On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Justin Shore wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to work around this? L3 will
eventually fix it when they eliminate 19094 but who knows when that will
be. I thought about trying to use a regex to match 19094 3356 to
raise local pref even higher. I also
All,
Between two routers I configured BGP for peering. Both routers are not
directly connected, but via a L2 switch.
To make the switch-over faster I use bfd (Bidirectional Forwarding
Detection) (The timers are set to 300msec with a retry timer of 3.)
On my router I need to setup more BGP
Greets,
Background: When connecting to an ASA using the Cisco VPN client you've got
to build a connection entry (stored as a PCF file) that includes the VPN
group name and VPN group shared key. PCF files can be migrated from one
machine to another.
We have an issue where a tech-savvy user has
Well, the problem is I don't really have a config. Here's what I have
the client side:
!
interface Multilink1
ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.252
ppp multilink
ppp multilink group 1
!
interface Serial0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
no fair-queue
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
Hello,
I've done this in vpn concentrators with radius:
Locking Users into a VPN 3000 Concentrator Group Using a RADIUS Server
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk59/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800946a2.shtml
It applies to VPN concentrators using Radius, but I guess that it will
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 10:52 +0200, Gier, Menno de (Menno) wrote:
All,
Between two routers I configured BGP for peering. Both routers are not
directly connected, but via a L2 switch.
To make the switch-over faster I use bfd (Bidirectional Forwarding
Detection) (The timers are set to
Hi
i have a problem about high cpu usage on a 7206 VXR NPE-G1 because of
process switching on a multilink ppp interface.
I have two E1 interfaces between 7206 and 3845 (below MTP-C72-02 indicates
7206 and ADN-C38-01 indicates 3845).
I've bundled these two E1 interfaces. And when the amount of
OCOSA ListAcct wrote:
Ok. I spoke with ATT earlier they said that they have other customers
taking some T1 IMAs over a channelized DS3 into the same router I was
like how they said they would have a tech contact me I was ok. I thought
maybe take the DS3 circuit into some sort of mux and
Hi,
For redundancy reasons, we have a server with two network cards.
Each card belongs to a subnet and each subnet to a different DMZ.
The server has two default routes with different metrics, where the prefered
default route is in the DMZ_1.
Sounds like you have a significant security issue here.
IF you have a PKI you can issue machine certificates and check them during the
XAUTH phase. So even if the user manages to transfer a .pcf to a unauthorized
device the machine cert will be invalid and the XAUTH will fail.You could
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:30:41AM -0500, neal rauhauser wrote:
Is it a WIC-1DSU-T1? And you need a WIC-1DSU-T1-V2 for the
18xx/28xx/38xx series ... if it came out of an older router this is
likely the case.
Thanks, that's exactly what happened. Luckily, we have a 1700 router
Figured it out. For anyone going through this in the future, check out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_
guide09186a00801149cf.html#wp1048901
Thanks,
evt
-Original Message-
From: Alex Balashov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
On Wed, August 29, 2007 2:37 pm, Ed Ravin wrote:
Is there some central router part compatibility page on Cisco's
site that lets you catch issues like this before you stick the parts
in? I thought I had reviewed the 2801 info and didn't see any warnings
about unsupported WICs.
As a
What would you recomend as a good SNMP trap collector and alerter, other
than HP OV? Open source or commercial.
Thanks,
Joe
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Correct. BFD doesn't work in a VRF. It's annoying.
BFD in a VRF works today on the GSR (12.0S) in the newer releases.
It will work in future releases on the different platforms.
Regards,
--
Aamer Akhter / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ent Commercial Systems, cisco Systems
-Original Message-
I understand that. I was trying to figure out what the ATT sales guy
was talking about. I know it is not possible but was wondering if anyone
knew of a way because the ATT sales guy was speaking like they got the
pa-mc-t3 and just used that card I was saying I did could not find
anything
Hi,
I have read your question today. Have you found out the solution?
as you set the tftp server machine to 10.0.0.2, make sure your firewall not
blocking the data transfer, use direct cable and in the tftp server
settings- make sure will allow sending files out. Better to turn the
firewall
You are so correct Robert Thanks!
Otis
Robert Blayzor wrote:
OCOSA ListAcct wrote:
I understand that. I was trying to figure out what the ATT sales guy
was talking about. I know it is not possible but was wondering if anyone
knew of a way because the ATT sales guy was speaking like
Hello group ,
Just wondering , why I cant add file to flash (CF) filesystem on
2811 without Erasing it ?
router#copy
tftp://192.168.0.1/2800/ccme40/cme-124-11XJ-chimes/79x1-backgrounds/List79x1.xml
flash:
Destination filename [List79x1.xml]?
Accessing
On Wed, August 29, 2007 4:05 pm, Andriy A. Yerofyeyev wrote:
router#copy
tftp://192.168.0.1/2800/ccme40/cme-124-11XJ-chimes/79x1-backgrounds/List79x1.xml
flash:
Destination filename [List79x1.xml]?
Accessing
tftp://192.168.0.1/2800/ccme40/cme-124-11XJ-chimes/79x1-backgrounds/List79x1.xml...
Just answer 'n' or 'no' to the question. It should then start copying,
assuming everything else is ok.
Chuck Church
Principal Network Engineer, CCIE #8776
Harris Information Technology Services
EDS Contractor - Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI)
1210 N. Parker Rd. | Greenville, SC 29609
I'd suggest using route-maps to *lower* the local-pref on
routes that contain ASNs from two or your upstreams.
- Bob
I have a situation with one of our upstreams that I'm trying to fix. We
peer with Level3 (3356), specifically we peer with 19094 which is the
old Telcove (Adelphia)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: XSS and SQL Injection in Cisco
CallManager/Unified Communications Manager Logon Page
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20070829-ccm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20070829-ccm.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arda Balkanay wrote:
Hi
i have a problem about high cpu usage on a 7206 VXR NPE-G1 because of
process switching on a multilink ppp interface.
I have two E1 interfaces between 7206 and 3845 (below MTP-C72-02 indicates
7206 and ADN-C38-01
Do you have a TAC SR open on this?
I just saw someone ask this a few days ago and I told them it's
a bug.
We support CEF switching of data over a MLPPP bundle with
MPLS.
Are you running MPLSoMLPPP or are you just running the MLPPP
interface in a VRF?
MTP-C72-02#sh inter mul 1 switching
Aaron,
It's a bug.
CSCse04192
Internally found cosmetic defect: Resolved (R)
NRT:lreuse:Can't write label reuse data to standby RP pdata file
was fixed in 12.0(32)SY3.
Is this seen on 32SY3?
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:19:53AM -0400, Aaron Daubman wrote:
Greetings,
I just saw these two
Gabor, many thanks for such a comprehensive reply and info. I did experience
MTU issues while working with Cisco devices however there are a few
differences between the described problem and my scenario. Firstly, I am
using Cisco as LAC and ERX as LNS. Secondly the error my Cisco device gives
is
There's no 12.4(15)T images for the 2600XM's on CCO. I haven't checked w/
account team yet, but does anyone know offhand if they got cut off mid-train
after their EoSales/Last Shipment earlier this year? With 12.5 mainline just a
couple of releases away, this seems rather abrupt (though I seem
Hi All is BGP configuration ok for these scenarios?
1MB and 2MB leased line link
1MB and 1MB leased line link
(also its a v.35 and fastethernet combo)
what would be the best setup? Full routes? Def routes?
Here's the show version of the router I will be using. can it support BGP?
=
Cisco
29 matches
Mail list logo
