Dear sethm
R u taking about the username and password which is configure for ISDN.
If username or password is different on both end then i believe isdn will not
be triggered.
In my case ISDN is triggering and i can access the router via telnet through
the ISDN. i can also ping the branch
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 12:19 +0600, Farooq Razzaque wrote:
R u taking about the username and password which is configure for ISDN.
I think Seth was referring to the fact that you seem to have publicly
posted your configuration without sanitizing it. One of the passwords is
using type 7
On 27/07/2011 05:00, John Gill wrote:
This paper is indeed a great read, it goes over some really good points of
the buffering and queuing that are commonly misunderstood.
All good points in this thread, I will make one small comment about the N5k
here if one wanted to compare buffer sizes on
We are seeing discards on a newly installed 4900M, probably coming from the
fact that most input to the C4900M is coming from routers connected to it on
10G lines and is going out on a 2G etherchannel, although the total load on the
2G channel is just about 250-300 Mb/s. The 2G connection goes
John Gill wrote:
The DHCP DISCOVER should be a broadcast
It should be a broadcast when exiting the client, i.e. on the client's
subnet. The DHCP relay (helper-address funcionality) transforms it in an
unicast packet from the (primary) IP of the router's interface facing
the client, to the
Hi Nick,
I agree they cannot be compared easily, and the reason I thought of the
aside was to point out this kind of discrepancy, in case one were
tempted to just use simple comparison of buffer sizes. Ingress vs.
egress buffering changes things significantly.
I hadn't considered your
That is called an Instance in SNMP terms. The instance could be seen
as an index which serves to link different variables/tables in
different MIBs. In your case polling OIDs in ENTITY-MIB with index
1003 (that is OID.Instance) should return all kind of information
about PS in question like name,
Hi,
Is there way to redefine reject code when max connections reached on
voip dial-peer? Currently its no circuit/channel available, but we would
like to prefer 17 - user busy.
I could re-map all isdb failure codes using isdn network-failure-cause
17, but this seems not so good idea when real
On 07/27/2011 10:51 AM, Andriy Bilous wrote:
That is called an Instance in SNMP terms. The instance could be seen
as an index which serves to link different variables/tables in
different MIBs. In your case polling OIDs in ENTITY-MIB with index
1003 (that is OID.Instance) should return all kind
Huawei got into a bit of trouble a couple of years back. Cisco sued them for
copying their CLI, claiming that it gave them an unfair cost advantage by
requiring less investment in training, or some such. But they also found
that the Huawei manuals contained large slabs of text copied seemingly
All,
Does anyone happen to know if the ME3600 supports Netflow and WCCP? I have a
customer considering them for the WAN edge and the docs/feature navigator
are coming up somewhat ambiguous.
Thanks,
--
Colby Glass
Network Engineer
http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com
How does this differ from what Foundry did? :) The CLI in the fast iron or
server iron gear for example is pretty damn similar. The router bgp
commands were absolutely the same and the only difference was the way that
foundry named interfaces. (ethernet x/x instead of distinguishing between
Hi,
Have an active portchan that currently has one 100Mb port - Trying to
add second port, I am getting the following in the logs:
Jul 27 22:17:44.744 GMT+10: %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Fa0/20 is not
compatible with Fa0/21 and will be suspended (trunk mode of Fa0/20 is
trunk, Fa0/21 is
On 2011-07-27, at 4:45 PM, Colby Glass wrote:
All,
Does anyone happen to know if the ME3600 supports Netflow and WCCP? I have a
customer considering them for the WAN edge and the docs/feature navigator
are coming up somewhat ambiguous.
I haven't tested it, but...
I don't think foundry was sued or stated that they stopped shipping
stolen IOS source.
John Gill
cisco
On 7/27/11 4:52 PM, Scott Granados wrote:
How does this differ from what Foundry did? :) The CLI in the fast iron
or server iron gear for example is pretty damn similar. The router bgp
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 06:28 +1000, m...@adv.gcomm.com.au wrote:
Jul 27 22:17:44.744 GMT+10: %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Fa0/20 is not
compatible with Fa0/21 and will be suspended (trunk mode of Fa0/20 is
trunk, Fa0/21 is dynamic)
Both Fa0/20 + Fa0/21 are configured the same(20 currently
Can you check the config on port-channel 2? perhaps there is difference
between port trunk config of 0/20 and the channel trunk config.
