Hi there,
You have to configure the CLAMAV milter for it to be able to send
the report. See man clamav-milter. Configure it so that it sends the
email report to an email address and use that email address for the
emailavlog configuration. Sorry, I am not of much help as I did not install
This site hosting the file seems be be over the limit. Anyone else have
some extra space to host the file. Thanks.
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:50:50 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Application to
Bo-Lina teknisk support wrote:
Neither of these link's work.
I downloaded the programs. It worked, but then I got these :
The web site you are trying to access has exceeded its allocated data
transfer.
Visit our help area http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/geo/ for more
information.Access to
Hi!
I start clamav-milter with options:
clamav-milter --force-scan --noxheader
--quarantine-dir=/usr/local/share/clamav/infected --postmaster=virus
--postmaster-only --noreject --headers --max-children=20
local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock
After starting it send failure message to user
Dilip M wrote:
I have
# rpm -qa|grep clam
clamav-0.67-1
clamav-devel-0.67-1
# exim -bV
How can i get this work my side ?
On a machine with amavisd-new clamav *and* kaspersky, I just grep
through the mail.log for infected files. If you only have clamav, you
might just grep
Hi!
I start clamav-milter with options:
clamav-milter --force-scan --noxheader
--quarantine-dir=/usr/local/share/clamav/infected --postmaster=virus
--postmaster-only --noreject --headers --max-children=20
local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock
After starting it send failure message to user
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 10:10, Clamav wrote:
I have now an email with attachment which is rejected with this error
(Milter: data, reject=451 4.7.1 Please try again later) - reproducable.
Are the developers interested? Where to send it?
Please send to [EMAIL PROTECTED], in an encrypted zip
i had the same problem. Now i start the milter like this
/usr/sbin/clamav-milter --dont-scan-on-error
local:/var/run/clamav/clamd-milter.sock
BR
Adi. B
- Original Message -
From: Clamav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 12:10 PM
Subject:
On Thursday 25 Mar 2004 10:10 am, Clamav wrote:
I have now an email with attachment which is rejected with this error
(Milter: data, reject=451 4.7.1 Please try again later) - reproducable.
Are the developers interested? Where to send it?
Please send me a copy of the email.
Best regards
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:08:32 -0500
Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Bonivart wrote:
I just noticed the new Virus DB Search function on the web site.
That's great, I will use that often but could you add the date and
time (GMT) the signature was added. I often get asked by
all three of (1) latest head build, (2) 0.70rc and (3) 0.67 of clamav on
OSX 10.3.3 are missing 100% of the Worm.SomeFool.Gen-1 virus. clamav is
being called via the CGPAV script from CommuniGatePro ...
its doing a fine job on almost all others ...
my second stage virus checker, McAfee,
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:10:21 +0100
Clamav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have now an email with attachment which is rejected with this error
(Milter: data, reject=451 4.7.1 Please try again later) -
reproducable. Are the developers interested? Where to send it?
Please send it to [EMAIL
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:31:02 +
Steve King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all three of (1) latest head build, (2) 0.70rc and (3) 0.67 of
clamav on OSX 10.3.3 are missing 100% of the Worm.SomeFool.Gen-1
virus. clamav is being called via the CGPAV script from
CommuniGatePro ...
its doing a
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 08:56 +, Trog wrote:
Well, you appear to be the only one seeing a leak. We (the devs) do
check for memory leaks quite frequently, and so are pretty sure there
are no big leaks.
Does that include the RAR scanner? I have yet to enable it because of
the comments in the
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 21:03, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:28:53 -0500
Jim Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
ClamAV update process started at Sun Mar 7 17:31:59 2004
ERROR: Maximal time (1200 seconds) reached.
We are aware of it and
Hi,
Yesterday I installed clamav-0.70rc-1 from rpm on my RedHat 9.0 (kernel 2.4.20-30.9)
and started
clamd just to test it's current stability
The computer was on all night and today I found the following in the rotated logs:
Thu Mar 25 04:02:33 2004 - No stats for Database check - forcing reload
I have the same issue on Linux when checking email in KMail. If I save the attachment
to my desktop and check it there, then the virus is detected. My definitions are
bang up to date; the virus has been getting missed for the past couple of days at
least; the string I use for checking my email
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 9:52:26 -0500, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
I've upgraded my ClamAV and I'm no longer getting errors on freshclam.
