gt; aj...@buffalo.edu
> +1.716.6458489
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
.5 moving to 11.5
>
> TIA
>
> Scott
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cis
stomer moving their home service.
Anyone have experience with porting over larger chunks of numbers between
carriers?
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
bject:* [cisco-voip] UCCX 10.6.1 SU2 and VMware
>
>
>
> We are going to be upgrading our VMware environment from vCenter 5.5 to
> 6.5 and can not find any specific information on compatibility with UCCX
> 10.6.1 SU2 for this. Is this compatible?
>
Dan
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
ssage/271653
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
gt;
>>
>> I am taking Python for network engineers course and have to do a project
>> on it. The project must be using an API or a major framework to do
>> something. It ideally should involve manipulating real-world data.
>>
>> I was looking to do my project focusin
greatly appreciated!
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
>
>
> James Conyers
>
> Telecommunications Engineer II
>
> 303-871-7992 <(303)%20871-7992>
>
>
>
> _______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
&
Service is @ https://www.calero.com/pinnacle/ , its actually a calero
product now.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> We're using a SaaS product called Pinnacle that can do those things (i'm
> 99% sure on the cable plant stuff), although we're only
8 at 8:32 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> To be honest, I'm a little worried about the rumoured slowdown the fixes
> are gonna have. Will this impact the supported status of certain CPUs in
> collab suite?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
niversity of Guelph
> Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON |
> N1G 2W1
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 <(519)%20824-4120> | le...@uoguelph.ca le...@uoguelph.ca>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram,
> Twitter and Facebook
>
> [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
of the dial peer to
receive calls."
I've found the knob to tell it what SRV format to use in the sip-ua
section.
Thanks!
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
60>
>> cvp4cc1.cisco.com
>>
>> For SIP/UDP:
>>
>> ip host _sip._udp.cvp.cisco.com srv 50 50 5060 <50%2050%205060>
>> cvp4cc3.cisco.com
>>
>> ip host _sip._udp.cvp.cisco.com srv 50 50 5060 <50%2050%205060>
>> cvp4cc2.cisco.com
>>
>>
Thanks for the tip!
Q
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018, 3:58 PM Loren Hillukka wrote:
> Nice tips Adam. The failovers to active endpoints was a pain. That retry
> invites 2 was a must - the default was 6.
>
> Loren
>
> > On Mar 5, 2018, at 1:14 PM, Pawlowski, Adam wrote:
> >
> > Ed,
> >
> > Caveat on all th
:NTP servers) not being used till this process is
> complete. Even when doing this time the DNS server is reachable.*
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Ryan
>
> *From: *Ed Leatherman
> *Sent: *Tuesday, March 6, 2018 7:31 AM
> *To: *Anthony Holloway
> *Cc: *Cisco VOIP
that it then becomes the RHS of the URI is nice, but not required.
>
> Therefore, if you ask them to commit to telling you about IP address
> changes completely negates their desire to use SRV records. Just say'n.
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:30 AM Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
>
field URI which resolved the issue.
Ed
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Ed Leatherman
wrote:
>
> Follow-up to this SRV/CUBE topic..
>
> Outbound calls work fine with this setup (after I enabled ip domain-lookup
> ;-) )
>
> For inbound calls, the service provider is using th
setup; so how in the world was
> it working for the others? Or maybe you are the beta tester?
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:54 AM Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
>
>> Follow-up for posterity..
>>
>> I had a feeling this was the case but got some confirmation from TA
SIP provider remain nameless in this thread? ;)
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:58 AM Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
>
>> I get the impression that im the first customer on these new sbc's.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018, 11:12 AM Anthony Holloway <
>> avholloway
and Facebook
>
> [University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
gt;
> Regards,
>
> Abhiram Kramadhati
>
> Technical Solutions Manager, CCBU
>
> CCIE Collaboration # 40065
>
>
>
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
dollars as
> well.
>
> Just my feedback.
>
> Adam
> ___________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
What you read was what i understood it to be, so i'm interested in hearing
what you find out.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 2:26 PM Scott Voll wrote:
> on CER 11.5 where does CER send call back numbers after the 3 hours after
> the post 911 call?
