Drew,
If your VLANs are all covered by network X.Y.Z.W area V command under
router ospf T then they all are represented as Type-1/Type-2 LSA in OSPF
LSDB.
And every time a VLAN goes down, LSA-1/2 are reflooded with Age=MaxAge
(default 3600 sec).
When this VLAn goes back up, LSA-1/2 are
On 30/11/2009 14:57, Jared Mauch wrote:
They made classless routing the default now in XE 2.5/XNE
Is there even an option to use classful routing on ios-xe? I simply can't
imagine who would use this, or why.
Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Alex,
If this is a big concern and you have the option,
check out IS-IS.
Eric :)
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 03:09:31PM -, Alex wrote:
Drew,
If your VLANs are all covered by network X.Y.Z.W area V command under
router ospf T then they all are represented as Type-1/Type-2 LSA in OSPF
On Dec 1, 2009, at 12:25 AM, Kevin Loch wrote:
Will the 2T and new LC's work in the 7600 chassis?
That depends upon if/when the 7600 team commit to the putative, unannounced
hardware we're speculating about which we don't know for sure exists, or when
it will be available, if it is.
;
Best
Since there is WPA-PSK and WPA2 often known as Enterprise,
The real difference is that WPA-PSK uses a fixed 'pre-shared' key to
encrypt the link between the AP and the supplicant, Enterprise assumes
that a RADIUS server is available to authenticate the session and set
the key for the
Not to be confused with WPA2-psk which is like WPA psk but uses aes instead
of TKIP cryptography.
- Original Message -
From: Scott McGrath mcgr...@fas.harvard.edu
To: 'cisco-nsp' cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco AIRONET
That's what I LIKE about standards - SO MANY incompatible ones to choose
from...
- Scott
Scott Granados wrote:
Not to be confused with WPA2-psk which is like WPA psk but uses aes instead
of TKIP cryptography.
- Original Message -
From: Scott McGrath mcgr...@fas.harvard.edu
To:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:18:13 +0100, you wrote:
Best to ask these questions of your Cisco account team.
Exactly :)
They say: We don't know. We can't get a definite answer from the BU.
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:18:13 +0100, you wrote:
Best to ask these questions of your Cisco account team.
Exactly :)
They say: We don't know. We can't get a definite answer from the BU.
Hopefully they won't screw everyone (again) who forklifted their 6500's
to
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:16:53AM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
Not to be confused with WPA2-psk which is like WPA psk but uses aes
instead of TKIP cryptography.
Let me clear up on a few terms:
There are a few pairs:
The (wireless) protocol to negotiate the (per packet) authentication
and
I've had a 2821 reload unexpectedly -sh ver shows a bus error as below
Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version
12.4(22)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc5)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Thu
Hi All,
I went through the archives and couldn't find specifically what I was
looking for and of course, most of the Cisco links are broken now, but I
noticed that QoS is applied to my virtual-template interface in my config,
but when I do a show policy-map interface virtual-access xx, I get
Sorry, should have included the importants as well.
Im running a little older code 12.3 mainline on NPE-G1. Gonna check to see
if this is a bug or not a feature, which I also read in another thread.
Clue
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Reuben Farrelly
reuben-cisco-...@reub.netwrote:
Hi,
Hi,
What version of code are you running?
I have found 12.4 mainline worked ok, but somewhere along the 12.4T series and
including 15.0(M) I cannot apply any QoS policies to Virtual-Access interfaces
- policies just don't apply. I have a TAC case open for this now...
Reuben
Clue Store
I do think you'll need the parent/child setup. The problems start with
knowing what to set the parent policer to. If all you're sessions are fixed
B/W then you can hard code it. If you have a mix then you may have more of a
challenge.
Some providers pass through the downstream B/W from the
Pete,
This is a software issue. The address - 0x1E - is invalid.
Eninja
On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:11 PM, Pete Barnwell pe...@whole-uk.com wrote:
I've had a 2821 reload unexpectedly -sh ver shows a bus error as below
Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version
It doesn't help me as I already know. That's why I was responding to the
original poster.
Maybe you could try that?
tv
- Original Message -
From: Scott McGrath mcgr...@fas.harvard.edu
To: 'cisco-nsp' cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 12:47 PM
Subject: Re:
17 matches
Mail list logo