However it doesn't seem to be updated. I noticed some viruses slipping
through and ran them through the online scanner. Some were identified as
SomeFool.P. I
Hello All,
I am new here, I hope this hasnt been hashed to death already.
I recently installed clamav into a production email system, using
clamav-milter.
This system had been operating with amavisd and uvscan (nai's command
line scanner) for years.
Now email is scanned twice, first by
Hi ppl,
I have a problem (my english first!).
I have a lan where for citrix problem the gw is a soho watchgard firewall
and where a machine from the lan works for proxi with squid.
Now i tried to put on the same proxi machine clamav and p3scan to work
togheter.
Everithing seems works fine in the
Never-Mind.
Standard database path screwup.
Joe Maimon wrote:
Hello All,
I am new here, I hope this hasnt been hashed to death already.
I recently installed clamav into a production email system, using
clamav-milter.
This system had been operating with amavisd and uvscan (nai's command
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:54:18 -0500
Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas on how to avoid this in the future? I'm running with
ScanArchive and ScanMail (because I want the binhex feature on).
The problem may be connected with already discussed and fixed
On 25 Mar 2004 16:41:21 +0100
Tarjei Knapstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 21:03, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:28:53 -0500
Jim Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
ClamAV update process started at Sun Mar 7 17:31:59
Another poster pointed to testvirus.org for testing. I think you'll
find some methods of delivery more effective than others and that
clamav will miss some of these.
They're not being detected by clam even when running them right through
clamscan on the command prompt. I think it's because
On 3/25/04 2:26 PM, Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 20702
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 57.21 MB
I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes
Time: 11.989 sec (0 m 11 s)
[13:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[~]%
Howdy list,
Is there a utility I can download to generate OLE2 archives,
or does anyone have an OLE2 archive with an EICAR virus
inside that I can use for testing?
I'm putting my ClamAV installations through various stress
tests, and the only archive format I can't generate from
FreeBSD seems to
Colin A. Bartlett said:
Another poster pointed to testvirus.org for testing. I think
you'll
find some methods of delivery more effective than others and that
clamav will miss some of these.
They're not being detected by clam even when running them right
through
clamscan on the command
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 14:26:05 -0500, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
[...]
The only thing I still don't understand is why clamscan is so
much faster than clamdscan, and why clamscan only uses 25M
of process memory while clamdscan uses over 298M of process
memory during the scan:
--- SCAN
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Colin A.
Bartlett
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] clam not fresh
Another poster pointed to testvirus.org for testing. I think you'll
find
Robert Blayzor wrote:
[...]
I still think there is a bug out there somewhere when scanning mail files.
Rarely we'll see clamd+clamdscan take quite a long time to process a mail
message. It happens rarely, but sometimes a 4K message file can take a
minute to scan.
What is your MaxThreads
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
[...]
2) clamdscan can be configured (in clamav.conf) to use more features
than you requested for clamscan in command line (e.g. ScanMail). If so,
scanning with clamdscan can require more resources than simple
'clamscan'.
I think that is exactly what is happening. If I
Howdy list,
Is there any way to make clamd log the structure of
a message and it's attachments? BinHex, MIME, plain-text,
ZIP, RAR, BZIP, GZIP, OLE2, etc...?
This information would be great for statistics, but I
could imagine it being useful during troubleshooting
or tech support also.
--
On Thursday 25 March 2004 10:36 pm, Mark Novak wrote:
If running the same command on your server does not show the
SomeFool.P then
your definitions are NOT up to date. If freshclam insists on saying
they
are up to date, i would try deleting them totally and running freshclam
again.
Jim Maul Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:28 PM
If freshclam insists on saying they
are up to date, i would try deleting them totally and running freshclam
again. Maybe that will clear up the problem.