>
> I've done some googling and it said the default ERL o
like this. Are there any actual SBCs that can handle something
like that?
Any other solutions to this issue?
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> Test after hours with your cell phone or something…
>
>
>
> You could also use a TCL script if you have that knowledge.
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 24, 2018, at 2:12 PM, Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This is a shot in the dark
Life tagline]
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
vided IOS config for a SIP integration
between a Cisco router and our public safety's dispatch system, and it
keeps matching on a dialpeer we are not expecting, based on how we _think_
it is supposed to work. Essentially the scenario above.
Thanks!
--
Ed
Thanks Guys, answer was staring me in the face the whole time.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 6:10 PM NateCCIE wrote:
> Yes. If you have no cor applied to the outbound dial peer, then anything
> can use that dialpeer.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 30, 2018, at 1:11 PM, E
RdpNj6xrVM%2FXiENBSc%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
ff) wrote:
> Kind of makes me want to enable mixed-mode on the 2nd cluster.
>
>
> If you've got the eTokens handy then it will certainly make you life a lot
> easier when it comes to SBD and endpoints.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Aug 11, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Ed Leatherman
&g
new CTL downloaded.
> The phones are probably fine to use the cached configs for a little bit
> until you finish the whole cluster and run the CTL client once assuming
> you're doing it all in one window.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
>
>&
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I've had a few requests for "Wireless" conference phones lately for some
> > medium sized rooms. In these cases the executive wants to get any cables
> etc
> > off the table
cause "Wireless"!
I'm curious what other people might be using, I see that polycom has the
SoundStation2W that uses a POTS line. I've also had some folks using a
Jabra Speak510 paired with some of the bluetooth capable Cisco Phones, but
this only works well in small r
ll.
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2015, at 7:41 AM, Ed Leatherman wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I've had a few requests for "Wireless" conference phones lately for some
> medium sized rooms. In these cases the executive wants to get any cables
> etc off the table, so a wired
there is something he is missing or if it is just a limitation
> of the device firmware.
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >> On Apr 28, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Circling around on this thread,
> >>
> >> So we're
> class CALL-SIGNALING
> bandwidth percent 10
> class class-default
> fair-queue
> !
> !
> access-list 51 permit 001.002.003.004 0.0.0.255
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck
/ device pool /
>>>> etc so I can just see what I'm looking for?
>>>>
>>>> Looks like RTMT is just all registered phones.
>>>>
>>>> TIA
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
ip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
e once the certs were regenerated, as this was
necessary in the past. Apparently now they automagically download them from
each other? I went in to do it and the tomcat-trust was already there with
the new domain name.
Cheers!
Ed
--
Ed Leatherman
___
ain name listed as a field that the license mac is
derived from, and i'm not changing my primary DNS server so I'm hoping that
will stay the same.
I'm getting some DNS domains organized now in preparation for Finesse and
CUIC so we can get some signed certs.
ionTech> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home> |
> G+ <https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ed Leatherman
> *Sen
solutions.
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
dated via the Certificate Change
> Notification process. There has been a few times I've seen conflicts that
> caused this not to work right though.
>
> Brian
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
>
>> Good morning,
>>
>> This mo
It's not a tomcat-trust cert though, the docs (and expressway) say it needs
to go in the callmanager-trust
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Charles Goldsmith
wrote:
> Just restart Tomcat
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
>
>> Good morning!
&
e CallManager service for it to take
>> affect. Make sure to upload to every node.
>>
>> You also shouldn't see any phone reboots for adding a CallManager-trust.
>> That would only be in the case you end up having to restart the CallManager
>> service.
>>
>
ode1.domain.edu
DNS:domain.edu
GoDaddy kicks back an error saying "You can not add a SAN that is the same
as the domain you are already using."
Is my dns/SAN configuration incorrect or is this a deficiency with godaddy
(standard UCC cert)? Or did I miss the boat completely (totally possible
elion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home> |
> G+ <https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts>
>
>
>
> *From:* Chris Ward (chrward) [mailto:chrw...@cisco.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 1, 2015 9:52 AM
> *To:* Matthew Loraditch; Ed Leatherman; Cisco VOIP
> *Subject:*
ions done and have a chance to
upload it.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> I tried a different CSR with alternate names collab-edge.domain.edu and
> expe.telecom.domain.edu , without the generic domain.edu, still same
> error. I'll see what godaddy support tells
Those numbers are used (with tcp)
for H.323 though.
