count chickens yet.
--
Patrick Cole
Chief Engineer
Spirit Technology Solutions
19-25 Raglan St, South Melbourne VIC 3205
Desk:0385541391
Mobile: 0410626630
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo
>
> > On Jun 26, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Patrick Cole wrote:
> >
> > Laurent,
> >
> > The HW platform isn't, but the older SW (3.16/3.18) are EOL'd, I was
> > advised by the TAC.
> >
> > With good reason too - We hit a bad VPLS bug in them t
nsp@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://
T,
We are having around 200-300k non-CGNAT translations on ASR1001-X and using
Netflow Event
Logging. The CPU on average is less than 20%.
Regards,
Patrick
Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 05:12:29PM +0200, ring...@mail.com wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Have an ASR 1006 doing NAT translations, it is havi
are having some very odd
> > RSVP issues in the lab with transit LSP.
> >
> >
> > What are these odd issues?
> >
> > Mark.
> >
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.n
than others.
This is mostly driven due to consideration of ASR90X for a certain role
and my personal experience with CSCva39893 (counters do not work on TE
tunnel interfaces) which is fixed in Everest.
Regards.
Patrick Cole
Senior Network Specialist
World Without Wires
Ph: 0410 626 630
sley wrote:
> On 1 September 2017 at 02:02, Patrick Cole wrote:
> > James,
> >
> > Interesting you should mention the PPPoE thing as all of our ASR920 P/PE are
> > deployed using BDI for NNI facing interfaces and we carry bucketloads
> > PPPoE traffic across them all w
php?page=mpls-over-phy-vs-eff-bdi-svi
>
>
> Cheers,
> James.
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Patrick Cole
Senior N
s://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
Patrick Cole
Senior Network Specialist
World Without Wires
PO Box 869. Palm Beach, QLD, 4221
Ph: 0410 626 630
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-
drop frames early instead of waiting
until the queue is full and performing tail drop. Depending on your traffic
profile (eg TCP or not), this may or may not help.
Regards,
Patrick
Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:23:05PM +1100, Patrick Cole wrote:
> Troy,
>
> Chances are you're dealin
al drops. Should I increase something?
>
> Thanks you very much in advance.
>
> Troy
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck
is didn't work and its not support (which is fair
> enough, its a metro Ethernet device not a BRAS).
>
> Cheers,
> James.
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-n
uary 4, 2017 12:35 PM
>To: Mark Tees; Aaron
>Cc: Mohammad Khalil; Patrick Cole; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Segment Routing
>
>
>I've yet to even test it, but am very keen to, and to hear from others who
>are testing/using it in pr
designed
for management and things I would expect.
Regards,
Patrick Cole
Senior Network Specialist
World Without Wires
PO Box 869. Palm Beach, QLD, 4221
Ph: 0410 626 630
Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 10:08:55PM +0100, Robert Hass wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
>
> &g
I've been searching high and dry for a MIB that would provide the
configured VFIs and their attached bridge-domains. Does this exist?
Thanks,
Patrick Cole
Senior Network Specialist
World Without Wires
PO Box 869. Palm Beach, QLD, 4221
Ph: 0410 62
; cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
Patrick Cole
Senior Network Specialist
World Without Wires
PO Box 869. Palm Beach, QLD, 4221
Ph: 0410 626 630
___
PATH request []"
"Failed to create Path state [.]: Invalid route specification"
Regards,
Patrick Cole
Senior Network Specialist
World Without Wires
PO Box 869. Palm Beach, QLD, 4221
Ph: 0410 626 630
___
cisco-nsp mai
traffic is balanced on LAG for
> the ME3600X/ME3800X and ASR920s.
>
> Cheers,
> James.
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether
any experience with this
platform and would be willing to share their thoughts?
Thanks,
Patrick Cole
Senior Network Specialist
World Without Wires
PO Box 869. Palm Beach, QLD, 4221
Ph: 0410 626 630
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
to be under active development?
>
>
> Thanks in advance for any other suggestions.
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/ci
gt; Regards,
>
> Lukas
>
>
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/piper
Hi guys,
I recently was testing out migration from 15.1 S to 15.2 S and noticed
that the cisco-avpair ip:vrf-id does not seem to be working anymore
with the same running conf I tried changing to subscriber:vrf-id but that
didn't seem to do the trick either. Both seem to get ignored and they
get
re.