Regards,
John Gill
cisco
On 7/27/11 4:28 PM, m...@adv.gcomm.com.au wrote:
Hi,
Have an active portchan that currently has one 100Mb port - Trying to
add
Quoting Peter Rathlev pe...@rathlev.dk:
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 06:28 +1000, m...@adv.gcomm.com.au wrote:
Jul 27 22:17:44.744 GMT+10: %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Fa0/20 is not
compatible with Fa0/21 and will be suspended (trunk mode of Fa0/20 is
trunk, Fa0/21 is dynamic)
Both Fa0/20 + Fa0/21 are
I'm not sure about that. Not sure about the legal action side but the
stolen source part I think there's some background to.
-Original Message-
From: John Gill
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 5:36 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] just installed a Huawei...
I
On 7/27/2011 4:52 PM, Scott Granados wrote:
How does this differ from what Foundry did? :) The CLI in the fast
iron or
server iron gear for example is pretty damn similar. The router bgp
commands were absolutely the same and the only difference was the way
that
foundry named interfaces.
You might want to look at putting the relevant modems in a vrf, if that
design model works for you.
Walter Keen
Network Engineer
Rainier Connect
(P) 360-832-4024
(C) 253-302-0194
On 07/27/2011 03:15 PM, Jason Ellison wrote:
All,
Does anyone know of any cable modems that support IPSEC
I believe you can still buy a cable HWIC for the 1800 series routers or
the 815-VPN device would probably do what you want.
Phil
On 7/27/11 6:15 PM, Jason Ellison info...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
Does anyone know of any cable modems that support IPSEC (not
passthru). I'm trying to build a
Thanks guys. Before posting, I noticed that it's listed in the unsupported
commands of an older IOS, but not in the newer one. That gave me some hope.
Though, none of the guides I saw listed anything for configuring WCCP or
Netflow. The feature nav listed WCCP Version 2 though. It's not looking
Lukasz,
it looks like the default value for keepalive packet is 10s. However,
if I disconnect the other end from my switch port, the line protocol
will be down immediately. How to explain this? In addition, there are
interfaces, which by default don't have keepaive set(for example
WS-C3750G-24TS
ME3600X does not support Netflow and WCCP in the current release.
If the configuration guide does not cover the features then it is not be
supported.
Netflow and WCCP features are not covered in the configuration guide.
-Waris
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
What sort of timeframes are we now looking at for the next release of
code for the ME3600/3800X's? There was some talk about new software
supporting VPLS related features coming out in June, and a bunch of
15.0(SE) releases has just turned up on CCO for the lower end floor
switches like the
15.1(2)EY is scheduled to be posted on CCO on July 30th, 2011. It'll support
VPLS on ME3800X and ME3600X.
-Waris
-Original Message-
From: Reuben Farrelly [mailto:reuben-cisco-...@reub.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 5:12 PM
To: Waris Sagheer (waris)
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Thanks. So the config guides are the definitive resource as far as features?
I would expect the feature navigator (which listed WCCP v2 on the ME3600) to
be the end-all, be-all. Either way though, thanks for clearing it up.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Waris Sagheer (waris)
There are more measured than simple keep alives. If you pull an interface
you lose carrier, timing, frames, and other various components of the
communication method in question.
When you view an interface the first up indicates that the interface is
enabled and the line protocol means that
We'll fix the feature navigator. Thanks for your feedback.
-Waris
From: Colby Glass [mailto:colbycciest...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 6:32 PM
To: Waris Sagheer (waris)
Cc: Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X Netflow and WCCP?
Hi,
Can anyone find any release note info in regards to 15.0(SE) on 3560's?
Regards,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Reuben Farrelly
Sent: Thursday, 28 July 2011 8:12 AM
To: Waris Sagheer (waris)
Yes:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11781/prod_release_notes_list.html
Doesn't seem like much difference between 12.2(58)SE and 15.0(1)SE in
terms of either features or bug fixes, so if you've taken the (brave)
plunge and are already running 12.2(58)SE it looks like a fairly minor
Waris,
Thanks for the input and taking the feedback into consideration to fix the FN.
Colby,
I've seen time and time again, people expecting to position this platform in an
environment other than what it is intended for. I'm not calling out anyone in
particular on this list but I've seen
33 matches
Mail list logo
