Garry wrote:
I'm playing with an ME3400 in our Lab, trying to set up some
QoS/Shaping stuff ...
I'm pretty sure the last ME3400 I had my hands on was running Metro
Access and was able to shape but only in class-default at the top level
of the policy. Granularity at anything less than about
Brad Henshaw wrote:
Garry wrote:
I'm playing with an ME3400 in our Lab, trying to set up some
QoS/Shaping stuff ...
I'm pretty sure the last ME3400 I had my hands on was running Metro
Access and was able to shape but only in class-default at the top level
of the policy.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Security Manager Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090121-csm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20090121-csm.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 January 21 1600 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Unified Communications Manager CAPF
Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090121-cucmcapf
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 January 21 1600 UTC (GMT
It has been a while but I wanted to follow up on the problem I was
having. It looks like IOS is the main culprit. I downgraded from
12.4(21) to 12.3(14)T7 this morning and the CPU utilization has dropped.
I received a message from another user that has 7206VXRs with NPE-300s
and he had CPU
My inline IPS/AV identifies this link as infected with JS/feebs@mm.
- Russ
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Aaron Riemer arie...@wesenergy.com.auwrote:
Hey guys,
I have found quite a useful website for different cisco configurations
etc.. If anyone has any similar feel free to post in
Is it possible to set TTL for outgoing packets on a cisco router ?
--
Best regards,
Adrian Minta
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi All
i want to know if there any network connectivity tool can be configured to
respond to spesific TCP/UDP port number ?
sometimes we do modifiy our security policy in FWs but the application level
still have problem so we need to use this tool to configure it to respond to
application port
Hi folks,
Anyone tried the SSL-3 VPN encryption card on a 2800 series before?
Thanks.
Luan Nguyen
Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
[W] http://www.netcraftsmen.net http://www.netcraftsmen.net/
[M] l...@netcraftsmen.net
[Blog] http://cnc-networksecurity.blogspot.com/
--- On Thu, 22/1/09, Ibrahim Abo Zaid ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ibrahim Abo Zaid ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com
Subject: [c-nsp] network connection tool
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net,
ci...@groupstudy.com
Date: Thursday, 22 January, 2009, 7:46 AM
Hi All
i want to know if there any network connectivity tool can
be configured to
respond to spesific TCP/UDP port number ?
iperf for both tcp udp
--
pgp-key 0x1C655CAB
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
We are using the SSL-2 card; I've been able to push about 130Mb/s 3des
traffic on this card.
Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: moua0...@umn.edu
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking Telecommunications Services
Luan Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
Anyone tried the SSL-3 VPN
Hi,
i want to know if there any network connectivity tool can be configured to
respond to spesific TCP/UDP port number ?
a selection of small tools and utils. eg 'lighttpd' for TCP - just
change the port its listening on and web browse to a file on it,
'netcat', 'tftpd' for UDP randomness.
We need to shift some routers around in our network, and we have a couple of
7206-VXR routers with NPE-G1 which we'd like to redeploy into a situation
where they'll need to take the full public BGP table.
Currently they have 512MB of RAM, and the NPE-G1 appears to top-out at 1GigB
of RAM. Can
can anyone please advice what does it mean and why is an LACP port-channel
displays an alphabet along with an actual channel number ?
240Po240(SD) LACP
240Po240A(SU) LACP Gi10/17(P) Gi10/18(P) Gi10/19(P) Gi10/20(P)
240Po240C(SU) LACP Gi10/21(P)
On Tue,
Re Mick,
mickster4...@gmail.com (The Mickster) wrote:
Currently they have 512MB of RAM, and the NPE-G1 appears to top-out at 1GigB
of RAM. Can anyone tell me if I can do the full table on 512 MB, or if I
need upgrade to !Gig, or is running the full table on a 7206-VXR a lost
cause anyway?
If you are on a 12.4 version of IOS and run NAT but don't need
NBAR classification in order to translate MGCP and RTP traffic
you can disable it via:
no ip nat service nbar
if you run 12.4(23) or later code.
I wonder how much that would have bought you back in CPU usage
as compared to what you
Need the answer quick or just I'd test it myself, and I didn't see it
specifically answered in the documentation.
Will the IOS DHCP server detect collisions if the address is in
use, but the host will not respond to pings? That is, the host
is firewalled and will not respond to ICMP echo
Hi Mick,
FYI a 7206VXR-NPE-G1 loaded with 1Gig only consumes around 250Mb of
its memory for a full BGP table (around 271K routes without
filtering). See our router stat here
#sh mem
HeadTotal(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b) Largest(b)
Processor 63F362C0
I was wondering if I could get some additional opinions on a case I have
open with Cisco. We have recently started turning up LDP on various
links out towards some routers that are being converted to act as PEs.
The core is all connected together and has been running LDP on those
particular
This happen when you have a mismatch configuration between your
Port-channel interface setting and Gigabit interfaces which are
members of that Port-channel.
Compare again the settings in Port-channel and its members. All must
be the same otherwise you will get several port-channels w/ alphabet
We have a few NPE-G1s out there as well with 1GB of memory and they are
more than capable of handling a full internet route table. Memory is
basically the same as what the others have posted. Feature wise we're
not really doing anything fancy so CPU utilization is fine.
One question I'd
On Thursday 22 January 2009 09:49:23 am Jose wrote:
One question I'd like to ask is whether anyone would ever
consider using one of these as a gateway towards your
upstream transits pushing over 500Mbps of bandwidth?
It's ability to reach that forwarding capacity would depend
on which other
Thank you, to Engel, Jose, Elmar, as well as to all of those who wrote to me
off-list!
I've gotten the information that I need (which is that 512 MB is plenty for
a VXR, NPE-G1, at least for now, at least for how I plan to use them).
I also thank all of you for the little bits and pieces of
Hi all,
I just came across this Cisco page:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/iosswrel/prod_gen_ios_licensing.html
Which among the info on it has:
When you purchase hardware, you also purchase the software and the license to
use it. Hardware arrives with licensed software.
No additional
Thanks for this info , I tried shut/unshut on physical ports and it went off
. Port configs were identical
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Engelhard Labiro engel.lab...@gmail.comwrote:
This happen when you have a mismatch configuration between your
Port-channel interface setting and
netcat
http://siliconrust.blogspot.com/2006/04/what-do-you-do-to-emulate-server.html
Quick tutorial on how to emulate a server. I guess that is what you are asking.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid
ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
i want to know if there any network
Eat a box of rusty hammers nails whoever signed up
ci...@groupstudy.com for a cisco-nsp address.
Chaining mailing liststhat is a sign of genius.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Cisco certification ci...@groupstudy.com
Date: Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:45 PM
Subject: Please confirm
At 11:22 AM 11-01-09 -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:41:59PM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
That provides RMA which we do not need. We want *only* TAC access and
IOS downloads. Softnet provided that option - which Cisco has abolished.
Oh.
30 matches
Mail list logo
