Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR unsuppressed map BGP

Hi TP, In XR, this would be done through RPL. Please refer to the “unsuppress-route” attribute in the following configuration guide: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k-r7-7/configuration/guide/b-routing-cg-asr9000-77x/implementing-routing-policy.html Regards,

Re: [c-nsp] C2C ASR9K

Hi Mohammad, XR requires the PE to have a /32 route towards the directly connected CE. This will enable MPLS on the interface. PE3: router static vrf CORE address-family ipv4 unicast 172.16.23.2/32 The same thing needs to be done on PE6 towards CE7. One more thing. You should specify

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ISIS/BGP Redistribute

--- Begin Message --- Hi Olivier, >From what I remember, the issue is that the redistribution is performed from >the RIB, rather than from the BGP local table and that the community >attributes are not installed In the RIB. What I used to do to achieve what you want, was to set a tag in the

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR9001 VXLAN Support

Hi Skeeve, VXLAN with eVPN discovery is supported in 5.3.2, which became available in September. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r5-3/lxvpn/configuration/guide/b-l3vpn-cg53xasr9k/b-l3vpn-cg53xasr9k_chapter_0111.html#concept_2CEF5924E428433A9547606912820564

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS XRv (Virtual ASR9k)

Hi Luan, CCO has more than just 5.1.2. It also has 5.1.1, 5.2.0 and 5.3.0. Regards, Harold Le 2015-08-17 14:08, « cisco-nsp on behalf of Luan Nguyen » cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of lngu...@opsource.net a écrit : Nice...thanks 5.3.1 is nice. though i don't think people will

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS XRv (Virtual ASR9k)

ASR9k) Thanks Harold...but from the link that Roland sent...there's nothing there... Regards, -Luan On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Harold Ritter (hritter) hrit...@cisco.commailto:hrit...@cisco.com wrote: Hi Luan, CCO has more than just 5.1.2. It also has 5.1.1, 5.2.0 and 5.3.0. Regards

Re: [c-nsp] junos olive and ios xrv - mpls ldp neighbor

Hi Aaron, This is due to an interoperability issue between XRv and JUNOS. It is documented by CSCuq77238. This is fixed in XRv 5.3, which is currently available on CCO. Note that this issue only affects XRv and not XR on physical platforms. https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuq77238

Re: [c-nsp] BGP error with optional attribute

Hi Thiyagarajan, You are apparently running into CSCtf27303. https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCtf27303 Regards, Harold Le 2014-12-19 10:29, « thiyagarajan b » bn.thiyagara...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi everyone, I have a problem in iBGP between Cisco 7301 and juniper mx series router

Re: [c-nsp] Strange IP address

Hi, There¹s at least two alternatives you can use. You either need to use a route-map under AF ipv4 to change the next-hop explicitly for the ipv4 prefixes or you can run a separate session for v4 ad v6 prefixes respectively. The latter is generally recommended. Regards Harold Le 2013-11-03

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel routes not making it into FIB - 2911/K9

Hi Tim, The fact that you are seeing the physical interface (gig0/0) is normal, as it is the recursive adjacency and ultimately the interface through which will exit the box. You can do a show ip cef 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 int if you want to see more details about the recursion. The issue is somewhere

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco and BGP MED

Hi Brandon, See comments inline. Le 2013-03-29 16:14, « Brandon Ewing » nicot...@warningg.com a écrit : Is there a knob in Cisco IOS to enable sending the MED learned from an iBGP peer to an eBGP peer? No. You can't propagate a MED received via iBGP to an eBGP neighbor but you could set the

Re: [c-nsp] label-allocation-mode per-ce Operational experience

Unlike the per-vrf label allocation mode, The per-ce mode does not cause an IP lookup on the egress PE. Traffic is rather label-switched directly to the egress interface leading to the CE. Regards Le 2012-11-14 09:42, « Saku Ytti » s...@ytti.fi a écrit : On (2012-11-14 15:25 +0100), Adam

Re: [c-nsp] 6rd on ASR1k

Could you try using a prefix other than 192.88.99.0/24 and see if it makes a diffrence. Envoyé de mon iPhone Le 2011-10-31 à 02:15, Ruslan Pustovoytov ru...@inbox.ru a écrit : 1. Ok. 2. Exactly. Harold Ritter пишет: Hi Ruslan, Two things: 1. It would be safer not to

Re: [c-nsp] BGP session resets if NLRI exchanged

Paul, You might be running into CSCsl72955. If so, you could try the workaround suggested by the following link or upgrade the code. http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method =fetchBugDetailsbugId=CSCsl72955 Regards -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] match and remove no-export

Tim, You should definitely be able to remove the no-export well know community using an inbound route-map but you will not be able to do it outbound on an eBGP session as the path will not even be considered for advertisement in the latter case. Regards -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] Conflicting OSPF router-ids in separate VRFs

Justin, The OSPF RID needs to be globally unique on the box. There is no way around it. Regards -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin Shore Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:27 AM To: 'Cisco-nsp'

Re: [c-nsp] Draft Rosen M-VPN

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 4:46 AM To: Harold Ritter (hritter) Cc: Harkins, Darren; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Draft Rosen M-VPN On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:51:39PM -0400, Harold Ritter (hritter) wrote: Phil

Re: [c-nsp] Draft Rosen M-VPN

Phil, Just a clarification. The interop issue only comes into play if you run SSM in the P domain. There is no interop issue if ASM is used in the P domain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007

Re: [c-nsp] TDP/LDP

Omar, You should be able to mix and match LDP and TDP in your network. This is actually common in network transitions. The only restriction is that two routers on a given subnet use the same protocol. Otherwise, the session will obviously not be established. -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] default route Label

Omar, The default route is not labeled by default. You need to use the command mpls ip default-route to change this behavior. Cheers, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of omar parihuana Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 10:26 PM To: nsp Subject:

Re: [c-nsp] BGP, auto-summary and IPv6

Aaron, This is a mistake indeed. Auto-summary doesn't apply to IPv6. I will take that information back to our documentation team for them to remove that line. Thanks, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Daubman Sent: Friday, May 18,

Re: [c-nsp] Strange behavior OSPF Default route

Omar, This default route is most probably generated by some other device. Can you do a show ip ospf da ext 0.0.0.0 and check the advertising router. It is probably different then the RID of the Central router. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel on GSR

Primoz, You can't configure a GRE tunnel on the GSR without using a tunnel server card (Engine 2 LC). Please refer to the following document to see the list of E2 LC that can be use for that purpose. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_

Re: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel on GSR

Primoz, This document also states that some Engine 0 LC can be used as tunnel server cards. Cheers, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Primoz Jeroncic Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 5:21 AM To: Cisco Mailing list Subject: [c-nsp] GRE tunnel