Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

2014-06-27 Thread James Bensley
Hi All, Thanks to Waris, Ramji and some very nice guys on the ME3600 layer 2 team and QoS team who spent some time with us troubleshooting this issue. Essentiall it is by design that we can't over-subscribe the port policers :( On 13 May 2014 13:27, Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net wrote: On

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

2014-05-18 Thread Waris Sagheer (waris)
From: James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.commailto:jwbens...@gmail.com Date: Monday, May 12, 2014 at 6:10 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS! Hi

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

2014-05-18 Thread Ramji Vasudevan (ramji)
ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS! Hi James, Is the issue resolved? I am copying my team to help with the following issue. Hi Wade and Ramji, Can you please look into this issue? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

2014-05-13 Thread Mattias Gyllenvarg
It no just that 11 x 10 100 ? Perhaps you could show us the conf? //Mattias On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:10 PM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Has anyone encountered this issue on the ME3600/ME3800s; Cisco 2960 - Layer 2 device terminating Layer 2 connections | | Layer

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

2014-05-13 Thread James Bensley
On 13 May 2014 09:28, Mattias Gyllenvarg matt...@gyllenvarg.se wrote: It no just that 11 x 10 100 ? Thats true, my point is that Cisco aren't allowing oversubscribtion :) The plot thickens, I have put the following onto a lab ME3800 and it worked fine. 11x 10Mbps shapers. class-map match-any

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

2014-05-13 Thread Roland Dobbins
On May 13, 2014, at 7:23 PM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote: Thats true, my point is that Cisco aren't allowing oversubscribtion :) That's an interesting sales strategy. ; - Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net //

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

2014-05-13 Thread Vitkovský Adam
On the unit in the field (with the same IOS version, 15.3(3)s) when either trying to apply the child policy PE-QOS-CPE-OUT (which just uses percentages) under the PARENT policy (which is suppose to provide the shape) or by first creating the 11 shapers and childs and then trying to apply the

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

2014-05-13 Thread Mark Tinka
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 03:00:22 PM Vitkovský Adam wrote: And that is the beauty of me3x00 boxes, there are no two alike. And they behave differently in the lab and in production so only several cases can be recreated in the lab even with the same exact config, IOS code and topology. You

[c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

2014-05-12 Thread James Bensley
Hi All, Has anyone encountered this issue on the ME3600/ME3800s; Cisco 2960 - Layer 2 device terminating Layer 2 connections | | Layer 2 Trunk on 100Mbps port | Cisco ME3800 - Various layer 2 connections trunked up in VLANs for termination on ME3800 We are trying to apply some policers on the

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

2014-05-12 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday, May 12, 2014 03:10:15 PM James Bensley wrote: Has anyone encountered this and has anyone overcome it? Are you running the latest code for this platform? It's been several months since I first tested it, but egress policing for all queues is a recent feature (Thank God!). To be