Matthieu,
While sending the CMD_REMOTE_CO command, the upstream should always include
the MD5 hash which would allow the downstream to determine if it has already
got this change order, maybe from some other partner. From the examples you
provided, it appears that it is related to the
Matthieu,
Did you get a chance to do it ? If you are not in the position to do
this, I can archive the case and we can come back to it any time.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 1:02 PM
To: 'm...@samba.org'
Cc: p
.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 4:36 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG:111080976529107] RE: Behavior explanation on subtree
[mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 6:07 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: cifs-protocol@cifs.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:01553031054] RE: [cifs-protocol] SystemLibraryDTC
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 22:58 +, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Andrew,
I am working with multiple product
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:32 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a
upstream windows Server
Hello
with.I may need to
work with the product team, so I need some information to show them.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 6:04 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve
implies
SamrChangePasswordUser/SamrOemChangePasswordUser2/SamrUnicodeChangePasswordUser2.
Is this right ?
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 4:25 PM
To: 'Andrew Bartlett'
Cc: cifs-protocol@cifs.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG
Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 5:49 PM
To: 'm...@samba.org'; 'p...@tridgell.net'; 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'
Cc: MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:111092854890403] RE: double send of command joined from a
upstream windows Server
Matthieu,
Can you send me
Andrew,
I confirmed that the fixed session key SystemLibraryDTC is only used by
NTLM when the client and server are both on the same machine. This type of
loopback behavior doesn't affect interoperability and thus is not covered by
the protocol documentation. Please let me know if you
Andrew,
I am looking into this request. I understand your request and I found
where it is used. I also confirmed that it is not mentioned in any documents
such as MS-NLMP.I will give an update soon.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From:
Matthieu,
Can you send me the screenshot you mentioned in your e-mail ? Even I
cannot make the decryption work with the correct version, looking at the screen
may help me know the scenario.
Thanks!
HOngwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 5
running Windows 64bit
version of Wireshark.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 10:45 PM
To: Hongwei Sun; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Interoperability
Documentation Help
Subject: double
Hi, Kai,
Just confirming what we already discussed in lab. This is an known
behavior to Windows DNS server. Windows DNS server will suppress sending
responses for DNS queries with format error (DNS_RCODE_FORMERR ) if there is
a same error encountered in the last 60 seconds. You
Matthieu,
I will be working on this request. I will send you the information shortly.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 5:25 PM
To: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Interoperability
: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:45 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG:111082958393266] RE: [cifs-protocol] Precision related to FRS
documentation
Hello Hongwei,
On 07/09/2011 22:55, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Hi, Matthieu,
I am working
Steve,
I just want to check with you to see if you have any questions before I close
this case.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:40 AM
To: 'Steve French'
Cc: bryan.james.krone-...@jci.com; MSSolve Case Email; cifs-proto
Andrew/Tridge,
I just want to close loop on this request even we already worked together
and resolved the related issue. I want to make sure the document is updated
properly to include the error conditions.
The first error can be returned by Windows DC handling IDL_DRSAddEntry if it
: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 4:55 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: cifs-protocol@cifs.org; tri...@samba.org
Subject: RE: Errors when doing a DsAddEntry
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 15:22 +, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Andrew,
Can you give the information about your configuration ? Are you joining
Samba DC
[mailto:smfre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 4:22 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: bryan.james.krone-...@jci.com; MSSolve Case Email; cifs-proto...@samba.org;
Edgar Olougouna; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: Re: [REG:111081664438980] RE: [cifs-protocol] Level 257 FindFirst
rejected by some Windows
Hi, Matthieu,
I am working on this request. What are the format of the need_join_1 and
need_join_2 attached ? Also what are the difference between those two
scenarios from the high level ? The second instance returns WARNING! 52
unread bytes. And the first instance returns
]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 5:24 AM
To: Steve French
Cc: MSSolve Case Email; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Edgar Olougouna; Hongwei Sun;
p...@tridgell.net
Subject: Re: [REG:111081664438980] RE: [cifs-protocol] Level 257 FindFirst
rejected by some Windows servers even though NTLM
I'm using
Andrew,
Can you give the information about your configuration ? Are you joining
Samba DC to a Windows DC ? If so, what is the version of Windows DC ?Are
you referring to the section 4.1.1.3 Server Behavior of the IDL_DRSAddEntry
Method of MS-DRSR for the impossible error case ?
