[c-nsp] Inter-AS EoMPLS/VPLS
Does anyone have any experience? I can see it's supported only on IOS-XR, so 7600 it's out of the question (any plans?). http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/iosxr_r3.7/mpls/configuration/guide/gc37v2.html#wp1100339 -- Tassos ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] HSRP and Standby router
Hi All I was studying some HSRP senario which is little bit different than what used to work on , we have 2 routers connected with access ports to internal box which has 2 direct physical layer-2 links to both routers and HSRP is running between VLAN SVIs on both routers across L2 ether-channel between them if physical link to active router fail , the client will ARP stanby router for MAC of HSRP group IP , my question here is stanby router will answer ARP requests while it still detect that active router is still alive from HSRP over etherchannel between them ? and if yes , what MAC address it will answer with ? the active router owns group vmac address so if standby reply it will reply with bia address and L2-switch the traffic to active router ? waiting for opinions and your experience share best regards --Ibrahim ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Inter-AS EoMPLS/VPLS
Hi Tassos, You could do inter-AS EoMPLS by using Pseudo Wire stitching/switching, which is supporte don 12.2(33)SRC on the 7600. It's done as a kind of VPLS domain, however it can only handle one neighbour. __ Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards Lars Lystrup Christensen Director of Engineering, CCIE(tm) #20292 Danske Telecom A/S Sundkrogsgade 13, 4 2100 København Ø -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tassos Chatzithomaoglou Sent: 10. juni 2009 10:10 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Inter-AS EoMPLS/VPLS Does anyone have any experience? I can see it's supported only on IOS-XR, so 7600 it's out of the question (any plans?). http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/iosxr_r3.7/mpls/configuration/guide/gc37v2.html#wp1100339 -- Tassos ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?
___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?
___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?
___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?
___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Inter-AS EoMPLS/VPLS
___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BGP - OSPF (Or another way?)
___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] HSRP and Standby router
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:30 +0300, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: I was studying some HSRP senario which is little bit different than what used to work on , we have 2 routers connected with access ports to internal box which has 2 direct physical layer-2 links to both routers and HSRP is running between VLAN SVIs on both routers across L2 ether-channel between them if physical link to active router fail , the client will ARP stanby router for MAC of HSRP group IP , my question here is stanby router will answer ARP requests while it still detect that active router is still alive from HSRP over etherchannel between them ? and if yes , what MAC address it will answer with ? the active router owns group vmac address so if standby reply it will reply with bia address and L2-switch the traffic to active router ? Assuming that the routers bridge the access connection and the connection between them, thus forming a triangular bridge domain, then if only one physical access link fails and the connection between the routers is still active the HSRP role will not move between the two routers. As long as they can see each other somehow the HSRP is stable. This is effectively a ring topology where any one link may fail without impacting the forwarding ability. The spanning tree might need to be recalculated, so it might introduce a short-ish pause. Traffic from access towards the HSRP standby IP might be switched through the inactive HSRP member, and this might not be the most effective way of switching, maybe introducing congestion, but traffic would still end up in the right place. OTOH if the two routers lose L2 contact they will both go active. (Though if the router has no active ports in the VLAN the SVI should go line protocol down and not try to participate in HSRP.) You can expect loss of connectivity towards the gateway for a full HSRP hold-time interval, default 10 seconds. AFAIK the standby HSRP unit will not answer ARP queries in this period. ARP entries need not be updated since the MAC address of the standby IP address stays the same. A topology change notification, sent out when there are changes in the physical topology, will flush all MAC address tables, helping this part of the convergence. I may not have understood your question completely though. :-) -- Peter Rathlev ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] 3750E and X2-10GB-ZR compatibility?
Just a quick question: The 3750E doesn't support X2-10GB-ZR tranceivers[1], only up to ER. Using service unsupported-transceiver I can get the switch to recognize the transceiver, but will I be able to get a link with it? It's for testing part of a fiber stretch, so it's not for production. Does anybody have any experience that can confirm or deny any of the following: - Could it damage the transceiver? - Could it damage the switch? - Would I be able to get link up with it? (The other end is a similar transceiver in a WS-X6708-10GE-3C module.) - If I got link up, could I trust this to generally work? The problem is that the last part of the stretch isn't finished yet, and it's a little much to carry around a 6506 chassis for testing purposes. (We have OTDR btw, just want to do a live test.) Thanks in advance. -- Peter Rathlev [1]: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modu les/compatibility/matrix/OL_6974.html#wp48759 (http://tinyurl.com/yooxks) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?
