Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

output show ip ospf Supports only single TOS(TOS0) routes Supports opaque LSA Supports Link-local Signaling (LLS) Initial SPF schedule delay 5000 msecs Minimum hold time between two consecutive SPFs 1 msecs Maximum wait time between two consecutive SPFs 1 msecs Minimum LSA

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

Sascha, Output show ip ospf  [...] As Peter already said, I was asking for the output of show ip ospf interface. It will show us whether something like a passive-nterface causes your problem. Thanks Sascha___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

There's really not enough to go on. You haven't said what type of interfaces are involved or shown the configuration of those interfaces on two sides of a link. Are they Ethernet, SONET, Frame-Relay? My guess is that you don't have your ospf network type correct on your interfaces, but without

Re: [c-nsp] Web TV Streaming Solution?

I know VLC can do some cool stuff with video broadcasting through LAN Check this article out: http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/streaming-live-tv.asp HTH Ziv -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a00800949f7 .shtml -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michael K. Smith Sent: mercredi 12 mai 2010 8:25 To: shake righa Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] Web TV Streaming Solution?

On Tue, 11 May 2010, Felix Nkansah wrote: To informally permit employees to watch the upcoming soccer world cup without consuming all the bandwidth through the use of web TV, one of my customers came up with this requirement: What would you recommend? Thanks. Get the stream using eg VLC

[c-nsp] ASA 8.3

Hi All, Shortly I will be deploying some new ASAs and came across the 8.3 release. I didn't expect that a minor release would have quite so many fundamental changes. Without looking at the release notes, migration notes

Re: [c-nsp] Huawei instead of Cisco

On Wednesday 12 May 2010 10:39:27 am Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: Generally - IMHO they lack maturity at this stage. Couldn't agree more. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding - Loose Mode

Hello List, Let me bounce on this thread again as I am seriously thinking about implementing uRPF loose mode / RTBH on our backbone. We have been taking on some DDoS recently, Internet is a bitch ;-) I was thinking enabling it on the interfaces towards my : - Upstream Providers, - Peerings, -

Re: [c-nsp] Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding - Loose Mode

On 05/12/2010 10:55 AM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: We have a bunch 6509s acting as core routers and a bunch of 7204VXRs (NPE-400 / NPE-G1) acting as LNS border routers. Problem Is : I am concerned about performance issues. Is uRPF a big consumer of CPU / Memory ? On 6500, I believe the

Re: [c-nsp] Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding - Loose Mode

On May 12, 2010, at 6:21 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 05/12/2010 10:55 AM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: We have a bunch 6509s acting as core routers and a bunch of 7204VXRs (NPE-400 / NPE-G1) acting as LNS border routers. Problem Is : I am concerned about performance issues. Is uRPF a big

Re: [c-nsp] ASA 8.3

Ivan, -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 4:12 AM To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] ASA 8.3 Hi All, Shortly I will be deploying some new ASAs and came across the 8.3 release. I didn't expect that a minor release would have quite so many fundamental changes. Without

[c-nsp] circuit degradation/error simulator

Hi all, sorry for the not really Cisco-related topic, but the collected expertise present on this list might once again be the solution. For some testing I'm looking for a piece of software which is capable of inserting various degradation and/or errors into a traffic stream. The setup I

Re: [c-nsp] circuit degradation/error simulator

This was answered in the past I think. You can use WANem for that purpose http://wanem.sourceforge.net/ -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Marcus.Gerdon Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 5:00 PM To:

Re: [c-nsp] circuit degradation/error simulator

For some testing I'm looking for a piece of software which is capable of inserting various degradation and/or errors into a traffic stream. The setup I thought of is setting up a PC with two NIC which passes traffic between the interfaces. In the middle the software should be able to

Re: [c-nsp] Huawei instead of Cisco

Your biggest issue will be support and associated costs. they tend to position themselves as a cheaper option in the begining but in the long run you end up paying more for deployment, support, spares training (not easy to find guys with extensive Huawei background off the shelf as you would

Re: [c-nsp] Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding - Loose Mode

Hey, Our 6509 boxes are equiped with SUP720-3BXLs, so it shouldn't be a problem. I am more concerned about the 7204VXRs equiped with NPE-400s or NPE-G1s. I haven't been able to find docs on the Internet related the URPF impact on performances. Thanks. Y. 2010/5/12 Jared Mauch

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco PGW Softswitch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco PGW Softswitch Document ID: 111870 Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100512-pgw http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20100512-pgw.shtml Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2010 May 12 1600 UTC (GMT

Re: [c-nsp] circuit degradation/error simulator

On Wed, 12 May 2010 15:59:43 +0200, marcus.ger...@versatel.de wrote: Hi all, sorry for the not really Cisco-related topic, but the collected expertise present on this list might once again be the solution. For some testing I'm looking for a piece of software which is capable of inserting