Hi, Andrew,
Is the element stored 'as sent', or is it processed to add a version field?
ANS:After code review, I confirmed that AuthenticationInformation is
decrypted into LSAPR_TRUSTED_DOMAIN_AUTH_INFORMATION (as specified in
2.2.7.11), then is just copied straightforwardly into the
Matthieu,
As per the existing documentation and my code review, the documentation in
3.3.4.2 MS-FRS1 is correct. This value is returned by the server as per
section 3.3.4.2 and it is set to the GUID of local replica identified on the
server by ReplicaSetName, which is one of the input
Steve,
Any update ?
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 4:26 PM
To: 'Steve French'
Cc: Edgar Olougouna; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case
Email
Subject: RE: [REG:111081664438980] RE: [cifs-protocol] Level 257
Yes, this is right.
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 3:13 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG:111082117135230] RE: Initial replication of sysvol
Hi, Matthieu,
We will work on you question and respond soon.
Thanks
Hongwei
Sent from my Windows Phone
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 6:45 PM
To: p...@tridgell.net; Interoperability Documentation Help;
cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject:
[mailto:smfre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 4:23 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Edgar Olougouna; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case
Email
Subject: Re: [REG:111081664438980] RE: [cifs-protocol] Level 257 FindFirst
rejected by some Windows servers even though NTLM
On Tue, Aug
Hi, Matthieu,
Thanks for your question. One of our team members will take a look at it and
respond to you soon.
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org] On
Behalf Of Matthieu Patou
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 6:08
Matthieu,
It seems that this is not a typo. The COMM_COMMAND is the command to be
sent as the result of the processing of CMD_NEED_JOIN. It should be
CMD_START_JOIN as indicated in the sentence above.If you look at the next
section for COMM_COMMAND Is CMD_START_JOIN , you will see
Matthieu/Andrew,
I am checking to see if you have any feedback on the response below. If
not, I will consider this issue resolved.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 2:15 PM
To: 'm...@samba.org'
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto
[mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 4:19 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: Behavior explanation on subtree delete control behavior with
iscriticalsystemobject
On 12/08/2011 07:56, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Hi, Matthieu,
I have trouble
Steve,
I took the ownership of this case. I will work on both of your questions and
respond to you soon.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org] On
Behalf Of Steve French
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:39 PM
.
On 28/06/2011 22:40, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Matthieu,
This is fine. We will wait for that. I also want to confirm
that we don't need any more data to be produced, we just need the
steps you used to produce the data output in the bug.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message
Hi, Matthieu,
I have trouble to decrypt the LDAP packets in the trace. Have you used
Wireshark to do that? Did the packet 1848 define a delete operation on record
#1 with LDAP_SERVER_TREE_DELETE_OID specified?Have you checked that both
records are not in the AD any more after tree
: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 4:39 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Michael Ströder; Andrew Bartlett
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111062276428612] RE: userParameters attribute
Hi Hongwei,
Any news on this subject
Edgar,
Matthieu already transferred the files to one workspace I created for him in
another case. I will give you the access to that workspace.
Matthieu,
You don't need to do it again.
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org
Matthieu,
Thanks for the confirmation!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 3:22 PM
To: m...@samba.org
Cc: Hongwei Sun; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; tridge
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG
.
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:13 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; tridge
Subject: Re: [REG:111063044753520] [cifs-protocol] Unable to dcpromo windows
with a Samba4 DC
Hi Hongwei
Matthieu,
Thanks for your question. One of our team member will work on it and respond
to you soon.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org] On
Behalf Of Matthieu Patou
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 12:06 PM
To:
Matthieu,
Any update ? I just checked the bug and it doesn't have any new information.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 4:42 PM
To: 'Matthieu Patou'
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Michael Ströder
Matthieu,
I noted that the tombtoned objects left on the Windows server
(172.16.100.27) are not in Delete Objects container. They are deleted server
objects for DC ARES(Samba DC) that have FLAG_DISALLOW_MOVE_ON_DELETE set. I
am wondering if it is due to a unsuccessful DC demotion in
the testing ? The product team needs that to
have the same repro for the investigation.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 8:09 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto
Jeff,
Thanks for sending the questions. One of our team member will work on it and
respond to you soon.