On Jun 9, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote: On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:41 AM, Maxwell Reid wrote: It's using them in combination with vShield Zones at the ESX level (new feature of v4) that yields the best results. It's also important to note that all of this runs in software, and is thus subject to the performance limitations thereof. When you're talking about a box with 16-32 3 Ghz Cores and 128 GBs of ram with offloading NIC/CNA's that software is pretty speedy. A single host running 3 vms can go as high as 350,000 IOPs/sec from a storage perspective, and handle high PPS loads w/ 10GbE at line rate. Even hardware appliances like the ASA boot strap off what appears to be KVM and handle multiple contexts in software; and you really only need specialized ASIC's as part of the forwarding plane of high end routers. ~Max --- Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net // http://www.arbornetworks.com Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well. -- Kevin Lawton ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ?
Guys Does anyone of you knows a good DSLAM for HDSL ADSL ? Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ?
Occam... ;) -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Juan C. Crespo R. Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:34 AM To: Cisco Post NSP Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ? Guys Does anyone of you knows a good DSLAM for HDSL ADSL ? Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] need help with 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B
I Have a brand new 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B booting up in rommon mode i was able to type the command boot so it can look for the right code to boot up but after i configured the switch i turned off and turned it back on, it boot up in rommon mode again and everything was lost. I know someone had upgraded the IOS and i am sure that's what causing the problem and i know there is command i can type to fix the problem but i can't remember it or find it on the web can someone please help me out with this ? Renelson ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ?
Juan, Cisco does not make DSLAMs for a long time now... Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Juan C. Crespo R. Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 18:34 To: Cisco Post NSP Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ? Guys Does anyone of you knows a good DSLAM for HDSL ADSL ? Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] HSRP and Standby router
I think this document can provide more insight: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/DC_Infr a2_5/DCInfra_6.html Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 14:27 To: Ibrahim Abo Zaid Cc: ci...@groupstudy.com; cisco_nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] HSRP and Standby router On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:30 +0300, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: I was studying some HSRP senario which is little bit different than what used to work on , we have 2 routers connected with access ports to internal box which has 2 direct physical layer-2 links to both routers and HSRP is running between VLAN SVIs on both routers across L2 ether-channel between them if physical link to active router fail , the client will ARP stanby router for MAC of HSRP group IP , my question here is stanby router will answer ARP requests while it still detect that active router is still alive from HSRP over etherchannel between them ? and if yes , what MAC address it will answer with ? the active router owns group vmac address so if standby reply it will reply with bia address and L2-switch the traffic to active router ? Assuming that the routers bridge the access connection and the connection between them, thus forming a triangular bridge domain, then if only one physical access link fails and the connection between the routers is still active the HSRP role will not move between the two routers. As long as they can see each other somehow the HSRP is stable. This is effectively a ring topology where any one link may fail without impacting the forwarding ability. The spanning tree might need to be recalculated, so it might introduce a short-ish pause. Traffic from access towards the HSRP standby IP might be switched through the inactive HSRP member, and this might not be the most effective way of switching, maybe introducing congestion, but traffic would still end up in the right place. OTOH if the two routers lose L2 contact they will both go active. (Though if the router has no active ports in the VLAN the SVI should go line protocol down and not try to participate in HSRP.) You can expect loss of connectivity towards the gateway for a full HSRP hold-time interval, default 10 seconds. AFAIK the standby HSRP unit will not answer ARP queries in this period. ARP entries need not be updated since the MAC address of the standby IP address stays the same. A topology change notification, sent out when there are changes in the physical topology, will flush all MAC address tables, helping this part of the convergence. I may not have understood your question completely though. :-) -- Peter Rathlev ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] need help with 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B
Hi Renelson, What's the configuration register set to? (sh boot) once you're in IOS. 0x0 will bring you to rommon everytime, 0x2102 will boot the sup using the config file. Aaron - Aaron Childs Assistant Director, Networking Westfield State College http://www.wsc.ma.edu/it/ -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Renelson Panosky Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:41 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] need help with 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B I Have a brand new 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B booting up in rommon mode i was able to type the command boot so it can look for the right code to boot up but after i configured the switch i turned off and turned it back on, it boot up in rommon mode again and everything was lost. I know someone had upgraded the IOS and i am sure that's what causing the problem and i know there is command i can type to fix the problem but i can't remember it or find it on the web can someone please help me out with this ? Renelson ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation
Hi there. We have a customer that does lots of IPTV - they have a new deployment currently going into an MDU (condos). They have asked for a recommended switch that is IPTV friendly - I'm presuming they mean multicast aware etc. Which Cisco switches would be recommended to handoff approximately 20 Cat5 drops fed by fiber coming in? Cheers, Paul ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ?
