FWIW, I strongly believe we should move the default to --memory-model=high.
This is what pretty much every other app in the world does, and we mostly
penalize ourselves when the OS aggressively swaps us out for a dumb reason
(which yes, Windows does do).
We have a lot of complaints of I came back
yep, for base_unittests, that's true.
But what I want to know is how chromium uses GTest. An important problem is
how it runs all the GTest projects.
Take the simplest GTest project printing_unittests as an example, I know
it's run via GTest's main in run_all_unittests.cc. But I don't know how it
I run it on Microsoft Windows XP Professional with SP2, not Vista.
nbsp;
The flag is --nocheck-sys-deps, right?
I don't want to use that flag really. The reason is what you've mentioned, many
of the layout tests may fail with that flag. That deviates from my goal. I want
to use the layout
Hi,
yuzo, tyoshino and I start working to implement HTML5 Web Socket and write
design docs
WebKit part: http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_0fpjg22gh
Chromium part: http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_1dm97qxgm
We'll send WebKit part to webkit-dev, if it looks ok.
We'd welcome if you
printing_unittests depends on gtestmain.lib. See src/printing/printing.gyp.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Jickae Davisjick...@gmail.com wrote:
yep, for base_unittests, that's true.
But what I want to know is how chromium uses GTest. An important problem is
how it runs all the GTest
This phenomenon is reproducible in my environment, too.
It's probably because localized Windows may have some different metrics on
window appearance. Try the following workaround:
1. Open Display Properties dialog.
2. Go to Design tab and press Details button.
3. For each item which has a
I have an NPAPI plugin (that I originally wrote for Firefox) which I
want to download to Chrome over the internet using an embedded object
(using either EMBED or OBJECT, I don't mind which).
My plugin works fine under Chrome once I've manually copied the files
to a location that Chrome knows
+1. Most people are not doing compiles, we're trying to say that people live
in the web and in their browser, and that their browser is the primary
application. For me at least, that is true. The browser is the app I use the
most -- the only other app I use regularly is an ssh client, which can
Could we stat at memory-model=hight and then change our memory model
mid-flight if there are any large, non-chrome, memory hungry
processes?
-- Elliot
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Ian Fettei...@chromium.org wrote:
+1. Most people are not doing compiles, we're trying to say that people live
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Ian Fette i...@chromium.org wrote:
+1. Most people are not doing compiles, we're trying to say that people
live in the web and in their browser, and that their browser is the primary
application. For me at least, that is true. The browser is the app I use the
I am willing to volunteer to be a test case if you need one, tell me what to
do so you will be able to monitor.Before I added that switch, it was pretty
horrible.
Though I am building stuff with Java, XSLT, JavaScript that process a lot of
files (HTMLs) and viewing and refreshing a lot of pages
2009/6/24 Rosail Davis sitan2...@sina.com:
I don't want to use that flag really. The reason is what you've mentioned,
many of the layout tests may fail with that flag. That deviates from my
goal. I want to use the layout test to test my codes in webkit/port/glue.
It seems the first step,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Non-Stick kevin.ra...@ntlworld.comwrote::
embed id=MY_PLUGIN type=application/my-plugin
width=640 height=480
pluginspage=http://mysite.com/test/npapi/chrome/
myplugin.crx
..snip..
What am I doing wrong ?
You can't embed Chrome extensions
Not sure about the theme part, Glen is the right person to answer that
(cc-ed).
As for keeping track of the work, your best best is to star issue 19 to get
notified about when something related to that bug is checked in. We try to
always include BUG=n in our checkins and then bug n will be updated
I only skimmed, but it looks well thought out.
One question though:
is this going to be functional for non-Chromium browsers? Given that
your design doc mentions v8 and hooks into Chromium's network
stack, but no mention of JavaScriptCore or WebKit's resource loading code,
I'm worried that the
Not sure about the theme part, Glen is the right person to answer that
(cc-ed).
There's some basic documentation here:
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/themes
More soon.