Thanks!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
hongw...@microsoft.com
Tel: 469-7757027
...@samba.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 6:24 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org;
Obaid Farooqi; Michael Ströder
Subject: Re: [REG: 111052361876778] RE: userParameters attribute
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 22:40 +, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Metze
-and-performance-tuning.aspx).
Jeff,
Please let me know if you have more questions. I can provide you more
clarification if needed.
Thanks!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
hongw
: Friday, June 17, 2011 1:50 PM
To: cifs-protocol@cifs.org; Hongwei Sun; p...@tridgell.net; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:111051779565831] RE: dfs referral for sysvol
and windows XP
Hello Hongwei,
Any news on this ?
Matthieu.
On 08/06/2011 11:22, Matthieu Patou wrote:
On 08/06
in the future.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 7:10 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Edgar Olougouna; 'cifs-proto...@samba.org'; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG: 111060784988397] RE: joining domain with IPv6 client
Hi
Matthieu,
I am the owner of this case now. Edgar transferred the case to me when I
came back from vocation. I will update you when I finish investigation
,hopefully sometime next week.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org
tonight, Edgar will
continue working with you while I am away. I also captured a trace for Windows
client to join to a Windows DC, so we compare while we are investigating it.
Thanks!
Hongwei
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Escalation
.
Is there a problem with the IPv6 record in DNS ?
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 6:54 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; Edgar Olougouna
Subject: [REG: 111060784988397] RE: joining domain
!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10:17 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: cifs-proto...@samba.org; Edgar Olougouna
Subject: RE: [REG: 111060784988397] RE: joining domain with IPv6 client
Hi Hongwei/Edgar
this in the
trace between Windows. I am not sure if it is related to the DFS Referral
Response v4.
Please let me know what you think.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:44 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p
.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:50 AM
To: 'Stefan (metze) Metzmacher'; Andrew Bartlett
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Obaid Farooqi; Michael Ströder
Subject: RE: userParameters attribute
metze,
I will check it and let
Andrew,
The request opened is still pending. I will follow up with the corresponding
product teams. I will keep you posted.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 10:50 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p
Andrew,
There is only one bit defined for this value. That is bit
POLICY_KERBEROS_VALIDATE_CLIENT (0x0080). All other bits SHOULD be set to
0 and ignored upon receipt. I will file a request to add the actual hex value
to POLICY_KERBEROS_VALIDATE_CLIENT.
Thanks!
Hongwei
Andrew,
One of our team member will work on this case and let you know when the
investigation is done.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org] On
Behalf Of Andrew Bartlett
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010
of office or so.
As of this issue, could you give a little more description about the
blackbox test which reproduces the behavior ?
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 11:29 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
up with a document update request. Hopefully this should not
affect interoperability.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:m...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:46 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Sebastian Canevari; cifs-proto...@samba.org
...@samba.org; Interoperability Documentation Help; Darryl Welch;
Hongwei Sun
Subject: Re: backup protocol
Hi Sebastian,
I made more investigation this night and after realizing that the guid of the
certificate was stored in reverse order in different fields like serialNumber
field
Help; Darryl Welch;
Hongwei Sun
Subject: Re: backup protocol
Hi Sebastian,
I made more investigation this night and after realizing that the guid of the
certificate was stored in reverse order in different fields like serialNumber
field in the certificate I tried to give a try and reverse
Matthias,
Thanks for raising this issue with us. First, We will add the missing
definitions for UF_PARTIAL_SECRETS_ACCOUNT (0x400) to 2.2.1.13 MS-SAMR,
USER_PARTIAL_SECRETS_ACCOUNT (0x0010) to 2.2.1.12 MS-SAMR and
DOMAIN_GROUP_RID_READONLY_DCS(0x0209) to 2.2.1.14 MS-SAMR. In
documents.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:51 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tri...@samba.org; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110081752971983] RE: How to RODCs get
with that too.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 6:37 PM
To: 'tri...@samba.org'
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110081752971983] RE: How to RODCs get their membership
...@samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 7:30 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: [REG:110081752971983] RE: How to RODCs get their membership of the
ENTERPRISE_RODCs group
Hi Hongwei,
You mentioned that all the documentation talks
Andrew,
Since Bill is out of office, I have taken over the ownership of this case.
