I thought we had a more ambitious
 goal once upon a time to do some of this in-tab. Then you could
 directly see the effect of the settings you were changing on the
 printed output.

 -Ben

 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mohamed Mansour
 m0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:
  I removed the options part to give a more visualized idea:
  http://i41.tinypic.com/syvz7p.png
  Scott, I agree headers / footers are confusing everywhere, can you
  elaborate
  on how we can do inline header/footer representation. I was thinking
  of the
  same thing, but I thought it would be confusing for the user to
  actually
  click that area, unless it is visually appealing. Ideas?
 
  -- Mohamed Mansour
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org
  wrote:
 
  I think the headers and footers are confusing (everywhere).  Why
  not
  just a single popup for each selection which displays a real-time
  view
  of each thing?  So it might have items like:
 
  Header: Bonsai Kitten
  http://www.shorty.com/bonsaikitten/;
  Footer: Page 1 of 2
  June 2,
  2009
 
  Even better if it were in-line in the box that shows the page
  (header
  above, footer below).  Also better if it integrates with the
  margins,
  since the header and footer presumably take up some space, showing
  how
  that space is reclaimed might be valuable.
 
  -scott [not a UI designer, I hate almost all print panels, they
  almost
  always make what I want hard to do]
 
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel
  mar...@chromium.org
  wrote:
   I like 

[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-02 Thread Scott Hess

I think the headers and footers are confusing (everywhere).  Why not
just a single popup for each selection which displays a real-time view
of each thing?  So it might have items like:

Header: Bonsai Kitten
http://www.shorty.com/bonsaikitten/;
Footer: Page 1 of 2   June 2, 2009

Even better if it were in-line in the box that shows the page (header
above, footer below).  Also better if it integrates with the margins,
since the header and footer presumably take up some space, showing how
that space is reclaimed might be valuable.

-scott [not a UI designer, I hate almost all print panels, they almost
always make what I want hard to do]



On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org wrote:
 I like the mock.
 Glen has a veto on any UI.
 I think the Options is unnecessary until implemented so it can be trimmed
 off.
 The inches/mm issue is well done in Microsoft Word where you can type the
 units you want to use instead of being forced to use one or another.
 M-A

 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mohamed Mansour m0.interact...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi guys, how are you doing? I asked Marc-Antoine about creating a mock-up
 of the print settings so I was looking into different printer
 settings user interfaces from various products.

 http://i44.tinypic.com/rka0c5.png
 The similarities between them is quite similar, but I really like what
 Firefox has done with how they divide their sections, as well, how the
 display the marginal data on the fly.  They all have the following things in
 common:

 Real-Time displaying of margin changes on the paper
 Changing headers / footers and allow custom desc
 Page orientations (Landscape and Portrait)

 What I liked about the Microsoft products is that everything is in one
 page. The user will not be confused with many
 clicks, and everything is there. But, the sections are not divided, they all look squished.
 Here is my initial proposal.

 http://i40.tinypic.com/14ki9w0.png
 Only a single page, where the user will enter his format, options (if
 any), margins, and header/footer. The components are same as Firefox but all
 in one page. We should probably do a drop down to state which metric to use
 (inch/cm) since only America uses inches.
 I have brought my mother to test this, and mind you, she is very new to
 computers (very inexperienced),  she liked the above version because
 everything she needs is in her finger tips and understands it better than
 the others.
 So that is my take, what do you think? I would like to send this email off
 to Ben/Glen/Nick since they are the UI team and may have a better UI
 perspective on how to do things. Let me know if its allowed to be sent to
 dev mailing list!
 Thanks!
 -- Mohamed Mansour



 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-02 Thread Mohamed Mansour
I removed the options part to give a more visualized idea:
http://i41.tinypic.com/syvz7p.png

http://i41.tinypic.com/syvz7p.pngScott, I agree headers / footers are
confusing everywhere, can you elaborate on how we can do inline
header/footer representation. I was thinking of the same thing, but I
thought it would be confusing for the user to actually click that area,
unless it is visually appealing. Ideas?


-- Mohamed Mansour


On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:

 I think the headers and footers are confusing (everywhere).  Why not
 just a single popup for each selection which displays a real-time view
 of each thing?  So it might have items like:

 Header: Bonsai Kitten
 http://www.shorty.com/bonsaikitten/;
 Footer: Page 1 of 2   June 2,
 2009

 Even better if it were in-line in the box that shows the page (header
 above, footer below).  Also better if it integrates with the margins,
 since the header and footer presumably take up some space, showing how
 that space is reclaimed might be valuable.

