I am trying to find out what is causing my link to go down either the transmit
power or a receive power. Below are the parameters of link having a
connectivity issue of DWDM transmission. The problem is sometimes it works and
sometime it does not and transmission guys keep insisting that
What do you want to do or monitor? All of the usual open source tools work
great with that ... be it RTG , mrtg, smokeping, fping netdisco etc
Alan
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I have seen the same messages recently on several slots after TE
tunnels
flap, but they caused a lot of issues (FIA errors, CEF disable and so
on).
%EE48-3-QM_SANITY_WARNING: Few free buffers(0) are available in ToFab
FreeQ
pool# 3
%EE48-3-QM_SANITY_WARNING: Few free buffers(0) are
Hi,
Experts , I need advise , I've problem with my 7609-S with IOS 12.3(33) SRB1,
after applying 'ip policy route-map' to TenGig interfece, my RSP720 crashed
Hardware details :
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
--- -
Was hoping someone could advise with regards to what the NAT keywords
match-in-vrf achieves? We typically use this in production. However,
Ive
just
been labbing NAT config using VRF lite and it doesnt appear to change
behaviour
and Cisco literature is unclear. With or without it,
I am trying to find out what is causing my link to go down either the
transmit power or a receive power. Below are the parameters of link having a
connectivity issue of DWDM transmission. The problem is sometimes it works
and sometime it does not and transmission guys keep insisting that
All,
Running a C3750 48TS on 12.2(35)SE2 . Used very simple AAA method for
authentication with radius, 4 lines of AAA.
Happened to log into router today only to notice that i can't configure
device, my credentials don't match and i have this in the log
%AAA-3-BADMETHOD
This entry is on AUG 2nd,
On 04/08/2010 12:54, Antonio Soares wrote:
Cisco IOS Release 15S initiates a consolidated support strategy to provide
greater consistency in new feature release and rebuild schedules and to
simplify the software selection process. The release numbering has changed
from 12.2SR to 15S to support
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:54:47PM +0100, Antonio Soares wrote:
Cisco IOS Release 15S initiates a consolidated support strategy to provide
greater consistency in new feature release and rebuild schedules and to
simplify the software selection process. The release numbering has changed
Yes very interested.
Thus 7200 will get out of the picture, because the SR train is used on the
7200 series with NPE-G2 in many small size service providers, and since
15.0s will be available for 7600 and 1 only, any small size SP should
move to ASR1002.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:54 PM,
I love NMIS :D
El 04/08/10 05:01, ar escribió:
Hi. Aside from Nagios, any other opensource monitoring tool you are using that
greatly works for cisco especially 7600 series?
thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 04/08/2010 13:35, Gert Doering wrote:
Seems too many customers have complained that they do not want this
old 12.2 software on their routers, so they can get new 15.0 now.
unscrambling the egg is hard.
Nick
/me goes shopping
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Hello,
I am setting up a pair of Nexus 1000v switches. As per the Cisco
documentation, I have the management port in my system-uplink
port-group. However, currently, this management port is in the same
production VLAN as most of our servers. I would rather have the
management in an separate
Hello,
Any pointers on real world experience on this topic would greatly be
appreciated. What are people using successfully out there as far as third
party SFP's go to hit a distance of approximately 115km? This would be for a
Catalyst 6506. Cisco's solution was a much more costly EDFA
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:34:06PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
/me goes shopping
Any interesting IOS versions in your basket?
(Needs Java, of course)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
I am trying to console in to this new wireless controller and i have done
everything the manual said but after it passed all the self test it got
stuck rc=0. Has anybody work with that before if so did you ran into the
same problem? How did you get passed it ?
Cryptographic library
Same experience here, with non-Java option in FF. I get redirected
back to the auth/login page each time. Clearing cisco.com cookies
solves it... until the next time.
- Marty
On 7/27/2010 7:34 AM, Aled Morris wrote:
I see this often (every couple of months) and have to clear my cookies for
We use opennms and love it's trap handling capabilities.
On 08/03/2010 09:55 PM, Jimmy Stewpot wrote:
Check out zenoss http://www.zenoss.com/
- Original Message -
From: arar_...@yahoo.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, 4 August, 2010 1:01:05 PM
Subject: [c-nsp]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA 5500
Series Adaptive Security Appliances
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100804-asa
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20100804-asa.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2010 August
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Firewall
Services Module
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100804-fwsm
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2010 August 04 1600 UTC (GMT
On 04/08/2010 15:30, Abello, Vinny wrote:
Any pointers on real world experience on this topic would greatly be
appreciated. What are people using successfully out there as far as third
party SFP's go to hit a distance of approximately 115km? This would be for a
Catalyst 6506. Cisco's solution
Never saw this before, we saw here error cosmetic AAA messages over
3750G and 12.2.44SE1 and SE2
Not this one.
El 04/08/10 14:07, Chris Lane escribió:
All,
Running a C3750 48TS on 12.2(35)SE2 . Used very simple AAA method for
authentication with radius, 4 lines of AAA.
Happened to log into
On Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:51:54 pm
ma...@martyadkins.com wrote:
Same experience here, with non-Java option in FF. I get
redirected back to the auth/login page each time.
Clearing cisco.com cookies solves it... until the next
time.
Here too, but only on Firefox.
Not seeing the
It would be nice if the feature navigator worked for 15.0(1)S.
Manually comparing release notes is a pain :(
LR Mack McBride
Network Architect
Viawest, Inc
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Hi Chris
The first thing that popped into my mind was partial nvram failure.