Thanks!
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
I'm around would be neat to meet some folks
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015, 10:45 AM Heim, Dennis wrote:
> I am all for it. Anyone is the CCP sessions for this afternoon?
>
>
>
> *Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)*
>
> World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
>
> [image: twi
kled this? Any Cisco employees have some insight in to
> the best way to do this?
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
>
> _______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
t familiar with the
>> Prime setup.
>>
>> Has anyone else tackled this? Any Cisco employees have some insight in
>> to the best way to do this?
>>
>> Thanks for any help!
>>
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip
;> TIA
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
> ____
rm.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 19, 2015, at 7:48 AM, Ed Leatherman wrote:
>
> I'm chasing this issue now... if palo can't filter on it I might have to
> (short term) try having people use a separate domain name for external
> logins, which is also ick.
ted list
ipv4 216.12.114.195
address-hiding
allow-connections sip to sip
fax protocol t38 version 0 ls-redundancy 0 hs-redundancy 0 fallback none
sip
bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/2
bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/2
registrar server
options-ping 60
--
Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Brian Meade wrote:
> What do you see for "show sip-ua register status"? Are you sure the
> gateway can resolve the sip-server via DNS?
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I&#x
n 23, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Brian Meade wrote:
> How about connecting via telnet over 5060? You may be having a TCP issue
> which is why you never see the Register sent.
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
>
>> Brian
>> msu-tmp-a
first.
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
>
>> I did a packet cap and we are sending the SIP REGISTER, but its not
>> showing up in sip debug?? really weird. anywhere I'm not binding SIP to my
>> loopback address, i'm not getting SIP de
.
After all that, still getting back 403 Authentication Failed - but its at
least cleaned up and I'm not getting put in timeout.
onward..
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> Didnt seem to help but thats a good thought. Slogging it out with SP
> tomorrow again.
present in packet cap!
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> Following up for posterity..
>
> Still fighting this one but a small bit of progress. So CME was trying to
> register both the ephone-dn extension and the E164 expanded number of the
> extension (which was
!
Is there any where else it could pull the credentials from? Still getting
403 and SP still just says its a PW mismatch - but i'm just pasting in what
they send me (checked for stray spaces and what-not already)
Thanks!
Ed
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> An
XXX@DNSNAME or @IPADDRESS for the
> registrar to accept it. That’s in the normal SIP world. Not sure how CME
> would handle that.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ed Leatherman
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 24, 2015
o now the browser doesn't
like the cert.
Anyone know of a way to get the redirection to use hostname?
I'm a SSL newb, is it possible to have the IP Address as a SAN in the cert?
with uccx?
Thanks!
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing
for
> the same. However, the redirection has been removed starting from 10.x
> because of the LiveData functionality where the live data is pulled from
> the master engine.
>
> Regards,
> Abhiram Kramadhati
> Technical Solutions Manager, CBABU
> CCIE Collaboration # 40065
&g
dhati
> Technical Solutions Manager, CBABU
> CCIE Collaboration # 40065
>
> From: Ed Leatherman
> Date: Sunday, 19 July 2015 10:40 pm
> To: akramadh , Cisco VOIP
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX/CUIC hostname question
>
> Thanks Abhiram!
>
> Are then the live data rep
-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
My first thought off the cuff is make sure they have that service in their
end user service profile , not sure if its the same in cucm 8 though
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015, 5:29 PM Scott Voll wrote:
> running Jabber 10.5.2
> CM 8.6.2
> UC 8.6.2
>
> I have my Jabber client and I have VM, Meetings, and P
ge step is not documented)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The guide says
>> >
>> > It is highly recommended that you gracefully shut down the UCCX VMs,
>> and update the memory allocation to the new values after you upgrade to
>> UCCX Version 10.0. If memory allocation for the VM is left unchanged after
>> the UCCX is upgraded to Version 10.0, this warning message displays:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Does this mean before the switch version?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> >
>> > Andrew
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
oute group paradigm,
which appears to be the way to go anyway.
