I'd rather suggest him to ask himself What am I trying to ask?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 8:37 PM
To: jack daniels
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shahid Shafi wrote:
Is anyone able to run 12.2.33 SRE train with Dynamips? I am trying to run it
on NPE-G2 and NPE-400 with no luck. My routers keep crashing without any
rhyme or reason. I also tried to decompress the image and bumped up the
Shahid Shafi wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone able to run 12.2.33 SRE train with Dynamips? I am trying to run it
on NPE-G2 and NPE-400 with no luck. My routers keep crashing without any
rhyme or reason. I also tried to decompress the image and bumped up the
memory to 1 Gig but still no success. Please
I was able to start it this way:
autostart=false
##
# Instance 0 #
##
[localhost:7200]
[[7200]]
image = c7200-adventerprisek9.122-33.SRE2.bin
ram = 256
npe = npe-400
idlepc = 0x624fa21c
mmap = false
[[Router R1]]
model = 7200
console = 2001
Regards,
Hi Team!
We have following config on the 3750 switch.
track 10 rtr 10 reachibility
!
ip route 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 vlan10 1.1.1.2 track 10
!
ip sla 10
tcp-connect 1.1.1.2 3 source-ip 1.1.1.1 source-port 433
!
The main disadvantage of such config is that route removed from routing
This is a bit late, but check out the documentation for the FSU and
eFSU procedures. I just did a VSS upgrade using the eFSU procedure and
it went well. We were not using a modular IOS, but there may be a
process detailed for that.
- Chris
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:26 AM, David Crane
We got an alarm that a T3 to a customer was down. PE router showed
interface up, line protocol down. CE router showed down/down. Provider
side goes to an Adtran Opti-mux out OC-12 to Verizon, customer end is a
Verizon mux on premise.
Called Vz and they claimed it was CPE, they saw idle loop
On 1/18/2011 09:52, Jay Hennigan wrote:
We got an alarm that a T3 to a customer was down. PE router showed
interface up, line protocol down. CE router showed down/down. Provider
side goes to an Adtran Opti-mux out OC-12 to Verizon, customer end is a
Verizon mux on premise.
Called Vz and
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 20:26 +0300, Sergey Voropaev wrote:
We have following config on the 3750 switch.
track 10 rtr 10 reachibility
!
ip route 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 vlan10 1.1.1.2 track 10
!
ip sla 10
tcp-connect 1.1.1.2 3 source-ip 1.1.1.1 source-port 433
!
The main
hi I am troubleshooting increasing ignore counts on 2950 to 2950 switch to
switch interface. This counter is increasing at same rate as no-buffer
under show interface. When I did show interface fast 0/2 counter errors
The counter rcv-error also increasing at same rate.
There are 4 2950 switches
What's the easiest way to find all bugs related to a particular platform?
It's simple enough to look through the release notes and the like for
specific version of IOS, but what about bugs related to specific box?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Is there any good reason to turn on STP on a switch port to a
customer? It seems like it could cause more trouble than preventing a
loop. What's your common practice? What if you hand off two
connection for redundancy?
I am in the middle of converting to MSTP from a network that didn't
really
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:52:16AM -0800, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Reconnected to Verizon mux and everything came back up nice and happy.
That's what is bugging me. Circuit has been running fine for months.
We've seen that on E3s and T3s as well - seems sometimes the stuff
just de-syncs, and
Release Notes, Bug Toolkit, Account Team.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Keegan Holley
keegan.hol...@sungard.com wrote:
What's the easiest way to find all bugs related to a particular platform?
It's simple enough to look through the release notes and the like for
specific version of IOS,
Really bad idea.. if you had 2 connection through a single switch, makes sure
it
your switch or managed by you. Or else, use L3 solutions.
Thanks,
Insan
- Original Message
From: Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wed, January 19, 2011
Cisco Catalyst 3750 QoS Configuration Examples is also a decent
documentation, can be found on the following link.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_tech_note09186a0080883f9e.shtml
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Dan Letkeman danletke...@gmail.com wrote:
Nick,
Im not sure you have a choice. If there are redundant links in the design
then spanning tree is the only way to prevent loops (unless you're running
TRILL or something like that). If you don't have any redundant links then
spanning tree can't cause much damage, although I would still leave it
What load-balance method do you use? If you see an uneven distribution
of output drops across the 2 L2 interface, consider changing the
etherchannel load-balance method to have a more even traffic
distribution (src-dst-ip for example).
I understand that you have 5 switches in the stack. You might
There are only good reasons for enabling it on L2 links. STP is
required to avoid bridging loops on L2 networks. The bad idea is to
disable it, especially if you're planning to hand out redundant links.
If you want to avoid incidents like creative customer attaching a
switch to the network or
I'd say the 'best' way is to go through your account team. Cisco doesn't post
all the bugs to their website. They only show the bugs which other customers
have reported, and not ones found internally. Your account team will have
access to ALL the bugs for a particular platform/code train.