If my understanding of that badmethod error description is correct, then its
talking about the methods you can configure for aaa - radius, local, tacacs
etc..
If you look where that is stored in the config, it is right
Chris - on second thought, when you say the 'memory dump' was in the log,
are you talking about your console session or actual log file / syslog? I
was assuming you might have seen it in the nvram config if you did a show
conf.
If its the actual syslog then I think you should consider a potential
This limits the scope of a NAT rule/translation to the VRF specified in the NAT
rule. The most common issue is that outside NATs were always global, even if
you specified a VRF. You could not re-use the same translated address (pool)
for another VRF / different real address...
Essentially
This is disgusting, specially if your 7200 is at 15% of capacity working
perfectly.
El 04/08/10 14:40, Mounir Mohamed escribió:
Yes very interested.
Thus 7200 will get out of the picture, because the SR train is used on the
7200 series with NPE-G2 in many small size service providers, and
Need some help deciphering Cisco marketing-speak. In the data sheet
for the Catalyst 2960S, they list:
Forwarding Bandwidth
88 Gbps
20 Gbps for FlexStack Stacking
Switching Bandwidth
176 Gbps
Classic marketeer speak.
88 * 2 = 176
They count each frame as in comes in and again as it goes out.
Chris
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Brian Landers br...@bluecoat93.org wrote:
Need some help deciphering Cisco marketing-speak. In the data sheet
for the Catalyst 2960S, they list:
On 04/08/2010 19:11, Brian Landers wrote:
Need some help deciphering Cisco marketing-speak. In the data sheet
for the Catalyst 2960S, they list:
Forwarding Bandwidth
88 Gbps
20 Gbps for FlexStack Stacking
Switching Bandwidth
176 Gbps
88Gbps forwarding bandwidth full duplex
Hi all,
I'm not very fibre-savvy, so if anybody could help me, I'd very much
appreciate it!
I have two Cisco 6500s about 250 meters apart in two separate buildings.
Between those two buildings I have OM2 grade fibre. and both Cisco have an
10GBase-LX4 X2 interface.
When I measure the fibre
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Cisco NSP wrote:
A little troubleshooting pointed me to mode conditioning patches (a piece of
SM and MM welded together) but I find it very hard to believe that this
patch will solve my problem.
Is this the page you're referring to?
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Cisco NSP wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not very fibre-savvy, so if anybody could help me, I'd very much
appreciate it!
I have two Cisco 6500s about 250 meters apart in two separate buildings.
Between those two buildings I have OM2 grade fibre. and both Cisco have an
10GBase-LX4 X2
It's really quite simple:
48x1G downlinks + 2x10G uplinks + 2x10G stacking = 88G non-blocking
88G x marketing = 176G
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Yes, like a 2GB circuit, in reality is 1Gb bidirectional.
That funny marketing math.
if (marketing=true) then (throughput=unidirectional-rate*2)
On 08/04/2010 01:39 PM, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
It's really quite simple:
48x1G downlinks + 2x10G uplinks + 2x10G stacking = 88G
Thanks for all the responses.
Unfortunately there is no single-mode fiber between the buildings. I'm much
more familiar with 10GBase-SR and 10GBase-LR and I would have liked to use
it instead. But we have to work with the current cabling.
I've checked the orientation of the TX/RX both ways and
LX4 is not supported on the 6500s.
Show int trans supported-list
...
X2 LX4 NONE
...
Mack McBride
Network Architect
Viawest, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Cisco NSP
Sent:
Based on the following, you might have too much light.
From :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/product_bulletin_c25-530836.html
Notes for LX4:
1. In some cases, customers might experience that a link would be
operating properly over OM2 fiber type without MCP.
2.
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Cisco NSP wrote:
Thanks for all the responses.
Unfortunately there is no single-mode fiber between the buildings. I'm much
more familiar with 10GBase-SR and 10GBase-LR and I would have liked to use
it instead. But we have to work with the current cabling.
I've checked the
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Mack McBride wrote:
LX4 is not supported on the 6500s.
Show int trans supported-list
...
X2 LX4 NONE
I have several 6509s running some flavor of 12.2(33)SXH, with lots of
XENPAK/X2 SR, LX4, LR, and ER optics in production with no problems.
jms
Hi,
We have 3560G-48's running at remote DataCentres(Connecting to 7200's via
PortChan) - We interconnect to clients in these remote DC's via eth. At one DC,
the 3560 is getting close to running out of ports(~8 remaining) - Simplest
solution is for us to purchase another 3560G, run a
The literature for the 6708 blade lists the X2-10GB-LX4 as an option for the
6500.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns224/ns668/net_business_benefit0900aecd80534918.html
The release notes also list it as supported.
After reading up on VTP server configurations at Cisco, I wanted to
get someone's real life experience sign off on this.
Cisco docs state that you can have more than one VTP server in a VTP
domain and that updates on one will update the other and vise versa.
My concern is that I have two
I recently saw this xkcd comic and the first thing I thought of when I saw it
was the Cisco website.
http://xkcd.com/773/
regards,
Tony.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I'm having a hard time grasping, just exactly what the export feature does.
From what I see, the import command basically tells the vrf which routes to let
into the table. Can any body give me a answer as to what the export route
target feature really does in a large network?
Here's my interpretation / explanation: In order to get a route into a VRF
there needs to be some type of tag the router can use to determine which
routes to import into a particular VRF. This is done with route-target
export command. In a particular vrf you'd route-target import what was
47 matches
Mail list logo
