Re: [Clamav-users] Mail from clamav-milter

2003-09-26 Thread Nigel Horne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 25 Sep 2003 11:40 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: there doesn't seem to be any way to tell it not to mail postmaster and the original recipient(s). You omitted to say what version of clamav-milter you are using. Ensure your version is at

[Clamav-users] Stability clamav-milter + clamd

2003-09-26 Thread SCHULZ, Wolfgang
Hi! I'm running sendmail (8.12.10) + clamav-milter + clamd (20030925 snapshot) on Solaris 8 and in principal I like the software (including the design) very much. Clamd has no problems to detect all the recent viruses (contrary to what I read during the last days in the list). The only problem

Re: [Clamav-users] Stability clamav-milter + clamd

2003-09-26 Thread Kelsey Cummings
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 08:03:23AM +0200, SCHULZ, Wolfgang wrote: Hi! I'm running sendmail (8.12.10) + clamav-milter + clamd (20030925 snapshot) on Solaris 8 and in principal I like the software (including the design) very much. Clamd has no problems to detect all the recent viruses

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Milter (climilter): local socketname ...../clamv-milter.sock unsafe

2003-09-26 Thread Lim Pey Foong
what is the command for Debug and foregruond? regarding the error u stated, it doesn't show in my system. any idea? -- Original Message --- From: Tommi Rintala [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:32:42 +0300 (EEST) Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Re:

Re: [Clamav-users] Mail from clamav-milter

2003-09-26 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Nigel Horne wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 25 Sep 2003 11:40 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: there doesn't seem to be any way to tell it not to mail postmaster and the original recipient(s). You omitted to say what version of clamav-milter you are using.

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Milter (climilter): local socketname ...../clamv-milter.sock unsafe

2003-09-26 Thread Tommi Rintala
I meant that you would enable in the clamd.conf the Debug and Foreground -options. -- Tommi Rintalapuhelin: 044-767 7770 WasaLab Oy web: http://www.wasalab.fi/ PL 365 käyntios: Wolffintie 36 F2 65101 VAASA 65200 VAASA On Fri, 26 Sep 2003,

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd core dump - 20030923

2003-09-26 Thread Tomasz Kojm
/var/spool/exim/scan/1A25Yc-0001MM-9f has been removed by Exiscan, but maybe you can disable directory cleaning (hope you have a big hdd ;)) and clean /var/spool/exim/scan from time to time by hand ? So bad exiscan does not give this feature.. I'll try to patch it. Best regards, Tomasz

Re: [Clamav-users] Stability clamav-milter + clamd

2003-09-26 Thread Tomasz Kojm
A) sometimes clmilter.sock disappears B) sometimes clamd crashes During the last night A) happend 22 times and B) happened 4 times. So it seems that with this version problem A) is the bigger problem. I made some major changes in libclamav and clamd that should fix stability problems with

Re: [Clamav-users] Stability clamav-milter + clamd

2003-09-26 Thread Adam Williams
A) sometimes clmilter.sock disappears B) sometimes clamd crashes During the last night A) happend 22 times and B) happened 4 times. So it seems that with this version problem A) is the bigger problem. I made some major changes in libclamav and clamd that should fix stability problems

Re: [Clamav-users] Mail from clamav-milter

2003-09-26 Thread Nigel Horne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is this still a problem, or will an upgrade to 0.60e fix it as well? I have not seen this problem - a fix included in 0.60g which handles sendmail not honouring it's API may help (though it's a long shot that it's relavant for you). 0.60e had no

[Clamav-users] A lot of Virii-Stuff

2003-09-26 Thread Mark
Ok and how should I test the archive? ClamAV isn't compileable under OpenBSD 3.3 und I can't use the precompiled package because it needs a unrar-version which is newer as the version into ports. I visited RarSoft but I'm not able to compile the Source cause there is no configure and so. I'm not a

Re: [Clamav-users] Mail from clamav-milter

2003-09-26 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Is this still a problem, or will an upgrade to 0.60e fix it as well? I have not seen this problem - a fix included in 0.60g which handles sendmail not honouring it's API may help (though it's a long shot that it's relavant for you). 0.60e had no hardening fixes so I wouldn't recommend an