Ken
Did you set the config-register to 0x0102 as well? It has been
mentioned in the guide that it's mandatory in order for the system to
autoboot with the IOS after the ROMMON upgrade.
Best regards,
Andras
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger
cisco-...@ml.karotte.org wrote:
Just a
On 2011-01-18 22:36, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
I'd say the 'best' way is to go through your account team. Cisco doesn't post
all the bugs to their website. They only show the bugs which other customers
have reported, and not ones found internally. Your account team will have
access to ALL the
Any attenuators involved?? I've actually experienced the same thing before
and traced it back to what we believed to be a bad attenuator. Replaced it
and LOS cleared right up. I only mention it because the Adtran MUX that was
in use at that facility didn't have a way to dial down the DB's.
On
Do any of you support / host servers from GE ?
Anyone have any of them in LACP port channels ?
thank you,
chris
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Agreed, and just asking for all the bugs on the platform(if you got
it) would likely give a deluge of mostly useless / incomprehensible
info. What you want to do is frame it something like this. I will be
deploying this box, to this place in my network, to offer these
services, with this
Hello,
We have a number of channelized DS3's that are terminating on to a 7206VXR
with the standard old PA-MC-T3 cards. We have a need to deliver ATM based
DS1's out to Adtran DSLAMs in the field. Customers will connect to the
Adtran units via ADSL and their local telco loop and their data is
On 18/01/2011 22:27, chris stand wrote:
Do any of you support / host servers from GE ?
Anyone have any of them in LACP port channels ?
Yes. Be very careful with your switch uplinks if you do this, because
applications can be badly behaved and can cause serious problems due to
Nick Voth nv...@estreet.com wrote:
We have a number of channelized DS3's that are terminating on to a 7206VXR
with the standard old PA-MC-T3 cards. We have a need to deliver ATM based
DS1's out to Adtran DSLAMs in the field. Customers will connect to the
Adtran units via ADSL and their local
Neither setting confreg to 0x102 doesn't help here. Also, in release
notes directly focused to ROMMON for Sup6E, there's only serial console
method (with boot break) mentioned for upgrading.
Daniel
On 01/18/2011 10:36 PM, Tóth András wrote:
Did you set the config-register to 0x0102 as well? It
There are many cases when terminating a DSLAM with a single T1 makes sense.
You assumed that these were ADSL end users, they may not be. We used this
exact model in a previous gig to terminate a bunch of management interfaces on
hardware or console servers. There's lots of telemetry type
Scott Granados sc...@granados-llc.net wrote:
Also, the DSLAMs I am familiar with (samsung, redback and nokia) can =
terminate DS3 or DS1.
Nokia D50 is the one I'm familiar with:
http://ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG/OpenWAN/DSLAMs/Nokia/
Its uplink options are DS3/ATM or OC3/ATM, no DS1/ATM. It can
Jay--
I have had similar experience with some T3s from Vz. I like to unplug and
replug as you and Gert noted. Plus I like to keep some spare coax and
adapters hanging around my routers. When I invariably receive the it's the
CPE I loop the cables and ask them if they see a loop. That shuts
Hi,
I have very basic question related to MTU / IP MTU value and ping test with
DF bit
*Scenario: *
I have one router connected to HUB router with Link leasing from SP
** 1. On spoke side, we have GigaEthernet Interface with MTU
value set to 1520
2. On HUB side, that
Yes these end users are ADSL users and in many cases these are very rural
connections where a single T1 will suffice. Often we bond several of them
with IMA to get better capacity, but higher bandwidth links are unavailable.
Thanks,
-Nick Voth
From: Scott Granados sc...@granados-llc.net
Nick Voth nv...@estreet.com wrote:
Often we bond several of them
with IMA to get better capacity, but higher bandwidth links are unavailable.
Well, if these DS1/ATM connections can be bonded with IMA, that certainly
indicates they are true ATM, not FUNI/DXI, so encapsulation atm-dxi
won't
Hi,
On 19 January 2011 15:20, Muhammad Atif Jauhar atif.jau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am testing the link and face issue.
1. while performing ping test without df bit, I am able to
ping with size upto 18024
2. while performing ping test with df bit, I am
Yes... there is typo error in 3rd point I am not able to ping more then
size 1520 with DF bit
Means there is no issue in link and I will not able to ping with DF bit more
then size 1520.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Pshem Kowalczyk pshe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 19 January 2011
Hi,
On 19 January 2011 15:54, Muhammad Atif Jauhar atif.jau...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes... there is typo error in 3rd point I am not able to ping more then
size 1520 with DF bit
Means there is no issue in link and I will not able to ping with DF bit more
then size 1520.
That's correct.
kind
Hey Muhammad,
If you set the MTU size to 1520 and set the DF (do not fragment bit) then it
will tell all device to never fragment the packets... So if a single hope in
the chain can not support the max size of the packet you are sending it will
drop the packet.
Sorry not certain if I missed
39 matches
Mail list logo
