Hi there --
As a general rule of thumb, what is the oldest a file should be from any given
day that is in the quarantine directory
before it should be deleted from the system?
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
Hi there --
As a general rule of thumb, what is the oldest a file should be from
any given
day that is in the quarantine directory
before it should be deleted from the system?
Depends on how often you check the
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
Hi there --
As a general rule of thumb, what is the oldest a file should be from any given
day that is in the quarantine directory
before it should be deleted from the system?
That is a policy decision each of us has to make. My policy is to not
quarantine files,
Wiltshire, Michael wrote:
I am currently out of office and will return on Wednesday 31st May 2006
. Please report any urgent matters to the help desk at 4008, or the
computer room at 6013.
People - please think long and hard before enabling broken
auto-responders. If you are on a mail
Andrew Kaplan wrote:
As a general rule of thumb, what is the oldest a file should be from
any given day that is in the quarantine directory
before it should be deleted from the system?
We run a script monthly that compresses anything in the quarantine directory
over 31 days old.
$ cat
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Wiltshire, Michael wrote:
I am currently out of office and will return on Wednesday 31st May
2006 . Please report any urgent matters to the help desk at 4008, or
the computer room at 6013.
People - please think long and hard before enabling broken
auto-responders.
On Wed, May 17, 2006 12:12 pm, Jim Maul said:
If you are on a mail list such as this, think longer
and harder than usual. Then don't do it.
Right. That seems like an acceptable solution. Hell, why even have
autoresponders at all then?
I figure autoresponders are relics of the way email
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
These days, being out of the office, or town, or country, is no reason for
you to not be able to get your email, if you felt you needed to. So, the
only reason you aren't responding is that you don't want to.
I would say the problem is people
Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 12:12 pm, Jim Maul said:
If you are on a mail list such as this, think longer
and harder than usual. Then don't do it.
Right. That seems like an acceptable solution. Hell, why even have
autoresponders at all then?
I figure autoresponders are
Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 12:12 pm, Jim Maul said:
The fact that some email packages still have autoresponders is a
misfeature, in my eyes.
Perhaps we should eliminate answering machines then too? I mean hell,
if they dont answer the phone, they must not be
On May 17, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Jim Maul wrote:
Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 12:12 pm, Jim Maul said:
If you are on a mail list such as this, think longer
and harder than usual. Then don't do it.
Right. That seems like an acceptable solution. Hell, why even have
On Wed, May 17, 2006 12:35 pm, Christopher X. Candreva said:
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
These days, being out of the office, or town, or country, is no reason
for you to not be able to get your email, if you felt you needed to.
So, the only reason you aren't responding is
Chris Candreva wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
These days, being out of the office, or town, or country, is no
reason for you to not be able to get your email, if you felt you
needed to. So, the only reason you aren't responding is that you
don't want to.
If you call
Subject: Re: Now OT - Re: Out of Office AutoReply:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 12:35 pm, Christopher X. Candreva said:
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
As for work email while I'm on vacation (to answer another
reply here): If you need to get a time-critial response to
something
At 09:27 AM 5/17/2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
Luckily, my spam filter catches them. That's all they are, anyway. More
spam.
as opposed to annoying copyright notifications attached to email
published to mailing lists, that state information that is wholey
meaningless within the context of a
Daniel T. Staal wrote:
As for work email while I'm on vacation (to answer another reply
here): If you need to get a time-critial response to something about
my job and you don't already *know* I'm on vacation, there should be
a 'department' email address that you can send to, that anyone in
On May 17, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 12:35 pm, Christopher X. Candreva said:
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
These days, being out of the office, or town, or country, is no
reason
for you to not be able to get your email, if you felt you
On Wed, May 17, 2006 1:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
as opposed to annoying copyright notifications attached to email
published to mailing lists, that state information that is wholey
meaningless within the context of a publicly distributed mailing
list, so therefore nothing more than junk
On May 17, 2006, at 12:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:27 AM 5/17/2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
Luckily, my spam filter catches them. That's all they are, anyway.
More
spam.
as opposed to annoying copyright notifications attached to email
published to mailing lists, that state
At 10:31 AM 5/17/2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 1:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
as opposed to annoying copyright notifications attached to email
published to mailing lists, that state information that is wholey
meaningless within the context of a publicly distributed
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
That's where you're both wrong. It's an extension to instant messaging. Why
Really ? That's amazing, that email managed to be invented at least a decade
before IM and still extended it.
It's an EXCHANGE based world, people! C'mon and catch up
On May 17, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
That's where you're both wrong. It's an extension to instant
messaging. Why
Really ? That's amazing, that email managed to be invented at least a
decade
before IM and still extended
On Wed, May 17, 2006 1:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
At 10:31 AM 5/17/2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 1:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
as opposed to annoying copyright notifications attached to email
published to mailing lists, that state information that is wholey
At 10:53 AM 5/17/2006, you wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 1:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
At 10:31 AM 5/17/2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 1:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
as opposed to annoying copyright notifications attached to email
published to mailing lists, that
Hello,
how do I unsuscribe from this list? I got another account registered in this
list, and i dont want to keep using this one.
Thanks.
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Luis Vargas wrote:
how do I unsuscribe from this list? I got another account registered in this
Read the URL on the bottom of every message.
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
==
Chris Candreva --
On May 17, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 1:34 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
At 10:31 AM 5/17/2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 1:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
as opposed to annoying copyright notifications attached to email
published to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kettle calling the pot black snipped
Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com
http://www.smileglobal.com
http://www.forumgarden.com
^^^
What is that garbage? By my count, each message YOU send to the list,
costs me 105bytes each (in
Hello,
I'm a novice on clam so please excuse the ignorance.
We want to use clam rules on our IDS.
Are there file archives of clam rules we can obtain
and use?
Thanks,
Garyc
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
At 11:24 AM 5/17/2006, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kettle calling the pot black snipped
Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com
http://www.smileglobal.com
http://www.forumgarden.com
^^^
What is that garbage? By my count, each message YOU send to the
auto responders are usefull to tell that you dont wanna work.
answering machines are usefull when you dont wanna talk to an ex-wife
or your mother-in-law
On 5/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:31 AM 5/17/2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 1:23 pm, [EMAIL
31 matches
Mail list logo
