I have been unsuccessful at getting 0.80rc to build on my RH9 box. 0.75.1
builds just fine with the exact same ./configure options. The build
error states it can't find -lssl. OpenSSL is installed in its default
(not the bastardized RH's default) location of /usr/local/ssl. All my
other
Just to say 0.80rc built and runs just fine on FC3-test1 and FC1
Sneaky change of name on clamav.conf, tho ;-)
--
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/
Bill Maidment
Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
Le Mon 20/09/2004, Steffen Heil disait
However, if you do such things, PLEASE only send a notification to the
intended user, NOT to the author. This would cause lot of collateral damage.
And ONLY if the intended recipient is a local one...
--
Erwan David
On Monday 20 September 2004 21:52, Daniel Alberto Cañas wrote:
On Sep 20, 2004, at 12:41 PM, Matt Gourley wrote:
Niek wrote:
On 9/20/2004 4:32 PM +0200, Matt Gourley wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to get ClamAV to log via multilog so that I can
generate reports via mrtg. I followed
On 9/20/2004 11:45 PM +0200, Jonathan Pitcher wrote:
We have Clam Av installed and running. It is blocking virus e-mails
but is not generating any notification.
Is it possible to send a message onto the user that they had an e-mail
blocked? Or to an admin stating that [EMAIL PROTECTED] had a
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 02:21, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
It seems there's a small type in filetypes.c. Try changing
{0, \377\330\377, 4, JPEG, CL_TYPE_GRAPHICS},
to
{0, \377\330\377, 3, JPEG, CL_TYPE_GRAPHICS}
That did the trick, thanks very much Tomasz.
BMRB
On Monday 20 Sep 2004 22:45, Jonathan Pitcher wrote:
We have Clam Av installed and running. It is blocking virus e-mails
but is not generating any notification.
Is it possible to send a message onto the user that they had an e-mail
blocked? Or to an admin stating that [EMAIL PROTECTED] had
On Tuesday 21 Sep 2004 01:50, OpenMacNews wrote:
mbox.c: In function `checkURLs':
mbox.c:2536: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
mbox.c:2537: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
mbox.c: At top level:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:54:18 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Luca Gibelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the development version of ClamAV is ready for general testing!
I have just done some quick .spec file hacking and a bit of tidying up
and have a first cut version of a src rpm that should build and
no I'm not using it, actually I'm just tring clamav to check the samba
shares (and take care of infections). I don't have a MTA, I just send
text mails (with an extern SMTP) to log samba events.
It could be easily construed that issuing this command would result in
a reply from the clamd daemon
this is the log I get:
/home/teottie/.viminfo: Unable to open file or directory ERROR
/home/teottie/mbox: Unable to open file or directory ERROR
/home/teottie/.bash_history: Unable to open file or directory ERROR
/home/teottie/clamav-testfiles/test-failure.rar: RAR module failure
ERROR
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:33:22 +0700
Fajar A. Nugraha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-) clamd
+ clamav.conf was renamed clamd.conf
Um, this has got the one of the most annoying change for me in the
history of clamav
Oh, I'm responsible for that change..
Tomasz, can you please make
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:01:37 +0200
Remi Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
There will be one soon !
This is the first time I talk about it. UScanIT is about to be ready
in a few week. It uses ClamDB and is not based on cygwin because it's
100% new Windows code. Inside it's 100% object
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:04:17 -0400 (EDT)
Christopher X. Candreva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Developers -- could we possibly have a grace period where it will
generate an error, but run, if no longer used options are in the
We already follow this way but in case of major releases brutal moves
are
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 at 12:23:32 +0200, agenteo wrote:
this is the log I get:
/home/teottie/.viminfo: Unable to open file or directory ERROR
/home/teottie/mbox: Unable to open file or directory ERROR
/home/teottie/.bash_history: Unable to open file or directory ERROR
[...]
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Tomasz, can you please make future changes to clamav
backward-compatible? In this case, renaming my clamav.conf to
Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming
was to force users to review/edit their config files. Most of you are
simply too lazy
Hi
This is my first mail to this list.
