Hi All,
I see that our normal Console port can be configured for the following commands
..
Access-class X in
Transport preferred TELNET
In which scenario do we need these IP commands in a Console Port ??? Can
Console port listen to IP traffic ??
Rijas
Hi,
I'm having a problem understanding how to configure EoMPLS in a
specific case, I've read lots of docs and found lots of examples, but
none that apply to my problem, so I'm not even sure that what I want
to do is possible.
I have two 7206 G1 PE routers with client-facing ATM interfaces,
Hi all!
I have some problems using flow-capture and Cisco routers 7206-VXR/NPE-G2.
Once per 2 or 3 days the proccess flow-capture dies. It disappears from
top-table
on the server, working as a collector (FreeBSD, Intel Xeon 3220 4GB 4x1000GB
1x250GB ARECA 1110).
A Collector is not loaded hardly.
I see you have your PVC as vbr-nrt.
Orig poster has UBR
When we've tested QoS on ADSL we found the PVC had to be configured as
VBR-NRT to make QOS work. this may be the issue here.
I'm sure I found a reference on CCO to this behaviour but cant find it again
quickly.
Regards
Dean
-
Here it is
Because CBWFQ provides a minimum bandwidth guarantee, you can only apply
CBWFQ to VCs with classes of service other than UBR and UBR+.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk824/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094cf6.shtml
- Original Message -
From: Dean
Nathan wrote on Monday, October 20, 2008 10:29 AM:
Hi,
I'm having a problem understanding how to configure EoMPLS in a
specific case, I've read lots of docs and found lots of examples, but
none that apply to my problem, so I'm not even sure that what I want
to do is possible.
I have
Hi experts !!!
I'd like to ask you for help / advice on cisco 7600 l2 vpn's management
Can you recommend any system for as much as monitoring and gathering
statistics on l2 vpns?
Do you know the software capable of discovering service instances on
physical interface ?
Service instance don't
On 17/10/2008 09:09, Peter Taphouse wrote:
* SXF15 which has a bug in BFD that caused a router to reload when it
detects a link flap, turning a sub-second blip into a 10 minute brown
out whilst the router reloaded.
We're now still running SXF15, and we've not had any problems since we
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you need the routed pseudowire feature, but this is currently only
supported on the 7600
If this is a one-off requirement (i.e. not supposed to scale), you could
use a physical loop cable :-|
Most
I don't think that routed pseudowire would work for you, but I could
be mistaken. However, external loop may work. If I understand your
problem well, this is what you want (horrible ascii art follows):
[CE]---{ATM PVC}---[PE]---[P]---[PE]
| {L3}
The 2800 is also connected to the 7200 via a frame-relay to ATM PVC on which
OSPF is running fine (but not IPv6, but that's another story).
What is happening to those hello packets? Who is eating them?
Before I accuse intermediate DSLAM filtering them, could you post
relevant interface and
We are setting up a testbed for IP SLA monitoring and I wanted to
include our core 6500 switches into the test. For 2 of them this went
without problem, on two others this doesn't work : I get the following
error (after putting on debug) :
RTR unable to set SO_STRICT_ADDR_BIND option
I
Holemans Wim wrote:
We are setting up a testbed for IP SLA monitoring and I wanted to
include our core 6500 switches into the test. For 2 of them this went
without problem, on two others this doesn't work : I get the following
error (after putting on debug) :
RTR unable to set
Holemans Wim wrote on Monday, October 20, 2008 3:50 PM:
We are setting up a testbed for IP SLA monitoring and I wanted to
include our core 6500 switches into the test. For 2 of them this went
without problem, on two others this doesn't work : I get the following
error (after putting on
Hi Hank
It's a good question.
Your approach is good as mentioned by others in the thread, if you
advertise both externally at the same time. Private peering agreements
may still prefer the prepended route as it costs them less money.
Hence do not advertise your prefix on the backup path as
Please don't tell that to this router
policy-map llq
class sipRTP
priority 512
class class-default
fair-queue
random-detect
vc-class atm CVPHDSL-VoIP
vbr-nrt 1524 1524
encapsulation aal5snap
interface ATM3/0.20842 point-to-point
description cust 1
ip
Hello All -
Seeing an issue on FWSM running 3.2(4) code..