As for keeping track of the work, your best best is to star issue 19 to get
notified about when
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏) u...@chromium.orgwrote:
Hi,
yuzo, tyoshino and I start working to implement HTML5 Web Socket and write
design docs
WebKit part: http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_0fpjg22gh
Chromium part:
Only skimmed thusfar as well... but from what i've seen, looks reasonable to
me.
* A version of the diagram you have in the chrome doc would be nice in the
webkit doc too.
* Does WebSocketHandle really need to be refcounted. I know ResourceHandle
is a refcounted object and this design looks
BTW, I checked in with IanH - it sounds like WebSockets are also on the
Worker roadmap, so that's something to keep in mind while you iterate on
your design.
+1 to avoiding WebCore/loader, but also +1 to refactoring to enable as much
common code as possible cross-platform - I'm looking at the
I'd like to be able to test 'my_variable' for 'Blort' and 'Blat', but
if neither of these are true, then I'd like to execute a default. The
problem is that with the syntax below, if 'my_variable' is 'Blort',
then both path A and C will be executed; which is wrong since each of
these paths should
Hi Daniel:
Currently you'd have to have another whole conditional inside:
'conditions': [
['my_variable==Blort', {
# path A
}, {
'conditions:
['my_variable==Blat', {
# path B
}, {
# path C (default)
}],
}],
-BradN
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Daniel
Thanks for the prompt reply Brad. Cheers!
On Jun 24, 2:52 pm, Bradley Nelson bradnel...@google.com wrote:
Hi Daniel:
Currently you'd have to have another whole conditional inside:
'conditions': [
['my_variable==Blort', {
# path A
}, {
'conditions:
['my_variable==Blat', {
Also, it occurs to me that I can avoid making the problem worse by not
putting the MessagePort entanglement in the proxy layer, which my patch
currently does (ick). Proving that proper API design does enable better code
re-use :)
-atw taking my own advice
2009/6/24 John Abd-El-Malek
On Jun 24, 2:32 am, Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏) u...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
yuzo, tyoshino and I start working to implement HTML5 Web Socket and write
design docs
WebKit part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_0fpjg22gh
Chromium part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_1dm97qxgm
On Jun 24, 2:32 am, Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏) u...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
yuzo, tyoshino and I start working to implement HTML5 Web Socket and write
design docs
WebKit part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_0fpjg22gh
Chromium part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_1dm97qxgm
On Jun 24, 2:32 am, Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏) u...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
yuzo, tyoshino and I start working to implement HTML5 Web Socket and write
design docs
WebKit part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_0fpjg22gh
Chromium part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_1dm97qxgm
I am building ToT chromium, and dying with a DCHECK here:
DCHECK(locale_resources_data_ != NULL)
unable to load generated resources;
It is trying to load en.dll.
However en.dll doesn't exist.
If I use a fresh profile this works, as it ends up instead loading
en-US.dll which does
ah, in fact, I don't really understand what the .gyp files do.
Could the gtestmain be found in printing_unittests' project properties under
VS2005?
I have check that, and didn't find a gtestmain.lib in Configuration
Properties--Linker--Input.
2009/6/25 William Chan (陈智昌) willc...@chromium.org
http://www.codexon.com/posts/a-real-benchmark-real-websites-with-chrome-firefox-opera-safari-ie
Brief summary:
- measures warm-disk-based snapshots of real websites
- hand-injected script src into pages that uses
addEventListener(load) / attachEvent(onload) to tell when load is
done (I wonder if
See http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=15286
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=15286This seems to be a
regression from (or a latent bug uncovered by)
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=19183
Jungshik is looking into it.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at
I presume that Chromium decided to support Windows 2000 when the
project started in 2006. The reasons may be:
(1) The profit is big. There were 6% Windows 2000 users in 2006.
(2) The cost is small. There should not be too many differences
between Windows 2000 (5.0) and Windows XP (5.1).
31 matches
Mail list logo
