The best box to monitor video with is an IneoQuest or two... :)
On Aug 16, 2010 8:44 PM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com wrote:
We have very large numbers of high-bandwidth multicast video streams
to monitor. The product is not vaporware, it's sitting on my desk!
We've had it for a while,
7600 will get it too ;-)
--
Tassos
Raymond Lucas wrote on 17/08/2010 01:45:
Available now on ME switches... surely only a matter of time before it
(re-)appears on other platforms...
Unfortunately no documentation to go with it yet though.
On 08/16/2010 05:02 PM, John Neiberger wrote:
Anyone here running CMM? I've been tasked with learning about it and
installing it. We've apparently had it for a couple of months, but no
one has had time to get it up and running. I'd love to hear if anyone
here is running and what your thoughts
David Freedman wrote on 13/08/2010 19:35:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
Does anyone know what is the trigger syntax for elam in order to match
on src mac address?
The only syntax i found being accepted is the following, but i'm not
sure if that is working.
show platform capture elam
David Freedman wrote on 13/08/2010 19:35:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
Does anyone know what is the trigger syntax for elam in order to match
on src mac address?
The only syntax i found being accepted is the following, but i'm not
sure if that is working.
show platform capture elam
Friends,
As you are already aware of the natural catastrophic disaster occurred in
Pakistan in recent month. Disaster on this scale would be devastating for
any country, but for Pakistan – a developing nation, chronically unstable
due to fight against terrorism - the consequences may go well
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 08/16/2010 05:02 PM, John Neiberger wrote:
Anyone here running CMM? I've been tasked with learning about it and
installing it. We've apparently had it for a couple of months, but no
one has had time to get it up
On (2010-08-17 11:50 +0300), Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
This isn't an IP packet (it probably has to do with CFM) and i only
know the source mac address.
AFAIK what you want to do, needs to be done by matching bit by bit.
First you specify pattern then you specify mask. So if you
want to
All:
I know there are tools out there like RANCID that help manage configuration
changes but we want something that will be able to be able to have a system
that will not only be able to document what changes were made, but to also
document why.
Can anyone out there make recommendations on
Maybe you want a system that enforces configuration workflow, such as LMS.
There, you can comment each work order with *why* this is to be done. You have
to enforce to have this documented before the changes are done, otherwise the
operators will fail to comment ex-post, with increasing
I hope this is where I have to post this question at.
I have 2 routers. r1 is the router connected to the net via an ethernet
interface, it is performing nat to exit to the world, and r2 is a router behind
it and connects wireless users.
r1 and r2 have a switch between them and few servers
Troubleshooting black hole issues again with the Nexus 7k. My question is..
is there a way to track when the peer bit is set/flagged so I can find when
my packets are going nowhere?
Thank you,
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I have used CMM for through several iterations of the product (from 2.3 - 3.1).
We had about 500 streams, MPEG 2, MPEG 4, video, music channels, etc for an
IPTV platform.
The latest release is a major improvement and it provides a great GUI so people
could see the multicast flows.
I
Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:18:28AM -0500, Jeff Wojciechowski:
All:
I know there are tools out there like RANCID that help manage configuration
changes but we want something that will be able to be able to have a system
that will not only be able to document what changes were made, but to also
On 8/17/10 2:46 AM, Asif Gul Khan wrote:
[snipped plea for charitable donations]
By definition, this list is email.
By definition, it is bulk.
Pleas for donations for charitable causes, no matter how worthy, in my
opinion and understanding of the purpose and charter of this list are by
We have written an PHP page for running rancid for a certain device and adding
CVS comments just like John noted in the
e-mail before. By using this method you can make your configuration changes and
afterwards run rancid and add comments
to the config changes. This should help with adding the
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:45:08AM +1200, Raymond Lucas wrote:
Available now on ME switches... surely only a matter of time before it
(re-)appears on other platforms...
Unfortunately no documentation to go with it yet though.
On 17/08/2010 18:15, Jay Hennigan wrote:
In the spirit of the Boulder Pledge, I would encourage the subscribers
of this list to donate to charities that do not participate in or
condone network abuse in their promotional efforts.
Jay,
I don't think you'd be saying this if half of California
For the last decade, we've been using a Redback SMS 500 to terminate our
DSL customers, delivered via ATM DS3.
Recently, however, a few customers (as well as the partners of the
company) have expressed a desire to bond 2 DSL circuits.
