We have an environment where we terminate our DSL customers over PPPoE on a
7606-S MPLS PE router with RSP720. The PPPoE sessions are terminated on a
GIG V2 interface of a SIP-400. Currently the IOS running on the device is
c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M, Version 12.2(33)SRD. The following is
Hi,
ExaBGP is perfect for this. I'm using it for RTBHF.
It can also support VPNv4 AF.
http://code.google.com/p/exabgp/
Br,
Gabor
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP_list
CiscoNSP_list
Sent:
+1 for Quagga on *BSD
You mentioned Linux and there is port for that too.
--
Regards,
Ge Moua
Univ of Minn Alumnus
--
On 11/06/2012 01:11 AM, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote:
Hi Guys,
Looking for a linux bgp utility to inject full bgp tables into our Lab Cisco
ASR1000 (To simulate
Hello group,
Anyone knows the difference between using the install all script or just
update the boot system flash command when upgrading NX-OS on a Nexus 7K ?
The question applies to a single supervisor setup.
The official documentation mentions the two ways of doing it:
- using
Hi allI was trying to configure BFD with OSPF
I have the below configuration R1#sh run int f0/0.519Building configuration...
Current configuration : 112 bytes!interface FastEthernet0/0.519 encapsulation
dot1Q 519 ip address 20.5.19.19 255.255.255.0 ip ospf bfdend
R5#sh run int f0/0.519Building
I came to conclusion that bfd doesn't work in dynamips it will always crash
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of M K
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 2:43 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp]
BFD is not supported in dynamips last I looked.
-Blake
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.skwrote:
I came to conclusion that bfd doesn't work in dynamips it will always crash
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
thanks, per the config guidance below, I have that route replicated into the
vrf that I wanted it into on the local pe where I did that replicate trick
from one vrf to another but how would I get that replicated route sent
to other neighboring pe's in that L3VPN ?
Aaron
-Original
Hi everyone. I was hoping I could get some help with an EoMPLS config
I'm working on between an ME3600X and an ME6524 and being able to
preserve the CoS field values.
The xconnect pseudowire it actually up and able to pass traffic so
that's not a problem. The issue is that any CoS values I
Thanks for the replies guys
From: iki...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:58:29 -0600
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco BFD
To: adam.vitkov...@swan.sk
CC: gunner_...@live.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
BFD is not supported in dynamips last I looked.
-Blake
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Adam
Hi,
On 7 November 2012 08:04, Lobo loboti...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone. I was hoping I could get some help with an EoMPLS config I'm
working on between an ME3600X and an ME6524 and being able to preserve the
CoS field values.
The xconnect pseudowire it actually up and able to pass
I was under the impression that the rewrite ingress tag pop 1
symmetric was required in order for the xconnect to work? Removing it
seems to break the xconnect as traffic no longer goes across it.
So is MQC with qos-groups is the only way to preserve the markings with
this platform?
Jose
Hi Folks,
Just a quick sanity check. I'm in the early stages of planning customer
IPv6 deployment and am trying to figure out how I'm going to deliver
SLAAC over P2P (ATM specifically) and QinQ interfaces for DSL or
similar, in non-PPP scenarios.
When I started poking around, it became
Hi,
On 7 November 2012 09:47, Lobo loboti...@gmail.com wrote:
I was under the impression that the rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
was required in order for the xconnect to work? Removing it seems to break
the xconnect as traffic no longer goes across it.
It's required if the other end
Thanks, I appreciate your feedback. Since it is a lab environment, may I ask
you to see what happens when you upgrade with the install all script and
with the sup in slot 6 ? I had the problem when upgrading from 5.1.3 to
5.2.3a. Now I need to upgrade to 5.2.7 and I want to avoid the issue.
Thanks very much for the suggestions - Just tested bgpsimple (full table), and
it is VERY slow to send the full table (Peering session has been up for
18minutes, and the ASR has only received ~185,000 prefixes?)
From: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Tue, 6
Hi Antonio,
The difference between the two procedures is that
install all will perform an in-service software
upgrade, ie, this should be non disruptive to the
data plane while the sups and all the modules will upgrade to the new version.
Versus just changing the boot strings and
Hi Antonio,
In general, doing a traditional upgrade (changing boot variables) will
not update the BIOS for example, while an ISSU does and it's
non-disruptive with dual-supervisors.
There's a defect which caused the behavior you were seeing, CSCtn61286
which affects 5.1(3). Since you were
On 7/11/2012 3:56 PM, Mal wrote:
Did you scope the purchase yourself ?
Mal
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Reuben Farrelly
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 3:10 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012, Tim Densmore wrote:
Just a quick sanity check. I'm in the early stages of planning customer IPv6
deployment and am trying to figure out how I'm going to deliver SLAAC over
P2P (ATM specifically) and QinQ interfaces for DSL or similar, in non-PPP
scenarios.
When I
20 matches
Mail list logo