I have been actively working on this case. I will update you as soon as I
have any new status.
Thanks for your patience.
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org
Proposed Request:
Matthieu,
I am working on the following issue you reported.
110080418016869
[MS-BKRP] 3.1.4.1.3 -- version field and a GUID field no documented
Also I've got questions of what is explained in the document.
First in paragraph 3.1.4.1.3, it
--- Fixed the minimal editor mistake.
Matthieu,
I am working on the following issue you reported.
110080418016869
[MS-BKRP] 3.1.4.1.3 -- version field and a GUID field no documented
Also I've got questions of what is explained in the document.
First in
Hi, Matthieu,
We have completed the investigation for your questions below.
* in which order the domain should be returned ? if any (ie. first
lower domain like samba.corp then au.samba.corp then brisbane.au.samba.corp)
ANS: The domain referral must include names for the local domain and
[mailto:ob...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 4:17 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Michael Adam; Andreas Schneider; p...@tridgell.net;
cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [Pfif] [REG:110052070326491] [cifs-protocol] MS_RRP: Question on
Symbolic Links
Hi Hongwei,
Hongwei Sun wrote
To: Hongwei Sun; Andreas Schneider
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [Pfif] [REG:110052070326491] [cifs-protocol] MS_RRP: Question on
Symbolic Links
Hi Hongwei,
Andreas Schneider wrote:
On Monday 24 May 2010 23:58:34 Hongwei Sun wrote:
Andreas
Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:19 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tri...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case
Email; Michael Ströder
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute
: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:12 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tri...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case
Email; Michael Ströder
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] [REG:110011477385004] RE: userParameters attribute
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 18:18 +, Hongwei Sun wrote:
Tridge,
I just
...@cynapses.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 9:45 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve Case Email
Subject: Re: [REG:110052070326491] [cifs-protocol] MS_RRP: Question on Symbolic
Links
On Monday 24 May 2010 23:58:34 Hongwei Sun wrote:
Andreas,
When you open
Kamen,
For your question regarding the algorithm used in UpdateObject() , as
documented in 4.1.10.6.9 of MS-DRSR, I think that the RemoveObj() was
performed after PerformModifyOperation just to ensure the attributes on the
deleted object conform to the invariants of a tombstone or
-Original Message-
From: Nadezhda Ivanova [mailto:nadezhda.ivan...@postpath.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:30 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: MSSolve Case Email; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: Re: [REG:110041557300829] RE: [cifs-protocol] Questions regarding
7.1.3.1 ACE Ordering Rules
Hi
Nadya,
Active Directory is supposed to apply the requirements to any security
descriptors maintained by a DC, as described in section 7.1.3. ACE ordering is
one of the requirement. If forest functional level is DS_BEHAVIOR_WIN2003 and
fDontStandardizeSDs is false, the ACEs in the ACLs
Andreas,
Thanks for your question. One of our team member will work on your question
and let you know when the investigation is done.
Thanks!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol Team, Microsoft
Tridge,
I just want to check with you to see if you have any question regarding the
newly added documentation for this attribute. If not, I will close this CAR.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:49 PM
To: 'tri...@samba.org'
Cc
Matthieu,
I just want to check with you to see if you have any further questions on
this issue. If not , I will consider this case closed. Again, if you have
related questions in the future, we can always revisit this case.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 6:34 PM
To: 'Matthieu Patou'
Cc: Sebastian Canevari; p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; MSSolve
Case Email
Subject: RE: [REG:110020183056252] - Inconsistencies in ACLs
Matthieu,
Ok from the reading of the DS flags it's not obvious that all
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 3:56 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Sebastian Canevari; cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: Re: FW: [cifs-protocol] Group Policy questions
On 23/12/2009 00:47, Hongwei Sun wrote
Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 5:58 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tri...@samba.org; CIFS Protocol
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text
files SRX090109601490
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 22:55 +, Hongwei Sun
Tridge,
Could you please take a look at my question below so I can proceed with this
request ? If you are busy, we can always come back to visit it whenever it
is good time for you.
