[c-nsp] My sham-links disappeared? (second try)

Three days later my original mails haven't arrived so I'm trying again :-) -- Forwarded message -- Hi, I just upgraded a 7206 NPE 300 router running IOS (C7200-JK9S-M), Version 12.2(15)T17 to an NPE G1 running (C7200-JK9S-M), Version 12.4(16). I changed nothing in the

Re: [c-nsp] ISP response and traffic billing for DDOS

Hi, On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 10:58:21AM +0800, Hock Jim wrote: Sorry for being slightly off-topic, but hoping to seek some advise on what is typically the case for ISP response in the case of a DDOS. In the case of a DDOS attack that saturates an upstream, typically: 1. will the ISP charge

Re: [c-nsp] [Fwd: FWSM 3.1 and Servers with redundant cards]

Thank you for your replies! The problem is not so much the asymmetric of the traffic but more the change of IP addresses source in the return flow: [IP_src:10.10.10.1,IP_dst:20.20.20.2]TCP/SYNFWSM-20.20.20.2 X--FWSM---TCP/SYN/ACK[IP_src: 20.20.20.1,IP_dst: 10.10.10.1] The ASA

Re: [c-nsp] Router Suggestion for console access?

Paul Stewart wrote: Looking for feedback on what still works well for console access via a router dial-up? We have quite a few sites that have several routers/switches/access devices all of which have console/serial connections on them We'd like to be able to dial-up to a router onsite

Re: [c-nsp] QoS - questions

(I'm not the original poster) On 8/21/07, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Usually you don't want to provision more than 50% of your BW for LLQ. Experience has shown that this can introduce some delay.. I have a recurring scenario in which the customers want one symmetric

Re: [c-nsp] ISP response and traffic billing for DDOS

On 3 Sep 2007, at 03:58, Hock Jim wrote: Sorry for being slightly off-topic, but hoping to seek some advise on what is typically the case for ISP response in the case of a DDOS. its fine but check out nanog which is more Internet operational than here.. In the case of a DDOS attack that

[c-nsp] cpu usage of a 7200 npe-g2: disapointed

Hello, We replaced a 7200 NPE400 with a NPE-G2 recently and are disapointed by the CPU usage: this router switches ~80kPPS in+out (~180Mbps), it was peaking at 55% CPU, now 40%, while the CPU clock is more that 4 time higher on the G2. currently running: c7200p-p-mz.122-31.SB7.bin was running

Re: [c-nsp] cpu usage of a 7200 npe-g2: disapointed

Philippe Strauss a écrit : Hello, Hello, We replaced a 7200 NPE400 with a NPE-G2 recently and are disapointed by the CPU usage: this router switches ~80kPPS in+out (~180Mbps), it was peaking at 55% CPU, now 40%, while the CPU clock is more that 4 time higher on the G2. currently running:

[c-nsp] Issues with NIC teams on Unix and ESX servers

Hi, We have recently migrated two of 6513 in our datacenter to Native IOS from catos. They were with catos 7 sup 2, msfc with 12.1 and now ios 12.2(18)sxf10. After the change we got strange issues with a Unix and ESX server. Sw1 and sw2 (6513 s) connected with etherchannel trunk and HSRP

Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 58, Issue 4

Hi, Did you have problem with SUP720 recently (hardware failure)? Last semester there was 3 problems. I am wondering if any series are having problem. Tks, Alaerte ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Multiple T1 IMA / Channelized DS3

Does the Telco Systems EdgeLink100 T1/E1 include an A/B side for redundant DC power? I couldn't discern that from the spec sheet. We've been recommended (and installed) the Adtran series of products. Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: [c-nsp] cpu usage of a 7200 npe-g2: disapointed

On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:15:45PM +0200, Christophe Fillot wrote: Philippe Strauss a écrit : Hello, We replaced a 7200 NPE400 with a NPE-G2 recently and are disapointed by the CPU usage: this router switches ~80kPPS in+out (~180Mbps), it was peaking at 55% CPU, now 40%, while the CPU

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco noob -- design guidance request

Hi, On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 04:51:46PM +0200, Niels Bakker wrote: I assume you'll be selling these people Internet access. If they get 172.16-Addresses, he's not selling Internet access... SCNR. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!

[c-nsp] Weird behaviour of recent XENPAKs in Cat6500-SXF

Hi all, we've run into weird problems with recent XENPAKs on Cat6509 platform running 12.2(18)SXF10. These are: - XENPAK is not recognized when plugged into shutdown port. However, after no shut XENPAK comes online and passes traffic fine - it is not possible to turn off the laser ouput.

Re: [c-nsp] LR over MMF

I have a very temporary need to bring up a 10g circuit between 2 cages in a data-center. I have some MMF in place I could use but the distance is over 300m so SX won't quite cut it. 10Gbase-LX4 will very likely work just fine, though unsupported. Have you tried that? -A