Yup Cisco does not make DSLAMs anymore. I think paradyne guys are doing great job in fact. http://www.paradyne.com/ Regards, Masood Juan, Cisco does not make DSLAMs for a long time now... Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Juan C. Crespo R. Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 18:34 To: Cisco Post NSP Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ? Guys Does anyone of you knows a good DSLAM for HDSL ADSL ? Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Paul Stewart wrote: Which Cisco switches would be recommended to handoff approximately 20 Cat5 drops fed by fiber coming in? 3560/3750 seems to work well for this. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation
Take a look at the ME3400 series. - Ed --Original Message-- From: Paul Stewart Sender: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation Sent: Jun 10, 2009 1:25 PM Hi there. We have a customer that does lots of IPTV - they have a new deployment currently going into an MDU (condos). They have asked for a recommended switch that is IPTV friendly - I'm presuming they mean multicast aware etc. Which Cisco switches would be recommended to handoff approximately 20 Cat5 drops fed by fiber coming in? Cheers, Paul ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation
On 10/06/09 13:25 -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: We have a customer that does lots of IPTV - they have a new deployment currently going into an MDU (condos). They have asked for a recommended switch that is IPTV friendly - I'm presuming they mean multicast aware etc. Which Cisco switches would be recommended to handoff approximately 20 Cat5 drops fed by fiber coming in? We're going through the same story at this stage. Working with allot of vendors, testing, and trails. So far for us, a combination of entry level 2960s and 3560s are working fine. You are correct, the most important thing is Multicast and IGMP subscriptions, so pretty much any half decent switch would be capable. Ciscos naturally just work best for us though because we love them so much. -- Chris. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation
Chris Knipe wrote: We're going through the same story at this stage. Working with allot of vendors, testing, and trails. So far for us, a combination of entry level 2960s and 3560s are working fine. You are correct, the most important thing is Multicast and IGMP subscriptions, so pretty much any half decent switch would be capable. Reminds me... do you need the LAN Base version to make it fly, or will LAN Lite work? (or for the 3560s, IP Base or IP Services?) Jeff ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation
On 10/06/09 14:27 -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: Chris Knipe wrote: We're going through the same story at this stage. Working with allot of vendors, testing, and trails. So far for us, a combination of entry level 2960s and 3560s are working fine. You are correct, the most important thing is Multicast and IGMP subscriptions, so pretty much any half decent switch would be capable. Reminds me... do you need the LAN Base version to make it fly, or will LAN Lite work? Didn't even know there is a LAN Lite :( All our switches runs LAN Base -- Chris ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation
It depends - largely on the type of Multicast you're rolling out. I had mixed results with 3560's running IP Base versus IP Services for SSM/AutoRP roll out. Depending on your requirements you could maybe get IP Base to work but best results were with IP Services. Ryan On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote: Chris Knipe wrote: We're going through the same story at this stage. Working with allot of vendors, testing, and trails. So far for us, a combination of entry level 2960s and 3560s are working fine. You are correct, the most important thing is Multicast and IGMP subscriptions, so pretty much any half decent switch would be capable. Reminds me... do you need the LAN Base version to make it fly, or will LAN Lite work? (or for the 3560s, IP Base or IP Services?) Jeff ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation
Ryan Hughes wrote: It depends - largely on the type of Multicast you're rolling out. I had mixed results with 3560's running IP Base versus IP Services for SSM/AutoRP roll out. Depending on your requirements you could maybe get IP Base to work but best results were with IP Services. Ryan On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote: Chris Knipe wrote: We're going through the same story at this stage. Working with allot of vendors, testing, and trails. So far for us, a combination of entry level 2960s and 3560s are working fine. You are correct, the most important thing is Multicast and IGMP subscriptions, so pretty much any half decent switch would be capable. Reminds me... do you need the LAN Base version to make it fly, or will LAN Lite work? (or for the 3560s, IP Base or IP Services?) Jeff ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Hi We use ME3400 with metro ip access image. ssm works perfect. Have a look at the following links for some guidelines. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6902/products_implementation_design_guide_book09186a00806b5b4c.html http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps6902/products_implementation_design_guide_book09186a0080665c4c.html Anthony ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation
