Re: [c-nsp] Older Cisco Routers - which one to go with?

Of course now I re-read what I wrote and I clearly meant a 6to4 tunnel. One would think after using it for 3+ years I'd remember the name. :) -Vinny -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Abello, Vinny Sent

Re: [c-nsp] Older Cisco Routers - which one to go with?

I push 30Mb of traffic through an 1841 regularly... larger packets, just me downloading a file while acting as a firewall doing stateful inspection, IPS, a 4to6 tunnel, netflow, and nothing else major going on... It handles it with no problem (maybe 65% CPU load), so depending on what you're

Re: [c-nsp] ME Series for a LAN/Server Farm

JFYI, all ports (with the exception of GigiabitEthernet0 which is the management port and doesn't have uni/nni) on the ME3600X are defaulted to nni in the running-config. interface GigabitEthernet0 no ip address shutdown negotiation auto ! interface GigabitEthernet0/1 port-type nni !

Re: [c-nsp] policy based routing CPU / MEM

Are you talking about using a policy map or simply a route-map on a BGP neighbor? What exactly are you trying to accomplish? Are you trying to change the next-hop based on the source address? Vinny Abello Network Engineer Dell | Physician Services office +1 973 940 6125 mobile +1 973 868 0610

Re: [c-nsp] BGP neighbor not establishing session

On Nov 24, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Lobo wrote: On 11/23/2010 5:13 PM, Eric Oosting wrote: On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Lobo loboti...@gmail.com mailto:loboti...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/23/2010 6:14 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: Can't think of why this would be an issue.

Re: [c-nsp] Best practices for Cat6500

Something else I just recently came across release notes from SXI2 (might be in other release notes as well with differing information) in regard to BFD and SSO: When evaluating BFD SSO for the network, the customer should note the following considerations. . Cisco Catalyst 6500 series switches

Re: [c-nsp] SXI4a

On Oct 8, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Jay Ford wrote: On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Dan Holme wrote: Some time has passed; can anybody elaborate on their experiences with SXI4/SXI4a? I've been running the advanced IP services SSH WAN flavor of 12.2(33)SXI4a on my campus core boxes (6500, sup720-3bxl, 67xx

Re: [c-nsp] redundant connection question

This is likely what you're looking for, Deric: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration _example09186a00806e880b.shtml -Vinny -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Deric Kwok

Re: [c-nsp] Recommended 1Gb SFP for ~115km?

ES 4 2) Cc: Abello, Vinny; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Recommended 1Gb SFP for ~115km? The distance also depends on the quality of the fiber in the ground, the quality of the splices, and any connections. On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:54, Hansen, Ulrich Vestergaard B. (E R WP

[c-nsp] Cat6500 modular IOS - direction?

Hi all, So, I've been reading many posts, Cisco documentation and release notes and testing various versions of 12.2(33)SXH and SXI in a lab environment. Based on all the Cisco marketing fluff, modular IOS seems like the way to go for reliability. Real world experience from many smart people

Re: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips

The PA-FE-TX (at least the ones I've used) don't support auto speed/duplex, so it's not that they have problems with auto. They just don't support it. I've always had to set the device up that they're talking to using manual settings. -Vinny -Original Message- From:

[c-nsp] Recommended 1Gb SFP for ~115km?

Hello, Any pointers on real world experience on this topic would greatly be appreciated. What are people using successfully out there as far as third party SFP's go to hit a distance of approximately 115km? This would be for a Catalyst 6506. Cisco's solution was a much more costly EDFA

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco out of stock?

We've also been seeing large delays with various Cisco ASA models and ended buying up as many as we could from any vendor that could get them in stock. We were being told it was due to a materials shortage on Cisco's end. Vinny Abello Network Engineer Physician Services Dell Perot Systems Phone:

[c-nsp] So when is IPv6 failover coming to the ASA?

Hi all, Anyone have information on when Cisco will actually have support for IPv6 on the Cisco ASA when in a failover configuration? It is getting a little ridiculous that there is no security device from Cisco that supports IPv6 in a redundant configuration, even in 8.2(1). Please someone

Re: [c-nsp] So when is IPv6 failover coming to the ASA?

with that for the time being. Thanks for the info! -Vinny -Original Message- From: Alan Buxey [mailto:a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 12:13 PM To: Abello, Vinny Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] So when is IPv6 failover coming to the ASA? Hi, Anyone have

Re: [c-nsp] ebgp load balancing using maxiumu-paths TCAM impact on Sup720-3BXL?

Yes, it is commonplace for service providers to run iBGP. The uncommon thing Kevin was eluding to was redistributing BGP into your IGP. That's a no no. :) -Vinny -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brad