Hi,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 06:36:20PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote:
I have a customer who went directly to cisco to ask about how to load
balance two WAN connections
I see two key issues here:
- how to load *balance*.
- how to reliably detect wireless is down if there is no end-to-end
Many thanks Vijay, had suspected as much, just didn't want to believe
it! It does seem really silly for the price of these things, it looks
like I will be pushing for a pair of F5's when I implement my shared LB
solution,
Thanks again,
Toby Burrows
-Original Message-
From: Ramcharan,
For a project we are in the process of evaluating the way to implement
the requirements ...
One solution would be a dual (extendable) site setup with a 4507R at
each site, with dual SupV 10GE and dual connection each via two
different fiber routes. Plan would be to connect one port each of the
Hi,
Just been asked if its possible to pull out the traffic values
for specific vlans on a trunk port via snmp on a 2960 or 3750.
I'm pretty sure the answer is no, but thought I'd have an ask, any
suggestions?
Vince
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Hello,
if the interface is GigE with traffic at around 300Mb/s and there is
not any other back presure mechanism like traffic shaping then on the
interface is not congestion and the congestion management like WFQ is
not in use.
David
the congestion management is used only when
On 8/19/08, Nic
Looks like I mis-read (or at least misunderstood) the wording in the
document I quoted ... in another one, I found a slightly more clear
statement which noted that of the four 10G interfaces, any two could be
used in a redundant setup ... so I guess the 20G idea is only feasible
for a 2-site
On Aug 19, 2008, at 12:21 AM, Kevin Graham wrote:
The connector on the cards are (Micro)D68F (also used by SCSI-3
devices). You would be looking for a D68M-D68F cable to extend the
connection.
[...oops. sorry Brian, you were right...]
Thanks, I didn't have one on hand to check. Do you
Good morning list.
No rant today. :-)
I am looking, however, for the collected experience of this list in platform
experience and recommendations for providing six to twelve point to point
L2TPv3 (or equivalent technology) tunnels at up to 150Mb/s rates between
APS-protected OC3 endpoints (if
Hi all,
#diagnostic start module 3 test per-port port 2
Diagnostic[Module 3]: Running test(s) 4-5 may disrupt normal system
operation
Do you want to continue? [no]:
Will running this diagnostics feature be disruptive to traffic on any
other ports than port 2?
Port 2 is currenly down/down but I
On Monday 18 August 2008 21:40:35 Andrew Girling wrote:
The connector on the cards are (Micro)D68F (also used by SCSI-3
devices).
A SCSI LVD/SE 68 pin extension might work; I'd just wonder about the pairing
(SCSI cables have strict pairing guidelines; certain signals have to traverse
Hi,
Anybody familiar with (freeware/shareware) tools for a network
inventory? Install-base is 100% cisco.
Are there other utilities around that would scan the collected
configurations and read relevant info (descriptions, ip add, link
bandwidth etc)?
Nasir Shaikh
I think solar winds may help you.
Regards,
Jack
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 August, 2008 8:13 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] OT: network inventory
Hi,
Anybody familiar with (freeware/shareware) tools for a
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:13:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody familiar with (freeware/shareware) tools for a network
inventory? Install-base is 100% cisco.
Sounds like you want rancid:
http://www.shrubbery.net/rancid/
--Jeff
___
Hello
I would like to share the problem we recently got on our network. We have DS3
coming to as5400, that converting PSTN calls to VOIP. We're handling only
incoming calls, so the dial-pear config is simple, one voice and one voip
provider. Recently we've started receiving complains from our
Andrew Girling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Aug 19, 2008, at 12:21 AM, Kevin Graham wrote:
Thanks, I didn't have one on hand to check. Do you happen to know if
the
pinout is consistent w/ the HD68's used in the CAB-OCTAL? (Could be
very
useful for sparing...)
Unfortunately, I'm not sure,
Besides documenting config changes, can rancid perform a tftp backup of
router / switch startup configs, or integrate with some other software to
pull down the config file if a change is detected?
- Original Message -
From: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
http://www.ziptie.org/
--
Rikard
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anybody familiar with (freeware/shareware) tools for a network
inventory? Install-base is 100% cisco.
Are there other utilities around that would scan the collected
configurations and read relevant info
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:04:29 Adam Greene wrote:
Besides documenting config changes, can rancid perform a tftp backup of
router / switch startup configs, or integrate with some other software to
pull down the config file if a change is detected?
See
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Adam Greene wrote:
Besides documenting config changes, can rancid perform a tftp backup of
router / switch startup configs, or integrate with some other software to
pull down the config file if a change is detected?
It doesn't use tftp for it, but rancid does backup your
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:04:29AM -0400, Adam Greene wrote:
Besides documenting config changes, can rancid perform a tftp backup of
router / switch startup configs, or integrate with some other software to
pull down the config file if a change is detected?