I want to know how to configure clamav with
postfix(linux plateform ) mail server for scanning the
mails for viruses.
Thanks in advance.
sUsHiL gHolAp.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage
Remi Thomas wrote:
Have a look at http://www.uscanit.com for 1.0 alpha 01 version.
Exe size is 280K and no setup.
Freeware? Won't be possible. AFAICS all components of clamav are
licensed to you under the GPL - so you will have to publish your
software under a license, which is compatible to
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 12:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl
make sure you have the openssl and openssl-devel packages installed.
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 12:44, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming
was to force users to review/edit their config files. Most of you are
simply too lazy to add, activate, or tune new options without such
dramatic
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 06:45 am, Sushil Gholap wrote:
Hi
This is my first mail to this list.
I want to know how to configure clamav with
postfix(linux plateform ) mail server for scanning the
mails for viruses.
http://www.google.com/search?q=clamav%20postfix%20howto
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Please remember that the license of ClamAV databases require your
software to follow a GPL compliant license.
The ClamAV database uses the GNU general license.
I don't modify the DB, I only use it.
The license is extracted and displayed in the About Windows
Remi
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Freeware? Won't be possible. AFAICS all components of clamav are
licensed to you under the GPL - so you will have to publish your
software under a license, which is compatible to the GPL.
Ralph
I didn't use any source code from orginal project.
This full object
agenteo wrote:
this is the log I get:
/home/teottie/.viminfo: Unable to open file or directory ERROR
/home/teottie/mbox: Unable to open file or directory ERROR
/home/teottie/.bash_history: Unable to open file or directory ERROR
/home/teottie/clamav-testfiles/test-failure.rar: RAR module failure
Sushil Gholap wrote:
Hi
This is my first mail to this list.
I want to know how to configure clamav with
postfix(linux plateform ) mail server for scanning the
mails for viruses.
Thanks in advance.
sUsHiL gHolAp.
Have a look at amavisd-new (http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/) and/or
mailscanner
Trog wrote:
Also, your freshclam.conf will be missing DNSDatabaseInfo
My freshclam.conf is indeed missing DNSDatabaseInfo, but I don't see
anything replacing that.
Is there supposed to be a freshclamd.conf ?
--
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/
_/_/
Remi Thomas wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Please remember that the license of ClamAV databases require your
software to follow a GPL compliant license.
The ClamAV database uses the GNU general license.
I don't modify the DB, I only use it.
The license is extracted and displayed in the About
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the
renaming was to force users to review/edit their config files.
Might one enquire which are the recommended options for review/change
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 13:42, Bill Maidment wrote:
Trog wrote:
Also, your freshclam.conf will be missing DNSDatabaseInfo
My freshclam.conf is indeed missing DNSDatabaseInfo, but I don't see
anything replacing that.
It's not a replacement, it's an addition to the existing
Trog wrote:
It's not a replacement, it's an addition to the existing freshclam.conf
So why wasn't freshclam.conf renamed to force people to look at that too?
--
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/
_/_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/
Bill Maidment
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200 Tomasz Kojm wrote:
[ ... ]
Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming
was to force users to review/edit their config files. Most of you are
simply too lazy to add, activate, or tune new options without such
dramatic changes.
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:11, Bill Maidment wrote:
Trog wrote:
It's not a replacement, it's an addition to the existing freshclam.conf
So why wasn't freshclam.conf renamed to force people to look at that too?
The new options in clamd.conf have an affect on the number of
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:23, Frank Elsner wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200 Tomasz Kojm wrote:
[ ... ]
Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming
was to force users to review/edit their config files. Most of you are
simply too lazy to add,
On Tuesday 21 Sep 2004 12:44, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Really? Then would you say my ChangeLog is wrong?
Mon Sep 20 18:08:53 BST 2004 (njh)
--
* libclamav/mbox.c: Some performance enhancements
Mon Sep 20 15:31:21 CEST 2004 (tk)
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200
Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:33:22 +0700
Fajar A. Nugraha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-) clamd
+ clamav.conf was renamed clamd.conf
Um, this has got the one of the most annoying change for me in the
history
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:30, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
In that case we should probably rot somewhere, but you make the life for packager's
of ClamAV (e.g. Debian) unnecessarily hard.
