Thank you. This is great.
I was using not using 0.6.2, I was using 0.6.0.
Am Montag, 27. Oktober 2014 16:00:34 UTC+1 schrieb Nick Zbinden:
Hallo,
Im trying to use tools.analyzer to analyse some clojure code and compile
it. I have used '(ana/analyze+eval form)' and it has worked nicely
Hallo,
Im trying to use tools.analyzer to analyse some clojure code and compile
it. I have used '(ana/analyze+eval form)' and it has worked nicely.
Now I always called my compile function either directly inside of the code,
or I would call it like this 'lein run test.clj'.
Now I tried to use
You have a misunderstanding.
core.logic and datomic datalog are not the same thing.
core.logic is a turing complet logic engine, datomic datalog is only a
querying subpart of this. You can not solve the zebra problem with datomic
datalog, its impossible.
Think of datomic datalog as if it
is required?
What would need to be implemented to get it to work on datomic?
On Sunday, December 9, 2012 5:48:55 AM UTC-5, Nick Zbinden wrote:
You have a misunderstanding.
core.logic and datomic datalog are not the same thing.
core.logic is a turing complet logic engine, datomic datalog is only
Hi,
If im in Switzerland then I will defentily come.
There was a lisp usergroupe for a time but the company that hosted it kind
of stopped.
Am Montag, 22. Oktober 2012 10:37:40 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas G. Kristensen:
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce the Zürich Clojure User Group!
I was thinking about this too. I don't really need Clojure-on-pypy but
I want to learn and understand the pypy project. I think that pypy is
an extreamly cool project and I want to learn more about it and it
would be fun to implment Clojure (and I would finally learn python).
The problem Timothy
There are some simple things you have to understand when you want to
know why you cant have:
(defrecord Person [foo bar])
((Person. 1 2) :foo)
In Clojure something after a ( gets called as a function. A function
is something that can be applied (not the apply function.
applied is now implmented
@Aaron: Could you go into why this is the case? What does jruby do
that it needs it so much and clojure does not.
@Tal Liron: You seem to differ in your opinion with Aaron (pretty sure
you would not be investing your time otherwise). What exactlly are you
attempting to speed up and how does
I'm puzzled when we say that Clojure is not particularly OO, but using
protocols and datatypes feel OO to me,
except that the namespace of the protocol method implementations is
decoupled from the namespace of the type.
Perhaps my definition of OO is too loose and I should think of
Not sure why that is there I just deleted that the 2G params, seams to
be working fine.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated -
On Jul 25, 7:51 am, cljneo cljneoph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have started reading about ClojureScript and Closure and had some
questions which I am sure will eventually be answered as I move along.
But I am too eager to know now so I thought of asking instead of
waiting.
- On page 2 of
Oracle announced/talked about Nashorn at the recent JVM Languages summit,
this is an Invoke Dynamic based Javascript runtime which is (aiming) for
inclusion in JDK8.
I do so hope however that someone manages to pull that out for a lets run
this NOW on Java 7 as that would be a great
Maybe the PLOT language is intressting to people here. It has syntax
and a very powerful macro system.
http://users.rcn.com/david-moon/PLOT/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Hallo all,
I just watched the talk Radical Simplicity (bit.ly/lsub9h) by Stuart
Halloway. Very Intressting but one little thing he says I wanted to
threw in the groupe because its kind of a half know thing and it
should really move into the Clojure Coding Standard.
Stu said:
Objects should be
Shouldn't these funkitons take the most effective implementation
iternaly? We allready have a internal reduce-protocoll why not have
one for other functions like last? The seq library should only drop to
first/rest if there is no better implementation.
--
You received this message because you
While we talk about Functional thinking. The IBM has a series. They
use Java (and Groovy) but it may help you since you allready know
java.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-ft1/index.html
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-ft2/?ca=drs-
--
You received this message
I think there are a few things most people agree about:
- The people in the comunity are genaraly very nice and help noobs
(stackoverflow, irc. mailinglist ...)
- Clojure.org has very cool content.
- Clojure.org is not a good place for noob
So i propose some things that I think would make a
I thing the java guys are late :)
http://clojure.com/
On May 16, 9:42 am, László Török ltoro...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just come across this:
http://typesafe.com/company
I believe Clojure will have to take a similar path in order to achieve
broader (enterprise) acceptance.
I'm sure Rich
Coming up with a clojure stack is not really clojury. I think clojure
does not really lack far behind scala/akka and its much simpler.