Lots of folks trigger rancid runs
So far all of the software that's been presented will autodiscover devices
and backup configs and such. Is there anything around that will actually
take inventory of a router. By inventory I mean, list of cards, model
numbers, serial numbers, pluggable optics, etc. I've been working on
scripts
You can use a tool from the cisco partner site called Cisco Network Discovery
Tool. It will categorize every modules in IOS/CatOS devices and output them to
excel spreadsheets. It lists all EOL hardware and Software as well as serial
numbers and such per device and module. Its great for
I've had pretty good luck with nedi so far:
http://www.nedi.ch/
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:56:42 -0400
chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far all of the software that's been presented will autodiscover
devices and backup configs and such. Is there anything around that
will actually take inventory
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:56:42 chip wrote:
So far all of the software that's been presented will autodiscover devices
and backup configs and such. Is there anything around that will actually
take inventory of a router. By inventory I mean, list of cards, model
numbers, serial numbers,
hi Chip,
chip wrote:
So far all of the software that's been presented will autodiscover devices
and backup configs and such. Is there anything around that will actually
take inventory of a router. By inventory I mean, list of cards, model
numbers, serial numbers, pluggable optics, etc. I've
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:56:42 chip wrote:
So far all of the software that's been presented will autodiscover
devices
and backup configs and such. Is there anything around that will actually
take inventory of a
Exactly. Some folks think they need it just to say they are doing
fancy qos. ;)
If you want to put a MQC policy on the interface they can.
But don't do it at those rates on the 7500 as you will kill the
VIP CPU. They need a hardware forwarding platform to do those
rates with QOS.
Rodney
On
omg terrible formatting, apologies everyone! damn webmail client...
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Scott Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Need some guidance for T1 / wireless ethernet
How are you getting this output?
If you ssh/telnet to it and run the command do you get th esame output?
That's not stack corruption to me.
Rodney
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:10:44PM -0700, bill fumerola wrote:
anyone see anything like this. i assume only a reload will fix this:
rtr1#sh
I see a lot of people ask about this. Here it is my 2 cents:
I have set this using rancid and some perl scripts. If you manage to install
rancid then the perl script should contain:
1. variables with : rancid config files , router.db, snmp community
2. vars with port type for cisco/cat/juniper
Hi All:
I am new to this forum so not sure if this is a good place to ask this question.
Whats the best way to troubleshoot transmit discards across MLPPP?
Here is my setup and symptoms:
-Cisco 2821 with 3x VWIC1-1MFT making up the multilink @ 1536 bandwidth (IPBASE
image)
-I am polling that
On a Cisco bundle we do QOS before putting the MLPPP headers on.
That prevents a lot of out of orders if you do QOS after putting
the MLP headers on.
So what you are seeing sounds correct.
You are most likely bursting above the bundle rate coming from
your LAN going towards the bundle so the QOS
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:56 AM, chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far all of the software that's been presented will autodiscover devices
and backup configs and such. Is there anything around that will actually
take inventory of a router. By inventory I mean, list of cards, model
numbers,
Hi Alex,
this is CAS with em, unfortunatly.
T1s configured as
signaling-class cas test
profile incoming S*a*d*n
controller T1 7/0:1
framing esf
ds0-group 0 timeslots 1-24 type em-fgb dtmf dnis
cas-custom 0
class test
!
controller T3 7/0
framing m23
clock source line
t1 1-28 controller
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:41:05AM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
How are you getting this output?
ssh rtr1
en
sh stacks
If you ssh/telnet to it and run the command do you get th esame output?
it is not signal noise (serial spew, ip corruption, etc).
That's not stack corruption to me.
i'll try
So far all of the software that's been presented will autodiscover
devices
and backup configs and such. Is there anything around that will
actually
take inventory of a router. By inventory I mean, list of cards, model
numbers, serial numbers, pluggable optics, etc. I've been working on
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 09:02:27PM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Scott Lambert wrote:
I have a customer who went directly to cisco to ask about how to load
balance two WAN connections to their Cisco PIX 515E. Cisco sold them an
ASA 5510 and two 1841s and suggested VRRP or GLBP for the LAN
If you can do (private) BGP, this document may help:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_configuration_example0918
6a00800945bf.shtml#conf3
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Hi,
I would like to export the ASA rules to a HTML file (without using ASDM).
Does anyone know a way (script?) to parse the ACLs and export to HTML?