Unfortunately, we've discovered that the customers who
On 8/17/10 12:46 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
I don't think you'd be saying this if half of California were under
water (about the size affected in .pk), two thirds the population of CA
were displaced by these floods, with 2000 dead, cholera breaking out,
starvation looming for 6 million people
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:44:20 -0700
Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote:
It is a slippery slope. His is a worthy cause. People are in need,
no question about it. However if everyone with a worthy cause posted
to every unrelated forum, the signal-to-noise would become
overwhelming.
I would
Oh I'd definitely draw the line at this single post about a mediocre cause,
Jay.
I couldn't even fathom how quickly the world would crumble if he did it on
more than one technical mailing list! That would be worse than say - I don't
know - a natural disaster in Pakistan!!
On 18/08/2010, at 1:24 AM, Jmail Clist wrote:
Troubleshooting black hole issues again with the Nexus 7k. My question is..
is there a way to track when the peer bit is set/flagged so I can find when
my packets are going nowhere?
no idea what you mean by peer bit.
contact me off list with some
Guys,
Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch
connection) - I thought that setting
speed auto would solve it.
R3#
*Mar 1 00:12:08.323: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
*Mar 1 00:12:10.027: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/0, changed
state
Do you have two Cisco devices separated by a non-Cisco device? Imagine this:
A B --- C
A and C are Cisco devices, B is not. If B is a switch or a hub, it
will pass CDP frames from A to C, which can cause these weird
mismatches. It's not really a mismatch because A and C are not
actually
Verify duplex and speed configurations on interface, the rule is:
autoXauto, forcedXforced. If problem not solve, disable cdp.
Att,
AB
2010/8/17 Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com:
Guys,
Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch
connection) - I thought that
Jeff,
use the 'show interface FastEthernet0/0' command on this router (R3)
and see a problem:
'duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 ''(not full duplex)''
- this interface not operate in fullduplex mode.'
Att,
AB
2010/8/17 Alessandro Braga sandro.u...@gmail.com:
Verify duplex and
Guys,
Thanks for all replies, googling it I came across a link at groupstudy from
someone experiencing the same problem before when labbing up CCIE
topologies.
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200701/msg01450.html
I think it is a dynamips 'bug/weird behavior' , the way of getting rid
You would need to change the duplex (half or full) to solve this, not the
speed.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 22:03, Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch
connection) - I thought that setting
speed auto would solve
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Alessandro Braga wrote:
Verify duplex and speed configurations on interface, the rule is:
autoXauto, forcedXforced. If problem not solve, disable cdp.
Also, while auto speed/duplex negotiation is fine for user workstation/PC
ports in most cases, I recommend against using
You may want to ask TAC for the latest Interim or disable SIP inspection if
you don't need it and see if either helps.
It may not help you, but in 8.0.5.x Cisco started mucking around with SIP
inspection; perhaps to fix the security vulnerability. At one place in our
network it broke some
Jeff,
probably your configurations dont are correct or the autonegotiation
dont work properly, try put the shut and no shut commands on envolved
interfaces.
i dont remember of the any case this.
Rgs,
AB
2010/8/17 Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com:
Guys,
Thanks for all replies,
Hi there,
Kindly provide the output of the show run int fa0/0 on RT3. Thanks.
regards,
YapCH
http://itcertguides.blogspot.com/
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:03:44 -0300
From: Jeferson Guardia
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
Message-ID:
Guys,
why no one read the 'dynamis' word on the subject? this is a particular
issue being experienced on a 3725 being used as a switch on DYNAMIPS... it
just doesnt work...
2010/8/17 Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Alessandro Braga wrote:
Verify duplex and
Is there any way to get a PA-FE-TX to autonegotiate duplex?
Peace... Sridhar
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
You haven't mentioned current and anticipated PPS requirement. If it's
really just one DS3 then a 7200VXR with NPE-G2 should be fine, otherwise if
your needs were 100+ Mbps and growing, the ASR1K, I'm told, is a good box.
We use 12.2(31)SB18 -- the latest in that series, but only because of a
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Sridhar Ayengar ploops...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any way to get a PA-FE-TX to autonegotiate duplex?
Peace... Sridhar
As long as both sides are set to auto, it should negotiate properly.
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Verify duplex and speed configurations on interface, the rule is:
autoXauto, forcedXforced. If problem not solve, disable cdp.
Also, while auto speed/duplex negotiation is fine for user workstation/PC
ports in most cases, I recommend against using it on your network
infrastructure if
38 matches
Mail list logo