hey, We have a customer that does lots of IPTV - they have a new deployment currently going into an MDU (condos). They have asked for a recommended switch that is IPTV friendly - I'm presuming they mean multicast aware etc. I have been down this road - don't waste your time with cheaper vendors, you will end up replacing the gear anyway. Which Cisco switches would be recommended to handoff approximately 20 Cat5 drops fed by fiber coming in? 2960 does fine job. You now get all the security features that were available on 3750 only, on 2960 too. ME2400 used to be an alternative but it always looked like a box made for one customer and it's EOS now anyway. -- tarko ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] WS-X6148-RJ21 Ethernet Modules
Hello I was wondering if anyone has any experience using the RJ21 modules for 6500 Catalyst? Any good things to say? Any bad things to say? Regrets deploying it? This would be for access switches. Thank you, Tom ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] WLC discovery
Hi, A Cisco WLC4402 is configured and working alright. All of the APs currently are in the same subnet and hence the discovery do not require DHCP Option 43 or DNS. I want to add another AP that is in a different. When the AP tries to register with the WLC, it registers momentarily and un registers. This has happened for eithe DHCP option and DNS discovery. I am sure, there is something I have not done to get this working. Can anyone suggest somthing that I should try? Thanks in advance, Shine ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ?
you can use Paradyne DSLAMs or Alcatel ISAMs (IP DSLAMs) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:03:33 -0430 From: jcposei...@cantv.net To: cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco DSLAM ? Guys Does anyone of you knows a good DSLAM for HDSL ADSL ? Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _ Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=createwx_url=/friends.aspxmkt=en-us ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery
Hi, Hi, A Cisco WLC4402 is configured and working alright. All of the APs currently are in the same subnet and hence the discovery do not require DHCP Option 43 or DNS. I want to add another AP that is in a different. When the AP tries to register with the WLC, it registers momentarily and un registers. This has happened for eithe DHCP option and DNS discovery. I am sure, there is something I have not done to get this working. Can anyone suggest somthing that I should try? is master controller mode turned on? alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery
Thanks Mike for the the quick response. That means I have to have physical access to the APs which are already mounted on the ceiling. I am in the process of moving this AP to another subnet and I have some 18 of them to be moved from a single subnet to different subnets. I can see this AP regsiters momentarily and de-registers. We are running code 5.1. When the AP regsiters I can go to its configuration page and I see Hardware reset and Reset to Factory defaults. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Shine - Original Message - From: Kaegler, Mike kaegl...@tessco.com To: Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:50 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery Boot the AP with the Mode button down to reset its parameter memory. If that doesn't help, hook into console and watch the messages. If that doesn't help, execute some 'debug [...]' statements on the same console. -porkchop On 6/10/09 4:42 PM, Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au wrote: Hi, A Cisco WLC4402 is configured and working alright. All of the APs currently are in the same subnet and hence the discovery do not require DHCP Option 43 or DNS. I want to add another AP that is in a different. When the AP tries to register with the WLC, it registers momentarily and un registers. This has happened for eithe DHCP option and DNS discovery. I am sure, there is something I have not done to get this working. Can anyone suggest somthing that I should try? Thanks in advance, Shine ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Michael Kaegler, TESSCO Technologies: Engineering, 410 229 1295 Your wireless success, nothing less. http://www.tessco.com/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery
Hi, There is only one controller and I believe this is the master controller. DO you know, where I could check this? Thanks, Shine - Original Message - From: a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk To: Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:11 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery Hi, Hi, A Cisco WLC4402 is configured and working alright. All of the APs currently are in the same subnet and hence the discovery do not require DHCP Option 43 or DNS. I want to add another AP that is in a different. When the AP tries to register with the WLC, it registers momentarily and un registers. This has happened for eithe DHCP option and DNS discovery. I am sure, there is something I have not done to get this working. Can anyone suggest somthing that I should try? is master controller mode turned on? alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery
