On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 11:42 +1100, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
The 2960 is a floor/access switch - and at the low end of the range. It
isn't positioned or designed to be used in the type of bursty traffic
environment that the OP was using it for.
Though I would tend to agree, you will see the
Hi
Does anybody know the exact process to activate 'right to use' licencing on
the ISRG2 platform, we currently install permanent licensing and it's a
long, drawn out, time consuming process.
Thanks
Sledge
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Does anybody know the exact process to activate 'right to use' licencing on
the ISRG2 platform, we currently install permanent licensing and it's a
long, drawn out, time consuming process.
license accept end user agreement
y
no license boot module ones you don't want
license boot module
On 19/02/2013 9:21 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
This is a classic example of when a Gig port in name is not a Gig port
in throughput, ie it may link up at that speed but you'd be lucky to get
the rated throughput in all but ideal circumstances.
Funny thing is that many lower end switches (i.e.
Thanks Nick, I will check this out. But since it's old hardware I don't expect
15.x support for it.
Anyway, thanks again,
Christian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Februar 2013 22:50
An: Hahn, Christian
Cc:
On 19/02/13 11:29, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
On 19/02/2013 9:21 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
This is a classic example of when a Gig port in name is not a Gig port
in throughput, ie it may link up at that speed but you'd be lucky to get
the rated throughput in all but ideal circumstances.
Funny
Tim
Thanks for that, can the licenses be disabled at will or after this process
do they become permanent 'right to use'.
On 19 February 2013 11:00, Tim Franklin t...@pelican.org wrote:
Does anybody know the exact process to activate 'right to use' licencing
on
the ISRG2 platform, we
Thanks for that, can the licenses be disabled at will or after
this process do they become permanent 'right to use'.
You can still turn them on and off at will with the 'license boot' / 'no
license boot' commands. Once you've accepted the EULA once, that's stored on
the router for good.
Hi,
Finally got the ASR1Ks delivered and configured but somehow DMVPN is not
working! I accepted the EULA for the IPSec license, it shows activated and I
have adjusted and copied the config from the 7206npe-g2 to the ASR1k. The
router accepts all the configuration but does not recognize a sh
here we talk about converging the MDT S,G
And this is something I'm not quite sure how it works during the failure.
For afi mdt the advertise best-external should work but additional paths
install is not an option.
I tried to lab a primary-egress-PE-CE link failure in redundantly connected
CE
I've run out of port capacity on my 7206VXR and need to go to the next router
or put in another 7206VXR side-by-side.
Any recommendations on what to use if I were to replace my existing 7206VXR
with
another chassis? (it's limited to 5 GB interfaces, and we need 7 or 8)
Much appreciated,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Eric A Louie elo...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've run out of port capacity on my 7206VXR and need to go to the next
router
or put in another 7206VXR side-by-side.
ASR1001 or ASR1002-X
Rob
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Eric A Louie wrote:
I've run out of port capacity on my 7206VXR and need to go to the next router
or put in another 7206VXR side-by-side.
Any recommendations on what to use if I were to replace my existing 7206VXR with
another chassis? (it's limited to 5 GB interfaces,
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:43:12PM -0800, Eric A Louie wrote:
I've run out of port capacity on my 7206VXR and need to go to the next
router
or put in another 7206VXR side-by-side.
Any recommendations on what to use if I were to replace my existing 7206VXR
with
another chassis?
I have (2) Cisco blade switches running in redundant mode and each is
connected to the same HP ROOT switch on the other end. Each blade switch
has an LACP / Etherchannel link of 2 cables going to the HP root. STP
enabled on the Cisco's.
Noticed this on my Cisco-SW1 today:
Group Port-channel
On 2/19/2013 2:57 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Eric A Louie wrote:
I've run out of port capacity on my 7206VXR and need to go to the
next router
or put in another 7206VXR side-by-side.
Any recommendations on what to use if I were to replace my existing
7206VXR with
another
Both Sup2t and RSP720 (to a lesser extent but still much better than
Sup720) can handle the churn of full feeds.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Tony Varriale tvarri...@comcast.netwrote:
On 2/19/2013 2:57 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Eric A Louie wrote:
I've run out of port
On Feb 16, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Lukasz Bromirski wrote:
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Charles Sprickman sp...@bway.net wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Mack McBride wrote:
One of the questions I haven't gotten a good answer to.
The ESP actually has the hardware for the route table.
The Sup720-3bxl (and Sup2T and RSP720) will run out of tcam before
the churn of [a couple of] full feeds makes them non-viable.
We're getting close to a repeat of 2008, where lots of 6500s (those still
running Sup2s) were inching up against their maximum supported routes when
dealing with
There are two pieces: control plane processing power and TCAM.
Sup720 CPU can't really keep up with the average churn of the internet
anymore. RSP720's and Sup2T CPUs can still keep up.
Both RSP720-3CXL and Sup2T-XL can support 1 million routes*
*hardware implementation is different on these
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Jon Lewis wrote:
Some will tune (or already have tuned) the split to buy another year or
so, others will do so only after some head scratching when their 6500s
fall over.
I believe the -XL version will last longer than 1-2 years. Getting number
of IPv4 DFZ routes into
HI,
i have a cisco asa 5520 at site A and cisco 2811 at site B with two P2P links
(Redundant) Link, Now i want to know the configuration to built a redundant
ipsec tunnel. I have read couple of article, but didn't got the success.
Ospf routing is running between these devices.
Regards
DS
22 matches
Mail list logo