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Thanks everyone
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:56 PM, NateCCIE wrote:
> Yep, it will work just like that.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ed Leatherman
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 27, 2015 1:15 PM
> *To:* Cisco VOIP
on
> Cisco UC.
>
> Thanks
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing lis
gt; we are upgrading from 8.5 to 10.6. We hope to move to Finesse soon after
>> =)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Scott
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
> __
o 10.x licensing? We are 99% EM. Running mainly 7961
> phones.
>
> TIA
>
> Scott
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
x27;t been able to
find a bug related to this one, I'm curious if anyone else has seen this
type of thing
UCCX 10.6(1)
Thanks!
Ed
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> _______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
d of CAD, or is there some
switch I have to flip for the team somewhere that i'm not finding?
I realize I'm oversimplifying a little bit as workflows/reasons codes/etc
need to get manually configured or verified on the finesse side.
Thanks!
--
Ed Leatherman
”
>
>
>
> The users profile is in the controlled list for RM application user.
>
>
>
> The phone they are loggin in – is used by other agents with their profiles
> and they can get through.
>
>
>
> Not sure what else I can check.
>
>
>
> P
s of the portal they
are showing all teams/CSQs.
Is this normal that they are seeing other teams like this in Finesse? I'm
thinking I can customize some live data reports in CUIC and then customize
each team's portal in Finesse admin, but it seems counter-intuitive and
maybe i
Annnd thank you googles..
For posterity:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/customer-collaboration/unified-contact-center-express/118823-technote-uccx-00.html
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We're getting ready to migrate our first team o
ldap but I'm not sure how
feasible this will be.
Any suggestions or am I SOL with that wildcard cert?
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Oct 5, 2015, at 8:22 AM, Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > We turned up directory sync on cucm yesterday, and ran into some issues
> with authentication; I ran out of mainten
es. Also verify
> that every cucm node can talk to the directory server (in the case that
> nodes are in different network segments).
>
> If you still have the CSR from the ldap server, take it to a CSR decoder
> (Google shows plenty) and I woul be interested to know if the cn is/is not
&g
__
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Thanks for sharing Ryan
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 3:03 AM Ryan Huff wrote:
> and now here is the attachment . sheesh.
>
> --
> From: ryanh...@outlook.com
> To: avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com; le...@uoguelph.ca
> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 03:01:52 -0400
>
> Subject: Re:
technology. What's the direction you see these two technologies
> heading, and should/could this list serve as both a Voice and Video
> discussion group?
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
__
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
gt;> jabber and skype all in a single call?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisc
Forwarding this to the list for Lelio:
what happens if our voice servers loose access to ntp servers for a long
period of time?
His Internet service is down
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https
are
going to get a live handoff when instead i'll have to send them to another
IVR application somewhere instead.
Doesn't appear to be possible but figured I'd ask in case there's a nerd
knob somewhere that I missed.
--
Ed Leatherman
__
where for expressway to get it and learn the right cucm etc to
send the client to (i'm assuming at this point). So i still need to solve
my split DNS issue :)
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Ed Leatherman
wrote:
> This thread is so much fun I thought i'd resurrect it again!
>
>
This sounds ominous !
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> Hold your ISO's tight
>
> I am withholding judgment and opinion till after the collaboration summit
> and Rowan & Jonathan have a chance to lay the plan out. Some of the pre
> released stuff looks interesting though ...
mpact
> some of the collaboration images, specifically those that are going the
> cloud, and that it happened the weekend before the summit. I dont recall
> seeing a maintenance notice.
>
> ---- Original message
> From: Ed Leatherman
> Date:12/07/2015 9:52 AM (G
s PIM or IGMP normally used? IGMP is already running,
> so I was thinking I only had to configure the multicast address for it.
>
> Aaron
>
>
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nethe
___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
other team related settings
with the correct teams.
Happy Holidays! :)
--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
t; team in the event I have to restore.
>
> The first time I had this problem was probably close to a year ago i'd
> guess, but i personally haven't seen it on 10.(6)1su1.
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Ed Leatherman
> wrote:
>
>> Just hit this fun bug, t
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
