I’ve been using Unified FX for quite some time now. The ability to see/manage
groups of phones makes it a dream for me (I manage several labs, so I have a
different use case).
It makes certain tasks very easy (like putting wallpapers on phones). You can
also use it to monitor audio and send a
To add what has been said already - managing large scales of numbers in a
router becomes very problematic. The bigger your dial plan, the worse it gets.
It's far easier to let IME handle this automatically.
I've managed large scales before - and as Ryan said - it gets to looking like a
toddle
I also see no issues with video on this list.
I've pretty much been saying for at least 7 years video devices should behave
like voice devices, and it's finally happening. AFAIK video is an extension to
the existing voice/UC features, albeit a bandwidth hogging one.
If you look at the overal
Going beyond putting the CN in the SAN, based on many experiences, wildcards
(while technically legal in a csr or signed cert) cause all kinds of havoc
exactly like this. If there's any way to remove the wildcard, I'd suggest
doing that.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 5, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Ryan H
Old schooler question -
I've been out of the actual setup of device for so long I've lost track of IPMA
and where those features went.
Last time I remember using this there was an XML/phone based app, and there was
also a desktop app.
All my searches seem to yield all the old info and nothing
te:
Philip,
Thanks for that - it looks like CME automatically adds the @dnsname (according
to what SP is telling me) correctly but its nice to have some confirmation on
that part from someone else :)
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Walenta, Philip
mailto:philip.wale...@polycom.com>> wro
Sometimes the “number” requires @DNSNAME or @IPADDRESS for the
registrar to accept it. That’s in the normal SIP world. Not sure how CME
would handle that.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed
Leatherman
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 3:28 PM
To:
Think of expressway as a very smart video/audio/auth proxy firewall.
It does not bridge. It enables external/internal calls to CUCM and other SIP
or H.323 based infrastructure.
You can proxy remote phones through it – although there are some limitations.
Unsure about the licensing under CUWL.
Route patterns, translation patterns also clean? There are so many places
digits can hide these days.
From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 8:17 AM
To: Walenta, Philip; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Interesting off hook dial delay
Is this potentially matching something in the "none" partition?
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan
Huff
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 7:48 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Interesting off hook dial delay
Experiencing some strang
It would help if we had a little more understanding of what you are trying to
accomplish.
Are you trying to distribute calls ¼ and ¾ over an hour, a day, a month? Will
there be any other quantification on the call itself (calling number, called
number, any IVR entry?)?
From: cisco-voip [mailt
I have vague recollections of similar issues when an incoming call wasn't
properly matching a dial peer - it was hitting a "default" which I believe was
g.729.
I'd verify it's actually hitting the dial-peer you think it should be.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Stupid phone wouldn’t paste the link:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ios-firewall/23602-confaccesslists.html#timebasedtimerange
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Walenta, Philip
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 8:19 AM
To: Ryan Huff
Cc: cisco
If memory serves there are time based ACLs that could be used.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 4, 2015, at 7:29 AM, Ryan Huff
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:
I have a service policy-map that I am trying to automate when it is actually
applied to the interface. So between the hours of 8AM and 5
Third party devices (SIP advanced or basic) are not allowed to use CM
conference resources. You need to mix on box or redirect somewhere else.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 28, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
>
> I just checked with a customer who has a bunch of the FLX2’s deployed and
You running 64 bit java on that machine? RTMT doesn’t like 64 bit java (at
least it didn’t use to).
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Justin Steinberg
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 3:45 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re:
While that functionality is nice, and possibly obvious to many of us on this
list, that sort of feature is not that intuitive to most average users. I
agree that it should exist in Windows.
Additionally, it is not as easy as a simple click from a UI/UX perspective.
That capability is a non-s
Now that's almost funny (the bug that is). I never understand how stuff like
this slips through QA.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2015, at 8:44 PM, Anthony Holloway
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I posted that one to the list about one year ago to the day.
https://tools.cis
You can actually force CUCM to generate configuration files if you want. That
may have changed.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 17, 2015, at 8:29 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:
I believe you can also do "file get" on CLI for anything that isn't a config
file. Config files ar
By default I think the system is set to drop all participants after the
initiator hangs up. There is a service option that changes this behavior.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 8:33 AM
To: cisco-
I should resurrect the app I wrote that fixes this. I wrote one like 10 years
ago, never updated it.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason
Aarons (AM)
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 1:23 PM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: [cisco-voip]
Years ago when I was doing a bunch of ICM I begged Cisco for a JSON or XML
export or something for the scripts.
Screenshots is still the only method of which I am aware.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Terry
Oakley
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:33
Do you have the clock sourced to a specific t1? It sounds like the clock isn't
syncing correctly. What do the t1 counters show?
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 25, 2015, at 5:27 PM, Ryan Huff
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:
Doing a PRI migration from a 2811 vwic2 T1 to a 2911 vwic3 T1
I can
It’s been a while sinceI’ve done CME, but if I remember correctly adding the
following should allow it to work:
Voice service voip
Allow-connections sip to SIP
That lets the router permit/make hairpin sip to sip connections (I think).
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...
One thing to check is that exchange did not default to TLS for its UM SIP
connection to CUCM. It has a bad habit of sneaking TLS into the settings.
I am fairly certain that CUCM 6 does not have the certificate capability to
interop with Exchange TLS.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 12, 2015, at 4:
Spectralink used to be a part of Polycom (my employer). When they were here, I
had a chance to test out the DECT handsets and found them to work exceptionally
well. Deploy a few repeaters and it makes for a very solid deployment (no
interference, I can't ever remember having a dropped call).