Are you saying that you would otherwise have simply left the existing
clamav.conf file unaltered, thereby leaving
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 at 13:03:32 +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:33:22 +0700
Fajar A. Nugraha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-) clamd
+ clamav.conf was renamed clamd.conf
Um, this has got the one of the most annoying change for me in the
history of clamav
Oh, I'm
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
I'd like to add that changing the name from clamav.conf to clamd.conf
was requested by users on the ML a few times. So, it's not our fault
;-).
You are correct there. But it didn't appear in any devel versions until
the 80rc came out. That's what took me by surprise.
I'm
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Luca Gibelli wrote:
-) clamd
+ clamav.conf was renamed clamd.conf
Um, this has got the one of the most annoying change for me in the
history of clamav
(the other ones was the change of libclamav.so.1.0.3 to libclamav.so.1.0.4,
and the now-missing
Trog wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:30, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
In that case we should probably rot somewhere, but you make the life for packager's
of ClamAV (e.g. Debian) unnecessarily hard.
Are you saying that you would otherwise have simply left the existing
clamav.conf file unaltered,
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:11:08 +1000
Bill Maidment [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trog wrote:
It's not a replacement, it's an addition to the existing
freshclam.conf
So why wasn't freshclam.conf renamed to force people to look at that
too?
Well, DNSDatabaseInfo does not affect virus
Bill Maidment wrote:
Trog wrote:
It's not a replacement, it's an addition to the existing
freshclam.conf
So why wasn't freshclam.conf renamed to force people to look at that
too?
Not specifically in reply to you, Bill, but has anyone complaining
actually thought of:
1)
Quoting Tomasz Papszun [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 at 13:03:32 +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:33:22 +0700
Fajar A. Nugraha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-) clamd
+ clamav.conf was renamed clamd.conf
Um, this has got the one of the most annoying change for me in
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:29:55 +0200
Remi Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Freeware? Won't be possible. AFAICS all components of clamav are
licensed to you under the GPL - so you will have to publish your
software under a license, which is compatible to the GPL.
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 15:24, Rob Evers wrote:
Trog wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:30, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
In that case we should probably rot somewhere, but you make the life for packager's
of ClamAV (e.g. Debian) unnecessarily hard.
Are you saying that you would otherwise
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Especially since make install does not even put clamd.conf it the default etc
dir
(I'm using latest CVS snapshot, which is newer that the 0.80rc, on Solaris).
Oooh -- opposite problem here.
make install on 0.80rc, Solaris 8 -- make install DOES
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Brian Morrison wrote:
Might one enquire which are the recommended options for review/change
please?
Every time I upgrade clamav, I do a diff of my clamav.conf with the one in
the distribution, and use that to patch new options into my config file.
ie, from
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Monday 20 Sep 2004 22:45, Jonathan Pitcher wrote:
Is it possible to send a message onto the user that they had an
e-mail blocked? Or to an admin stating that [EMAIL PROTECTED] had a virus
sent to them?
Yes it is, though the first option is not advisable. You can find
i see the following problem in freebsd 4.8 and 5.2.1 - but not in any of the
linux distros i've tried:
$ freshclam --datadir . --log freshclam.log
ClamAV update process started at Sun Sep 19 10:09:45 2004
Reading CVD header (main.cvd): OK
Downloading main.cvd [*]
main.cvd updated (version: 27,
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:49:57 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not specifically in reply to you, Bill, but has anyone complaining
actually thought of:
1) Reading the README.
Did that, everything worked first time for me except for me leaving an
unrecognised option
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:49:14 -0400
Dewey Hylton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ sigtool --unpack-current daily.cvd
LibClamAV Error: Unknown type flag 3.
ERROR: Can't unpack file.
This error comes from libclamav/cvd.c:cli_untgz() and was also reported
on Cygwin. We're working on a fix.
--
oo
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:44:45 -0700 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there is no way to do this currently, can I submit this as a
feature request for clamav-milter?