Boot the AP with the Mode button down to reset its parameter memory. If that doesn't help, hook into console and watch the messages. If that doesn't help, execute some 'debug [...]' statements on the same console. -porkchop On 6/10/09 4:42 PM, Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au wrote: Hi, A Cisco WLC4402 is configured and working alright. All of the APs currently are in the same subnet and hence the discovery do not require DHCP Option 43 or DNS. I want to add another AP that is in a different. When the AP tries to register with the WLC, it registers momentarily and un registers. This has happened for eithe DHCP option and DNS discovery. I am sure, there is something I have not done to get this working. Can anyone suggest somthing that I should try? Thanks in advance, Shine ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Michael Kaegler, TESSCO Technologies: Engineering, 410 229 1295 Your wireless success, nothing less. http://www.tessco.com/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery
Are you in Layer 2 or Layer 3 AP mode. I forget if this is the actual name, but you may need to switch to layer 3. Sent from handheld. On Jun 10, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au wrote: Thanks Mike for the the quick response. That means I have to have physical access to the APs which are already mounted on the ceiling. I am in the process of moving this AP to another subnet and I have some 18 of them to be moved from a single subnet to different subnets. I can see this AP regsiters momentarily and de-registers. We are running code 5.1. When the AP regsiters I can go to its configuration page and I see Hardware reset and Reset to Factory defaults. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Shine - Original Message - From: Kaegler, Mike kaegl...@tessco.com To: Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:50 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery Boot the AP with the Mode button down to reset its parameter memory. If that doesn't help, hook into console and watch the messages. If that doesn't help, execute some 'debug [...]' statements on the same console. -porkchop On 6/10/09 4:42 PM, Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au wrote: Hi, A Cisco WLC4402 is configured and working alright. All of the APs currently are in the same subnet and hence the discovery do not require DHCP Option 43 or DNS. I want to add another AP that is in a different. When the AP tries to register with the WLC, it registers momentarily and un registers. This has happened for eithe DHCP option and DNS discovery. I am sure, there is something I have not done to get this working. Can anyone suggest somthing that I should try? Thanks in advance, Shine ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Michael Kaegler, TESSCO Technologies: Engineering, 410 229 1295 Your wireless success, nothing less. http://www.tessco.com/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery
Yes it is in layer 3 mode - Original Message - From: Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com To: Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au Cc: Kaegler, Mike kaegl...@tessco.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:30 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery Are you in Layer 2 or Layer 3 AP mode. I forget if this is the actual name, but you may need to switch to layer 3. Sent from handheld. On Jun 10, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au wrote: Thanks Mike for the the quick response. That means I have to have physical access to the APs which are already mounted on the ceiling. I am in the process of moving this AP to another subnet and I have some 18 of them to be moved from a single subnet to different subnets. I can see this AP regsiters momentarily and de-registers. We are running code 5.1. When the AP regsiters I can go to its configuration page and I see Hardware reset and Reset to Factory defaults. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Shine - Original Message - From: Kaegler, Mike kaegl...@tessco.com To: Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:50 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery Boot the AP with the Mode button down to reset its parameter memory. If that doesn't help, hook into console and watch the messages. If that doesn't help, execute some 'debug [...]' statements on the same console. -porkchop On 6/10/09 4:42 PM, Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au wrote: Hi, A Cisco WLC4402 is configured and working alright. All of the APs currently are in the same subnet and hence the discovery do not require DHCP Option 43 or DNS. I want to add another AP that is in a different. When the AP tries to register with the WLC, it registers momentarily and un registers. This has happened for eithe DHCP option and DNS discovery. I am sure, there is something I have not done to get this working. Can anyone suggest somthing that I should try? Thanks in advance, Shine ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Michael Kaegler, TESSCO Technologies: Engineering, 410 229 1295 Your wireless success, nothing less. http://www.tessco.com/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery
Good call anyway, Ryan. Master mode will have no affect in this scenario, AFAIK. Master will only cause this controller to take priority over any other controllers if several share the same group, forcing new APs to land on the Master (knowing where they'd land makes for easier configuration during initial deployment). In the era of WCS, this is less of an issue. The only other things you can do are check firewalls between subnets (make sure both IPs are allowed, etc). You can try a few 'debug [...]' commands on the controller, but what you may really need is a ladder. -porkchop On 6/10/09 5:49 PM, Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au wrote: Yes it is in layer 3 mode - Original Message - From: Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com To: Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au Cc: Kaegler, Mike kaegl...@tessco.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:30 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery Are you in Layer 2 or Layer 3 AP mode. I forget if this is the actual name, but you may need to switch to layer 3. Sent from handheld. On Jun 10, 2009, at 5:26 PM, Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au wrote: Thanks Mike for the the quick response. That means I have to have physical access to the APs which are already mounted on the ceiling. I am in the process of moving this AP to another subnet and I have some 18 of them to be moved from a single subnet to different subnets. I can see this AP regsiters momentarily and de-registers. We are running code 5.1. When the AP regsiters I can go to its configuration page and I see Hardware reset and Reset to Factory defaults. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Shine - Original Message - From: Kaegler, Mike kaegl...@tessco.com To: Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:50 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] WLC discovery Boot the AP with the Mode button down to reset its parameter memory. If that doesn't help, hook into console and watch the messages. If that doesn't help, execute some 'debug [...]' statements on the same console. -porkchop On 6/10/09 4:42 PM, Shine Joseph shinejos...@dodo.com.au wrote: Hi, A Cisco WLC4402 is configured and working alright. All of the APs currently are in the same subnet and hence the discovery do not require DHCP Option 43 or DNS. I want to add another AP that is in a different. When the AP tries to register with the WLC, it registers momentarily and un registers. This has happened for eithe DHCP option and DNS discovery. I am sure, there is something I have not done to get this working. Can anyone suggest somthing that I should try? Thanks in advance, Shine ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Michael Kaegler, TESSCO Technologies: Engineering, 410 229 1295 Your wireless success, nothing less. http://www.tessco.com/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Michael Kaegler, TESSCO Technologies: Engineering, 410 229 1295 Your wireless success, nothing less. http://www.tessco.com/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] need help with 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B
Check the config-register, as Aaron suggests, but also check the SP's config-register. #remote command switch show boot If the RP shows 0x2102 but the SP is something else, that could be the problem. To fix, go into config mode on the RP and re-enter the 0x2102 config-register, ^Z, then write mem. Cheers, Dale On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Childs, Aaronaa...@wsc.ma.edu wrote: What's the configuration register set to? (sh boot) once you're in IOS. 0x0 will bring you to rommon everytime, 0x2102 will boot the sup using the config file. Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Renelson Panosky Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:41 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] need help with 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B I Have a brand new 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B booting up in rommon mode i was able to type the command boot so it can look for the right code to boot up but after i configured the switch i turned off and turned it back on, it boot up in rommon mode again and everything was lost. I know someone had upgraded the IOS and i am sure that's what causing the problem and i know there is command i can type to fix the problem but i can't remember it or find it on the web can someone please help me out with this ? Renelson ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] need help with 6509-E with WS-SUP32-GE-3B
Check the config-register, as Aaron suggests, but also check the SP's config-register. #remote command switch show boot If the RP shows 0x2102 but the SP is something else, that could be the problem. To fix, go into config mode on the RP and re-enter the 0x2102 config-register, ^Z, then write mem. Cheers, Dale While looking at show boot, you should also verify the boot variable. It may be necessary to explicitly specify the image filename. show boot BOOT variable = disk0:c7600s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRC2.bin,1;,1; show star | i ^boot boot-start-marker boot system flash disk0:c7600s72033-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SRC2.bin boot system flash boot-end-marker ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Nexus V1000 - Feedback?