Where a static nat gets stuck, and the host becomes unreachable via
both ingress/egress
If i issue a clear xlate local x.x.x.x, this clears things up and
connectivity is restored
there are currently 2 hosts on the same network, yet this
Do you see the correct arp for the translation when it stops working?
You might need to define a static arp with alias to fix it.
--- On Mon, 20/10/08, Christian Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Christian Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [c-nsp] FWSM Static NAT gets stuck..
To: Cisco-nsp
i checked this when it happened the first time but i forgot what the
ouput was...thanks for the suggestion, i'll have to check it again
next time it pops up
christian
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Ozgur Guler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you see the correct arp for the translation when it
Hi there...
I just scanned Cisco's site and come up empty... got this weird message in
our logs this morning on a 7206VXR-NPE2G:
Oct 20 11:37:17: %UTIL-3-IDTREE_TRACE: SSM SEG freelist DB:Duplicate ID free
for 11532219 (count = 2)
-Traceback= 662444 6633DC 663B0C 2E1D644 2E1D7AC 17BCAA0 17A1FB0
Googling UTIL-3-IDTREE_TRACE returns 6 hits.
Apparently applicable for 10K and 12K boxes:
http://74.125.45.104/search?q=cache:e_oNyDi2EUcJ:cco.cisco.com/en/US/doc
s/ios/12_0/12_0sy/release/notes/120SYrn.html+UTIL-3-IDTREE_TRACEhl=enc
t=clnkcd=1gl=us
CSCek77589
Symptoms: The following message
Currently, my Wireless Control System is running on an upgraded WLSE
box that runs RHEL 4 (which came with the WLSE-WCS conversion) and
version 5.0.56 of the WCS software. I'd like to move to the latest
version but it requires RHEL 5. I don't have any RHEL licenses
otherwise as I use CentOS for
We are looking for a replacement for our 7200 BRAS routers. The ASR1002
looks promising:
- Dual IOS (Software Redundancy / Much easier upgrading)
- Standaard 4 GE ports
- 6-8 Mpps
- Front to back airflow in stead of side air flow
- Much hardware features like QOS / SBC / NBAR
Anybody some
I'm not sure if this will help, but try altering your
/etc/redhat-release (yes, centos has such a thing) file to say redhat
version 5 instead of centos version 5 before you install the WCS and see
if you can trick it into installing. Change it back to Centos, when you
are done installing it.
I'm
I've got one customer running a ASR 1006 and seems to be working just fine
on their 100 mb metro-e link; running 12.2(33) XNA - using basic EIGRP and
QoS features.. I've heard unconfirmed claims of some software instability
but maybe there's more people out there who have run into them.
On Mon,
You have to do the same thing to trick HP agents to install on Centos:
Edit /etc/redhat-release to contain:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Client release 5 (Tikanga)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Loughlin, Daniel
J.
Sent: Monday,
have you tried zenoss?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi all. I have a typical BGP loopback setup to my ISP. 4 links across 2
routers. 2 links on each router. Easy -- no problemo.
Now, how can I get loopback address redundancy? I'm currently using
Router A as my loopback address, with an iBGP to Router B, and
multihop and maximum-paths set up.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:46:31PM, Matt Carter wrote:
the main problem i've seen with this is that a lot of
providers are going to local pref their downstreams such that
they are not using provider/peer links for traffic going to
directly connected customers. given local pref beats as
ok just had it happen again and i checked, and the correct arp entry
was there...
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Ozgur Guler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you see the correct arp for the translation when it stops working?
You might need to define a static arp with alias to fix it.
--- On
Can anyone tell me what's wrong with this configuration or a better way to
do it? It doesn't appear to be working.
1811 - Cisco IOS Software, C181X Software (C181X-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version
12.4(20)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
3500Kb/s bi-directional connection via PPPOE - trying to give
Hi All,
Another interesting thing about the SB release we're using has to do
with flows.
After upgrading to the SB release (12.2(31)SB13) on a few production
7301 routers we noticed the usage was down for our PPPoE/A customers
connecting to that router. Based on historical data, one PPPoE/A
Hi Paul,
If I understand well, you're doing VoIP over a PPPoE link.
I never tried such a configuration (does not mean it should not work, just I
never had the chance to have to implement it), but as you're mentionning
that voice quality is not good, I would consider:
1) First thing very
33 matches
Mail list logo