>
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
Patri
Hi all,
Doing some lab work with an ASR1001 as a PPPoE AC and am getting
the following back in the PADS packet being sent back to the PPPoE
client from the ASR:
echo: pppoe,debug,packet ether1.599: rcvd PADS from 88:F0:31:9F:14:81
echo: pppoe,debug,packet session-id=0x
echo: pppoe,debug,
//puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
Patrick Cole
Senior Network Specialist
World Without Wires
PO Box 869. Palm Beach, QLD, 4221
Ph: 0410 626 630
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-n
Experts Who The Experts Call
> Juniper - Cisco ? IBM - Brocade - Cloud
> -
> Check out our Juniper promotion website for Oct/Nov! eintellego.mx
> Free Apple products during this promotion!!!
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-ns
Marc,
Perhaps it was right on the limit of max receive threshold and they
repaired a splice that was dodgy to start with increasing the signal.
Patrick
Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:13:48AM +0100, marc williams wrote:
> 10 GIG cisco compatible SFP in a 3750-X switch.
> we started to see this error
I've been using 15.1S with very good success as a BRAS on NPE-G1
Regards,
Patrick on the iPhone.
On 07/05/2012, at 5:58 PM, ar wrote:
> Hi Guys.
>
> Part of building our new 7200 PE, im researching on the best updated IOS for
> this.
> Anyone using Release 15?
> Or better stay with the lat
Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:23:53PM -0800, Mike wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am considering going to a cisco 7201 for PPPoE subscriber
> termination, and I am trying to figure out how I would duplicate some
> features of my current (linux based) pppoe solution. I use radius and am
> certain %85 of
Dave,
We do the following on 7200 for PPPoE to terminate any inner VLAN below a
specific outer VLAN. I can't help but wonder if it would work fine with
a bridge-group too if that is what you need? The command seems to be
accepted fine on the interface.
interface gi 0/0.
encapsulation dot1q
Nick,
Yes it can as long as the netflow data it receives has AS info in it.
nfdump can filter based on AS from its data stores, and nfsen is just
a graphing program/wrapper interface around nfdump so it can display
graphs of anything nfdump can filter with basically.
Patrick
Wed, Jan 18, 2012
Radius?
>
> --
>
>From: Patrick Cole
>To: ar
>Cc: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net"
>Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 9:43 PM
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ADSL sync speed Info at LAC/LNS
>Assuming you have cont
Assuming you have control of the DSLAM and it correctly sends the
PPPoE VSA's to the BRAS that performs the LAC function, the following
can be used
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/vpdn/configuration/xe-3s/vpd-cfg-aaa.html#GUID-AD2177CB-5798-4BFE-9D19-89DA83CEF9C6
Pat
Mon, Nov 21, 2
Brocade MLX/XMR/CER/CES can be really good, I just wouldn't try to do
everything
on them, ie, P and PE, IPv4 & IPv6 full table routing, multicast video.
They do it all, but in my experience more software problems tend to surface
the more things you do at once and you don't want it taking out all
Hi all,
I'm running some 7200's terminating PPPoE for BB subscribers.
The sessions are being forwarded using L2TP to some l2tpns LNS's.
I am experiencing what seems to be an issue with LCP negotiation
with the cisco LAC and the l2tpns LNS causing an mtu mismatch
in the path for subscribers.
Peter,
Offtopic slightly but RAD make a whole range of IPmuxes to do exactly
what you are after:
http://www.rad.com/3-2563/Pseudowire_Remote_Gateways/
Pat
Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 01:11:07PM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We currently have a bunch of RAD FOM-E1/T1 modems. They wo
Dave,
Negative - the ppp doesn't even get to IPCP stage and defaultroute
is not turned on.
On another note, I tested a cisco and the LAC and it's working fine
with the same config so must be something with pppd/xl2tpd. I've
used this config before with l2tpns but never tried with IOS before.
Not
wrote:
> Patrick Cole (z...@amused.net) wrote:
> > version 12.2
> > service timestamps debug datetime msec
> > service timestamps log datetime msec
> > no service password-encryption
> > !
> > hostname router
> > !
>
> [...]
>
> &
Hi all,
Got a really weird problem that I'm hoping is the result of something simple and
stupid on my part.
I've got a 7204VXR running 12.2(31)SB16 and am trying to terminate a PPP
session
using L2TP/VPDN as an LNS. The test LAC is linux using xl2tpd/pppd.
Here is some debug logging from when
39 matches
Mail list logo