On Jun 10, 2009, at 9:32 PM, Maxwell Reid wrote: you really only need specialized ASIC's as part of the forwarding plane of high end routers. When you're talking about DDoS, that's what's needed; general-purpose CPUs on boxes running many different VM/OS/app stacks, or things like ASAs don't cut it. That's why you don't see stateful firewalling in front of major public- facing properties; not only is it useless by definition in such scenarios, in which every single incoming connection is unsolicited, but it's a DDoS chokepoint due to the state instantiated and the limited resources available. --- Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net // http://www.arbornetworks.com Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well. -- Kevin Lawton ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] full routing table / provider-class chassis
I've been trying to spec Cisco for an upgrade of our Force10 backbone for nearly 2 months now. I'm just trying to clarify which platform Cisco recommends for full routing table/hardware forwarding/provider- class environments. Unfortunately every time I get through to the supposed right group, I mention our requirements and Cisco never follows up. It's almost like they realize they have nothing on Juniper and they don't even bother. They are about to be eliminated from the choices for lack of having an answer. Until they decide to care, is there anyone on here willing to propose a basic platform for provider-class environment? By which I mean * Full IPv4 v6 routing table (Cisco has 760k v4/260k v6 I know with SUP720/3CXL) * ASIC-based line-rate forwarding (SUP720-3CXL and DFC-3CXL on each line card, right?) * 196 ports copper 10/100/1000 * 40 ports SFP 1g (on two line cards, not one) * 96+ BGP peers, 8-10 full routing table peers Unfortunately, Cisco's partners are useless. They propose 6509s without the DFCs, which we know will fall over. And as I understand it, the 6509 even with the 3CXL cards can't handle 5 full peers, nevermind 96 total peers. Most people suggest the 7600 platform, but at least two comments on the mailing list indicate it isn't much better. What are people using today for this kind of environment? Does it work? -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] full routing table / provider-class chassis
On Jun 11, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Jo Rhett wrote: What are people using today for this kind of environment? GSR, ASR 1K, CRS-1 all work quite well. Avoid 6500/7600 for edge applications due to NetFlow, uRPF, ACL caveats (they're fine in the core). --- Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net // http://www.arbornetworks.com Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well. -- Kevin Lawton ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Location of 67xx rommon (c2lc-rm) images?
With the new and not so improved software download and documentation sites, does anyone know where to find rommon images and release notes for 6500 line cards? RP/SP images are linked under the 6500 download pages, but the only DFC-related link is for c6dfc3 (65xx/68xx DFC3, I believe). Thanks. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] need help.....
Why VLAN 0 is not configur in Switch where as starting range of VLAN is 0 and default VLAN is 1... -- Regards. Arup Bhattacharya GSM-9748238797 - Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Location of 67xx rommon (c2lc-rm) images?
Do a search for c2lc-rm2.srec.122-18r.S1 and you'll find many download locations. i.e. http://tools.cisco.com/support/downloads/go/IPCheck.x?defAdv=NsftAdv=Nfilename=c2lc-rm2.srec.122-18r.S1advUrl=nulldefInd=Nmdfid=281569550sftType=IOS%20ROMMON%20SoftwareoptPlat=relVer=12.2(18r)S1md5=cabfe0b596363489047c769baf9dc161modifmdfid=281569550imname=nullimst=Nhybrid=YmodelName=Cisco%20Catalyst%206500%20Series%20Virtual%20Switching%20Supervisor%20Engine%20720%20with%2010GE%20uplinkstreeMdfId=268437717treeName=Cisco%20Interfaces%20and%20Modulesedesignator=fsd=hasfsd=Nnodecount=0 or use the old -classic- one: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Software/Tablebuild/doftp.pl?ftpfile=/cisco/lan/catalyst/6000/rommon/c2lc-rm2.srec.122-18r.S1 -- Tassos Kevin Graham wrote on 11/06/2009 04:17: With the new and not so improved software download and documentation sites, does anyone know where to find rommon images and release notes for 6500 line cards? RP/SP images are linked under the 6500 download pages, but the only DFC-related link is for c6dfc3 (65xx/68xx DFC3, I believe). Thanks. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
