More features and above all more SECURITY.
Wireshark dissectors are tested against fuzzing by Mister G. Combs and
should be by dissectors authors by running tools/fuzz-test.sh before
putting public dissectors on bugs.wireshark.org.
My advice here is to always use the last version for limiting
fyi about 4B ASN :)
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:59:13AM -0600, Forrest W Christian wrote:
The must-have features in my mind are:
BGP4 w/Long ASN
Complain to your Cisco sales representative. And do it loudly.
To my knowledge, there is *still* no IOS version
Hi,
is anybody here using a Cisco 881 3G Router with IPSEC and can share his
experiences/config with me ?
Cheers
Anton
Anton Schweitzer
Senior Specialist BS Projekt Service
Customer Design
o2 (Germany) GmbH Co.OHG
Georg Brauchle-Ring 23-25, D-80992 München
Tel +49(0)89-2442-5794
What kind of box is this? GSR? what kind of cards?
Dave.
Drew Weaver wrote:
This is kind of a trivial question but does anyone know at or
around what numbers the 'show ip cef resources' is no longer G (Green?)
It has been creeping up over the last year or so and I'm just
hi Ross,
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
Hi everyone,
Has anyone running SXH on a SUP720-3B(-XL) series 6500 tried ip cef
optimize neighbor resolution?
Cisco's docs seem to offer the usual tautologous explanation, and as a
bonus, include a circular reference:
LOL, classic.
Both indicate that it
Thanks James this worked perfectly!
Cheers.
W
2008/11/5 James Slepicka [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
use the ip multicast boundary command:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/ipmulti/command/reference/1rfmult1.html#wp1058494
e.g.
ip access-l standard mcast_boundary_vl999
permit 224.9.9.9
int
There is no need to use attenuators for 10GBASE-LR even if you run it over
a 1 meter cable. Also, I would be very surprised if cisco didn't support SR
in that module, where did you get that information?
The datasheet doesnt say anything about supporting SR in that SPA. looks
like 10km with
Hi
Im looking at enabling 10G on the 12k platform and it looks like the
SPA-1x10GE-L-V2 is the one to go for inside a SIP601. But it seems like the
SPA only supports single mode SFPs.
Im finding hard to believe that i need to use single mode fibre to connect
the SPA to a switch in the same rack,
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, vince anton wrote:
Im looking at enabling 10G on the 12k platform and it looks like the
SPA-1x10GE-L-V2 is the one to go for inside a SIP601. But it seems like
the SPA only supports single mode SFPs.
The SPA-1x10GE-L-V2 supports XFP, not SFP.
Im finding hard to believe
Is there a command to allow received routes from the same AS #?
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this e-mail message and
any attachments are intended solely for the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential
and/or legally privileged information. If you
are not the
Hi Chaps,
I use to have a VPN tunnel running between two sites using Cisco Pix
6.x, the B end now has a dynamic IP address every time the router
reloads which means the tunnel has gone down and to get it back up we
have to reconfigure a ISAKMP key and change our config here on the A
end.
Is
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, vince anton wrote:
The datasheet doesnt say anything about supporting SR in that SPA. looks
like 10km with LR optics is the lowest you can go to cross a rack !!! -
check it out at
Neighbor allowas-in
Luan Nguyen
Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
www.NetCraftsmen.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephens, Jamie A
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 9:18 AM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] BGP Question
Is there a
Make certain that if you have multiple tunnels on your gateway device that
use the same tunnel source/ipsec profile, that you specify the shared
keyword at the end of the tunnel protection statement.
--
Eric Cables
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Rakesh Hegde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Hello Peter, thank you for your reply, I changed my NET address back to the
original and reloaded and I tried to dig up more data on this
FYI This is what my config looks like on this box.
router isis
net 49.0001.0001.5011.1565.00
is-type level-2-only
metric-style wide
spf-interval 30
Basically just another DHCP interface IP-wise.
Here's a sample configuration for DMVPN/IPSEC I used for 1841 3G-EVDO.
