Hi all,
I have two translation pattern within the same partition (cucm 9.x).
They are:
1XXX
1!
When an incoming call from external sip gateway comes in with called number
(say) 1234, the matched translation is 1!.
At first, I thought that 1!, being less specific than 1XXX, should not
being
Is Ameyo using CTI/JTAPI to do the transfers? If so would be a setting in
Ameyo.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Henry
Gicheru (KE)
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 7:12 AM
To: cisco-voip; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Call transfer
Thanks!
From: Jeff Sandstrom [mailto:jeff.sandst...@enghouse.com]
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 2:40 PM
To: Jason Aarons (AM)
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Attendant Console User 10.5.1 can't change layout?
Hi Jason,
Unfortunately, we don’t have a way
The calling party info should be updated after the Cisco user completes the
transfer. Do you see this coming across and does Ameyo have the ability to
update it's connected party info?
-Ryan
On Dec 9, 2014, at 8:17 AM, Henry Gicheru (KE)
Hi group. I'm relatively new to Cisco telephony, but not to telecom in general.
I've been tasked with generating a report of all our sites with MGCP and their
version numbers, phone counts/ATA's at each remote location, and call volumes
(most likely minimal but who knows). We're running Cisco 7
The reference from the SRND was only to make clear the origin of my
suspect. Initially I tought that 1XXX has higher priority than 1! but now,
after reading the SNRD, I'm not that sure. Of course the pattern from the
SRND examples are different from mine but the concept still applies imo.
I was
If urgent priority wasn't involved, then the interdigital timeout would apply,
thus giving you more time to dial and the system time to assess a more
accurate, competing match. Since urgent priority applies here, the system will
not wait to assess further digit input and there is no further
Doh, sorry. ! Is variable length. I was thinking single digit
Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys. Please
excude my typtos.
On Dec 9, 2014, at 10:58 AM, daniele visaggio visaggio.dani...@gmail.com
wrote:
The reference from the SRND was only to make
I had a customer that had bought CUEAC back on version 8.x a few years ago
and complained about this very thing. When I spoke to Arc about it, they
told me that they researched and the layout was the best you could have and
there was no reason to customize it.
The customer switched to a 3rd