Thanks !
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:31 PM
Andrew,
I just want to check with you to see if you have any questions regarding the
request and our response below. If not, I will resolve this case for now.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Hongwei Sun
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 6:27 PM
To: 'Andrew Bartlett'
Cc: p
Andrew,
We finished the investigation on your request. We will update the MS-ADTS
as follows.
Section 3.1.1.2.2.2 LDAP Representations
Changed footnote on attributes of String(OID) to:
††† Values of attributes of syntax String(OID) are accepted in either
the numericoid (numeric
Tridge,
How did you generate the UserParameters you mentioned in the e-mail ? I got
a little bit different result. The steps I used are
(1) Open Avtive Directory Users and Computers - User - select a user
such as Administrator
(2) In Properties windows , select Sessions tab and then
.
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: tri...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 8:55 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; erick.nogueira.nascime...@gmail.com;
cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: repadmin.exe crashing - TTT trace
Hi Hongwei,
Erick Nogueira has
Hi, Tridge,
Thanks for your question. One of our team member will work on your
request and get back to you when the investigation is done.
Thanks!
Hongwei
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol
Matthieu,
This process is described in one of the open protocol document ([MS-BKRP]:
BackupKey Remote Protocol Specification
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc224123(PROT.13).aspx ).
The following KB article might be useful for understanding DPAPI too
Andrew,
Most of the issues mentioned in your mail have been fixed in the latest
released MS-ADSC or MS-ADA3. The following is a summary.
1. cn: Computer - Schema pulled from Windows 2008R2 shows two additional
attributes for systemMayContain msTSSecondaryDesktopBL, msTSPrimaryDesktopBL.
Hello Matthieu,
Thanks for your question. We will investigate it and let you know if we need
any additional clarification.
Best Regards,
Hongwei Sun
Email: hongw...@microsoft.com
Phone: +1 (469) 7757027
Time zone: (UTC-06:00) Central Time (US and Canada)
-Original Message-
From
Tridge Andrew,
I am owning this request now. I will investigate it and let you know. Bt
the way, I already responded to the initial questions from Andrew in a separate
mail.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: cifs-protocol-boun...@cifs.org
schemaFlagsEx: FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:42 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: p...@tridgell.net; cifs-proto...@samba.org; Andrew Tridgell
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies
...@samba.org [mailto:tri...@samba.org]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:13 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: Andrew Bartlett; cifs-proto...@samba.org
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text
files SRX090109601490
Hi Hongwei,
For adminDescription and adminDisplayName
Andrew,
I have been actively working with the product team on your request. This
one requires more effort than schema and display specifiers. Considering the
holiday schedule of the product team and support team, including myself, the
progresses will be delayed. I will be on vacation
documenting the
logic for ACE OI and CI flags.
Thanks!
Hongwei
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat+informatique.sa...@matws.net]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 4:01 PM
To: Sebastian Canevari
Cc: Hongwei Sun; Interoperability Documentation Help; cifs-proto...@samba.org
07, 2009 9:03 PM
To: Hongwei Sun; cifs-proto...@samba.org; p...@tridgell.net
Subject: RE: SMBv1 LockAndX return status on lock conflict
Hey Hongwei,
That's very interesting and indeed explains the behavior I've seen.
I can understand the motivation for delaying a small timeout for locks
, you can easily explain what shows in your network
trace.We will add the logic to the SMB protocol document. Please let us
know if you have further questions regarding this behavior.
Thanks!
Hongwei Sun - Sr. Support
Steven,
I am now working on this issue. I am wondering what program you ran to
create the network trace attached in your e-mail. Is it Samba smbtorture ?
If we can duplicate the behavior, it may be easier for us to debug it.
Thanks!
Hongwei
From: Steven Danneman
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