I used it as a primary connection as well as backup connection.
interface Dialer1
ip address negotiated
ip virtual-reassembly
encapsulation ppp
dialer pool 1
dialer
Just change your A end to use dynamic map.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/products_configuration
_example09186a0080094680.shtml
Luan Nguyen
Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
www.NetCraftsmen.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 08:49:27PM +1100, Lincoln Dale wrote:
the feature is essentially an enhancement for how CEF Gleans and the
like are handled.
if you're familiar with how those kinds of things work, they would
typically need to punt to software to resolve a (not yet available)
Hi all,
I'm testing the control plane policy in my lab. Now i found a very
interesting event.
I have a 6500/sup720 whit different IOS (SXF6, SXF10a, SXH3a). I send a
very big SYN flood to this router.
I'm doing this test in clear config. (erase startup, reload :) )
I made a policy:
Hi
I have a couple of GSR's and 7600'2 running ldp in an an MPLS test environment.
All of a sudden 1 GSR has lost all its LDP neighours. I have cleared the mpls
ldp neighours, and finally ended up rebooting the router with no success
Here is an brief output of some ldp commands:
-here
Thanks for the input.
-Rakesh
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Franklin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 05,
2008 10:03:
On Wed, November 5, 2008 6:24 am, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
if I recall
Hi all,
I'm about to begin upgrading our old sup1a/msfc1 switches from both
native and hybrid ios to sup32 native. My main requirements are simple,
bgp and ios slb. The new download layout and new hardware are causing
me some problems. Am I going to need both sp and rp images or a single
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:58:39AM -0500, Jason LeBlanc wrote:
Am I going to need both sp and rp images or a single image?
For native, it's a single image. We run
s3223-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF7.bin
and yours should be similarily named (starting with s3223-...).
gert
--
control plane overloaded by traffic? are you doing control plane policing?
Mark Tech wrote:
Hi
I have a couple of GSR's and 7600'2 running ldp in an an MPLS test
environment. All of a sudden 1 GSR has lost all its LDP neighours. I have
cleared the mpls ldp neighours, and finally ended up
I would start with what was done here ?
Nov 6 14:44:45 GMT: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by vty0
(5.14.64.1)
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tech
Sent: giovedì 6 novembre 2008 17.39
To:
Hello List
I have a dedicated LNS for what we call our pwan customers, all
connections are ADSL PPPoA and they all use private IP ranges as there
is currently no internet access. We have about 150 connections spread
over 8 customers, these are currently grouped by customer and then
separated from
Great, thanks for simplifying this for me. ;)
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:58:39AM -0500, Jason LeBlanc wrote:
Am I going to need both sp and rp images or a single image?
For native, it's a single image. We run
s3223-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF7.bin
Hi All,
We have recently deployed 17, 6500's on campus, and about two months
in we have already had 5 supervisors fail for no apparent reason. When
we call TAC they just RMA us a new Sup, but I suspect (cannot prove)
that something else is causing this problem. At first I thought it was
I will at least give it a try and upgrade to SXH3a or wait couple
weeks for SXH4. SXH2 is really buggy.
pavel
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Richard Chew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
We have recently deployed 17, 6500's on campus, and about two months in we
have already had 5
Hello to all,
I thought this would be easy to find, and maybe I haven't looked in the
right place, but figured I'd ask.
I have a Cat6509 switch, and on a couple of the interfaces I have feeding
from some servers, I keep seeing input errors, as shown below:
FastEthernet9/48 is up, line
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 09:48 -0500, David Jacobs wrote:
When I do a sh spf-log this is the message I keep seeing
On Cisco
00:24:50 72109 8 router1.00-00 TLVCONTENT
00:24:20 72109 8 router1.00-00 TLVCONTENT
00:23:50 76109 8
Hi All,
I'm upgrading IOS on my c7206VXR with an npe-300 and:
UBR7200-I/O-2FE/E
PA-A3-T3=
PA-IMA-T1=
PA-4E=
I'm currently using 122-28.SB2 and noticed a 122-31.SB. Is anyone using the
12.2(31)SB instead of the 12.2(28)SB? I've been looking online and haven't
seen much about it. I assume it's
Ruben,
Funny you mention it.
