Re: [c-nsp] 12.40(20T), pppoe woes

2008-09-09 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 8/09/2008 8:43 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: David, please check CSCsu35584, it will be fixed in the upcoming 12.4(20)T1 rebuild and the above restriction will be removed.. oli Hi Oli, What is the approximate timeframe on 12.4(20)T1? I'm asking because I'd really like

Re: [c-nsp] 12.40(20T), pppoe woes

2008-09-09 Thread Rodney Dunn
Around 10/17. On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:50:10PM +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote: On 8/09/2008 8:43 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: David, please check CSCsu35584, it will be fixed in the upcoming 12.4(20)T1 rebuild and the above restriction will be removed.. oli Hi Oli,

Re: [c-nsp] 12.40(20T), pppoe woes

2008-09-08 Thread David Freedman
:43 To: David Freedman; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 12.40(20T), pppoe woes David Freedman wrote on Monday, September 08, 2008 12:21 PM: Have just moved to testing 12.4(20)T for the HQF functionality, have now hit another stumbling point. Was previously doing multiple

Re: [c-nsp] 12.40(20T), pppoe woes

2008-09-08 Thread Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
David Freedman wrote on Monday, September 08, 2008 12:21 PM: Have just moved to testing 12.4(20)T for the HQF functionality, have now hit another stumbling point. Was previously doing multiple pppoe sessions (multiple pppoe client feature) using the HWIC-4ESW which mandates that the

[c-nsp] 12.40(20T), pppoe woes

2008-09-08 Thread David Freedman
Have just moved to testing 12.4(20)T for the HQF functionality, have now hit another stumbling point. Was previously doing multiple pppoe sessions (multiple pppoe client feature) using the HWIC-4ESW which mandates that the pppoe-client functionality *must* come from SVI, in 12.4(20)T this no