Re: [c-nsp] IPerf alternative

Thanks Ryan - They did not include bidirectional simultaneous test in V3 I dont think? (this is a test we definitely require, and one that is causing us the most issues in v2 (It appears to be somewhat broken...perhaps that is what they dint include it in v3 ?

Re: [c-nsp] IPerf alternative

lll def check this out - Cheers - from a hardware perspective, pizza box 1RU servers work great, but we would also like a "smaller" option that we can send to various POPs for testinghas anyone got suggestions ? I doubt the raspberry pi range would have the grunt to push 1G (or more?)...I

Re: [c-nsp] IPerf alternative

On 9 August 2017 at 08:39, CiscoNSP List wrote: > Thanks Ryan - They did not include bidirectional simultaneous test in V3 I > dont think? (this is a test we definitely require, and one that is causing us > the most issues in v2 (It appears to be somewhat

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS DHCP server problem

On second look, I don’t see your routers interface (Gi0) having a native vlan to be able to move untagged traffic between itself and the switch. Usually ip phones get dhcp from data vlan. Try changing voice subnet to something else and give x.x.15.0/24 to data vlan and see if that works.

Re: [c-nsp] IPerf alternative

Hello We use some small computers similar to Intel NUC to work as probes in our POPs and DCs. We get them for like 200 USD or similar and use them for Netrounds. //Gustav -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP List Sent:

Re: [c-nsp] IPerf alternative

Hi James - Yes I tested this alsoit still will not go above 50%...at first I though it may be the carriers link, but I also tested the bidirectional/simultaneous test, and it produced similar results (Single direction test were fine.) Single direction tests are fine. I think its a

Re: [c-nsp] IPerf alternative

Hi Raymond (Apologies re top post, Hotmail is a pain) - Reliability concerns primarily with bidirectional simultaneous test mode - Single direction test (UDP), we are able to achieve close to a links capacity (1Gb), bidirectional (-r) (Sends one direction first, then the other), also achieves

Re: [c-nsp] IPerf alternative

On 9 August 2017 at 10:51, CiscoNSP List wrote: > > Hi James - Yes I tested this alsoit still will not go above 50%...at > first I though it may be the carriers link, but I also tested the > bidirectional/simultaneous test, and it produced similar results (Single

[c-nsp] N5K Spine as L3 VXLAN GW

Hello everybody, Have DC fabric with N5K as a Spine and N3K as Leaf switches. VXLAN + EVPN is configured for layer 2. Is it possible to configure N5K as a L3 VXLAN gateway for servers connected to the Spine switches? Can please someone share the working config? Thanks.

Re: [c-nsp] IPerf alternative

Two brands of small form factor PC to check out are Liva and Zotac. Very affordable. You can even get a Zotac with 2x1Gbit/s and it will really push it. On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 2:43 AM CiscoNSP List wrote: > lll def check this out - Cheers - from a hardware