To answer all questions about versions e.d.
We are running 3.1(4), not the latest I know, but people here are
'allergic' to network downtime and with semester exams coming up, I
won't be able to upgrade before February.
I removed the log option from the rule which should have given me 106023
Hi,
I would like to know if anyone is using NEXUS (7000/5000/2000) in
unification of fiber channel and Ethernet in one network.
Did it allow to save cost?
Is it a major advantage towards traditional isolated equipment LAN/SAN?
Was major issues brought up over simple things like LACP, QoS.. ?
It looks like we lost the ability to check OSPF neighbors via snmp in SRD?
See below
Host xx.xx.222.194 is running 12.2(33r)SRC3
Host xx.xx.208.1 was just upgraded to 12.2(33)SRD2a
(and both checks below really are checking neighbors that ARE in a full
state, verified from the CLI)
Wow thanks Daniel that did the trick on the 3750 platform! Here's a
sample config in case anyone ever needs it:
interface FastEthernet1/0/23
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 666-670
switchport mode trunk
load-interval 30
srr-queue bandwidth share 1 25 35
Hi Peter. The reason why the radio only works at less than 100M is
because that's all the bandwidth it has. This is licensed based
wireless technology for point to point shots between buildings.
Bandwidths can be anywhere from 18M to 400M depending on which frequency
you use and radio
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:40:10AM -0500, Lobo wrote:
Hi Peter. The reason why the radio only works at less than 100M is
because that's all the bandwidth it has. This is licensed based
wireless technology for point to point shots between buildings.
Bandwidths can be anywhere from 18M to
Dear All,
Kindly i am working in a Service Provider environment
We have daily upgrade in the network and moving customer from one PE to
another PE
Is there is any Management tool can check the status of the Customer (VRF)
before and after the migration of the customer to another PE ?
If you use APs that support PEAP, you might consider using outsourced
services, such as AuthenticateMyWiFi
http://www.nowiressecurity.com/service.htm . You don't have to mess with
setting up your own RADIUS server. Plus it works for multiple locations,
unlike traditional servers.
Hello,
I am using easy-vpn on my routers. I want to be able to PBR inbound traffic
(coming from the IPSec tunnel) to force it down a different path than the one
in the routing table.
I have applied PBR on the virtual-template, based on the different show
commands I issued, it is taken
Hi,
Has anyone seen this in serial interfaces before?
Link is UP and traffic is going through, however router shows CTS=down
besides a lot CRCs/Input Errors.
It doesn't make sense to me the parameter which should advise that the link
is ready to go is DOWN while there is traffic on it.
Users are
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Marcelo Zilio
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:04 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Serial link CTS=down link UP
Hi,
Has anyone seen this in
Cts is clear to send. It sounds like you have a physical problem with the
line.
On Dec 17, 2009 1:09 PM, Marcelo Zilio ziliomarc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone seen this in serial interfaces before?
Link is UP and traffic is going through, however router shows CTS=down
besides a lot
I'm enabling MPLS on a network that contains 7200VXR's with NPE-400s
that have PA-FE and IO-FE cards and are currently 12.4 mainline. 12.4
mainline does not support MTU 1500 for FE interfaces on this
platform (CSCsc62963). I've had one box running SB stable for about
two months. I also tested
I'm trying to diagnose some bandwidth problems at one particular remote site.
At the moment, I'm concentrating on one particular server (a Novell site
server, looking at NCP packets...tcp port 524 outbound from that server to
addresses outside of that remote site).
I turned on ip accounting
*ugh* I really, really need a vacation! I could have sworn the netflow side was
set to bytes, but it wasn't... that was the difference. Thanks! Sorry... a
little brain damage on my part...
Steve Pfister
Technical Coordinator,
The Office of Information Technology
Dayton Public Schools
115 S.
Clyde,
Thanks so much for your help. This appears to work well.
I did try and map this into a 12.4(15)T/EEM 2.2 and it appears to work. I'm
just not sure how.
Here's the 2.2 config:
event manager applet BGPADJ_SHUT
event syslog occurs 2 pattern %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 172.16.10.3 Down
Tony,
event timer countdown time 120 means that the applet BGPADJ_NOSHUT will
run once, two minutes after it is added to the config.
For EEM v2.2 in place of action 150 publish-event sub-system 798 type 100
arg1 shutdown you could add policy B to the config. Policy B would then
run once, 120
CTS isn't needed for synchronous serial so i thought? The only time you
would need clear to send is if you are asynchronous...or so i thought. My
impression was that those pins were not tied to anything typically. And the
wires would be tied back to DCD.
Not sure i'm correct, but logically I
Sometimes the simplest things can grow into the biggest projects.
For those of you that provide or support large data centers, I have a
situation that I'd like to pick your brains about.
We have some older switch gear that needs replaced because line cards are
beyond MTBF and several have failed
What's the current architecture?
tv
- Original Message -
From: ch...@lavin-llc.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 4:25 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] Data Center switch replacement
Sometimes the simplest things can grow into the biggest projects.
For those of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/09 5:25 PM, ch...@lavin-llc.com wrote:
Sometimes the simplest things can grow into the biggest projects.
For those of you that provide or support large data centers, I have a
situation that I'd like to pick your brains about.
We have
Lobo wrote:
Wow thanks Daniel that did the trick on the 3750 platform! Here's a
sample config in case anyone ever needs it:
interface FastEthernet1/0/23
srr-queue bandwidth limit 80
Glad to hear that worked. Be aware that bandwidth limiting on these
platforms is not an exact science -
What's the current architecture?
tv
Tony,
Good question. For this portion of the data center it is more traditional.
By that I mean these 6509 switches provide the Layer 2 connections to the
servers. The 6509s have dual uplinks to an Agg layer. The Agg layer hosts
the default gateways using
Manny,
Very good points. And that is our design. However, lack of strict
adherence to our standard has led to two problems. First, several servers
didn't get cabled with two connections. Second, the folks who manage the
servers have challenges with the NIC configurations. So while we expect
Very good points. And that is our design. However, lack of strict
adherence to our standard has led to two problems. First, several servers
didn't get cabled with two connections. Second, the folks who manage the
servers have challenges with the NIC configurations. So while we expect
many of
Clyde,
I don't think I'm following your example with mine. But, it sounds like I
need EEM 3.0 to get the BGP functionality that I'm looking for.
Once again thanks for your help!
tv
- Original Message -
From: Clyde Wildes cwil...@progrizon.com
To: 'Tony Varriale'
On Friday 18 December 2009 02:56:29 am Chris Wopat wrote:
I'm enabling MPLS on a network that contains 7200VXR's
with NPE-400s that have PA-FE and IO-FE cards and are
currently 12.4 mainline. 12.4 mainline does not support
MTU 1500 for FE interfaces on this platform
(CSCsc62963). I've
After a long day, I'm certain that I'm missing something simple. I'm
trying to get a loopback address advertised into OSPF, after a direct
ptp setup has already been established ( I can ping6 from ptp interface
to ptp interface ).
I'm working from a C2961, and in this case, its peer is Quagga. I
28 matches
Mail list logo
