Are you saying that the link does not come up with both ends in auto/auto?
At least on copper, that would indicate to me that you either have a bad switch
or bad cabling... Are you sure the unit you have is good?I am plugged
into a 3550-12T here at home with a few machines and auto
I agree with that. If it doesn't link at all with auto auto then the link
pulse frames that control speed negotiation are some how hindered. Since you
have three different devices exhibiting the same behavior on newer code I would
even skip to the switch being bad.
Sent from my iPhone
On
Correct - doesn't even link with auto/auto. Can only get it to link at 100.
I am armed with new cabling and try to rule out the physical.
Nothing in the init process that is indicating any bad phy or anything of
the sort - I am hoping it's not a bad switch.
Thanks for all the replies.
-graham
Hello,
Simple and plain question: does MQC work in hardware when attached to
ATM VP||PVC on c7200+PA-A6 ?
Thank You
Regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Hi Skeeve,
That is not right, we should state the limitations of the feature in the
configuration guide. I will get this edited.
Regards,
John Gill
cisco
On 4/14/12 4:24 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Thanks John, just very frustrating is all... the release notes said a
particular version
Hi
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Marco Marzetti
Sent: lunedì 16 aprile 2012 16:13
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] MQC and PA-A6
Hello,
Simple and plain question: does MQC work
What is the best practice around routing iSCSI?
We have been asked about routing iSCSI traffic over our WAN. What are the
pit falls that we need to be looking at?
Thanks
Scott
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
iSCSI across a WAN will introduce latency and latency is one of the key factors
to degraded performance.
Lars Christensen
CCIE #20292
Den 16/04/2012 kl. 22.14 skrev Scott Voll:
What is the best practice around routing iSCSI?
We have been asked about routing iSCSI traffic over our WAN.
Howdy,
I have a 7201 terminating pppoe sessions. I ran the following command
and saw that the max virtual-access interface number was 900, per below:
sh int virtual-access ?
1-900 Virtual-Access interface number
I am wondering if this is actually a dynamic number?
My high water
On 4/16/2012 at 4:14 PM, in message
cahgd+39diyynpifqzpe7l3uwkto9izub8wsafxgq186-7aq...@mail.gmail.com, Scott
Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the best practice around routing iSCSI?
We have been asked about routing iSCSI traffic over our WAN. What are the
pit falls that we need to
Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com writes:
Howdy,
I have a 7201 terminating pppoe sessions. I ran the following
command and saw that the max virtual-access interface number was 900,
per below:
sh int virtual-access ?
1-900 Virtual-Access interface number
I am
On 04/16/2012 02:41 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Mikemike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com writes:
Howdy,
I have a 7201 terminating pppoe sessions. I ran the following
command and saw that the max virtual-access interface number was 900,
per below:
sh int virtual-access ?
1-900
That number is the actual number of virtual-access interfaces you have
active at the moment, not a fixed number.
Kind regards,
Sibbi
On 16.4.2012 20:54, Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com wrote:
Howdy,
I have a 7201 terminating pppoe sessions. I ran the following command
and saw
Hi There,
A quick questions in relation to the following policy based routing
configuration for a Cisco 6500.
Example:
interface TenGigabitEthernet9/8
ip address 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
ip directed-broadcast
ip route-cache flow
ip policy route-map MY-TEST
!
route-map
On the 6k/Sup720 only match ip address acl (permits only and without
log statements) and set ip next-hop are supported in hardware. Anything
else will be punted.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Andy S tswmmeejs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi There,
A quick questions in relation to the following
What is the best practice around routing iSCSI?
We have been asked about routing iSCSI traffic over our WAN. What are
the
pit falls that we need to be looking at?
Many of the iSCSI initiators I have looked at have NO sense of even a
default
route, because they are designed to have
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:14:31PM -0700, Scott Voll wrote:
What is the best practice around routing iSCSI?
We have been asked about routing iSCSI traffic over our WAN. What are the
pit falls that we need to be looking at?
I imagine the most important thing will be some end-to-end way to
17 matches
Mail list logo
