Hank,
This is available on the 6500/7600 through microflow policers:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/con
figuration/guide/qos.html#wp1571584
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Hank,
This is available on the 6500/7600 through microflow policers:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/con
figuration/guide/qos.html#wp1571584
Did I fail to mention that the router is much smaller? :-)
-Hank
Arie
-Original Message-
From:
The 7600 supports NSF/SSO (Non-Stop Forwarding, Stateful Supervisor
O(something)) essentially giving you the 5sec recovery but the neighbors
need to be NSF Aware.
Or you can use RPR+ (the 30secs version) and ensure your layer3 network
routes around the missing box in well under a second.
Hello List!
My company is working on building Inter-AS VPN connection with other provider
(both using MPLS).
After researching on different option we've decided to use Option B (single-hop
MP-EBGP).
The only way to build l2vpn for option B is to use point-to-point VFI on ASBRs:
Hi all ,
I have got a project for an ISP ( also LDP configured ) runnning OSPF to
migrate to IS-IS.
I was planning to runnn dual IGP , as ospf with AD 110 and ISIS with AD 115
, OSPF will always be preffered.
I was planning the challenges for migration, below are the ones which I
could think of ,
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, jack daniels wrote:
Hi all ,
I have got a project for an ISP ( also LDP configured ) runnning OSPF to
migrate to IS-IS.
I was planning to runnn dual IGP , as ospf with AD 110 and ISIS with AD 115
, OSPF will always be preffered.
I was planning the challenges for migration,
Jens Link li...@quux.de writes:
On the bright side: Download worked for me using Debian Testing +
Firefox.
I stand corrected. It doesn't. :-(
Jens
--
-
| Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:49:32AM -0400, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, jack daniels wrote:
Hi all ,
I have got a project for an ISP ( also LDP configured ) runnning OSPF to
migrate to IS-IS.
I was planning to runnn dual IGP , as ospf with AD 110 and ISIS with AD
jack daniels wrote:
Hi all ,
I have got a project for an ISP ( also LDP configured ) runnning OSPF to
migrate to IS-IS.
Please make sure you understand your reasons for doing so clearly before
you get started with this, examples:
Good reasons:
- Want to completely re-engineer the IGP
Book MPLS Configuration on Cisco IOS Software. Implementing Layer 2 VPNs
over Inter-AS Topologies Using Layer 2 VPN Pseudo-Wire Switching.
23 сентября 2009 г. 11:10 пользователь Ольга Ружанская
frosy...@mail.ruнаписал:
Hello List!
My company is working on building Inter-AS VPN connection
jack daniels wrote:
Hi all ,
I have got a project for an ISP ( also LDP configured ) runnning OSPF to
migrate to IS-IS.
I was planning to runnn dual IGP , as ospf with AD 110 and ISIS with AD 115
, OSPF will always be preffered.
I was planning the challenges for migration, below are the ones
Hi Mohammad.
Cisco recommend the utility rtmcd (windows and linux version)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6135/products_user_guide09186a00808165dd.html#o16501
In my case it was impossible setup in linux server :-( , i did not
probe in windows. Few days ago, Gergi Genov post a
Hi,
Is there a way to prioritize ospf hello packets with 802.1p?
The reason for this is that I have wireless link between 2 routers and often
the ospf adjacency goes down/up very quickly and I can enable 802.1p
priority on this wireless link.
Regards,
Rens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software Object-group Access
Control List Bypass Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090923-acl
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 September 23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express
Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090923-cme
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 September 23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software Zone-Based Policy
Firewall Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090923-ios-fw
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 September 23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software Network Time Protocol
Packet Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090923-ntp
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 September 23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software Session Initiation
Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090923-sip
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 September 23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software Crafted Encryption Packet
Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090923-tls
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 September 23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session
Initiation Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090923-cm
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 September 23
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Rens r...@autempspourmoi.be wrote:
Is there a way to prioritize ospf hello packets with 802.1p?