I don't really know about IDEs I can see how that could be a problem.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure
Hallo David,
Very cool that this is moving to contrib.
I saw that you gave a presentation at NYC Clojure User Groupe. Was
that tapped? If not I think it would be very cool if you could do a
screencast with simular content. The videos of rich showing of clojure
a reason why some of use are here
What are meta data used for?
Its a open system it can be used for anything. If you have data about
your data that does not effect equality.
Examples:
The docstrings you can write in clojure are metadata.
(defn my-func
my-func does XY
[] whatever)
This will be expanded to metadata like
Dare I mention the idea of an official (or semi-official) Clojure
documentation project that ties together the disparate sources that currently
exist? What say you, community?
I was thinking about something. This is just an idea spil I didn't do
anything jet.
Kind of like a learning
One more thing people should do is update there blogs. I know its
stupid work but I should be done. Its extremly confusing when google
for something.
Update your blog with a little notice or update it that it is correct
again.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Yes, I think thats a naming restriction by the JVM.
On Mar 28, 11:57 am, Fred Concklin fredconck...@gmail.com wrote:
in common lisp: (setf x '((1st element) 2 (element 3) ((4)) 5))
((1ST ELEMENT) 2 (ELEMENT 3) ((4)) 5)
in clojure:
user (def x '((1st element) 2 (element 3) ((4)) 5))
Incorrect.
Thx, for clearing it up.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe
MMhh it would be to hard to design a little guid for this.
There are peole who don't know java and if you don't know what a jar
file is you can understand java -jar. Somethink like that should be on
the clojure website. Something like A Letter to a new Clojure
Developer.
Posting stuff like this
program is causing the JVM to invoke garbage collection repeatedly.
I'd recommend using a -Xmx512m argument on the command line, or maybe a bit
more, and see if things speed up.
Andy
On Mar 14, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Nick Zbinden wrote:
Hi,
I'm working with binarytree benchmark from
of nearly 512 MB.
Andy
On Mar 15, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Nick Zbinden wrote:
Hi,
I did not mention that earlier but the benchmark sais no change in
heapsize.
See here:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/performance.php?test=binarytrees
Does Clojure just have a much smaller heapsize
Man that look awesome not a single thing I would wanne miss.
On Mar 15, 9:16 pm, Alex Miller a...@puredanger.com wrote:
I just put up a blog entry with some updated info on Strange Loop
2011:http://thestrangeloop.com/blog/11/03/15/strange-loop-2011-update
Lots more to come, but perhaps of
I have to give some more background on this. Me and a friend are doing
this for school we never did anything like it so we just make up as we
go. My task is to write (at this point I changed to objective to
improving the existing programm) the programm. His task was to do all
the mesurements. I
This sounds very good. It would have to be start up with one topic
(lisp or FP) and if the system worked you could add more topics.
The length could be like steve yeggy blogposts or like the ibm ähh
articals (http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-clojure-
protocols/).
On Mar 14, 11:12
Hi,
I'm working with binarytree benchmark from the Language Shotout.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/program.php?test=binarytreeslang=clojureid=5
Its basiclly a port from the java version.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/program.php?test=binarytreeslang=javaid=2
The Problem with the
Maybe this is intressting for you:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4304468/clojure-jvm-7-8-improvements/4306950#4306950
It should answer your question and give some more information.
On Jan 26, 4:04 pm, Harrison Maseko lis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I need some help in understanding some
That a problem people find often.
The thing is #(%) not the same as (fn [x] x) its more like (fn [x]
(x)).
So if you write #([x]) is (fn [x] ([x])) witch throws an error. You
would have to write #(vec %).
On Jan 24, 1:59 pm, László Török ltoro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
just a quick one:
I can't speak for the original poster, but it seems like a fair
assessment to me. Scala is, as you point out, more complicated in
many ways than Clojure. But there is a subset of Scala that looks and
behaves very similarly to Java. It is possible for a Java programmer
to make the
I have a simple library that mimics newLISP's net-eval command, which
will allow you to evaluate expressions in parallel on remote network
nodes,
http://nakkaya.com/net-eval.html
Regards...
Very Nice. I looked at it and its what I need. I tested it sucessfully
and I am using it with in my
Hallo,
I would like to talk about two things.
General:
I have a small project that has really easy to paralyzable problem so
I think that a good place to start with parallel programming. Doning
it on one pc is simple in clojure. So I tought to myself: You can
distribute that. I have never done
37 matches
Mail list logo
