-occurences-20131010.png
The graph is event time on the X-axis and distance to last event on the
Y-axis. A linear regression (management types like those, right?) shows
that the link will be unusable around next midnight CEST. ;-)
--
Peter
___
cisco-nsp
After 2 months, i managed to get a DE answer:
IOS-XR decided it's best to display the actual next hop which is a v4 nexthop
and is also registered with the v4 RIB for tracking purposes, rather than what
is transported in the NLRI and matches the output of everything else. So the
behaviour is
Hi all,
For a few reasons, I had to move an IP SLB configuration off a
6500/Sup720 (where it worked fine) to a 7206/NPE-G2 running 15.2(4)M4
Advanced IP Services. There were no errors when adding the
configuration, but sessions appeared to fail. I did run a debug and
captured connection
Which IOS are you using?
El 08/10/13 09:53, Octavio Alvarez escribió:
Wait a minute... My router supports reload reason already and rejects
reload int 10.
Check later IOS versions.
On 10/07/2013 12:05 PM, Pete Lumbis wrote:
The two outputs do have different warnings:
reload reason:
Somewhere I heard that version 6.x NX-OS improved handling of orphan
ports in the N5500 series. But the peer link still drops non-IGMP
transit traffic. Any improvements in v6.x with respect to supporting
one-armed devices upstream or downstream?
Also are there any caveats for creating a
According to [1], reload reason was added in 15.0(1)M.
[1] Cisco IOS Configuration Fundamentals Command Reference, R through
setup:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/fundamentals/command/reference/cf_r1.html#wp1078590
On 10/10/2013 04:04 AM, Luis Miguel Cruz Miranda wrote:
Which IOS are you
we have not yet received full data from the
splicing team. They're just saying it looks good. :-)
2.4dB loss over 3km is not in g652 spec.
max dampening @1550 should be something like: (Length in Km * 0.25)+(Number of
connectors * 0.5)+(number of splices * 0.1)
Regards,
Erik
Hello,
I have a trouble understanding the problem I have with mGRE on 7206VXR with
NPE-G1 on one side and Cisco ASR 1001 on another. The problem is random
packet loss for example:
7206 - ASR
Sending 1, 1300-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 16:57 +0200, Erik Klaassen wrote:
2.4dB loss over 3km is not in g652 spec.
max dampening @1550 should be something like: (Length in Km *
0.25)+(Number of connectors * 0.5)+(number of splices * 0.1)
If the SFP+ to fiber interface counts as a connector we have six of
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 18:17 +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
If the SFP+ to fiber interface counts as a connector we have six of
those. Using Cisco's numbers[0] we should see around 2.8dB loss end to
end, and their numbers are lower than yours.
I thus don't think 2.4dB loss in unreasonable; the
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 15:59 +, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater wrote:
Does anyone know if OIR has any effect on Spanning Tree ?
Assuming some flavour of Catalyst 6500/7600. I never saw anything like
that. For us it mostly never causes even the slightest pause on devices
with only CEF720 cards.
If the
Hi all,
We ran into a very strange problem last night with a customer who utilizes
Meraki switches. I'd like to ask anyone on the list who is familiar with this
model of switch whether there is *any* possibility that an upstream
modification would cause issues with traffic traversing these
Good news everybody! as professor Farnsworth would put it. :-)
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 18:28 +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
We have now introduced a switch between RTR-A and ODF 1 to rule out
the physical interface on RTR-A. This was necessary since we had no
free interfaces in RTR-A at the moment.
Blake,
I'm well aware of how switching and buffering works, but I appreciate the
derisive suggestion - it was a big help.
However, for clarity: no errors (including input/output drops) on the transport
circuit (or the customer's directly-attached circuit).
Let me ask a more pointed question:
meraki switches create pseduo-out-of-band management tunnels to (2)
geographically remote datacenters. this is how the changes are pushed
from the cloud dashboard to the devices themselves.
if the connectivity is lost, the devices should continue to push bits as
previously configured. limited
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater jf...@princeton.edu
wrote:
Does anyone know if OIR has any effect on Spanning Tree ?
I know it stops the BUS briefly but thats it.
We had to remove a mod that had nothing connected but did still have config,
Thanks, Quinn, for not being a condescending prick - your answer was actually
helpful and to the point. The customer is not entirely knowledgable about
these switches, doesn't like them one bit, and had mentioned that they had a
problem before where the switches changed the MTUs dynamically on
Has anyone ever used Redback connected with cisco and configure as PPPOE?
Why can't burst traffic over 7Gbps on 10G interface?
How should I do?
Thank you very much
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
iirc the 'wireshark' is a 30s .pcap file that is dumped into your web browser
for download.
i am trying to recall if you can span off the switch. its been a month (and
many beverages) since my meraki training.
q.
-= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =-
On Oct
19 matches
Mail list logo