Tks
Artur
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I use this script to parse my pix acls and export them to an excel file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Artur Renato
Araujo da Silva
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 1:57 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco ASA - Export
'Created by Robert Teller
WScript.Echo This script will take a minute or two to run vbCrLf
Please be patient
Const ForReading = 1
'Looks for CF acl query
WSArg = Wscript.arguments.Count
If WSArg 1 Then
WScript.Echo Please select a valid source
WScript.Quit
End If
PixACL =
you could use nipper, which is a config auditor, so it will audit your
security policy and configuration, and you have the options to export
to xml, html, etc ..
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nipper/?abmode=1
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Artur Renato Araujo da Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Chip,
chip wrote:
| Is there
| anything around that will actually take inventory of a router.
| By inventory I mean, list of cards, model numbers, serial
| numbers, pluggable optics, etc.
We use Netdisco for network discovery (both for
Check out NAV (Network Administration Visualized) at http://metanav.uninett.no/
as well. It gives full inventory of all devices as well as a load of other
useful features..
Best regards,
Stig Meireles Johansen
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På
a 64bit route distinguisher and the 32bit ip address are used to
create vpnv4 address, which specifically solves the overlap problem
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Andy Saykao
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering from those in the know, whether it's best practice to
implement public or
In ASDM, there is a button under file called Show running configuration
in a new window. That opens up a browser window with a URL something
like:
https://X.Y.Z.6/admin/exec/show%20running-config/show%20running-config%2
0asdm# that shows the whole running config.
Probably nothing you couldn't
We have layer 2 connectivity from our main office to an offsite facility where
our servers reside. We are connected via fiber but is not a dedicated circuit.
Recently I created a VLAN with same ID on both switches (main office and
Offsite facility) . I trunked the port on both ends but not
Q-in-Q
Johnny Ramirez wrote:
We have layer 2 connectivity from our main office to an offsite facility
where our servers reside. We are connected via fiber but is not a dedicated
circuit.
Recently I created a VLAN with same ID on both switches (main office and
Offsite facility) . I
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 09:41:09PM -0400, Christian Koch wrote:
a 64bit route distinguisher and the 32bit ip address are used to
create vpnv4 address, which specifically solves the overlap problem
I don't think the overlap is the real issue:
Although I tend to be more fond of using public
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Andy Saykao wrote:
Just wondering from those in the know, whether it's best practice to
implement public or private IP's for the PE-to-CE link. What's everyone
using and why?
Best practice is to use public IP for the PE-CE link and then you admin
the CE using that
Justin,
I appreciate your well explained answer. So basically they would tell me what
VLANs I should use for me to match them.
Thanks
John--- On Tue, 8/19/08, Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Unable to connect VLAN
Johnny,
I think the better solution if your provider can accommodate, is to do
Q-in-Q instead of having to dictate what tags you can use. This allows you,
as Justin mentioned, to use your own tags across the circuit instead of
having to coordinate with them every time you need to add another
Johnny Ramirez wrote:
Justin,
I appreciate your well explained answer. So basically they would tell me
what VLANs I should use for me to match them.
That's one possibility. Hopefully your SP has progressed beyond that
point though and supports Q-in-Q. It scales much better than
For some reason, my Catalyst 2900 series (WS-C2924-XL) does not like
VLAN IDs higher than 1005:
sw01(config)#switchport trunk allowed vlan add 1202
Command rejected: Bad VLAN list - character #5 (EOL) delimits a VLAN
number (1202) out of the range 1 to 1005.
This is with a trunking interface:
Are you in transparent vtp mode?
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Alex Balashov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason, my Catalyst 2900 series (WS-C2924-XL) does not like VLAN
IDs higher than 1005:
sw01(config)#switchport trunk allowed vlan add 1202
Command rejected: Bad VLAN list -
Alex,
You don't get around it on the 2924. You will need to upgrade to the
2950G-24-EI.
They're not much more than the 2924.
Good luck.
Alex Balashov wrote:
For some reason, my Catalyst 2900 series (WS-C2924-XL) does not like
VLAN IDs higher than 1005:
sw01(config)#switchport trunk
Damn.
Are you absolutely sure there is no IOS upgrade for the existing switch
that can fix this?
Chris Phillips wrote:
Alex,
You don't get around it on the 2924. You will need to upgrade to the
2950G-24-EI.
They're not much more than the 2924.
Good luck.
Alex Balashov wrote:
For some
The last time I checked 12.0(WC17) or something like that, it was not
possible. WC17 came out in mid-2007 if I recall correctly.
I don't think that Cisco is going to support anything 1005 on the XL
series switches ever. Their goal is to keep you buying new gear, and if
they just keep
afaik, the 2900XL and 3500XL series switches do not support extended range
vLANs, you'll need to upgrade your switch, sorry ...
http://supportwiki.cisco.com/ViewWiki/index.php/The_Cisco_Catalyst_switch_does_not_permit_the_creation_of_extended-range_VLANs_in_the_VLAN_database_mode
-
Gabriel
59 matches
Mail list logo
