[c-nsp] LACP between 3750 and Enterasys DFE platinum

Hi all, Has anyone had experience bringing up a trunked LACP bundle between a 3750 and an Enterasys DFE Platinum (in a N7 chassis) ? If I configure the link as Access ports, everything works fine. But when I try to configure the LACP bundle as a trunk port, the Port-Channel comes up and

Re: [c-nsp] 7200s (VXRs and not) and MPLS capabilities

Hi Justin, in the end, the VXR backplane has nothing to do with MPLS - rather is an added TDM bus for cross-connects. Consensus was a few time ago on this same list that there are really few cards supporting it and pretty much nobody getting benefit from it. Also, you don't have different IOS

Re: [c-nsp] 7200s (VXRs and not) and MPLS capabilities

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Sean Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (2) If you are using an older IOS, there is a bug with PPP where the router won't negotiate (I believe it is) maximum RECEIVE unit (MRU). This has kept us from using some devices on bonded MLPPP connections as the PPP link

Re: [c-nsp] SIBYTE-CFC3-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR

Hello All of enviroment values are wholly normal no temporary peaks... I think not this is why i got this messages. I think this is a ram or HW error, but i have 6 cards and i don't know which one may have this problem. I got this error 5 times in the last 3 month... Laszlo Ramcharan,

Re: [c-nsp] 7200s (VXRs and not) and MPLS capabilities

The 7200s non vxr will do mpls just fine. I ran some in the past with npe 225s for mpls L3 VPNs with no problem. Having said that I would spend the extra money and get a vxr chassis, especially if you are going to be doing VoIP. You can still go with an older NPE to save money but you will have

[c-nsp] ip multicast rate-limit

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipmulti/command/reference/imc_03.html#wp1016097 In 12.2(18)SXF11: petach-tikva-gp(config)#int pos11/0/0 petach-tikva-gp(config-if)#ip multicast rate-limit in group-list SAP-mcast-group 1000 ip multicast rate-limit command is not supported So I go to:

Re: [c-nsp] WAN Simulator

Aaron, M0n0wall http://m0n0.ch/wall/ has configurable bandwidth, delay, packet drop ratio, fancy GUI and it's free too. Cheers Alex - Original Message - From: aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:14 AM Subject: [c-nsp] WAN Simulator

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF on Secondary IP addresses.

On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Jared Mauch wrote: No, you need to utilize the primary IP address for your routing protocols. Having cisco enforce this also will help you make fewer mistakes in your network configuration, or overcomplicate the topology. Agree, we find secondary IP

[c-nsp] Advertising NAT pool using OSPF on the ASA

Hello, According to this document: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/cfgna t.html#wp1042725 If you NAT to a pool of address, then this pool of address will be advertise to the upstream router automatically. I have the set up:

[c-nsp] Syslog alert generated -- %PM_SCP-SP-2-LCP_FW_ERR_INFORM

I did a quick search, but couldn't find any reports of this error, or whether it requires replacement or not. A search revealed some matches, but none referencing inline power problem. Has anyone seen this before? Jun 12 09:42:21.655 PDT: %PM_SCP-SP-2-LCP_FW_ERR_INFORM: Module 6 is experiencing

[c-nsp] Multilink Routing Problem

Hi folks.. missing something obvious here.;) Cisco 6500 on one side, 2621 on other (customer prem) Relevent 6500 Config: controller T1 5/0/7 framing esf clock source internal linecode b8zs channel-group 1 timeslots 1-24 controller T1 6/0/7 framing esf clock source

Re: [c-nsp] Syslog alert generated -- %PM_SCP-SP-2-LCP_FW_ERR_INFORM

I've seen that before as well. On some of the cards, there's an add-on inline power module that fits onto the linecard itself. On that daughtercard there's a power converter that supplies the proper voltages for PoE devices. Either that daughtercard has gone bad, or the whole linecard has and is

Re: [c-nsp] Syslog alert generated -- %PM_SCP-SP-2-LCP_FW_ERR_INFORM

Thanks. Cisco TAC had me run a complete diagnostic boot check on the module, and determined it needed to be replaced. On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Matlock, Kenneth L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've seen that before as well. On some of the cards, there's an add-on inline power module that

Re: [c-nsp] Multilink Routing Problem

I'd like to see more of the OSPF config. Is this all part of area 0, or is it configured as a stubby network? If it's stubby, you may need to configure it as NSSA to get the redistributed routes back into area 0. On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Paul Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi

[c-nsp] eBGP via loopback

Hi everyone, I'm having an issue delivering packets in a test environment that I have. To make it as simple as possible, I'll describe what I have with all links disconnected except for the problematic one. My inquiries are not really regarding the packet loss, but more about BGP

Re: [c-nsp] Multilink Routing Problem

Thanks. Here's the OSPF config from the 6500: router ospf 1 router-id xx.xx.98.184 log-adjacency-changes redistribute connected subnets tag 116661016 redistribute static subnets tag 116661016 network xxx.xxx.227.0 0.0.0.7 area 0 network xx.xx.246.16 0.0.0.7 area 0 network

[c-nsp] Cisco 7513 problem

Hi, I'm seeing following log on my Cisco 7513 router: 00:07:58: %RSP-3-SLAVECHANGE: Slave changed state from Slave to Non-participant 00:08:03: %RSP-3-SLAVECHANGE: Slave changed state from Non-participant to Slave 00:08:10: %RSP-3-SLAVECHANGE: Slave changed state from Slave to