 -scott [not a UI designer, I hate almost all print panels, they almost
 always make what I want hard to do]



 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org
 wrote:
  I like the mock.
  Glen has a veto on any UI.
  I think the Options is unnecessary until implemented so it can be
 trimmed
  off.
  The inches/mm issue is well done in Microsoft Word where you can type the
  units you want to use instead of being forced to use one or another.
  M-A
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mohamed Mansour 
 m0.interact...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  Hi guys, how are you doing? I asked Marc-Antoine about creating a
 mock-up
  of the print settings so I was looking into different printer
  settings user interfaces from various products.
 
  http://i44.tinypic.com/rka0c5.png
  The similarities between them is quite similar, but I really like what
  Firefox has done with how they divide their sections, as well, how the
  display the marginal data on the fly.  They all have the following
 things in
  common:
 
  Real-Time displaying of margin changes on the paper
  Changing headers / footers and allow custom desc
  Page orientations (Landscape and Portrait)
 
  What I liked about the Microsoft products is that everything is in one
  page. The user will not be confused with many
 
 clicks, and everything is there. But, the sections are not divided, they all 
 look squished.
  Here is my initial proposal.
 
  http://i40.tinypic.com/14ki9w0.png
  Only a single page, where the user will enter his format, options (if
  any), margins, and header/footer. The components are same as Firefox but
 all
  in one page. We should probably do a drop down to state which metric to
 use
  (inch/cm) since only America uses inches.
  I have brought my mother to test this, and mind you, she is very new to
  computers (very inexperienced),  she liked the above version because
  everything she needs is in her finger tips and understands it better
 than
  the others.
  So that is my take, what do you think? I would like to send this email
 off
  to Ben/Glen/Nick since they are the UI team and may have a better UI
  perspective on how to do things. Let me know if its allowed to be sent
 to
  dev mailing list!
  Thanks!
  -- Mohamed Mansour
 
 
 
   
 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[chromium-dev] Re: Print Settings Mockup

2009-06-02 Thread Scott Hess

What I meant was to have a popup full of formatted choices which look
like the thing you want to have.  So instead of Page # of #, which
is pretty abstract, Page 1 of 2.  Also, instead of have six places
where you can list five different things (Firefox has five, two of
which are variants of each other), just have two popups each with all
48 sensible combinations.  Well, OK, that's a little excessive, but
maybe someone can think of a better something to constrain that.
Personally, I don't think a popup with 48 items which are easy to
navigate (because each item is only a small edit-distance from the
previous one) is materially worse than three popups with 5 items.
It's sort of like the search suggest popup, it's easy to navigate
because things are constrained by what you've typed so far.

Just in case it was the contents that was confusing, I mean instead of
three independently-settable positions, show a formatted cell made up
of the literal bits from the page, arranged as they would be shown on
the output.  So in your png, the single Header: popup would show a
cell with the left-justified title and right-justified URL and nothing
in the middle.  When you pop it up the change things, you'd get the
different variations to choose from, again formatted with the literal
items from the page you're printing.

-scott


On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mohamed Mansour
m0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:
 I removed the options part to give a more visualized idea:
 http://i41.tinypic.com/syvz7p.png
 Scott, I agree headers / footers are confusing everywhere, can you elaborate
 on how we can do inline header/footer representation. I was thinking of the
 same thing, but I thought it would be confusing for the user to actually
 click that area, unless it is visually appealing. Ideas?

 -- Mohamed Mansour


 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:

 I think the headers and footers are confusing (everywhere).  Why not
 just a single popup for each selection which displays a real-time view
 of each thing?  So it might have items like:

 Header: Bonsai Kitten
 http://www.shorty.com/bonsaikitten/;
 Footer: Page 1 of 2                                               June 2,
 2009

 Even better if it were in-line in the box that shows the page (header
 above, footer below).  Also better if it integrates with the margins,
 since the header and footer presumably take up some space, showing how
 that space is reclaimed might be valuable.

 -scott [not a UI designer, I hate almost all print panels, they almost
 always make what I want hard to do]



 On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org
 wrote:
  I like the mock.
  Glen has a veto on any UI.
  I think the Options is unnecessary until implemented so it can be
  trimmed
  off.
  The inches/mm issue is well done in Microsoft Word where you can type
  the
  units you want to use instead of being forced to use one or another.
  M-A
 
  On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mohamed Mansour
  m0.interact...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  Hi guys, how are you doing? I asked Marc-Antoine about creating a
  mock-up
  of the print settings so I was looking into different printer
  settings user interfaces from various products.
 
  http://i44.tinypic.com/rka0c5.png
  The similarities between them is quite similar, but I really like what
  Firefox has done with how they divide their sections, as well, how the
  display the marginal data on the fly.  They all have the following
  things in
  common:
 
  Real-Time displaying of margin changes on the paper
  Changing headers / footers and allow custom desc
  Page orientations (Landscape and Portrait)
 
  What I liked about the Microsoft products is that everything is in one
  page. The user will not be confused with many
 
  clicks, and everything is there. But, the sections are not divided, they all look squished.
  Here is my initial proposal.
 
  http://i40.tinypic.com/14ki9w0.png
  Only a single page, where the user will enter his format, options (if
  any), margins, and header/footer. The components are same as Firefox
  but all
  in one page. We should probably do a drop down to state which metric to
  use
  (inch/cm) since only America uses inches.
  I have brought my mother to test this, and mind you, she is very new to
  computers (very inexperienced),  she liked the above version because
  everything she needs is in her finger tips and understands it better
  than
  the others.
  So that is my take, what do you think? I would like to send this email
  off
  to Ben/Glen/Nick since they are the UI team and may have a better UI
  perspective on how to do things. Let me know if its allowed to be sent
  to
  dev mailing list!
  Thanks!
  -- Mohamed Mansour
 
 
 
   
 



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev