Have had both ways. Always get them preinstalled now.
Licencing process is a pain.
On 27 September 2012 00:35, Eric A Louie elo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hey folks, I'm trying to get the straight scoop on the licensing issue
I received an ME 3600x from my reseller, without the Advanced Metro
So if I understood it correctly you are concerned that the router will start
to originate the default prior to receiving full BGP table from its upstream
right?
The simplest solution would be to place a static default route pointing to
the upstream -so in case of the above happens the router
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 05:03:12PM -0400, Tim Durack wrote:
1000BASE-BX-U connects to 1000BASE-BX-D, no problem there.
Is there a general standard for installation, like 1000BASE-BX-U is
installed in the Upstream equipment, 1000BASE-BX-D is installed in the
Downstream equipment?
That
On 27/09/2012 03:38, Ivan wrote:
Just connecting 2 service instances is all I would like to do.
There is a difference between an ESI and an xconnect. In the case of an
ESI, the switch will learn all the mac addresses passing over the link.
This doesn't happen for an xconnect.
If you're dealing
Are you running the advanced services license?
me360x-universalk9-mz.152-2.S1.bin
switch#sh license
Index 1 Feature: AdvancedMetroIPAccess
Period left: Life time
switch(config)#connect ?
WORD Name for this connection
On 9/27/2012 6:38 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 27/09/2012 03:38,
Another option is to lock the static default route to a tracked object, and
based that object on eem scripting or something similar which has a built
in delay after the bgp peer reaches X prefix count.
It's definitely more creaky though. Something you should keep in mind is
you're going to have
As well could put a GRE Tunnel or VLAN between the two ASR's and run iBGP
between the two. You control the path between the two routers, so the tunnel
can be over a jumbo frame capable path. I would still do a selective
advertisement for the default, so that traffic doesn't need to traverse the
I'm trying to decode some option 82 stuff on my 4500E, but I can't really find
any specific documentation on what bytes 1-2 in the circuit-id mean on this
platform.
For example:
Option: (t=82,l=21) Agent Information Option
Option: (82) Agent Information Option
Length: 21
04 seems to be number of bytes following it...
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote:
I'm trying to decode some option 82 stuff on my 4500E, but I can't really
find any specific documentation on what bytes 1-2 in the circuit-id mean on
this platform.
For
Hi
Not sure what ESI stands for, but the main reason I don't want to do
bridge mode is to avoid the MAC learning. Also better not to use up the
bridges which are a global resource.
Ivan
On 27/Sep/2012 10:38 p.m., Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 27/09/2012 03:38, Ivan wrote:
Just connecting 2
I am running
Switch#show license
Index 1 Feature: AdvancedMetroIPAccess
Period left: Life time
License Type: Permanent
License State: Active, In Use
License Count: Non-Counted
License Priority: Medium
Index 2 Feature: MetroIPAccess
Index 3 Feature:
The best way is here really to inject the defaults via ISIS.
On 27.09.2012, at 04:04, Tom Lanyon tom+c-...@oneshoeco.com wrote:
Hi list,
In an enterprise network I have a core of 4900Ms with a few ASR1ks hanging
off to handle upstream connectivity. As an example:
Upstream1 -
I get some with and some without... the ones without I send system serial
number to my cisco account se and she sends me a license file
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mattias Gyllenvarg
Sent:
Does anyone happen to know if this feature exists in some other form on the
SUP7L-E?
Thanks in advance.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
If you get an E-License Delivery instead of the license coming
preinstalled on the switch, the process is still actually very
straightforward.
All you have to do is fill in a short form online and enter a key from
the E-License PDF, the actual license file itself then gets emailed back
to
I don't see an eval license for ME 3600X Advanced Metro under Routers
Switches
Much appreciated,
Eric Louie
619-743-5375
From: Reuben Farrelly reuben-cisco-...@reub.net
To: Aaron aar...@gvtc.com
Cc: Mattias Gyllenvarg mattias.gyllenv...@bredband2.se; Eric A
The Eval license does not require a license be obtained from CCO. Only
permanent non-expiring licenses require the special file/key.
sw6.nsw(config)#license boot level advancedMetroIPAccess
Pretty sure this is all you need to activate the 60 day eval.
Unfortunately I don't have any ME3600s
Our 7609 running 12.2(33)SRE2 has been using DHCPv6-PD relay with static
router insertion (with an external DHCPv6 server) for over a year now and
it's worked quite well for customers on our access platform. The 7609
snoops the DHCPv6 responses and builds the static route like it's supposed
to.
Thanks for the help. That didn't work. I opened a case with TAC to get the
secret formula, because all my searches for activate evaluation
license advanced metro gave me no configuration hints.
Much appreciated,
Eric Louie
619-743-5375
From: Reuben
On 28/09/2012, at 4:03 AM, Christian Meutes wrote:
The best way is here really to inject the defaults via ISIS.
Great - that's my current thinking too. I just wanted to double-check that
this was reasonable and I wasn't missing something!
Tom
___
Hi all
Hopefully you'll excuse the fact this isn't explicitly a 'Cisco' question, but
I figure people on the NSP list are the most likely to have experience with
accounting setups.
We have just implemented a Windows NPS solution to provide RADIUS authorisation
for our WLAN users. The WLAN
21 matches
Mail list logo
