On 3 February 2016 at 12:23, Alistair Cockeram wrote:
>
> Beware this does not appear to work yet on the Cisco 887VA-M.
>
To update, it does work on the 887VA-M. Remove any existing "encapsulation
dot1Q” command if a subinterface is already configured, or the
“second-dot1q” command is not availa
On 3 February 2016 at 11:48, James Bensley wrote:
> This is a live working 897 using QinQ over VDSL:
>
>
> #show ver | i IOS
> Cisco IOS Software, C800 Software (C800-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version
> 15.5(3)M, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Beware this does not appear to work yet on the Cisco 887VA-M.
A Zho
This is a live working 897 using QinQ over VDSL:
interface Ethernet0
no ip address
!
interface Ethernet0.400
encapsulation dot1Q 101 second-dot1q 400
ip vrf forwarding test
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.252
!
interface Ethernet0.401
encapsulation dot1Q 101 second-dot1q 401
ip vrf forwardin
hey,
It is disappointing that Cisco do not seem to have implemented q-in-q
support on the Ethernet0 interface, on the 887 or 897.
At least the commands for specifying second dot1q are missing so it's
very clear the functionality is not there.
--
tarko
___
On 13 January 2016 at 11:02, Tarko Tikan wrote:
>
> I'm actually testing this as we speak. Not with BT but it doesn't really
> matter.
>
> See below for the config that should theoretically work, in reality it
> does not. The packets are correctly double tagged in LAN>VDSL direction but
> in VDSL
hey,
Anyone out there trunking multiple VLANs to a Cisco CPE over FTTC, in a
similar position?
I'm actually testing this as we speak. Not with BT but it doesn't really
matter.
See below for the config that should theoretically work, in reality it
does not. The packets are correctly double
Hello,
Integrated devices such as the Cisco 887VA-M or Cisco 897 which are
"approved and certified for use with BT GEA/FTTC and compliant with
SIN498", do not appear to support q-in-q across the VDSL ethernet interface.
The configuration examples I have reviewed and limited testing carried out
t
