Hi,
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:01:47AM +1000, David Hughes wrote:
Is anyone happily using per-interface NDE on SXI? That would be a
huge leap in usefulness.
We do (SXH3a and SXI) and it works. That is, we haven't uncovered any
nasties yet, and the amount of data is matching our
In fear of prosecution from section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914 I will simply
say it is the successor to SXI, the SX series is an IOS available for the
6500 Platform.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps8802/ps6970/ps6017/ps9673/product_bulletin_c25-503086.html
Ben
On Thu, Apr 2,
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +1030, Ben Steele wrote:
In fear of prosecution from section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914 I will simply
say it is the successor to SXI, the SX series is an IOS available for the
6500 Platform.
I still say the name SXI1 is a sexual harassment complaint just
So anyone try out an ISSU upgrade from SXI to SXI1 yet? I'd really like to
see if it works as advertised.
-Brandon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
I believe that SXI introduces eFSU and not ISSU - which requires a linecard
reload if the line card is not supported.
*
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/configuration/guide/issu_efsu.html
The following modules support eFSU preload:
–WS-X67*xx* modules
Hi,
So anyone try out an ISSU upgrade from SXI to SXI1 yet? I'd really like to
see if it works as advertised.
hmmm, good call - I may have to check this out as when we
did our SXF and SXH to SXI upgrade it thought it had been done
via ISSU (why? dont know - hopefully fixed in SXI1 !) and
...but release notes haven't been updated yet.
I'm having a maintenance window tomorrow and i was planning to upgrade 3 6500s from SXF9 to SXI, but since SXI1 came
out, i'm thinking of moving directly to it. Anyone know what is fixed from SXI to SXI1?
PS: I was running SXI in a lab for a few
On Apr 1, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
...but release notes haven't been updated yet.
I'm having a maintenance window tomorrow and i was planning to
upgrade 3 6500s from SXF9 to SXI, but since SXI1 came out, i'm
thinking of moving directly to it. Anyone know what is
: Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out
On Apr 1, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
...but release notes haven't been updated yet.
I'm having a maintenance window tomorrow and i was planning to
upgrade 3 6500s from SXF9 to SXI, but since SXI1 came out, i'm
thinking of moving directly
Mike Louis wrote:
SXI didn't support Netflow export from a VRF other than the global table. The
command option wasn't available in the ip flow export command syntax.
Here is what I am seeing in SXI
6509(config)#ip flow-export destination 10.1.1.3 9996 ?
cr
The vrf flag was available in
. Then we lost Netflow
commands again outside the global VRF.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Phil Mayers [mailto:p.may...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 12:41 PM
To: Mike Louis
Cc: Jared Mauch; Tassos Chatzithomaoglou; cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out
Mike Louis
...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 12:41 PM
To: Mike Louis
Cc: Jared Mauch; Tassos Chatzithomaoglou; cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SXI1 is out
Mike Louis wrote:
SXI didn't support Netflow export from a VRF other than the global
table. The command option wasn't available in the ip flow export
Mike Louis wrote:
SXI didn't support Netflow export from a VRF other than the global table. The
command option wasn't available in the ip flow export command syntax.
Here is what I am seeing in SXI
6509(config)#ip flow-export destination 10.1.1.3 9996 ?
cr
The vrf flag was available in
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:01 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
netflow on the 65xx is broken enough i'm surprised it gave you any
data of value.
Hm, I thought it worked okay. Out of curiosity, what should one be
careful about with it, if one's network was dominated by 6500s?
We only use it for
Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:01 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
netflow on the 65xx is broken enough i'm surprised it gave you any
data of value.
Hm, I thought it worked okay. Out of curiosity, what should one be
careful about with it, if one's network was dominated by 6500s?
We
Is anyone happily using per-interface NDE on SXI? That would be a
huge leap in usefulness.
David
...
On 02/04/2009, at 4:01 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
netflow on the 65xx is broken enough i'm surprised it gave you any
data of value.
- jared
0n Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:50:01PM +0300, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
...but release notes haven't been updated yet.
I'm having a maintenance window tomorrow and i was planning to upgrade 3
6500s from SXF9 to SXI, but since SXI1 came
out, i'm thinking of moving directly to
17 matches
Mail list logo