Re: [c-nsp] circuit degradation/error simulator

NETEM is a very good choice for this. We have a test enviroment using this including automatic graphs generation with RRDtool. http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/netem 2010/5/12 sth...@nethelp.no For some testing I'm looking for a piece of software which is

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

Apologies for delayed response. Output from show ip ospf interface are as folows FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up Internet Address loopback ip , Area 0 Process ID 64512, Router ID loopback ip 8, Network Type BROADCAST, Cost: 1 Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DR, Priority 1

Re: [c-nsp] circuit degradation/error simulator

For some testing I'm looking for a piece of software which is capable of inserting various degradation and/or errors into a traffic stream. There are a number of open source tools (Dummynet, Wanem) with fairly basic capabilities. You can also program your typical router for pure shunning; I

Re: [c-nsp] Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding - Loose Mode

On Wednesday 12 May 2010 11:30:20 pm Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: I am more concerned about the 7204VXRs equiped with NPE-400s or NPE-G1s. I haven't been able to find docs on the Internet related the URPF impact on performances. We've had a couple of NPE-G1's/G2's and we run both loose

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000 / Nexus 2000 SFP+ with LRM

Sorry to be late to the convo here, but I can personally attest that LRM'S work fine. Our 6513 with 6704's are glued to our N5K's with Xenpack LRM, and Merge Optics (Digikey special 280 per unit) SFP+ LRM's. We bought them because for our DC LRM is the sweet spot and Cisco doesn't offer LRM.

Re: [c-nsp] circuit degradation/error simulator

If you are looking for a commercially supported solution, there is a box called a network nightmare that can simulate most of that stuff. http://networknightmare.net/ (My understanding is that its just an embedded Linux box) John -Original Message- From:

[c-nsp] seeking an advice about PIM DM riddle

Hi all. I have several 7604+RSP720+6704card(12.2SRC) installed in a ring topology as a core part of our network. There is a multicast source attached with one of that 7600 routers. The routers successfuly use PIM DM to distribute multicast streams over the ring. Here comes the riddle. There

[c-nsp] Per subnet rate limiting (6500) simple solution?

Looking for a simple solution to do per-subnet rate limiting where we have a bunch of subnet's on the same VLAN.. we a single output interface for this traffic facing the customers, but lots of upstream links to the internet.. so ideally everything could live on the customer interface.. Peter

[c-nsp] PPPoE termination on ES+20/12.2(33)SRE1

I'm trying to terminate 802.1q tagged PPPoE sessions on a 7600 with a ES+20G card. PPPoE works fine, but large packets (ie: 1500 bytes) fail. All MTU's are 9216 throughout the path until it hits the ES+20 card. I did some initial work with this as a test on a 7200, hit the same problem, and

[c-nsp] 20 second packet delay

Well, this was a new one for me. One way packet delay of around 20 seconds on a single link. I had never thought it was possible, but just when you think you've seen it all... I have a customer with a number of sites, each with 2 x 3750 in a stack. Each stack will typically have four ethernet

Re: [c-nsp] 20 second packet delay

On 5/12/10 2:28 PM, Raymond Lucas wrote: Well, this was a new one for me. One way packet delay of around 20 seconds on a single link. I had never thought it was possible, but just when you think you've seen it all... You must not be familiar with RFC1149. Ignoring the specifics of the

[c-nsp] 6 T1s in a 2851

I am trying to populate a 2851 with 6 WIC-1DSU-T1v2 Cards. The first 4 cards can fit into the WIC slots on the 2851 but I am at a loss as to how to get the 5th and 6th card in the box. One page on the Cisco site recommends using the 2851 when terminating 6 T1s. That same page also says the

Re: [c-nsp] 6 T1s in a 2851

On 5/12/2010 14:15, Richey wrote: I am trying to populate a 2851 with 6 WIC-1DSU-T1v2 Cards. The first 4 cards can fit into the WIC slots on the 2851 but I am at a loss as to how to get the 5th and 6th card in the box. One page on the Cisco site recommends using the 2851 when terminating 6

Re: [c-nsp] 6 T1s in a 2851

Thanks, That's what I am looking for. Richey -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 6:49 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6 T1s in a 2851 On

Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE termination on ES+20/12.2(33)SRE1

On my pppoe virtual templates I have an 'ip mtu 1492' that would probably help. From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Walter Keen [walter.k...@rainierconnect.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:38 PM

[c-nsp] Vote for me on the Cisco contest! :-)

Hi guys, vote for me, the Next-Generation technical writer, on the Cisco Share the Wealth Contest! :-) https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/contest CCNP EIGRP Theory is written by me. Thanks and have a nice day. :-) http://itcertguides.blogspot.com/

Re: [c-nsp] circuit degradation/error simulator

On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 11:40 -0500, cisco...@secureobscure.com wrote: If you are looking for a commercially supported solution, there is a box called a network nightmare that can simulate most of that stuff. http://networknightmare.net/ (My understanding is that its just an embedded Linux box)