I've just finished an upgrade of a mixture of 7301 and 7206vxr to
12.2(31)SB13.
Had a 7301 running in production for 1 week, no issues, the LNS seems a lot
more stable if you ask me.
Don't know how the 7206 will go as they have been in production less than an
hour
Ruben,
We are using the 12.2.(31)SB on one of our routers. We saw some problems
with policy routing with VRF's with the SB6 release, but we expect this
be fixed in the SB12+.
For a full list of software/hardware features/caveats, see
What kind of features do you use with the 7206VXR box ? We are also
looking to upgrade to 12.2.31SB13 because we have some problems with
12.2(31)SB6.
regards Rinse
Roddy Strachan schreef:
Ruben,
Funny you mention it.
I've just finished an upgrade of a mixture of 7301 and 7206vxr to
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 14:24 -0500, Howard Leadmon wrote:
FastEthernet9/48 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is C6k 100Mb 802.3, address is 0004.de66.8f73 (bia
0004.de66.8f73)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
That's a great Cisco doc, thanks. I haven't been able to find anything on
Google, but we are having issues with static IP configuration with the new
Actiontec M1000 modem firmware (v2.) I can assign static IP addresses to
the modem via radius, but cannot with the IP unnumbered mode feature in
10:55am Mark Tinka said:
Hi all.
We've had a bit of bad luck lately with a couple of NPE-G1's
suddenly reloading due watchdog timeouts.
WAG: The pseudo-preemption gets tangled by something like BFD?
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2008-October/055734.html
../C
No real special features.
MQOS to allow QOS policies on the fly as well as POD radius disconnects.
Other than that its a plan vanilla PPP/LNS termination device.
On 7/11/08 8:14 AM, Rinse Kloek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What kind of features do you use with the 7206VXR box ? We are also
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 22:20 +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
1067610 packets input, 920823086 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 0 broadcasts (0 multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
980 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
cut
I have googled around a bit,
Hi there.
I'm looking for a Cisco doc or a quick guide to *best practice* for the
following scenario:
Provider A gets 5 upstream BGP feeds via two core routers.
Provider B wants to purchase transit from Provider A but does not want to
send/receive any traffic via one of Provider A's
Hi All,
I am researching if there is a possibility to save some money on links
by using link compression. I am not talking WAN acceleration, but
something that will basically zip packets on one end and unzip on
another. Link bandwidths are 10Gig and up.
Any recommendations/experiences are
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 14:24 -0500, Howard Leadmon wrote:
FastEthernet9/48 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is C6k 100Mb 802.3, address is 0004.de66.8f73 (bia
0004.de66.8f73)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 22:20 +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
1067610 packets input, 920823086 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 0 broadcasts (0 multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
980 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
cut
I have googled around a
Hi,
That module is limited to 32Gbps which is split up into 4 ASIC's that
handle 12 ports each.
Quoting Cisco's website -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_configura
tion_example09186a0080118a5c.shtml
You can also take a look at the counters that indicate if the
Hi All,
I am facing an issue with Ipv6-multicast. Here I am seeing variance in
route entries with different command outputs
1) sh ipv mld groups summary
MLD Route Summary
No. of (*,G) routes = 16
No. of (S,G)
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone else on the list here has seen this issue we've been
struggling to pin down:
We are using interface SPAN (both rx tx) on the 65k platform (S720/3BXL,
currently running SXH3a) to aggregate data from (3) different 10G interfaces
into a 10G output port for use with a
Hi,
be careful with your NPE-300, which has already reached
End-of-everything and is not supported with 12.2SB train.
As far as I know the last supported S-based train for NPE-300
is 12.2S.
You might notice the warning message at bootup of the router or if
issuing of show version command.
Ivan
48 matches
Mail list logo