They are by default. See
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk544/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094612.shtml
Cisco IOS assigns an IP precedence of 6 to routing
So as long as your router is correctly mapping the IP PREC to the COS (802.1P
field), it sounds like it might help. These are 802.1Q tagged packets on the
wireless, right?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:50 AM, jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.com wrote:
[cut]
WHAT CONSIDERATIONS TO KEEP IN MIND BEFORE MIGRATION.
as others have shared, vijay's presentation and methodology were spot on:
- have ALL of your configurations pre-written/staged/tested
- have a well
Hi Cisco PSIRT (and c-nsp),
this one is specifically making me unhappy:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:15:00PM -0400, Cisco Systems Product Security
Incident Response Team wrote:
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software Tunnels Vulnerability
[..]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gert,
Gert Doering wrote:
What exactly does this mean?
- there will never be a fixed 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 or 12.3 IOS, and we
have to upgrade all routers to 12.4 IOS, which is very likely to
require DRAM and Flash upgrades, and in many
If someone could hip me off list as to what a Proxy Registered Route
Object is, I would be grateful.
Google has presented too much information for me to glean through right
now.
It seems to be a favorite way to do something. I just can't figure out
what that may be.
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 01:06:40PM -0700, Wendy Garvin wrote:
Gert Doering wrote:
What exactly does this mean?
- there will never be a fixed 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 or 12.3 IOS, and we
have to upgrade all routers to 12.4 IOS, which is very likely to
require DRAM and Flash
[..]
The source and destination address must be the configured tunnel
addresses. The source address does matter, but it is possible to spoof
it. The destination address cannot be any address on the box, it must be
the configured destination address. However, you must take into account
that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gert,
Clear words. Unhappy customer.
(Going to 12.4 is painful enough, due to the necessary feature/bug testing
required. But what is much worse is hardware replacements, due to
hardware that's no longer supported - like various NPEs
Hi,
To add more to the comments against the new download management system,
the download screens are totally inaccessible to users that require a screen
reader. You can get as far as selecting the software to download, accepting
the far to many terms and conditions and then once you select
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Scott Granados gsgrana...@comcast.net wrote:
[cut]
All that aside, does anyone have a non Cisco pointer or back way in to
Cisco's site that I can use to download the latest V5.X windows XP VPN
client? Any pointers would be appreciated.
check out the
richard,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Richard Golodner
rgolod...@infratection.com wrote:
If someone could hip me off list as to what a Proxy Registered Route
Object is, I would be grateful.
Google has presented too much information for me to glean through right
now.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Matthew White ma...@vestas.com wrote:
The policy polices HULU and PANDORA, counters don't increment for YOUTUBE
(and doesn't get policed) and after 3 or 4 minutes ALL web traffic is
policed. Has anyone seen this behavior before?
Counters not incrementing for
You really need to communicate this to GSA and perhaps DoJ. Many web
developers do not take these issues into account, it's sad to continue
to see the same regression of website access. I would love to see a
way to access the downloads that does not require javascript (it can
require
Hi,
I plan on mentioning this to a few contacts. I don't think much will come
of it what with the blind community being such a small subset of the market
(far below the noise levels) but it can't hurt. It just surprises me that a
company would show such lack of concern for their products and
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Scott Granados wrote:
To add more to the comments against the new download management system,
the download screens are totally inaccessible to users that require a screen
reader. You can get as far as selecting the software to download, accepting
the far to many terms
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
All that aside, does anyone have a non Cisco pointer or back way in to
Cisco's site that I can use to download the latest V5.X windows XP VPN
client? Any pointers would be appreciated.
[snip]
Echoing Scott's request, if there is an 'off the
William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
All that aside, does anyone have a non Cisco pointer or back way in
to Cisco's site that I can use to download the latest V5.X windows XP
VPN client? Any pointers would be appreciated.
[snip]
Echoing
Can I ask a stupid question? What about the cat6.5k that ceilings out at
12.2(33)SXI2? Is this special case?
-b
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Behalf Of ML [...@kenweb.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 23,
Sorry to reply to my own post. Someone on the list contacted me off-list to
point out that this does *not* include the 12.2.S release.
I apologize to the group.
-b
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Behalf
40 matches
Mail list logo
