Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber over 443 and not 8443?

Definitely something to lab. If it is hard coded to port 8443 and not honoring the SRV record that just seems messy. From: NateCCIE Sent: ‎1/‎12/‎2015 6:16 PM To: 'Josh Warcop'; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber over 443 and not 8443?

I've done a few expressway MRAs, and what you ask is something I wouldn't even attempt. There seems to be a lot of hard-coded magic that happens when the client detects collaboration edge. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Josh Warcop Sent: Monday, Ja

[cisco-voip] Jabber over 443 and not 8443?

Has anyone tested Jabber MRA via Expressway over 443 and not 8443?___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data

I haven’t seen a BRI for voice since 1992…..but perhaps they are popular in your location ☺ From: Tom Storey [mailto:t...@snnap.net] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 4:09 PM To: Jason Aarons (AM) Cc: Walenta, Philip; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for vo

Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data

Yeah I have one of those cards already, and may pick up another couple. I'm also looking to include BRI and POTS for completeness. :-) On 12 Jan 2015 21:01, "Jason Aarons (AM)" wrote: > So simulate a PSTN I just use a router with 4 VWIC2-2MFT-T1E1 cards. > Let’s me have 8 sites via PRIs either E

Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data

So simulate a PSTN I just use a router with 4 VWIC2-2MFT-T1E1 cards. Let’s me have 8 sites via PRIs either E1 or T1. Builds your sip/h323 skills ☺ From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom Storey Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 2:57 PM To: Walenta, Philip Cc:

Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data

They did have E1 interfaces for those. Unsure if you’ll be able to find any. It’s a shame these got discontinued as they were the best PRI aggregation devices. From: Tom Storey [mailto:t...@snnap.net] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:57 PM To: Walenta, Philip Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Sub

Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data

Hi Philip, I came across those boxes the other day and indeed they look promising. I think the only thing they are lacking are E1 interfaces, which is what all of my current boxes are filled with. Not too much of a big deal though, T1 WICs/VWICs etc are not too expensive. On 12 January 2015 at 18

Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data

Honestly, go find yourself some old Adtran Atlas gear. It’s ideal for this sort of thing and can emulate everything perfectly (ISDN BRI, PRI, T1, even T.120 data ISDN). From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom Storey Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 12:19 PM

Re: [cisco-voip] PSTN network emulation for voice and data

Cross posting from cisco-nsp, as there may be more people in the know about the inner workings of this kind of thing over here. :-) On 12 January 2015 at 06:02, Tom Storey wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I'm looking at putting together a box with some PRI, BRI and FXS > interfaces to act as an "exchan

Re: [cisco-voip] LIDB / CallerID outside of the United States

This part of telephony frustrates me to no end, namely because I'm not 100% sure how it works, and just when I think I do know how it's working, it turns out I don't. That being said, I did speak to an LIDB in the US recently, pleading ignorance and asking for help and was surprised as to how

Re: [cisco-voip] LDAP Search Filter Syntax reference

(&(memberof=ABC,OU=Groups,OU=Company,OU=Users and Groups,DC=NorthAmerica,DC=Company,DC=com)(!( memberof=XYZ,OU=Groups,OU=Company,OU=Users and Groups,DC=NorthAmerica,DC=Company,DC=com))(!(ipPhone=""))) Here is an example... -- Chase Mergenthal From: cisco-voip [mail

[cisco-voip] LDAP Search Filter Syntax reference

Does anyone have any links / info for LDAP Search Syntax? I am trying to write this filter: Sync all children in ABC OUExcept for children in XYZ OUANDAll children of ABC OU WHERE IpPhone IS NOT null Thanks, Ryan Huff r...@ryanthomashuff.com http://www.ryanthomashuff.com CCNA R/S, CCNA Wirel

Re: [cisco-voip] Migration from MCS UCCX 8.5.1SU4 to UCS - do not see any setting in desktop administrator

Hi Anthony, The UCCX hooks into the DRS process for back and restore of the CAD LDAP has had issues, as Abhiram detailed out in his reply immediately after this one. The LDAP migrating between active and inactive sides on a switch-version isn’t impacted by any of these. Thank you, Ryan LaFoun

[cisco-voip] LIDB / CallerID outside of the United States

>From the SS7 article on Wikipedia, it looks like it should be an international standard. Earlier threads in this mailing list have led me to believe that at least in Canada, (Lelio) if I set outbound caller name, then that's what the telco accepts and delivers to the destination. What is the sit

Re: [cisco-voip] Migration from MCS UCCX 8.5.1SU4 to UCS - do not see any setting in desktop administrator

Hi Anthony, The issue is due to CSCul99618 - when the CVD is not initialised completely and the DRF restore is started, the license package is taken to be IPIVR and therefore the CAD component is skipped during the restore. You will see this in the UCCXCOMPONENT.log which Ryan mentioned: 2013/

Re: [cisco-voip] Migration from MCS UCCX 8.5.1SU4 to UCS - do not see any setting in desktop administrator

So Ryan, when you say you had a lot of issues around 8.5(1)SU4 backing up the CAD LDAP and restoring, are you literally talking about DRS, or would this also affect upgrades to 9x/10x? On Mon Jan 12 2015 at 9:18:12 AM Ryan LaFountain (rlafount) < rlafo...@cisco.com> wrote: > This may be because t

Re: [cisco-voip] Migration from MCS UCCX 8.5.1SU4 to UCS - do not see any setting in desktop administrator

This may be because the LDAP didn’t migrate correctly. The left side of this screen just reads directly from the LDAP structure. The right hand side is static HTML that isn’t stored in the LDAP. I would open a TAC case, but we had a lot of issues around 8.5(1)SU4 backup up the CAD LDAP and rest

Re: [cisco-voip] Advanced Attendant Console 10.5, which Win OS?

The OS required is Windows 2008 server 32 or 64 bit. Regards, Henry Gicheru Ryan Huff wrote: Anyone know where I can find which Win OS is required for the Advanced Attendant Console Server 10.5? Thanks, Ryan Huff r...@ryanthomashuff.com http://www.ryanthomashuff.com CCNA R/S, CCNA Wirele

Re: [cisco-voip] Advanced Attendant Console 10.5, which Win OS?

http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucmac/cuaca/10_5_2/install_admin_guide/CUACA1052WAG.pdf?mdfid=285974824 Page 28: One of the following activated operating systems, with Windows regional settings set to English: - Windows Server 2008 R1 (32-bit) - Windows Server 2008 R2 (64-b

[cisco-voip] Advanced Attendant Console 10.5, which Win OS?

Anyone know where I can find which Win OS is required for the Advanced Attendant Console Server 10.5? Thanks, Ryan Huff r...@ryanthomashuff.com http://www.ryanthomashuff.com CCNA R/S, CCNA Wireless, CCNA Voice CCNP Voice, CCIE Collaboration (Written) UCCX Specialist

[cisco-voip] Cisco Telepresence SX20 "No incoming Video"

Hi I have two Sx20 endpoints registered to Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server Control and using H323. Nating is configured and no firewall. Making calls to Cisco Video test sites I get an error "No incoming video". What do I need to configure to resolve this. [cid:image001.png@01