But as you have already been told, it is up to the MTA to do this.
When Exim passes incoming mail through clamd
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:49:56 +0100
Trog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 15:24, Rob Evers wrote:
Trog wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:30, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
In that case we should probably rot somewhere, but you make the life for
packager's
of ClamAV (e.g.
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:48:15 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I look forward to seeing how I get on with this new version, so far
it seems to be quite happy and freshclam has not complained either.
And now, before even having time to draw a decent breath,
I just installed 0.80rc and got the following error:
/var/spool/exim/scan/1C9pqn-0003rF-0l/1C9pqn-0003rF-0l.eml: Bad format or
broken data ERROR
(this is with exim+exiscan connecting to clamd via socket)
I saw there errors several times from the same IP, so I'm assuming it's
the same message
With all the discussion about leaks, or the lack thereof, recently, I notice
the ScanRAR section of clamd.conf still says that the RAR unpacker is
disabled by default because the code terribly leaks.
Does it in fact still leak, or has this been fixed and the comment should be
updated ?
Hello,
In order to make the port for OpenBSD. I'd like to know when the final
release of clamav 0.80 will go out.
The real question is: Do I need to make the port of 0.80rc2 or 0.80 final
will be out quickly?
Thanks, ++ jerome
+---+
|
On Tuesday 21 Sep 2004 16:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Monday 20 Sep 2004 22:45, Jonathan Pitcher wrote:
Is it possible to send a message onto the user that they had an
e-mail blocked? Or to an admin stating that [EMAIL PROTECTED] had a virus
sent to them?
Yes
Hi,
I know this was reported earlier, but just to back up the initial
posters message.
2004-09-21 17:03:04.990049500 LibClamAV Warning: Unsupported message
format `disposition-notification'
2004-09-21 17:03:04.990056500
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/work/./msg:
Bad format or broken data ERROR
So yes, it
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Trog wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:23, Frank Elsner wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200 Tomasz Kojm wrote:
[ ... ]
Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming
was to force users to review/edit their config files. Most of
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 12:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl
make sure you have the openssl and openssl-devel packages installed.
Thanks for the reply. I thought I implied that OpenSSL was compiled and
installed
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 04:26:40PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is perfectly acceptable to place an explanatory message in an SMTP
REJECT message.
Acceptable, maybe, but I believe it's better to simply discard all
viruses.
Why? Since all you achieve with rejects is indirectly causing a
Matt wrote:
1) Reading the README.
Agreed.
How about adding an incompatibility comment similar to this from the
mimedefang Changelog ?
WARNING: Before upgrading MIMEDefang, please search this file for
*** NOTE INCOMPATIBILITY ** to see if anything has changed that will
affect your filter.
hey folks,
from the older thread about using dns for cvd-updates and server-traffic.
There was the note that there is no easy way to patch binary files.
I was thinking about this one:
For gentoo-linux there's the need to download sources packages which are
rather large in size.
At the moment
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 04:09 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 12:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl
make sure you have the openssl and openssl-devel packages installed.
Thanks for the
I have looked all over the clamav.net web pages and I can't find it.
Where is it?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 04:26:40PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is perfectly acceptable to place an explanatory message in an SMTP
REJECT message.
Acceptable, maybe, but I believe it's better to simply discard all
viruses.
And most sane people
Brian Morrison wrote:
You need to do something appropriate to sendmail.cf or the milter
configuration (which I know nothing about I'm afraid) to do this.
This is not something that can be configured in clamav AFAICS.
He was referring to the clamav-milter, which *does* hook clamav into
sendmail,
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Well, DNSDatabaseInfo does not affect virus recognition.
What IS the default behaviour of clamav when a particular default option
does not exists?
Is running clamd (and freshclam) with empty clamd.conf and
freshclam.conf (if it is possible)
be the same as running with the
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
I didn't use any source code from orginal project.
This full object oriented C++ rewriting.
I can send source code to project manager I you want to check about
this. I don't modify the DB, I only download it and use it. I display
DB copyright in the About Window.
The
70 matches
Mail list logo