Jumping in the way-back machine to Circa 2004 –
Wireless was B only at the time, and someone at a company wanted to deploy 900
desktops and 900 wireless phones (call center even).
After 298 access points got installed (basically 1 AP to ~ 3 cubes), and
numerous hours spent on wireless surveys,
This involves some very special messaging on the D channel.
Unless Cisco gateways support CCITT recommendation x.31 (virtual ISDN services
essentially) their gateways won't support this.
I'm not aware of any devices except central office switches that support this
type of operation.
I could be
I find it odd that Cisco hasn't fixed this yet as they have tons of Mac users.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 13, 2015, at 2:41 AM, Gary Parker wrote:
>
>
>> On 9 Jan 2015, at 15:19, Ryan Burtch wrote:
>>
>> According to Jabra, the only soft phones supported w/ call-ctrl are Avaya,
>> IBM, an
They did have E1 interfaces for those. Unsure if you’ll be able to find any.
It’s a shame these got discontinued as they were the best PRI aggregation
devices.
From: Tom Storey [mailto:t...@snnap.net]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:57 PM
To: Walenta, Philip
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Honestly, go find yourself some old Adtran Atlas gear. It’s ideal for this
sort of thing and can emulate everything perfectly (ISDN BRI, PRI, T1, even
T.120 data ISDN).
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tom
Storey
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 12:19 PM
What is the end goal? I've frequently used plain old voice gateways (as5350 is
cheap). Setup dial peers and you are off and running for voice, unless you
need pure transport for things like data service.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 10, 2015, at 4:12 PM, Heim, Dennis
mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.c
Going way back from memory I want to say this is a call on hold dropping, a
call on hold or park being terminated, or a call being placed on hold and being
dropped by a gateway (like if using an h323 gateway with no supplementary
services). Might also be a region codec mismatch and call getting
In my VM lab I'm running iSCSI against a 4GB connected NetApp NAS. With about
80 other machines running on the same NAS upgraded from 8.6 to 9.1 in about 30
minutes with a ~250 device database. I could have gone with a 10gb connection
but didn't like the price.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 17,
Not sure if this equates – but a single DevNet case is $250.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio
Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:55 PM
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco TAC Per Incident fee
Just wondering if there is any documen
n.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:
Using IE 9 on Windows 7. All other screens seem to work fine.
Seems if I wait 4-5 minutes that Import Users page comes up.
From: Walenta, Philip [mailto:philip.wale...@polycom.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 11:39 AM
To: Jason Aarons (AM)
Cc: cisco-voip
Try a different browser?
I've found that occasionally certain browsers won't load certain pages (IE has
been notorious for this for me).
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 17, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Jason Aarons (AM)
mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com>> wrote:
My Import Users is broke : ( We are LDA
It depends on the usage you expect for each role. I've found VCS does pretty
well at all of those in light to medium duty usage. Yes it's a bear to
configure it all, but it works.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 5, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Pawlowski, Adam
mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:
So just out o
You running QSIG or vanilla? I've seen issues with QSIG signaling in the past.
Haven't tried recently.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 2:16 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Avaya PRI to CUBE t
I’ve got a few. They look like a completely different designer built them.
Their workflow/software feels different from the 99XX’s as well.
I personally don’t like them and prefer the higher end devices. I’ve not
tested Bluetooth on them.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.neth
I would second this opinion. I've done a lot of work with CUBE and it does not
handle phone proxy well at all (or much when it comes to endpoint auth
situations). VCS is your best best.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:55 PM, Josh Warcop
mailto:j...@warcop.com>> wrote:
TAC opened 3 b
;> wrote:
Hi Philip,
All Posts are running Windows 7, 32 and 64.
BR
Antonios
--
Sent using K-9 Mail from my Android mobile.
Στις 30 Νοεμβρίου 2014 12:08:02 π.μ. EET, ο/η "Walenta, Philip"
mailto:philip.wale...@polycom.com>> έγραψε:
I've seen issues similar to this with o
I've seen issues similar to this with other products on win 8, but not win 7.
Which desktop OS you running?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 29, 2014, at 2:36 PM, Anthony Kouloglou wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i have a CUCM and IM&P cluster 9.1.X and jabber for windows 10.5.X.
> I have noticed (for all Jabb
]
-Original Message-
From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:49 AM
To: Walenta, Philip
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber (Everyone) without IM/Presence ?
You say extension and password, it's not username?
Sent from my iPad
I'm not sure about the pure soft phone.
It is possible to run without IM&P, I do it in several of my labs.
You login with extension/password only and it works purely like a soft phone.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio
Ful
Last time I checked Cisco has a public resolved H.323 address/name (was running
through VCS). I find this very odd.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Robert Kulagowski
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 11:46 AM
To: Cisco VOIP
Subje
The closest equivalence would be SS7 over IP. The problem is if your local
class 5 is down and alternates are also down, you have no path.
There are ideas floating out there...I just can't comment ;)
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Matthew Loraditch
Se
I've set one up for SIP without dial-peers. Matching on incoming/outgoing
characteristics.
It's a very poorly documented box.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erick
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 12:29 PM
To: ciscovoip
Subjec
It should be noted that this is the way most IM&P systems work. You definitely
wouldn't want all possible Google contacts showing up in your list
automatically :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 4, 2014, at 6:54 AM, "Abebe Amare"
mailto:abu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Mathew
The users can be searc
Please contact me off-list.
Not sure if this is allowed on this list - if it isn't please yell at me
appropriately.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
50 matches
Mail list logo