Per Tomasz, I first checked the number of signatures reported by freshclam
and it was
Colin A. Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Maul Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:28 PM
If freshclam insists on saying they
are up to date, i would try deleting them totally and running freshclam
again. Maybe that will clear up the problem.
Per Tomasz, I first checked the number of
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 18:19:02 -0500, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
Per Tomasz, I first checked the number of signatures reported by freshclam
and it was reporting the correct number. So Per Jim, I deleted both main.cvd
and daily.cvd from /var/lib/clamav and ran freshclam again. It downloaded
At 02:56 PM 3/25/2004, you wrote:
On Thursday 25 March 2004 10:36 pm, Mark Novak wrote:
If running the same command on your server does not show the
SomeFool.P then
your definitions are NOT up to date. If freshclam insists on saying
they
are up to date, i would try deleting them
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
I'm updating from clamav.elektrapro.com and starting a short time ago it
now wants
to update viruses.db, but the checksum fails after the download. The
mirror at ozforces
does the same thing.
This isn't the issue that
Has anyone tried to run clamav with
SurgeMail?
Thanks
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 08:36, Claudio Alonso wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I installed clamav-0.70rc-1 from rpm on my RedHat 9.0 (kernel 2.4.20-30.9)
and started
clamd just to test it's current stability
The computer was on all night and today I found the following in the rotated logs:
Thu Mar 25
The startup script clamav-milter.sh
Makes a few calls to init.d. I am on a Virtual
Private Server so I do not have init.d available to
me. All I have is rc.d. How can I then get clamav-milter to start when I reboot my server?
Thanks
At 05:24 PM 3/25/04, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
I'm updating from clamav.elektrapro.com and starting a short time ago it
now wants
to update viruses.db, but the checksum fails after the download. The
mirror at ozforces
does the
Yes we have it working flawlessly here on FreeBSD_4 with the latest
clamv devel releases and the latest version of Surgemail. We've been
running it for a while with a lot of success as of late. The stability
has greatly improved.
We're using a custom PERL handler which marshals the virus scans
* Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20040325 14:04]: wrote:
Dilip M wrote:
I have
# rpm -qa|grep clam
clamav-0.67-1
clamav-devel-0.67-1
# exim -bV
How can i get this work my side ?
On a machine with amavisd-new clamav *and* kaspersky, I just grep
through
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:26:05 -0500
Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:54:18 -0500
Jesse Guardiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas on how to avoid this in the future? I'm running with
ScanArchive and ScanMail (because I want the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This site hosting the file seems be be over the limit. Anyone else have
some extra space to host the file. Thanks.
It's also available on http://clamav.or.id/contrib/emailavlog/
It would be great if you could also put some installation instruction there.
Regards,
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 18:39:29 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
At 05:24 PM 3/25/04, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
I'm updating from clamav.elektrapro.com and starting a short time ago it
now wants
to update viruses.db, but the
I have been having the same as well.
I added some more verbosity into the syslog statement and got this logged
write failure to clamd, nbytes: -1, quarantine_dir: (null), error: Bad
file descriptor
Any ideas?
---
This SF.Net email is
Hello.
(B
(BI installed amavis under exim.
(BThey communicate themselves each other.
(BI found spamassasin in exim does not work
(B if the router and transport are ON.
(BThe problem occurs because
(Bexim is regarded as a outer command and
(Bexim is executed infinitely many times.
(B
At 07:09 PM 3/25/04, you wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 18:39:29 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
At 05:24 PM 3/25/04, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
I'm updating from clamav.elektrapro.com and starting a short time ago it
now wants
Joe's Web Hosting $B!!(B-- $B;3EDhttp://duncanthrax.net/exiscan-acl/)
(BIt can use clamav and SpamAssassin natively.
(B
(BRegards,
(B
(BFajar
(B
(B
(B---
(BThis SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
(BFree Linux tutorial
Hello.
Im running a smtp server with f-secure and clamav. I have a problem with
the f-secure server because it cant find the bagle virus in password
protected zip files but clamav does. I e-mailed f-secure support about
and they said to me it isnt any virus scanner today that can find virus
in
52 matches
Mail list logo
