AFAIK without BVI interfaces this will not work. You need to reconfigure
the subinterfaces of Fa0 to match what Leslie pointed out:
interface FastEthernet0.10
encapsulation dot1Q 10
bridge-group 10
bridge-group 10 spanning-disabled
!
interface FastEthernet0.20
encapsulation dot1Q 20
Hello List!
Questions about platformX vs platformY or what platform to choose is not
new for discussion here, but I didn't find mails in archives that directly fits
to my needs. So, I would really appreciate any suggestions (or usefull
references or links :-)).
We are using 7206VXR-G1/G2
Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 06:18 -0700, Bill Blackford wrote:
The subject line says it all.
I have some questions regarding how the upgrade works.
1. Do I only upgrade the master?
Technically no, but the master might be able to auto-upgrade the
-Original Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
Anyone can write an informational rfc. See apr 1 as an example. One can
easily
write up what they do, or survey responses. You can then follow the
feedback
from your request.
That is exactly my point - if /126s are the
Hi, I have a pair of ASA5500 devices that I wish to use to provide VPN
services. I've been googling but all the examples I've found on Cisco.com
and other sites are designed for configuration using the ASDM. The ASDM is
absolutely awful to use and also almost entirely inaccessible with a screen
Scott,
I hope this helps:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008060f25c.shtml#cli
.
aaa-server WINDOWS protocol nt
aaa-server WINDOWS (inside) host x.x.x.x
nt-auth-domain-controller servername
group-policy name-vpn-policy internal
group-policy
Hello,
Guys, are there any drawbacks of doing the following:
interface Lo0
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.1
encapsulation dot1q 1 native
ip unnumbered Lo0
!
ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0.1
!
as opposed to having ip address configured
Loopback interfaces do not go down, so I'm not sure what benefit you are
getting besides the ability to blackhole the 10.10.10.0/24 if the ethernet
goes down.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:09, Michael Ulitskiy mulits...@acedsl.com wrote:
Hello,
Guys, are there any drawbacks of doing the
So you don't want to use another IP for loopback. Sorry, misunderstood.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:29, Aaron dudep...@gmail.com wrote:
Loopback interfaces do not go down, so I'm not sure what benefit you are
getting besides the ability to blackhole the 10.10.10.0/24 if the ethernet
goes down.
Don't do it. It's a hack and there are other forwarding plane things
that don't like it. Read as..it may or may not always work.
Burn another /32 for your loopback.
Rodney
Aaron wrote:
Loopback interfaces do not go down, so I'm not sure what benefit you are
getting besides the ability to
Jack,
can you define lots of ping drops? primary CSC OIR (or CSC switchover)
is expected to cause traffic loss for a few seconds..
What type of fabric is this (2.5, 10 or 40Gbps) and which chassis? Do
you see the same traffic loss on all linecard types? If you see more
than 10 seconds or so loss,
To follow up,
I have tried 12.4(20)T3, 12.4(24)T, 12.4(24)T1, all of them have the
same symptom.
I have downgraded back to 12.4(15)T9 and the network is stable again.
I need at least 12.4(20)T because we want to implement IOS content filtering.
TAC case is pending.
I will post again when the
OSPF does not work across unnumbered VLAN subinterfaces.
http://wiki.nil.com/Unnumbered_Ethernet_VLAN_interfaces#Limitations
Ivan
http://www.ioshints.info/about
http://blog.ioshints.info/
-Original Message-
From: Michael Ulitskiy [mailto:mulits...@acedsl.com]
Sent: Monday, August
Recently I have to configured L3VPN Inter-AS Option C on our network,while I
noticed these issue on ASBR:
1.Cisco(7609 router) will allocate Implicit Null(3) label for routes locally
generated on ASBR.
2.For routes learned from the PE in the same AS(suppose using LDP in the
local AS),when
It's not about saving a /32.
This is a CPE device and I was just trying to save myself administrative burden
of maintaining another per-customer static ip assignment.
I don't need dynamic routing protocol to run on those interfaces, but thanks
for pointing it out anyway.
Ok, if I have to do it
Not sure what's attached to the IP, or what you want to achieve , but a
different approach would be to add no keepalive to the ethernet so it is always
up.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:05:03PM +0400, ? ? wrote:
We are using 7206VXR-G1/G2 platform as edge router (PE) in our MPLS network.
When traffic volume grows, we replace NPE-G1 processor with NPE-G2.
But in future we'll need something more powerfull.
As far as I understand the
Hi,
I currently have a setup below that works ok, but I'd like some opinions
about some unanswered questions ive got.
Basically i currently offer IP based services to customers. What i do is
run a fibre to a customer site, which on my end terminates in a switch as a
vlan or as a trunk allowing
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, vince anton wrote:
My concern here is whether this is best practise for delivering such
services, or if other ways of doing this are out there and proven better.
No, that's a common model.
Last but not least, security. what if a customer plugs the fibre link
into his
I decided to go with Internet connection solution but based on your
experience as a customer what ISP should i select ?
Level3 , Globalcrossing , Verizon , Sparkle , TATA or FLAG?
thanks
Andy
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Scott Granados gsgrana...@comcast.netwrote:
I still like the heavy
selection will depend on service relaibility , network stability and support
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Andy William awilliam1...@gmail.com wrote:
I decided to go with Internet connection solution but based on your
experience as a customer what ISP should i select ?
Level3 ,
Antivirus, verzia databazy 4300
(20090803) __
Tuto spravu preveril ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.sk
__ Informacia od ESET NOD32 Antivirus, verzia databazy 4300
(20090803) __
Tuto spravu preveril ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.sk
Hi
By layers are your suggesting building tunnels to match the iBGP
topology so the peers all think they are directly connected?
Interesting thought but not sure how it'd scale with gre etc. There
is mpls configured on the core (just for inter-DC EoMPLS at present)
so perhaps mpls-te
Looking for a well structure web site of info from this list? Just
use markmail.
David
...
On 02/08/2009, at 11:51 PM, e ninja wrote:
Gert,
So if we apply your thought process, there is no value in capturing
and
organizing re-usable intellectual capital? I guess you must think
Looks like Cisco went and removed a bunch of IOS release from the
website in May. Not sure if this has already been discussed here.
http://www.cisco.com/web/software/SPRIT/swretirement/IOSRetirementTable.html
Anyone with older production equipment should probably archive their
images from
Thanks.
But I did almost exactly you suggested and still not working. BTW, the command
bridge 10 route ip doesn't work since only command bridge 1 route ip works.
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk wrote:
From: Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Can't pick
26 matches
Mail list logo
